Exploring parents' physical activity motivation during the COVID-19 pandemic: a mixed-methods study from a self-determination theory perspective.

Lydia Emm-Collison, Robert Walker, Ruth Salway, Danielle House, Kate Sansum, Katie Breheny, Sarah Churchward, Joanna G Williams, Frank de Vocht, Russell Jago
{"title":"Exploring parents' physical activity motivation during the COVID-19 pandemic: a mixed-methods study from a self-determination theory perspective.","authors":"Lydia Emm-Collison, Robert Walker, Ruth Salway, Danielle House, Kate Sansum, Katie Breheny, Sarah Churchward, Joanna G Williams, Frank de Vocht, Russell Jago","doi":"10.3310/KPKW8220","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>The COVID-19 lockdowns impacted physical activity for all, but especially parents, because they had to balance home, work and leisure activities. Motivation for exercise is consistently shown to be associated with physical activity levels. Self-determination theory provides a framework through which the motivation for exercise and its social-contextual antecedents can be explored. The purpose of this study is to explore the role of motivation in determining physical activity in parents and carers of English primary school children before, during and after the COVID-19 lockdowns.</p><p><strong>Design, setting and participants: </strong>This study uses a mixed-methods design combining quantitative data and individual interviews. Participants were all parents/carers of children in year 6 (aged 10-11 years) at English primary schools in the United Kingdom.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Quantitative data were collected on three occasions: between March 2017 and May 2018 (Wave 0, <i>N</i> = 1296), between May and December 2021 (Wave 1, <i>N</i> = 393) and between January and July 2022 (wave 2, <i>N</i> = 436). Motivation for exercise was assessed using the Behavioural Regulations in Exercise Questionnaire-2 and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity was estimated via waist-worn accelerometers. Data were analysed via regression models. Interviews with a subsample of parents (<i>N</i> = 43) were conducted on two occasions: between September and December 2021 and between February and July 2022. Interviews covered the impact of the pandemic on children and parents' physical activity and changes over time. This study focuses on discussions around the parents' own physical activity behaviour and their motivation. The framework method was used for analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In separate linear regression models, intrinsic and identified regulation were associated with higher moderate-to-vigorous physical activity in waves 0 and 2. Amotivation was associated with lower moderate-to-vigorous physical activity in waves 0 and 2. In fully adjusted multivariable regression models, identified regulation was associated with a 4.9-minute increase in moderate-to-vigorous physical activity and introjected regulation was associated with a 2.3-minute decrease in moderate-to-vigorous physical activity at wave 0. Associations with moderate-to-vigorous physical activity were different in wave 2, with introjected regulation changing direction and a negative association with amotivation, although confidence intervals were wide due to smaller sample sizes. In the interviews, parents spoke of the effects that the COVID-19 lockdowns had on their motivation to be physically active in four theoretically driven themes: (1) motivation for physical activity, (2) perceived autonomy for physical activity, (3) perceived competence for physical activity and (4) perceived relatedness for physical activity.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>The smaller sample sizes for waves 1 and 2 may have limited the ability to identify associations between behavioural regulations and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity post pandemic. Across all waves, parents were predominantly active, females, white and from higher socioeconomic areas and therefore may not reflect broader experiences.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and future work: </strong>Autonomous motivation, especially enjoyment and the importance for mental and physical well-being, was a key driver in keeping parents active during lockdowns and remains important for physical activity post lockdown, with introjected regulation potentially playing an increased role. Parents' interviews highlighted that while for some the lockdowns <i>promoted</i> autonomous motivation for exercise, others had enduring <i>negative</i> influences on their autonomy, competence and relatedness, which could be detrimental to their well-being. Strategies that focus on offering a range of novel activities for parents and that bring parent groups together may be effective.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>This article presents independent research funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Public Health Research programme as award number NIHR131847.</p>","PeriodicalId":74615,"journal":{"name":"Public health research (Southampton, England)","volume":" ","pages":"1-35"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public health research (Southampton, England)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3310/KPKW8220","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: The COVID-19 lockdowns impacted physical activity for all, but especially parents, because they had to balance home, work and leisure activities. Motivation for exercise is consistently shown to be associated with physical activity levels. Self-determination theory provides a framework through which the motivation for exercise and its social-contextual antecedents can be explored. The purpose of this study is to explore the role of motivation in determining physical activity in parents and carers of English primary school children before, during and after the COVID-19 lockdowns.

Design, setting and participants: This study uses a mixed-methods design combining quantitative data and individual interviews. Participants were all parents/carers of children in year 6 (aged 10-11 years) at English primary schools in the United Kingdom.

Methods: Quantitative data were collected on three occasions: between March 2017 and May 2018 (Wave 0, N = 1296), between May and December 2021 (Wave 1, N = 393) and between January and July 2022 (wave 2, N = 436). Motivation for exercise was assessed using the Behavioural Regulations in Exercise Questionnaire-2 and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity was estimated via waist-worn accelerometers. Data were analysed via regression models. Interviews with a subsample of parents (N = 43) were conducted on two occasions: between September and December 2021 and between February and July 2022. Interviews covered the impact of the pandemic on children and parents' physical activity and changes over time. This study focuses on discussions around the parents' own physical activity behaviour and their motivation. The framework method was used for analysis.

Results: In separate linear regression models, intrinsic and identified regulation were associated with higher moderate-to-vigorous physical activity in waves 0 and 2. Amotivation was associated with lower moderate-to-vigorous physical activity in waves 0 and 2. In fully adjusted multivariable regression models, identified regulation was associated with a 4.9-minute increase in moderate-to-vigorous physical activity and introjected regulation was associated with a 2.3-minute decrease in moderate-to-vigorous physical activity at wave 0. Associations with moderate-to-vigorous physical activity were different in wave 2, with introjected regulation changing direction and a negative association with amotivation, although confidence intervals were wide due to smaller sample sizes. In the interviews, parents spoke of the effects that the COVID-19 lockdowns had on their motivation to be physically active in four theoretically driven themes: (1) motivation for physical activity, (2) perceived autonomy for physical activity, (3) perceived competence for physical activity and (4) perceived relatedness for physical activity.

Limitations: The smaller sample sizes for waves 1 and 2 may have limited the ability to identify associations between behavioural regulations and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity post pandemic. Across all waves, parents were predominantly active, females, white and from higher socioeconomic areas and therefore may not reflect broader experiences.

Conclusions and future work: Autonomous motivation, especially enjoyment and the importance for mental and physical well-being, was a key driver in keeping parents active during lockdowns and remains important for physical activity post lockdown, with introjected regulation potentially playing an increased role. Parents' interviews highlighted that while for some the lockdowns promoted autonomous motivation for exercise, others had enduring negative influences on their autonomy, competence and relatedness, which could be detrimental to their well-being. Strategies that focus on offering a range of novel activities for parents and that bring parent groups together may be effective.

Funding: This article presents independent research funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Public Health Research programme as award number NIHR131847.

探索 COVID-19 大流行期间家长的体育锻炼动机:从自我决定理论角度进行的混合方法研究。
背景和目标:COVID-19 封锁影响了所有人的体育锻炼,尤其是家长,因为他们必须兼顾家庭、工作和休闲活动。运动动机一直被证明与体育锻炼水平相关。自我决定理论提供了一个框架,通过该框架可以探索锻炼动机及其社会背景前因。本研究的目的是探讨在 COVID-19 封锁之前、期间和之后,动机在决定英国小学生的家长和看护者的体育锻炼中的作用:本研究采用混合方法设计,结合了定量数据和个别访谈。参与者均为英国小学六年级(10-11 岁)学生的家长/监护人:定量数据在三个场合收集:2017 年 3 月至 2018 年 5 月(第 0 波,N = 1296)、2021 年 5 月至 12 月(第 1 波,N = 393)和 2022 年 1 月至 7 月(第 2 波,N = 436)。运动动机通过 "运动行为规范问卷-2 "进行评估,中等至剧烈运动量通过腰部佩戴的加速度计进行估算。数据通过回归模型进行分析。在 2021 年 9 月至 12 月期间和 2022 年 2 月至 7 月期间,对家长的子样本(N = 43)进行了两次访谈。访谈内容包括大流行病对儿童和家长体育锻炼的影响以及随着时间推移发生的变化。本研究的重点是围绕父母自身的体育锻炼行为及其动机展开讨论。采用框架法进行分析:在单独的线性回归模型中,内在调节和识别调节与第 0 波和第 2 波中较高的中强度体育活动有关。在第 0 波和第 2 波中,动机不足与中强度体力活动较少有关。在经过充分调整的多变量回归模型中,在第 0 次调查中,识别调节与中强度体力活动增加 4.9 分钟相关,而内驱调节与中强度体力活动减少 2.3 分钟相关。 在第 2 次调查中,与中强度体力活动的相关性有所不同,内驱调节改变了方向,与非激励负相关,但由于样本量较小,置信区间较宽。在访谈中,家长们谈到了COVID-19封锁对他们体育锻炼动机的影响,这些影响有四个理论驱动的主题:(1)体育锻炼的动机;(2)体育锻炼的自主感知;(3)体育锻炼的能力感知;(4)体育锻炼的相关感知:局限性:第 1 和第 2 次调查的样本量较小,这可能限制了确定大流行后行为规范与适度至剧烈体育活动之间关系的能力。在所有波次中,父母主要是活跃的女性、白人和来自社会经济地位较高地区的人,因此可能无法反映更广泛的经验:自主动机,尤其是乐趣和对身心健康的重要性,是家长在封锁期间保持积极活动的主要驱动力,对封锁后的体育活动仍然很重要,引入调节可能会发挥更大的作用。家长们在访谈中强调,虽然对一些家长来说,封锁促进了自主锻炼的动力,但对另一些家长来说,封锁对他们的自主性、能力和亲和力产生了持久的负面影响,这可能会损害他们的幸福。重点为家长提供一系列新颖活动并将家长团体聚集在一起的策略可能会有效:本文是由美国国家健康与护理研究所(NIHR)公共卫生研究计划资助的独立研究,获奖编号为NIHR131847。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信