Journal of academic ophthalmology (2017)最新文献

{"title":"Perspectives of Resident and Attending Ophthalmologists on Common Ethical Dilemmas in Research.","authors":"Sarah C Miller, Brittany C Tsou, Michael J Fliotsos, Gary L Legault, Jiangxia Wang, Todd J Mondzelewski, Patrick D Munson, Alice Lorch, Laura K Green, Won I Kim, Ron W Pelton, Fasika A Woreta, Grant A Justin","doi":"10.1055/s-0043-1774394","DOIUrl":"10.1055/s-0043-1774394","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Purpose</b>  To assess how resident and attending ophthalmologists perceive and evaluate ethically controversial scenarios regarding mentorship, authorship, and ethics compliance that may occur during research involving residents. <b>Methods</b>  An online survey was developed and contained 14 controversial vignettes based on common research scenarios that can occur when conducting research with trainees. The scenarios were designed to capture issues regarding three themes: mentorship, authorship, and compliance with ethical guidelines. Resident and attending ophthalmologists at eight military and civilian academic residency programs in the United States were invited to participate. Respondents used a Likert scale to assess the ethicality of the situations in addition to self-reported demographic characteristics. <b>Results</b>  The response rate was 35.6% (77/216), consisting of 37.7% ( <i>n</i>  = 29) residents and 62.3% ( <i>n</i>  = 48) attendings. More attending ophthalmologists responded than residents ( <i>p</i>  = 0.004). Many respondents identified controversies around compliance (67.3%) and authorship (57.1%) as unethical, whereas situations regarding mentorship were largely viewed as neutral to ethical (68.0%). Responses to two scenarios, one regarding mentorship and one regarding authorship, significantly differed between residents and attendings ( <i>p</i>  = 0.001 and <i>p</i>  = 0.022, respectively). <b>Conclusion</b>  Academic ophthalmologists' perceptions of the ethicality of common research scenarios varied. There is a need for more prescriptive guidelines for authorship and mentorship ethics at all training levels to ensure consistency, fairness, and integrity of research.</p>","PeriodicalId":73579,"journal":{"name":"Journal of academic ophthalmology (2017)","volume":"15 2","pages":"e237-e242"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10630083/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"71523697","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Erratum: Nurse Practitioner Students' Knowledge Assessment and Perceived Preparedness to Triage Ophthalmology Complaints in a Primary Care Setting: An Educational Intervention.","authors":"Grace R Reilly,&nbsp;Nancy G Russell,&nbsp;Kimberly McIltrot,&nbsp;Stephen D Sisson,&nbsp;Adrienne W Scott","doi":"10.1055/s-0043-1776425","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1776425","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1771355.].</p>","PeriodicalId":73579,"journal":{"name":"Journal of academic ophthalmology (2017)","volume":"15 2","pages":"e1"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10611533/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"71415808","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Follow-Up Adherence After Community Health Vision Screening Programs: A Review of the Literature.","authors":"Rebecca Zeng,&nbsp;Kara C LaMattina","doi":"10.1055/s-0043-1771354","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1771354","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective</b>  Although the purpose of community eye screening programs is to reduce health care disparities, the effectiveness of these programs is limited by the follow-up adherence of their participants. The aim of this review is to investigate factors that may promote or hinder participants from attending follow-up ophthalmological exams after community eye screenings and identify interventions to increase follow-up rates. <b>Methods</b>  For literature review, PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Proquest/Global Health Library, and Google Scholar databases were searched to identify studies of community eye screenings published between January 2000 and May 2023. Data from these articles were analyzed to identify barriers and facilitators of follow-up adherence after community eye screenings in the United States and to examine strategies used to increase follow-up rates. Only published manuscripts were included. We excluded studies of school screenings and clinic-based screenings. <b>Results</b>  A total of 28 articles were included. Follow-up rates ranged from 12.5 to 89%. Nineteen articles reviewed facilitators and barriers to follow-up. Eighteen articles were non interventional and seven (see Table 1 and 2 , respectively) articles described interventions that were tested to improve follow-up rates after screening. Interventions included prescheduled appointments, transportation assistance, patient education, and patient navigators. <b>Conclusion</b>  Several interventions are promising to increase follow-up adherence in community eye screenings, but more evidence is needed. Future research should focus on randomized trials of isolated interventions to improve follow-up adherence of disadvantaged populations, although this may be limited given ethical considerations and documented lack of follow-up after screening.</p>","PeriodicalId":73579,"journal":{"name":"Journal of academic ophthalmology (2017)","volume":"15 2","pages":"e223-e231"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/e8/55/10-1055-s-0043-1771354.PMC10547536.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41157210","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Nurse Practitioner Students' Knowledge Assessment and Perceived Preparedness to Triage Ophthalmology Complaints in a Primary Care Setting: An Educational Intervention.","authors":"Grace R Reilly,&nbsp;Adrienne W Scott,&nbsp;Nancy G Russell,&nbsp;Kimberly McIltrot,&nbsp;Stephen D Sisson","doi":"10.1055/s-0043-1771355","DOIUrl":"10.1055/s-0043-1771355","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Purpose</b>  In this proof-of-concept pilot study, we aimed to increase nurse practitioner (NP) student knowledge of ophthalmology to prepare NPs for encounters in primary care settings. The Association of University Professors of Ophthalmology (AUPO) and the American Academy of Ophthalmology (AAO) endorse core knowledge that medical students should achieve. We assess the effectiveness of an innovative ophthalmologist-led curriculum based on these competencies tailored to issues NPs encounter in primary care. <b>Methods</b>  Johns Hopkins University NP students enrolled in a pre-post-cohort study and educational intervention. The didactic program was developed according to AUPO and AAO core ophthalmology content for medical students and was taught in-person by an ophthalmologist. Pre-post-assessments evaluated students' perceived readiness to encounter ophthalmic issues in the clinic and baseline knowledge of core competencies of ophthalmology. <b>Results</b>  A total of 42 NP students were included in the analysis. NP students improved in core knowledge and readiness to encounter ophthalmology issues. After the educational event, there was a statistically significant improvement in students' ratings of preparedness to obtain a focused history, exam, perform initial management and decide the urgency of a referral for acute painless vision loss ( <i>p</i>  < 0.001), chronic vision loss ( <i>p</i>  < 0.001), or a patient with a red/painful eye ( <i>p</i>  < 0.001). Students showed a statistically significant improvement in postdidactic event core ophthalmology knowledge assessment scores ( <i>p</i>  = 0.002). <b>Conclusion</b>  Primary care NPs are increasingly the initial point of contact for patients with ophthalmic complaints, and thus, high-quality and thorough education regarding ophthalmology triage and referral for NPs is necessary. NP student comfort with and knowledge of ophthalmic complaints and triage may be improved by a brief educational intervention taught by an ophthalmologist early in the NP curriculum.</p>","PeriodicalId":73579,"journal":{"name":"Journal of academic ophthalmology (2017)","volume":"15 2","pages":"e232-e236"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/f3/37/10-1055-s-0043-1771355.PMC10547544.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41160918","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Evaluation of an Instructional Video and Simulation Model for Teaching Slit Lamp Examination to Medical Students.","authors":"Sophia Collis,&nbsp;Madeline Yung,&nbsp;Neeti Parikh","doi":"10.1055/s-0043-1775577","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1775577","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Purpose</b>  This article assesses the efficacy of an instructional video and model eye simulation for teaching slit lamp exam to medical students as compared to traditional preceptor teaching. <b>Methods</b>  First through 4th year students from the University of California, San Francisco School of Medicine were recruited via email to participate in the study. Students were randomized into two groups. The experimental \"model eye\" group watched an instructional video on slit lamp exam, spent 10 minutes practicing on the model eye, then practiced for 25 minutes with a student partner. The control \"preceptor teaching\" group received 25 minutes of in-person preceptor teaching on slit lamp exam, then spent 25 minutes practicing with a student partner. Students were objectively assessed by a blinded grader who scored their examination skills with a 31-item checklist. Qualtrics surveys that measured student perceptions were distributed before and after the intervention. <b>Results</b>  Seventeen medical students participated in the study. Students in the model eye group achieved higher mean objective assessment scores than students in the preceptor teaching group on skills relating to slit lamp set up (1.75, standard deviation [SD] = 0.50 and 1.50, SD = 0.80 out of 2 points, <i>p</i>  = 0.03) and on the total score (1.69, SD = 0.6 and 1.48, SD = 0.8 out of 2 points, <i>p</i>  < 0.01). Both groups reported a significant increase in their understanding of what a slit lamp is used for ( <i>p</i>  < 0.01) and in their confidence using a slit lamp ( <i>p</i>  < 0.01). All students felt their skills improved with the workshop, 94% found the workshop to be useful, and 88% enjoyed the workshop, with no intergroup differences on these metrics. <b>Conclusion</b>  An instructional video combined with a simulation model is as effective as traditional preceptor teaching of the slit lamp exam. Such a teaching module may be considered as an adjunct to traditional methods.</p>","PeriodicalId":73579,"journal":{"name":"Journal of academic ophthalmology (2017)","volume":"15 2","pages":"e215-e222"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/d2/ec/10-1055-s-0043-1775577.PMC10522417.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41179698","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Resident Sleep During Traditional Home Call Compared to Night Float.","authors":"Apoorva Chowdhary,&nbsp;John A Davis,&nbsp;Leona Ding,&nbsp;Parisa Taravati,&nbsp;Shu Feng","doi":"10.1055/s-0043-1775578","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1775578","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Purpose</b>  This article aims to compare resident sleep while on night float with a traditional home call. <b>Methods</b>  We conducted a crossover observational study assessing sleep patterns of seven postgraduate year-2 ophthalmology residents at the University of Washington from 2019 to 2021 using the Fitbit Alta HR device. Overnight call was scheduled from 5 p.m. to 8 a.m. on weekdays, and 8 a.m. to 8 a.m. on weekends. The residency program implemented a partial night float rotation, during which two to three nights of consecutive call were assigned to a resident without other clinical duties. Sleep was recorded using the Fitbit Alta HR for residents while on a 5-week partial night float rotation, on 10-week home call rotations, with postcall relief, and for stretches of seven or more days without call responsibilities. Mixed model regression analysis was used to compare average sleep on home call, night float, and periods without call. <b>Results</b>  Sleep data were recorded for a total of 1,015 nights, including 503 nights on home call rotation and 230 nights on night float rotation. Residents slept more during periods away from call compared to either night float or home call rotations ( <i>p</i>  < 0.001). Residents experienced increased average overall sleep during 10-week rotations on night float compared to home call ( <i>p</i>  = 0.008). While there was no difference in overnight sleep on call between night float and home call ( <i>p</i>  = 0.701), residents experienced more sleep overall while on call on night float compared to home call due to more sleep being recorded during postcall naps ( <i>p</i>  = 0.016). <b>Conclusion</b>  Implementing a night float system can increase resident sleep by allowing for more sleep recovery during time away from clinical duties.</p>","PeriodicalId":73579,"journal":{"name":"Journal of academic ophthalmology (2017)","volume":"15 2","pages":"e204-e208"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/28/c5/10-1055-s-0043-1775578.PMC10513783.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41163485","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Rates of Internal Hiring of Ophthalmology Faculty from their Institution of Training at Top Academic Medical Centers: A Cross-Sectional Study.","authors":"Emanuelle M Rizk, Jiangxia Wang, Xiyu Zhao, Brittany Tsou, Beruk E Metiku, Katie Cho, Pranav Samineni, Jayanth Sridhar, Fasika A Woreta","doi":"10.1055/s-0043-1771377","DOIUrl":"10.1055/s-0043-1771377","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background</b>  Throughout graduate and postgraduate education, trainees need to gauge the impact of training location on future institutions of practice. <b>Objective</b>  We assessed rates of internal hiring of ophthalmology faculty at academic institutions from their same institution of training. <b>Methods</b>  This was a cross-sectional study. We included 1,246 clinical ophthalmology faculty at the 13 top-ranked institutions listed in the 2021 U.S. News and World Report. Primary, emeritus, adjunct, and affiliate faculty were included. Publicly available information was collected from institutional websites and other online sources. Statistical analyses were conducted using <i>t</i> -tests or Mann-Whitney tests, chi-squared or Fisher's exact tests, and multivariate logistic regression. The main outcome measured was internal hires, defined as faculty who had completed residency and/or fellowship training at their current institution. <b>Results</b>  In total, 47.3% of faculty were internal hires who completed residency or fellowship at the same institution. Among externally trained faculty, 27.7% completed residency and 56.0% completed fellowship at another top 13 programs. Internal hires were more frequently fellowship-trained, had a greater number of publications, and practiced in smaller departments ( <i>p</i>  < 0.001, <i>p</i>  < 0.001, and <i>p</i>  = 0.002, respectively). A greater proportion of internal hires held leadership positions ( <i>p</i>  = 0.012). Faculty practicing in the Midwest or West and with more years since residency graduation were less likely (odds ratio [OR], 0.29, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.18-0.48; OR, 0.49, 95% CI, 0.31-0.78; OR, 0.98, 95% CI, 0.97-0.99, respectively) to be internal hires. Faculty with non-R01 National Institutes of Health funding were more likely to be internal hires (OR, 1.82, 95% CI: 1.12-2.96). <b>Conclusions</b>  Training institution is key to determining the institution of practice. These results may be beneficial for trainees to consider when selecting a training program.</p>","PeriodicalId":73579,"journal":{"name":"Journal of academic ophthalmology (2017)","volume":"15 2","pages":"e154-e161"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/0e/e4/10-1055-s-0043-1771377.PMC10411073.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10331666","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Postoperative Complications of True Dropless Cataract Surgery versus Standard Topical Drops.","authors":"Evan K Wotipka, Alex J Wright, James Z Fan, David Fuhriman, Alice Z Chuang, Grace C Lindhorst, Robert M Feldman, Eric L Crowell","doi":"10.1055/s-0043-1771043","DOIUrl":"10.1055/s-0043-1771043","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Purpose</b>  Compare postoperative outcomes in cataract surgery between eyes with standard drop regimen versus dropless protocol by residents. <b>Design</b>  Retrospective cohort study between April 1, 2018 and March 31, 2020. <b>Methods</b>  The study was performed at Lyndon B. Johnson General Hospital in Houston, Harris County, Texas. A total of 547 eyes (234 dropless vs. 313 standard) with phacoemulsification cataract surgery and minimum of 1-month follow-up with best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) were included. Dropless received 40 mg sub-Tenon's triamcinolone and intracameral moxifloxacin. Patients were followed at postoperative day 1 (POD1), week 1 (POW1), and month 1 (POM1). Postoperative rate of BCVA better than 20/40 (Good vision) and rate of complications were compared between groups. <b>Results</b>  Good vision on POM1 in dropless (77.8%) was noninferior to standard (75.1%, <i>p</i>  = 0.80). Complication rate in dropless (28.6%) was noninferior to standard (24.0%, <i>p</i>  = 0.13). Intraocular pressure (IOP) elevation on POD1 ( <i>p</i>  = 0.041) and anterior chamber (AC) cells on POW1 and POM1 ( <i>p</i>  < 0.001) were more frequent in dropless. Mean spherical equivalent at POM1 was better in dropless (-0.37 D [±0.81 D]) compared with standard (-0.61D [±0.77 D], <i>p</i>  = 0.001). Early posterior capsular opacification (early PCO) was more frequent in dropless ( <i>p</i>  = 0.042). <b>Conclusions</b>  Postoperative rate of BCVA better than 20/40 and rate of postoperative complications were noninferior, although dropless had higher rates of AC inflammation, IOP elevation, and early PCO.</p>","PeriodicalId":73579,"journal":{"name":"Journal of academic ophthalmology (2017)","volume":"15 2","pages":"e144-e153"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/1d/90/10-1055-s-0043-1771043.PMC10411064.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10032569","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Success in Increasing Diversity: One Residency Program's Journey.","authors":"Jamie B Rosenberg,&nbsp;Sunju Park,&nbsp;Richard Gibralter,&nbsp;Anurag Shrivastava,&nbsp;Roy S Chuck","doi":"10.1055/s-0043-1774401","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1774401","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":73579,"journal":{"name":"Journal of academic ophthalmology (2017)","volume":"15 2","pages":"e175-e177"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/51/82/10-1055-s-0043-1774401.PMC10484180.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10276057","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Attending Perceptions on the Use of Preference Signaling in the Ophthalmology Residency Application Process","authors":"Geoffrey Nguyen, Benjamin Lin, Jayanth Sridhar, Moran R. Levin","doi":"10.1055/s-0043-1775576","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1775576","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Objective This article characterizes perspectives of ophthalmologists involved in the residency selection process regarding the potential impact of preference signaling on the ophthalmology residency match. Methods An anonymous online questionnaire generated from SurveyMonkey was approved by the Association of University Professors of Ophthalmology (AUPO) Data Resource Committee for distribution to 391 individuals from the AUPO Departmental Chairs, Program Directors, and Directors of Medical Student Education email listservs in August 2022. Results A total of 96 (24.6%) ophthalmology faculty completed the questionnaire. The majority (n = 76, 79.2%) agreed or strongly agreed that preference signaling should be implemented in the ophthalmology residency application system. Most respondents agreed or strongly agreed that preference signaling will allow for more holistic reviews of applications (n = 55, 57.3%), agreed or strongly agreed that it will benefit applicants who do not have connections to home programs or faculty that can reach out to desired programs (n = 81, 84.4%), and agreed or strongly agreed that it will improve the distribution of interviews to applicants (n = 76, 79.2%). Participants agreed or strongly agreed that applicants who have signaled interest in their program will receive preference when offering interviews (n = 59, 61.5%), and those signals will be used as a tiebreaker for similar applications (n = 75, 78.1%). The majority of participants believed that the ideal number of preference signals' applicants should be given three to four signals (n = 35, 36.0%) or five to six signals (n = 29, 30.2%). Conclusion A majority of ophthalmology faculty surveyed support the integration of preference signaling into the ophthalmology residency match.","PeriodicalId":73579,"journal":{"name":"Journal of academic ophthalmology (2017)","volume":"39 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135807104","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}