Digital society : ethics, socio-legal and governance of digital technology最新文献_第6页

The Brussels Effect, European Regulatory Power and Political Capital: Evidence for Mutually Reinforcing Internal and External Dimensions of the Brussels Effect from the European Digital Policy Debate. 布鲁塞尔效应、欧洲监管权力和政治资本:来自欧洲数字政策辩论的布鲁塞尔效应内部和外部维度相互强化的证据。

Digital society : ethics, socio-legal and governance of digital technology Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI: 10.1007/s44206-022-00031-1

Annegret Bendiek, Isabella Stuerzer

{"title":"The Brussels Effect, European Regulatory Power and Political Capital: Evidence for Mutually Reinforcing Internal and External Dimensions of the Brussels Effect from the European Digital Policy Debate.","authors":"Annegret Bendiek, Isabella Stuerzer","doi":"10.1007/s44206-022-00031-1","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s44206-022-00031-1","url":null,"abstract":"Anu Bradford has described the European Union's ability to externalise its norms and standards as the so-called Brussels effect. We apply the Brussels effect to select issues discussed via the EU-US Trade and Technology Council (TTC) and show that its capacity to project power stems not only from the EU's market size but also from its domestic decision-making structure. The political capital accumulated in the EU's consensus-based and inclusive deliberations functions as an effective instrument for motivating other states to adopt European regulations, as legislative acts resulting from European inter-institutional and multi-level policy-making hold high standards of legal certainty and signal European strategic goals and political commitments credibly. Knowing that European consensus is an important condition for externalisation, Brussels can facilitate consensus by calling for internal compromise in order to be able to take the European compromise to the international stage. Thus, the internal and external dimensions of the Brussels effect are mutually reinforcing. This twofold appearance demarcates it from the California effect and the Beijing effect.","PeriodicalId":72819,"journal":{"name":"Digital society : ethics, socio-legal and governance of digital technology","volume":"2 1","pages":"5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9868500/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10688238","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

Sovereignty in the Digital and Contact Tracing Apps. 数字和联系人追踪应用程序中的主权。

Digital society : ethics, socio-legal and governance of digital technology Pub Date : 2023-01-01 Epub Date: 2022-12-26 DOI: 10.1007/s44206-022-00030-2

Max Tretter

{"title":"Sovereignty in the Digital and Contact Tracing Apps.","authors":"Max Tretter","doi":"10.1007/s44206-022-00030-2","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s44206-022-00030-2","url":null,"abstract":"Recently, the concept of sovereignty in the digital has attracted much attention. Several publications dealing with this concept assume that it can best be described as a network of different, overlapping exercises of power. Nevertheless, there is a need for further research on how exactly sovereignty in the digital can be understood. In order to contribute to a better understanding of this concept, I illustrate its complex structure using contact tracing apps as a paradigmatic example. I conduct a narrative review to show what sovereignty looks like in the context of these apps. In the context of digital contact tracing apps, sovereignty is best understood as a complex network of three actors-nations, (big tech) companies, and individuals-that exercise various forms of power against or on behalf of each other to claim sovereignty for themselves and to either weaken or strengthen the sovereignty claims of other actors. Since large parts of the results can be generalized from the particular context of contact tracing apps, they contribute to a better overall understanding of the concept of sovereignty in digital. This might, in turn, be helpful for discussions about this technology as well as about the regulation and governance of the digital in general.","PeriodicalId":72819,"journal":{"name":"Digital society : ethics, socio-legal and governance of digital technology","volume":"2 1","pages":"2"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9791621/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10467628","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Exploring the Concept of Solidarity in the Context of AI: An Ethics in Design Approach 探索人工智能背景下的团结概念:设计方法中的伦理

Digital society : ethics, socio-legal and governance of digital technology Pub Date : 2022-12-17 DOI: 10.1007/s44206-022-00027-x

Catharina Rudschies

引用次数: 0

Learning Domain Ethical Principles from Interactions with Users 从与用户的交互中学习领域伦理原则

Digital society : ethics, socio-legal and governance of digital technology Pub Date : 2022-11-28 DOI: 10.1007/s44206-022-00026-y

Abeer Dyoub, S. Costantini, F. Lisi

引用次数: 2

European Digital Sovereignty: A Layered Approach 欧洲数字主权:分层方法

Digital society : ethics, socio-legal and governance of digital technology Pub Date : 2022-11-18 DOI: 10.1007/s44206-022-00025-z

H. Sheikh

引用次数: 1

The Self-Synchronisation of AI Ethical Principles 人工智能伦理原则的自同步

Digital society : ethics, socio-legal and governance of digital technology Pub Date : 2022-11-10 DOI: 10.1007/s44206-022-00023-1

Rohan Light, Enrico Panai

引用次数: 2

The Quantum Governance Stack: Models of Governance for Quantum Information Technologies 量子治理堆栈:量子信息技术的治理模型

Digital society : ethics, socio-legal and governance of digital technology Pub Date : 2022-10-12 DOI: 10.1007/s44206-022-00019-x

Elija Perrier

引用次数: 5

Continuous Auditing of Artificial Intelligence: a Conceptualization and Assessment of Tools and Frameworks 人工智能的持续审计:工具和框架的概念化和评估

Digital society : ethics, socio-legal and governance of digital technology Pub Date : 2022-10-04 DOI: 10.1007/s44206-022-00022-2

Matti Minkkinen, Joakim Laine, Matti Mäntymäki

引用次数: 10

The Politics of Data in EU Law: Will It Succeed? 欧盟法律中的数据政治:它会成功吗?

Digital society : ethics, socio-legal and governance of digital technology Pub Date : 2022-09-21 DOI: 10.1007/s44206-022-00021-3

U. Pagallo

引用次数: 3

Auditing of AI in Railway Technology – a European Legal Approach 铁路技术中人工智能的审计——一种欧洲法律途径

Digital society : ethics, socio-legal and governance of digital technology Pub Date : 2022-08-01 DOI: 10.1007/s44206-022-00015-1

Dagmar Gesmann-Nuissl, Stephan Kunitz

引用次数: 2