OphthoPods:分析眼科播客的教育内容和变化。

Journal of academic ophthalmology (2017) Pub Date : 2023-11-21 eCollection Date: 2023-07-01 DOI:10.1055/s-0043-1776911
Isaiah I Greene, Fradah E Gold, Nicholas E Tan, Alexander H Fang, Nickisa M Hodgson
{"title":"OphthoPods:分析眼科播客的教育内容和变化。","authors":"Isaiah I Greene, Fradah E Gold, Nicholas E Tan, Alexander H Fang, Nickisa M Hodgson","doi":"10.1055/s-0043-1776911","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective</b>  Podcasts are a novel modality for digitally disseminating ophthalmic knowledge, yet minimal information exists on their offerings. This study sought to describe the growth of ophthalmology podcasts, characterize their features, and analyze clinically pertinent content trends. <b>Materials and Methods</b>  Apple Podcasts, Spotify, Google Podcasts, and Google Search were queried for English- language shows relating primarily to ophthalmology. Ninety-six podcasts and 3,594 episodes were analyzed. <b>Results</b>  Of the 48 currently active shows, most cover general ophthalmology topics ( <i>n</i>  = 25, 52.1%) and are run by multiple hosts ( <i>n</i>  = 29, 60.4%) in both academics and private practice. The majority of podcasts released episodes monthly ( <i>n</i>  = 21, 21.9%) or less frequently than monthly ( <i>n</i>  = 36, 37.5%). Among all episodes, procedural topics ( <i>n</i>  = 951 episodes, 26.4%) and clinical education ( <i>n</i>  = 1385, 38.5%) were the most prevalent categories. Retina was the most represented subspecialty in podcast production, while oculoplastics and neuro-ophthalmology had the fewest podcasts. Episodes on disease pathophysiology ( <i>p</i>  = 0.04) and published research ( <i>p</i>  < 0.001) each declined over time. The proportion of episodes released from 2020 to 2022 that discussed digital technologies was 33.3% greater versus 2005 to 2019 ( <i>p</i>  = 0.005). Personal retrospective episodes doubled, career guidance and patient perspectives tripled, and wellness and social justice topics increased fivefold (all <i>p</i>  < 0.001). <b>Conclusion</b>  In summary, the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic coincided with a rise in ophthalmology podcasts and shifts in content. Podcasts have trended toward practical advice and technologies, reflecting their value in sharing modern, peer-to-peer pearls. Emphases on storytelling and social justice offer unique, clinically relevant perspectives compared with traditional modalities.</p>","PeriodicalId":73579,"journal":{"name":"Journal of academic ophthalmology (2017)","volume":"15 2","pages":"e248-e257"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10712415/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"OphthoPods: An Analysis of the Educational Content and Changes of Ophthalmology Podcasts.\",\"authors\":\"Isaiah I Greene, Fradah E Gold, Nicholas E Tan, Alexander H Fang, Nickisa M Hodgson\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/s-0043-1776911\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Objective</b>  Podcasts are a novel modality for digitally disseminating ophthalmic knowledge, yet minimal information exists on their offerings. This study sought to describe the growth of ophthalmology podcasts, characterize their features, and analyze clinically pertinent content trends. <b>Materials and Methods</b>  Apple Podcasts, Spotify, Google Podcasts, and Google Search were queried for English- language shows relating primarily to ophthalmology. Ninety-six podcasts and 3,594 episodes were analyzed. <b>Results</b>  Of the 48 currently active shows, most cover general ophthalmology topics ( <i>n</i>  = 25, 52.1%) and are run by multiple hosts ( <i>n</i>  = 29, 60.4%) in both academics and private practice. The majority of podcasts released episodes monthly ( <i>n</i>  = 21, 21.9%) or less frequently than monthly ( <i>n</i>  = 36, 37.5%). Among all episodes, procedural topics ( <i>n</i>  = 951 episodes, 26.4%) and clinical education ( <i>n</i>  = 1385, 38.5%) were the most prevalent categories. Retina was the most represented subspecialty in podcast production, while oculoplastics and neuro-ophthalmology had the fewest podcasts. Episodes on disease pathophysiology ( <i>p</i>  = 0.04) and published research ( <i>p</i>  < 0.001) each declined over time. The proportion of episodes released from 2020 to 2022 that discussed digital technologies was 33.3% greater versus 2005 to 2019 ( <i>p</i>  = 0.005). Personal retrospective episodes doubled, career guidance and patient perspectives tripled, and wellness and social justice topics increased fivefold (all <i>p</i>  < 0.001). <b>Conclusion</b>  In summary, the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic coincided with a rise in ophthalmology podcasts and shifts in content. Podcasts have trended toward practical advice and technologies, reflecting their value in sharing modern, peer-to-peer pearls. Emphases on storytelling and social justice offer unique, clinically relevant perspectives compared with traditional modalities.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73579,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of academic ophthalmology (2017)\",\"volume\":\"15 2\",\"pages\":\"e248-e257\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10712415/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of academic ophthalmology (2017)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1776911\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/7/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of academic ophthalmology (2017)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1776911","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的 播客是一种以数字方式传播眼科知识的新模式,但有关其内容的信息却少之又少。本研究旨在描述眼科播客的发展情况,描述其特点,并分析与临床相关的内容趋势。材料和方法 通过 Apple Podcasts、Spotify、Google Podcasts 和 Google Search 查询了主要与眼科有关的英语节目。分析了 96 个播客和 3,594 集节目。结果 在目前活跃的 48 个节目中,大多数涉及普通眼科主题(25 个,占 52.1%),由学术界和私人诊所的多名主持人(29 个,占 60.4%)主持。大多数播客每月发布一集(21 个,占 21.9%)或发布频率低于每月一次(36 个,占 37.5%)。在所有节目中,程序主题(951 集,占 26.4%)和临床教育(1385 集,占 38.5%)是最普遍的类别。视网膜是播客制作最多的亚专科,而眼部整形和神经眼科的播客最少。有关疾病病理生理学(P = 0.04)和已发表研究(P = 0.005)的情节。个人回顾剧集增加了一倍,职业指导和患者视角增加了两倍,健康和社会正义主题增加了五倍(所有 p 结论 总之,2019 年冠状病毒疾病大流行与眼科播客的增加和内容的转变相吻合。播客趋向于实用建议和技术,反映了其在分享现代、同行珍珠方面的价值。与传统模式相比,强调讲故事和社会正义的播客提供了独特的、与临床相关的视角。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
OphthoPods: An Analysis of the Educational Content and Changes of Ophthalmology Podcasts.

Objective  Podcasts are a novel modality for digitally disseminating ophthalmic knowledge, yet minimal information exists on their offerings. This study sought to describe the growth of ophthalmology podcasts, characterize their features, and analyze clinically pertinent content trends. Materials and Methods  Apple Podcasts, Spotify, Google Podcasts, and Google Search were queried for English- language shows relating primarily to ophthalmology. Ninety-six podcasts and 3,594 episodes were analyzed. Results  Of the 48 currently active shows, most cover general ophthalmology topics ( n  = 25, 52.1%) and are run by multiple hosts ( n  = 29, 60.4%) in both academics and private practice. The majority of podcasts released episodes monthly ( n  = 21, 21.9%) or less frequently than monthly ( n  = 36, 37.5%). Among all episodes, procedural topics ( n  = 951 episodes, 26.4%) and clinical education ( n  = 1385, 38.5%) were the most prevalent categories. Retina was the most represented subspecialty in podcast production, while oculoplastics and neuro-ophthalmology had the fewest podcasts. Episodes on disease pathophysiology ( p  = 0.04) and published research ( p  < 0.001) each declined over time. The proportion of episodes released from 2020 to 2022 that discussed digital technologies was 33.3% greater versus 2005 to 2019 ( p  = 0.005). Personal retrospective episodes doubled, career guidance and patient perspectives tripled, and wellness and social justice topics increased fivefold (all p  < 0.001). Conclusion  In summary, the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic coincided with a rise in ophthalmology podcasts and shifts in content. Podcasts have trended toward practical advice and technologies, reflecting their value in sharing modern, peer-to-peer pearls. Emphases on storytelling and social justice offer unique, clinically relevant perspectives compared with traditional modalities.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信