Journal of health monitoring最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
German Health Update (GEDA 2019/2020-EHIS) - Background and methodology. 德国卫生最新情况(GEDA 2019/2020-EHIS)--背景和方法。
Journal of health monitoring Pub Date : 2021-09-15 eCollection Date: 2021-09-01 DOI: 10.25646/8559
Jennifer Allen, Sabine Born, Stefan Damerow, Ronny Kuhnert, Johannes Lemcke, Anja Müller, Tim Weihrauch, Matthias Wetzstein
{"title":"German Health Update (GEDA 2019/2020-EHIS) - Background and methodology.","authors":"Jennifer Allen, Sabine Born, Stefan Damerow, Ronny Kuhnert, Johannes Lemcke, Anja Müller, Tim Weihrauch, Matthias Wetzstein","doi":"10.25646/8559","DOIUrl":"10.25646/8559","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Between April 2019 and September 2020, 23,001 people aged 15 or over responded to questions about their health and living conditions for the German Health Update (GEDA 2019/2020-EHIS). The results are representative of the German resident population aged 15 or above. The response rate was 21.6%. The study used a questionnaire based on the third wave of the European Health Interview Survey (EHIS), which was carried out in all EU member states. EHIS consists of four modules on health status, health care provision, health determinants, and socioeconomic variables. The data are collected in a harmonised manner and therefore have a high degree of international comparability. They constitute an important source of information for European health policy and health reporting and are made available by the Statistical Office of the European Union (Eurostat). They also form the basis of the Federal Health Reporting undertaken in Germany. Data collection began in April 2019, just under a year before the beginning of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, and continued into its initial phase, as of March 2020. As such, data from the current GEDA wave can also be used to conduct research into the health impact of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic.</p>","PeriodicalId":73767,"journal":{"name":"Journal of health monitoring","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8734110/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39605322","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Health situation of adults in Germany - Results for selected indicators from GEDA 2019/2020-EHIS. 德国成年人的健康状况 - 来自 GEDA 2019/2020-EHIS 的部分指标结果。
Journal of health monitoring Pub Date : 2021-09-15 eCollection Date: 2021-09-01 DOI: 10.25646/8459
Christin Heidemann, Christa Scheidt-Nave, Ann-Kristin Beyer, Jens Baumert, Roma Thamm, Birga Maier, Hannelore Neuhauser, Judith Fuchs, Ronny Kuhnert, Ulfert Hapke
{"title":"Health situation of adults in Germany - Results for selected indicators from GEDA 2019/2020-EHIS.","authors":"Christin Heidemann, Christa Scheidt-Nave, Ann-Kristin Beyer, Jens Baumert, Roma Thamm, Birga Maier, Hannelore Neuhauser, Judith Fuchs, Ronny Kuhnert, Ulfert Hapke","doi":"10.25646/8459","DOIUrl":"10.25646/8459","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In this article, we examine selected health indicators for the adult population aged 18 years and older in Germany (n=22,708) from the German Health Update (GEDA 2019/2020-EHIS) conducted between April 2019 and September 2020. These indicators include those of self-assessed health and depressive symptoms as well as chronic physical diseases and conditions. In young adulthood (18 to 44 years), over 80% of participants report good or very good subjective health. During this phase of life, most chronic diseases and conditions are rare, although allergies are frequent, and bronchial asthma and depressive symptoms are not uncommon. From mid adulthood (45 years and older), there is a gradual increase in the prevalence of chronic diseases such as cardiovascular disease, diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and osteoarthritis. Over 60% of older adults (65 years and older) report a chronic disease or long-term health problem, while only half continue to report good or very good subjective health. During this stage of life, allergies and depressive symptoms become less prevalent. For some diseases, there are also differences according to gender and level of education. This article demonstrates the high public health relevance of age-associated chronic physical diseases and health related limitations in everyday life in an ageing society as well as the need to provide care for certain health conditions already in young adulthood.</p>","PeriodicalId":73767,"journal":{"name":"Journal of health monitoring","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8734117/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39909229","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Health-promoting behaviour among adults in Germany - Results from GEDA 2019/2020-EHIS. 德国成年人的健康促进行为 - GEDA 2019/2020-EHIS 的结果。
Journal of health monitoring Pub Date : 2021-09-15 eCollection Date: 2021-09-01 DOI: 10.25646/8553
Almut Richter, Anja Schienkiewitz, Anne Starker, Susanne Krug, Olga Domanska, Ronny Kuhnert, Julika Loss, Gert B M Mensink
{"title":"Health-promoting behaviour among adults in Germany - Results from GEDA 2019/2020-EHIS.","authors":"Almut Richter, Anja Schienkiewitz, Anne Starker, Susanne Krug, Olga Domanska, Ronny Kuhnert, Julika Loss, Gert B M Mensink","doi":"10.25646/8553","DOIUrl":"10.25646/8553","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Health-promoting behaviours are important at any age to prevent diseases and to promote well-being. Using data from GEDA 2019/2020-EHIS, a Germany-wide, representative survey, this article describes how often the adult population in Germany reports certain types of health-promoting behaviour in their everyday lives. The behaviours considered are nonsmoking, low-risk alcohol consumption, achievement of the World Health Organization's (WHO) recommendations on aerobic physical activity, at least daily fruit and vegetable consumption, and maintaining a body weight within the normal range. This article describes the proportion of people who report these behaviours in their everyday lives by gender, age and education level, the number of health-promoting behaviours each person reports and the most common combinations in which they occur. Young adults between 18 and 29 years are most likely to achieve a health-promoting lifestyle. The proportion of people who report at least 150 minutes of physical activity per week and a normal body weight is lower in later adulthood than among 18- to 29-year-olds. The recommendation to eat fruit and vegetables daily is implemented least often of all five aspects of health behaviour under study. Finally, women are more likely to lead a health-promoting lifestyle than men.</p>","PeriodicalId":73767,"journal":{"name":"Journal of health monitoring","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8734172/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39605320","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Utilisation of outpatient medical services in Germany - Results from GEDA 2019/2020-EHIS. 德国门诊医疗服务利用率 - GEDA 2019/2020-EHIS 的结果。
Journal of health monitoring Pub Date : 2021-09-15 eCollection Date: 2021-09-01 DOI: 10.25646/8555
Franziska Prütz, Alexander Rommel, Julia Thom, Yong Du, Giselle Sarganas, Anne Starker
{"title":"Utilisation of outpatient medical services in Germany - Results from GEDA 2019/2020-EHIS.","authors":"Franziska Prütz, Alexander Rommel, Julia Thom, Yong Du, Giselle Sarganas, Anne Starker","doi":"10.25646/8555","DOIUrl":"10.25646/8555","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Outpatient health care provision plays an important role in the identification and treatment of health problems. Data are needed on the utilisation of health care services and their determinants to enable health policy decision-making and needs-based care provision. The analyses set out in this article are based on current data on the utilisation of outpatient health care services. The data stem from the German Health Update (GEDA 2019/2020-EHIS), a nationwide cross-sectional survey of the resident population in Germany that is undertaken as part of the health monitoring conducted at the Robert Koch Institute. Around 80% of the population aged 18 or over were treated at least once within twelve months by a general practitioner, 60% by a specialist, and 10% received psychiatric or psychotherapeutic treatment. Less than half of those eligible had had a stool test during the past two years, and just over half had had a colonoscopy in the past ten years. Around 80% of women and 70% of men had had their blood pressure checked within the last year, and 60% had had their blood cholesterol or blood sugar levels monitored. Over 50% reported that they had taken medically prescribed drugs in the past two weeks. In general, most of the indicators under study suggest that utilisation increases with age and that utilisation is higher among women than men, with the exception of psychiatric and psychotherapeutic services, among others.</p>","PeriodicalId":73767,"journal":{"name":"Journal of health monitoring","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8734077/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39605321","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Erratum: Health-promoting behaviour among adults in Germany – Results from GEDA 2019/2020-EHIS 勘误:德国成年人的健康促进行为——GEDA 2019/2020-EHIS结果
Journal of health monitoring Pub Date : 2021-09-01 DOI: 10.25646/9853
R. A, Schienkiewitz A, Starker A, Krug S, Domanska O
{"title":"Erratum: Health-promoting behaviour among adults in Germany – Results from GEDA 2019/2020-EHIS","authors":"R. A, Schienkiewitz A, Starker A, Krug S, Domanska O","doi":"10.25646/9853","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.25646/9853","url":null,"abstract":"[This corrects the article DOI: 10.25646/8553.].","PeriodicalId":73767,"journal":{"name":"Journal of health monitoring","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41944050","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Needs of the population in Germany for information about health-related topics - Results from the KomPaS study. 德国人口对健康相关主题信息的需求——KomPaS研究的结果。
Journal of health monitoring Pub Date : 2021-06-16 eCollection Date: 2021-06-01 DOI: 10.25646/7146
Kerstin Horch
{"title":"Needs of the population in Germany for information about health-related topics - Results from the KomPaS study.","authors":"Kerstin Horch","doi":"10.25646/7146","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.25646/7146","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Very few investigations have been conducted in Germany into the areas in which the population, including patients, lacks information about health-related issues. However, data from these areas provide crucial supplements to the descriptions and scientific analyses of health information behaviour that are more often available. Data on gaps in the population's knowledge about health-related issues provide indications of health policy challenges. The Alliance for Health Competence, the German National Health Targets and the German National Health Portal, which was commissioned by the German Federal Ministry of Health, have all taken up this issue. The 2017 study 'KomPaS: survey on communication and patient-safety' was conducted by the Robert Koch Institute (RKI). The KomPaS study used the response categories 'fairly well' informed and 'fairly poorly' informed to assess how well-informed people feel when it comes to health-related issues. A comparison of the results from the supplementary survey conducted as part of the German Health Update (GEDA) 2009 and those of the KomPas study demonstrate varying degrees of improvement in the population's level of health information in all areas over a period of almost ten years.</p>","PeriodicalId":73767,"journal":{"name":"Journal of health monitoring","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8734088/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39909226","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Self-assessed quality of care among adults with diagnosed diabetes in Germany. 德国确诊糖尿病成人患者对护理质量的自我评估。
Journal of health monitoring Pub Date : 2021-06-16 eCollection Date: 2021-06-01 DOI: 10.25646/8329
Jens Baumert, Rebecca Paprott, Yong Du, Christin Heidemann, Christa Scheidt-Nave
{"title":"Self-assessed quality of care among adults with diagnosed diabetes in Germany.","authors":"Jens Baumert, Rebecca Paprott, Yong Du, Christin Heidemann, Christa Scheidt-Nave","doi":"10.25646/8329","DOIUrl":"10.25646/8329","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>People who have diabetes require regular medical care. The views of patients about the quality of their care are becoming increasingly relevant when it comes to chronic diseases such as diabetes. As part of the nationwide study Disease Knowledge and Information Needs - Diabetes mellitus (2017), data on self-assessed quality of care by people with diagnosed diabetes was collected using the Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care - DAWN short form (PACIC-DSF, scale 1 to 5) and analysed for respondents aged 45 years or above. The average score for quality of care was 2.47 and was lower for women than for men (2.33 vs 2.58). The respondents assessed the quality of their care as being worse with rising age and size of the population in their residential area. No significant differences were observed by education group. Overall, people with diabetes in Germany consider the quality of their care to be moderate, which indicates a need for improvement in care.</p>","PeriodicalId":73767,"journal":{"name":"Journal of health monitoring","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8734079/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39909223","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Healthy life years among people with and without diabetes in Germany. 德国糖尿病患者和非糖尿病患者的健康寿命。
Journal of health monitoring Pub Date : 2021-06-16 eCollection Date: 2021-06-01 DOI: 10.25646/8331
Jens Baumert, Christin Heidemann, Lukas Reitzle, Christian Schmidt
{"title":"Healthy life years among people with and without diabetes in Germany.","authors":"Jens Baumert, Christin Heidemann, Lukas Reitzle, Christian Schmidt","doi":"10.25646/8331","DOIUrl":"10.25646/8331","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In addition to life expectancy, the length of time a person can expect to remain free of health-related functional impairments is becoming increasingly important both for the individuals concerned and for society at large. The indicator healthy life years used for this purpose is a key figure for mapping mortality and morbidity. Diabetes is one of the most common chronic diseases and can be associated with health-related functional impairments. In 2014, women and men with diabetes could expect to have significantly fewer healthy life years than people without diabetes; this particularly applies to younger and middle-aged groups. Among 30- to 34-year-olds, for example, women and men with diabetes could expect eleven and twelve fewer healthy life years respectively than people without diabetes. These differences narrow with increasing age. Ensuring that people with and without diabetes have a similar length of lifetime free of health impairments is an important task for public health.</p>","PeriodicalId":73767,"journal":{"name":"Journal of health monitoring","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8734206/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39909224","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Gestational diabetes in Germany: Development of screening participation and prevalence. 德国的妊娠糖尿病:筛查参与率和患病率的发展情况。
Journal of health monitoring Pub Date : 2021-06-16 eCollection Date: 2021-06-01 DOI: 10.25646/8325
Lukas Reitzle, Christian Schmidt, Christin Heidemann, Andrea Icks, Matthias Kaltheuner, Thomas Ziese, Christa Scheidt-Nave
{"title":"Gestational diabetes in Germany: Development of screening participation and prevalence.","authors":"Lukas Reitzle, Christian Schmidt, Christin Heidemann, Andrea Icks, Matthias Kaltheuner, Thomas Ziese, Christa Scheidt-Nave","doi":"10.25646/8325","DOIUrl":"10.25646/8325","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is an important risk factor for pregnancy complications. Since 2012, the Federal Joint Committee's maternity directive recommends a two-step screening for GDM with a pre-test and subsequent diagnostic test if the pre-test is positive. This study analyses the implementation and development over time of GDM screening participation and prevalence in Germany. The data basis is the external inpatient obstetrics quality assurance documentation, which covers all births in hospital. Women with diabetes before pregnancy were excluded. The study defined women as GDM cases if the condition was documented in maternity records or if the ICD-10 diagnosis O24.4 was coded for inpatients at discharge and figures were determined for the years 2013 to 2018. As the documentation of screening tests has only been included in the data set since 2016, screening participation for the years 2016 to 2018 were estimated and evaluated based on the pre-test and/or diagnostic tests documented in maternity records. In 2018, the majority of all women who gave birth in hospitals had had a pre-test conducted (65.0%) or a pre-test and diagnostic test (18.2%) in line with the two-step procedure. A further 6.7% received a diagnostic test alone. GDM screening participation increased over time from 83.4% in 2016 to 89.9% in 2018. The prevalence of a documented GDM increased from 4.6% to 6.8% between 2013 and 2018. In 2018, this equates to 51,318 women with GDM. Reliably assessing the extent and causes of this development will require continuous analyses of screening implementation, documentation and changes in maternal risk factors.</p>","PeriodicalId":73767,"journal":{"name":"Journal of health monitoring","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8734204/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39908751","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Diabetes mellitus and comorbidities - A cross-sectional study with control group based on nationwide ambulatory claims data. 糖尿病与合并症--基于全国门诊报销数据与对照组的横断面研究。
Journal of health monitoring Pub Date : 2021-06-16 eCollection Date: 2021-06-01 DOI: 10.25646/8327
Christian Schmidt, Lukas Reitzle, Rebecca Paprott, Jörg Bätzing, Jakob Holstiege
{"title":"Diabetes mellitus and comorbidities - A cross-sectional study with control group based on nationwide ambulatory claims data.","authors":"Christian Schmidt, Lukas Reitzle, Rebecca Paprott, Jörg Bätzing, Jakob Holstiege","doi":"10.25646/8327","DOIUrl":"10.25646/8327","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>As a condition, diabetes mellitus is associated with risk factors and diseases such as obesity. At the same time, cardiovascular diseases are a frequent consequence of diabetes. There have yet to be any findings on the Germany-wide prevalence of diabetes and diabetes comorbidities based on statutory health insurance data. This study estimates the documented prevalence of diabetes in 2019 on the basis of all ambulatory physicians' claims data of German statutory health insurance. In addition, the prevalence of obesity, high blood pressure, coronary heart disease, heart failure, stroke and depression is calculated for diabetes and non-diabetes patients, and the prevalence ratio (PR) is determined as a quotient. The approach used was a case-control design, which assigns a control person without diabetes to each diabetes patient who is similar in terms of age, region and sex. In diabetes patients, a PR greater than 1 was observed for all examined diseases across all age groups, thus demonstrating a higher prevalence compared to persons without diabetes. The highest PR across all age groups for women (3.8) and men (3.7) was found for obesity. In a comparison over time, documented prevalence figures of diabetes in Germany stagnate. With the exception of depression, the documented prevalences of comorbidities correspond well with the prevalences found in population-wide examination surveys.</p>","PeriodicalId":73767,"journal":{"name":"Journal of health monitoring","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8734101/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39909222","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信