{"title":"From Argentina to Zimbabwe: Exploring the global appeal of the International Baccalaureate","authors":"Saira Fitzgerald","doi":"10.1016/j.acorp.2024.100096","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.acorp.2024.100096","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper presents the third stage of a larger research project examining perceptions of the International Baccalaureate (IB) to better understand its growing influence on education systems around the world. The first two stages involved a synchronic and diachronic analysis of IB discourse in a 27 million word specialized corpus of global press articles, created as an unsolicited window into public opinion (Mautner, 2008). The present study uses the same corpus to explore how the IB is represented in different countries, what values and attitudes may be associated with it, and how it interacts with other global education actors. Bottom up and top down methods from corpus-assisted discourse studies (CADS) were used to analyze 34,104 newspaper articles from 56 countries. Frequency, collocation and concordance analyses revealed four dominant discourses of deficiency connected to national education systems in countries across the ideological spectrum that helped to legitimize the inclusion of private actors in the provision of education. Results also showed unique discourses associated with the IB in North America, thereby highlighting the key role that this region plays in the IB world.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72254,"journal":{"name":"Applied Corpus Linguistics","volume":"4 3","pages":"Article 100096"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666799124000133/pdfft?md5=2c0d3c0ae023763fdea6e64970af8fc6&pid=1-s2.0-S2666799124000133-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141405145","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Attitudes, communicative functions, and lexicogrammatical features of anti-vaccine discourse on Telegram","authors":"Souad Boumechaal , Serge Sharoff","doi":"10.1016/j.acorp.2024.100095","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.acorp.2024.100095","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper reports the process of collecting a corpus with examples of anti-vaccine discourse and the results of its linguistic analysis. The overall aim of the project is to help public health authorities to improve their communication campaigns by better understanding the conditions for misinformation spreading via social media. More specifically, this paper analyses linguistic properties of a corpus of prominent misinformation channels in Telegram as compared against a more general COVID corpus as well as against a general purpose English corpus. For this paper, the quantitative analysis relies on corpus querying to identify the most recurrent discourse patterns related to COVID vaccines. We use the appraisal framework to analyse the patterns with respect to the attitudes conveyed in the messages. We have also applied an automatic AI classifier to predict communicative functions of these texts. This allows us to examine them more closely through the use of simple lexicogrammatical features following Biber, as well as their ideational processes following Halliday. The findings show that common collocations in the Telegram corpus containing misinformation draw on three attitudes: fear, insecurity, and mistrust in COVID vaccines which are discursively constructed to promote vaccine hesitancy among social media users. Furthermore, the misinformation messages tend to occur more often in such communicative functions as promotional texts, news reporting, and text expressed as presenting reference information.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72254,"journal":{"name":"Applied Corpus Linguistics","volume":"4 2","pages":"Article 100095"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141031247","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Wash your hands: CDC, WHO, and NHS tweets in the #COVID19 pandemic","authors":"Katherine A Ireland","doi":"10.1016/j.acorp.2024.100094","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.acorp.2024.100094","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This work tracks public health messaging and evidence of stability and change in corpora of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), World Health Organization (WHO), and National Health Service (NHS) official account tweets throughout 2020. Using corpus-based methods, including keyword analysis, major similarities and differences are identified across tweets by each organization over time. Larger macro-level and micro-level discourses and linguistic patterns are revealed, with specific applications relevant to public health and governmental messaging, especially regarding risk and health communication. Findings include the NHS providing the most comprehensive and varied messaging out of each organization, including references to recommended actions, communities and individuals, and information. The WHO focuses predominantly on cases and region-specific information, while the CDC includes a variety of information, with a US-internal focus. Applications include further recommendations for public health communication, including the necessity of diverse linguistic patterns and interactive messaging tactics for governmental organizations.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72254,"journal":{"name":"Applied Corpus Linguistics","volume":"4 2","pages":"Article 100094"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141054741","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Applying corpus linguistics to the law","authors":"Jesse Egbert , Ute Römer-Barron","doi":"10.1016/j.acorp.2024.100093","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acorp.2024.100093","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":72254,"journal":{"name":"Applied Corpus Linguistics","volume":"4 2","pages":"Article 100093"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140620603","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Representations of obesity in Australian and UK news coverage: A diachronic comparison","authors":"Luke C. Collins , Paul Baker , Gavin Brookes","doi":"10.1016/j.acorp.2024.100092","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acorp.2024.100092","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In both Australia and the UK, the number of adults living with obesity has been increasing over the last 30 years (AIHW, 2023; Baker, 2023). Although policy has emphasised ‘community-based interventions’ in Australia (AIHW, 2017) and ‘system-wide approaches’ in the UK (Ulijaszek and McLennan, 2016) for overcoming the challenges of obesity, previous research has shown that media representations have been dominated by representations promoting individual responsibility (e.g., Kim & Willis, 2007). In this paper, we report our observations of representations documented in corpora of media coverage from Australia and the UK between 2008-2017. The corpora amount to 16.4 million tokens and 36 million tokens, respectively. We identify key semantic domains for each year of the corpora and discuss both consistent and shifting themes in the data. Our findings show that the Australian coverage provides a more sustained focus on responses to obesity at the societal level, referring to practices in the food industry and differences between communities that can lead to health disparities. By comparison, while there is an increase in the amount of coverage in the UK press referring to obesity, the content became more narrowly focussed on food consumption and weight loss over the study period. The findings demonstrate how media coverage contributes to public understanding of how to respond to the challenges of obesity.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72254,"journal":{"name":"Applied Corpus Linguistics","volume":"4 2","pages":"Article 100092"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666799124000091/pdfft?md5=6e9ecc0d87ef63dc626b52509b233d53&pid=1-s2.0-S2666799124000091-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140180464","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"‘Luxurious’ metaphors in luxury hotel websites in Singapore and Hong Kong: A mixed-methods study","authors":"Joanna Zhuoan Chen, Kathleen Ahrens, Dennis Tay","doi":"10.1016/j.acorp.2024.100090","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acorp.2024.100090","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Previous research has yielded a substantial body of empirical evidence regarding the use of metaphors in various types of discourse. However, limited research exists on the relationship between metaphor and more segmented economic industries, such as the luxury hospitality sector. The attention of this article is directed towards inspecting how metaphorical expressions are deployed by luxury hotels to construct their luxury identity and attract potential guests.</p><p>A corpus of 62 lxury hotel websites from Singapore and Hong Kong is used as the contextual background for the investigation of metaphor usage in this study. Using MIPVU (Metaphor Identification Procedure VU University Amsterdam), a total of 6990 metaphorical keywords, including a diverse range of 28 source domains were observed. Among others, the five most productive source domains in the corpus are <span>living organism, physical object, space, artifact, and motion</span>. A mixed-methods approach that combines both quantitative data analytics and qualitative discourse analysis reveals and interprets significant associations between source domains, hotel facilities, and regions, suggesting that the choice of metaphorical expressions is not arbitrary but is influenced by specific factors related to the hotel's offerings and cultures. This study emphasises that the analysis of lexical-conceptual patterns in promotional texts can generate deeper insights into positioning strategies.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72254,"journal":{"name":"Applied Corpus Linguistics","volume":"4 2","pages":"Article 100090"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140191302","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Using early LLMs for corpus linguistics: Examining ChatGPT's potential and limitations","authors":"Satoru Uchida","doi":"10.1016/j.acorp.2024.100089","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acorp.2024.100089","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study evaluates the extent to which information can be obtained from early Large Language Models (LLMs) for corpus linguistic research. Various tasks were conducted using ChatGPT 3.5, such as generating word frequency lists, collocations, words that fit certain grammatical patterns, and identifying genres. The generations were then compared with the search results from a large-scale general corpus (COCA). While favorable results were not achieved in identifying the genres of words or paragraphs, there was notable congruence in the frequency lists (75.0 %), collocations (42.8 %), and grammatical patterns (53.0 %) for the top 20 items. Even when the generated items did not perfectly match those from COCA, it was evident that high-frequency items were produced. Although LLMs may not be sufficient for rigorous academic research, the results are adequate for discerning overall trends or assisting learners. In addition, the results of this study show that the ability to search at the phrase level is an advantage of using LLMs for corpus research.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72254,"journal":{"name":"Applied Corpus Linguistics","volume":"4 1","pages":"Article 100089"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666799124000066/pdfft?md5=322cc8730f1db87e3aee8190477b04ed&pid=1-s2.0-S2666799124000066-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140000123","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"here-, there-, and every where-: Exploring the role of pronominal adverbs in legal language","authors":"David Chandler, Brett Hashimoto","doi":"10.1016/j.acorp.2024.100087","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acorp.2024.100087","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Many have claimed that pronominal adverbs, such as <em>hereby, thereafter,</em> and <em>wherein</em>, are a frequent, distinctive, and problematic in their use in legal language (<u>Tiersma, 1999</u>; <u>Mellinkoff, 2004</u>). The purpose of this study is to examine those claims empirically. In the present study, the prevalence of PAs in legal registers is compared to more general registers of contemporary American English to determine the extent to which these words are distinctly legal. The study will also explore why different types of PAs may be (in)frequent in specific legal registers to better understand their use. The frequency of PAs was extracted from corpora that are designed to represent six registers of English (3 legal; 4 non-legal). Rates of occurrence of PAs per text were then compared across registers using Kruskal-Wallis tests with Dunn post-hoc test with an eta<sup>2</sup> effect size. Subsequently, a functional analysis describing the uses of PAs was also conducted. The results indicate that PAs are highly restricted to legal registers because of functions that they serve. The types of functions that PAs perform within a text are discussed. A closer examination of the PAs considered both individually as well as grouped by locative adverb (i.e., <em>here-, there-</em>, and <em>where-</em>) indicates that some PAs are also more distinctive to certain legal registers for different reasons. This study opens the discussion as to the utility and necessity of PAs in legal language and provides suggestions for legal writers on how to use or remove PAs without inhibiting clarity or effectiveness.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72254,"journal":{"name":"Applied Corpus Linguistics","volume":"4 1","pages":"Article 100087"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666799124000042/pdfft?md5=e07e56f679be7690beb03b867265ebaa&pid=1-s2.0-S2666799124000042-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139749266","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"War in law: A corpus linguistic study of the lexical item war in the laws of war","authors":"Annabelle Lukin , Alexandra García Marrugo","doi":"10.1016/j.acorp.2024.100088","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.acorp.2024.100088","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>As a crucial register of modernity, the laws of war provide a discursive environment for the production and/or maintenance of key categories associated with organized violence. The register hosts the concepts which are used to refer to mass organized violence (<em>war, armed conflict</em>), and has both constructed and/or amplified categories of person that have been developed to legitimate war and give coherence to the international laws of war (e.g., prisoners of war, civilians). With the key texts of the international laws of war including such well-known instances as the 1949 Geneva Conventions now available in a searchable corpus format via the Sydney Corpus Lab, this paper explores the usage and meaning of <em>war</em> in this register where, in principle, the word <em>war</em> is a central part of a body of law which purports to put limits on organized violence. The method is essentially corpus driven: it takes the usages of this lexical item in this register and explores its frequency, its typical local lexical environments, and its collocates. The analysis shows that while the concept of war is essential to the laws of war, it remains ill-defined, indeed virtually undefined, at the same time that its collocational habits affirm its naturalness and legitimacy. As has been found elsewhere, in the laws of war, <em>war</em> and <em>violence</em> are treated as distinct phenomena, operating in distinct lexical environments. The paper is a contribution from corpus linguistics to the work of understanding the ideological effects of this highly significant legal register.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72254,"journal":{"name":"Applied Corpus Linguistics","volume":"4 1","pages":"Article 100088"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666799124000054/pdfft?md5=ec7ffb0252b1bf940897edc0a6b33ca9&pid=1-s2.0-S2666799124000054-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139631765","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Talking across the interdisciplinary aisle: A guide for legal and corpus-linguistic scholars and practitioners","authors":"Stefan Th. Gries , Tammy Gales","doi":"10.1016/j.acorp.2024.100086","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.acorp.2024.100086","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In this paper, we discuss a variety of misunderstandings that have arisen – and still linger – in the field of Law and Corpus Linguistics (LCL). Many have to do with the interdisciplinary nature of legal scholarship and practice on the one hand and corpus linguistics (CL) on the other. Our goals are to address these misunderstandings to explicate them, illuminate the assumptions that co-motivated them in the first place, and provide advice as to how to discuss, maybe refute, and avoid them moving forward, especially given the progress made to-date. In order to illustrate our discussion, we have separated the critiques into two major stages in the collaborative process – (i) a legal stage and (ii) a corpus linguistics stage. In stage (i), we address issues such as the desire to involve a corpus linguist, the question of whether the use of CL outsources a judicial task, and the role CL plays in legal theories of interpretation. In stage (ii), we discuss common critiques of CL applications to legal interpretation such as the claim that the method is inherently subjective, the potential arbitrariness of corpus compilation and selection, and the variable role that context plays in such applications. The final section provides our set of recommendations connecting the two stages to allow for the iterative fine-tuning process we think is required for successful collaboration in academic and applied legal settings; we conclude with our view on who should do corpus linguistics in legal contexts, hopefully facilitating further talk across the interdisciplinary aisle.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72254,"journal":{"name":"Applied Corpus Linguistics","volume":"4 1","pages":"Article 100086"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-01-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666799124000030/pdfft?md5=3ca5d65b9eff85e662710ecaa844011f&pid=1-s2.0-S2666799124000030-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139638640","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}