Nature reviews psychology最新文献_第10页

Repetitive negative thinking as a transdiagnostic cognitive process 重复消极思维作为一种跨诊断认知过程

IF 16.8

Nature reviews psychology Pub Date : 2025-01-14 DOI: 10.1038/s44159-024-00399-6

Michelle L. Moulds, Peter M. McEvoy

{"title":"Repetitive negative thinking as a transdiagnostic cognitive process","authors":"Michelle L. Moulds, Peter M. McEvoy","doi":"10.1038/s44159-024-00399-6","DOIUrl":"10.1038/s44159-024-00399-6","url":null,"abstract":"Repetitive negative thinking processes such as rumination and worry — also referred to as ‘perseverative thinking’ or ‘perseverative cognition’ — have traditionally been conceptualized as distinct processes defined, measured and studied in the clinical literature from a disorder-specific stance (for example, rumination in relation to depression, worry in relation to anxiety). However, rumination and worry are highly correlated, share phenomenological features, load onto a common factor, and predict and maintain multiple psychopathologies. In this Review, we overview the evidence base that conceptualizes repetitive negative thinking as an overarching cognitive process unconstrained by disorder-related content or temporal focus. The related theories and the empirical literature covering measurement, treatment and prevention support repetitive negative thinking as a transdiagnostic process. Adopting a transdiagnostic approach can help advance a more nuanced understanding of the role of repetitive negative thinking in clinical presentations and their treatment. Transdiagnostic approaches to psychopathology are expected to overcome the assessment and treatment limitations of categorical diagnoses. In this Review, Moulds and McEvoy conceptualize repetitive negative thinking as a transdiagnostic process and advance a nuanced understanding of its diverse clinical presentations.","PeriodicalId":74249,"journal":{"name":"Nature reviews psychology","volume":"4 2","pages":"127-141"},"PeriodicalIF":16.8,"publicationDate":"2025-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143381085","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Reply to ‘Structure-based dissociations provide agnostic evidence to the multiple-systems debate’ 回复“基于结构的分离为多系统辩论提供了不可知论的证据”

IF 16.8

Nature reviews psychology Pub Date : 2025-01-13 DOI: 10.1038/s44159-024-00396-9

Casey L. Roark, John Paul Minda, Priya Kalra, Anthony Cruz

引用次数: 0

Single and multiple systems in probabilistic categorization 概率分类中的单系统和多系统

IF 16.8

Nature reviews psychology Pub Date : 2025-01-13 DOI: 10.1038/s44159-024-00389-8

Nicolás Marchant, Sergio E. Chaigneau

引用次数: 0

Structure-based dissociations provide agnostic evidence to the multiple-systems debate 基于结构的分离为多系统争论提供了不可知论的证据

IF 16.8

Nature reviews psychology Pub Date : 2025-01-13 DOI: 10.1038/s44159-024-00395-w

C. E. R. Edmunds, Andy J. Wills, Fraser Milton

引用次数: 0

Reply to ‘Single and multiple systems in probabilistic categorization’ 回复“概率分类中的单系统和多系统”

IF 16.8

Nature reviews psychology Pub Date : 2025-01-13 DOI: 10.1038/s44159-024-00390-1

Priya Kalra, John Paul Minda, Casey L. Roark, Anthony Cruz

引用次数: 0

How aggregated opinions shape beliefs 聚合的意见如何塑造信念

IF 16.8

Nature reviews psychology Pub Date : 2025-01-06 DOI: 10.1038/s44159-024-00398-7

Kerem Oktar, Tania Lombrozo

{"title":"How aggregated opinions shape beliefs","authors":"Kerem Oktar, Tania Lombrozo","doi":"10.1038/s44159-024-00398-7","DOIUrl":"10.1038/s44159-024-00398-7","url":null,"abstract":"In today’s online world, the beliefs of people are shaped by aggregated opinions: the elicited, quantified and summarized judgements of many strangers. Ratings guide purchases, likes guide shares, and polls guide votes. In this Review, we consolidate cross-disciplinary research to clarify how individuals draw inductive inferences about the world based on the opinions of others. We draw on philosophy to clarify what conceptually distinguishes aggregated opinion from other forms of evidence, draw on political science to describe its functional origins in collective judgement and decision-making, and draw on psychology to shed light on the mechanisms that drive how individuals conform to, learn from and ignore the collected opinions of others. Finally, we highlight future directions to address important gaps in the literature, such as exploring how the causal history of opinion shapes the inferences that people draw, and how the mechanisms that drive responses to aggregated opinion can be leveraged in tailored interventions that are responsive to people’s individual reasons for maintaining their beliefs. Aggregated opinions, such as election results and product ratings, are prevalent in the modern world. In this Review, Oktar and Lombrozo describe the properties of aggregated opinion and the mechanisms by which it drives individuals to change or maintain their beliefs.","PeriodicalId":74249,"journal":{"name":"Nature reviews psychology","volume":"4 2","pages":"81-95"},"PeriodicalIF":16.8,"publicationDate":"2025-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143381115","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Psychosocial and behavioural consequences of ostracism across contexts 跨环境的排斥心理和行为后果

IF 16.8

Nature reviews psychology Pub Date : 2025-01-02 DOI: 10.1038/s44159-024-00393-y

Zhansheng Chen, Kai-Tak Poon, Tonglin Jiang, Fei Teng

引用次数: 0

Using natural language processing to analyse text data in behavioural science 使用自然语言处理分析行为科学中的文本数据

IF 16.8

Nature reviews psychology Pub Date : 2025-01-02 DOI: 10.1038/s44159-024-00392-z

Stefan Feuerriegel, Abdurahman Maarouf, Dominik Bär, Dominique Geissler, Jonas Schweisthal, Nicolas Pröllochs, Claire E. Robertson, Steve Rathje, Jochen Hartmann, Saif M. Mohammad, Oded Netzer, Alexandra A. Siegel, Barbara Plank, Jay J. Van Bavel

{"title":"Using natural language processing to analyse text data in behavioural science","authors":"Stefan Feuerriegel, Abdurahman Maarouf, Dominik Bär, Dominique Geissler, Jonas Schweisthal, Nicolas Pröllochs, Claire E. Robertson, Steve Rathje, Jochen Hartmann, Saif M. Mohammad, Oded Netzer, Alexandra A. Siegel, Barbara Plank, Jay J. Van Bavel","doi":"10.1038/s44159-024-00392-z","DOIUrl":"10.1038/s44159-024-00392-z","url":null,"abstract":"Language is a uniquely human trait at the core of human interactions. The language people use often reflects their personality, intentions and state of mind. With the integration of the Internet and social media into everyday life, much of human communication is documented as written text. These online forms of communication (for example, blogs, reviews, social media posts and emails) provide a window into human behaviour and therefore present abundant research opportunities for behavioural science. In this Review, we describe how natural language processing (NLP) can be used to analyse text data in behavioural science. First, we review applications of text data in behavioural science. Second, we describe the NLP pipeline and explain the underlying modelling approaches (for example, dictionary-based approaches and large language models). We discuss the advantages and disadvantages of these methods for behavioural science, in particular with respect to the trade-off between interpretability and accuracy. Finally, we provide actionable recommendations for using NLP to ensure rigour and reproducibility. Natural language processing (NLP) methods are growing in popularity as they become cheaper to implement and easier to use. In this Review, Feuerriegel et al. describe NLP methods and provide recommendations for the use of NLP in behavioural science.","PeriodicalId":74249,"journal":{"name":"Nature reviews psychology","volume":"4 2","pages":"96-111"},"PeriodicalIF":16.8,"publicationDate":"2025-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143381082","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Attachment as a target mechanism in the mental health of child refugees 依恋作为难民儿童心理健康的目标机制

IF 16.8

Nature reviews psychology Pub Date : 2024-12-18 DOI: 10.1038/s44159-024-00401-1

Ximena Goldberg

引用次数: 0

Defining transdiagnostic constructs to advance clinical research 定义跨诊断结构以推进临床研究

IF 16.8

Nature reviews psychology Pub Date : 2024-12-16 DOI: 10.1038/s44159-024-00400-2

Hilde M. Geurts, Iris L. Rapoport

引用次数: 0