India Review最新文献_第5页

Economic nationalism and India-US trade relations during the Modi-Trump years 莫迪-特朗普时期的经济民族主义和印美贸易关系

IF 0.8 3区社会学

India Review Pub Date : 2023-03-15 DOI: 10.1080/14736489.2023.2180912

Surupa Gupta

{"title":"Economic nationalism and India-US trade relations during the Modi-Trump years","authors":"Surupa Gupta","doi":"10.1080/14736489.2023.2180912","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14736489.2023.2180912","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT While India and the United States’ relations on the strategic and political fronts improved during 2017–2020, trade relations between the two countries noticeably worsened. Ever since their relations began to improve in the 1990s, deep divisions have existed between the two on trade issues such as market access in goods and services, intellectual property rights, and industrial policy. Given the focus on their strategic relations, successive administrations sought to manage these economic differences without public escalation of conflicts. The Trump administration’s approach deviated from this practice. While it continued to use the multilateral trading system to resolve some conflicts, it also resorted to using public shaming, tariff escalations and withdrawal of concessions in its relations with India. Although the Modi administration’s trade policy was similarly nationalist, its response to US actions were cautious. Evidence from the Modi-Trump period (2017–2020) shows that while both nationalist leaders pursued protectionist policies, the power capabilities of the states they led and the level of mutual economic dependence shaped their actions, their choice of instruments, and their ability to compel change in the other’s policies.","PeriodicalId":56338,"journal":{"name":"India Review","volume":"22 1","pages":"128 - 138"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2023-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42056155","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

US retreat, Indian reform: multilateralism under Trump and Modi 美国撤退，印度改革:特朗普和莫迪领导下的多边主义

IF 0.8 3区社会学

India Review Pub Date : 2023-03-15 DOI: 10.1080/14736489.2023.2180914

Kate Sullivan de Estrada

{"title":"US retreat, Indian reform: multilateralism under Trump and Modi","authors":"Kate Sullivan de Estrada","doi":"10.1080/14736489.2023.2180914","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14736489.2023.2180914","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT From early 2017 to early 2021, Donald J. Trump’s disengagement of the United States from international institutions, later amplified by the pressures of the COVID-19 pandemic, produced a weakening of multilateralism at the global level. The overlapping leadership of Narendra Modi diverged on the issue of multilateralism, producing a dynamic of US retreat and redoubled Indian efforts at reform. Despite their common recourse to populism in their respective countries, the United States and India present disparate cases of how populist leaders engage with multilateralism. Trump prioritized national sovereignty and framed international institutions as an imposition on US freedoms, while Modi envisioned international institutions as an avenue through which to remake multilateralism, elevate India’s reputation, and reap domestic political dividends. Trump’s protectionist and inward-looking policy narratives appealed to communities disadvantaged materially and socially by hyperglobalisation and financial crisis, while Modi’s efforts at elevating India’s profile and engagement in multilateral forums resonated with long-standing elite desires for India to enact leadership in global governance. They drew popular support, too. Finally, China’s rising global influence encouraged India to increase its own influence within existing multilateral institutions and develop new avenues of multilateral action, while Trump’s nationalist response was to turn away, and inward.","PeriodicalId":56338,"journal":{"name":"India Review","volume":"22 1","pages":"139 - 149"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2023-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45117819","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

No climate for cooperation: India-US climate relations during the Trump years 没有合作的氛围:特朗普时期的印美气候关系

IF 0.8 3区社会学

India Review Pub Date : 2023-03-15 DOI: 10.1080/14736489.2023.2180918

V. Jha

引用次数: 1

India-US-Russia dynamics in the Trump era 特朗普时代的印度-美俄动态

IF 0.8 3区社会学

India Review Pub Date : 2023-03-15 DOI: 10.1080/14736489.2023.2180920

R. Verma

{"title":"India-US-Russia dynamics in the Trump era","authors":"R. Verma","doi":"10.1080/14736489.2023.2180920","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14736489.2023.2180920","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Out of more than thirty strategic partnerships signed by India, its ties with the US and Russia are crucial for achieving economic and strategic objectives in the Indo-Pacific and the Eurasian region respectively. There was a growing convergence on bilateral, regional, and global issues with the US during Trump years, but there was divergence between the two countries on Russia. While Washington perceived Russia as a competitor and interfering in the domestic affairs of the US, Moscow on the other hand perceived the US as attempting to not only expand its influence in Russia’s backyard but also undermining Russia’s leadership and its political system. The relationship was also adversarial because the Sino-American escalation coincided with an increasing Russia-China bonhomie. Russia remained a valuable partner for India and India hoped for improved US-Russia ties under Trump. However, adversarial US-Russia ties cast a dark shadow on India-Russia ties. The US complained and was even contemplating sanctions on India for its purchase of S400 air defense systems from Russia. India’s reliance on Russian defence equipment and its policy of multi-alignment further increased tensions between India and the US although India-US strategic alignment has increased under Trump.","PeriodicalId":56338,"journal":{"name":"India Review","volume":"22 1","pages":"172 - 183"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2023-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49258120","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 2

Navigating “maximum pressure”: the India-Iran-US relationship under the Trump presidency 驾驭“最大压力”：特朗普总统任期内的印伊美关系

IF 0.8 3区社会学

India Review Pub Date : 2023-03-15 DOI: 10.1080/14736489.2023.2180916

Vinay Kaura

引用次数: 0

Separately together: Indian and American approaches to China during the Trump era 分开来看:特朗普时代印度和美国对中国的态度

IF 0.8 3区社会学

India Review Pub Date : 2023-03-15 DOI: 10.1080/14736489.2023.2180913

D. Ollapally, R. Verma

引用次数: 1

Trump, Modi, and the illiberal consensus 特朗普、莫迪和非自由主义共识

IF 0.8 3区社会学

India Review Pub Date : 2023-03-15 DOI: 10.1080/14736489.2023.2180915

Vibhav M., Irfan Nooruddin

引用次数: 0

Welfare discourses in India 印度的福利话语

IF 0.8 3区社会学

India Review Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI: 10.1080/14736489.2022.2142760

P. Sarangi

引用次数: 0

Debating cow-slaughter: the making of Article 48 in the Constituent Assembly of India 屠牛辩论:印度制宪会议第48条的制定

IF 0.8 3区社会学

India Review Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI: 10.1080/14736489.2022.2142757

S. Gundimeda

{"title":"Debating cow-slaughter: the making of Article 48 in the Constituent Assembly of India","authors":"S. Gundimeda","doi":"10.1080/14736489.2022.2142757","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14736489.2022.2142757","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The present article examines the efforts of the Hindu conservatives at securing support for a law to ban cow-slaughter during the intervening years of India’s Independence. It also critically examines the debate on this question in the Constituent Assembly of India. Through this examination the article notes how the Hindu conservatives prepared the ground for a law against cow-slaughter even prior to the question being debated in the Constituent Assembly. Further, it argues that by an exclusive consideration of the views of the practitioners of conservative Hindu religion, whose ideology is based on a monolithic conception of Hinduism, over cow and conversely disregarding the others’ views, particularly of Islam on the same, the makers of the Constitution of India sought to impose a Hindu religious practice upon the non-believers of Hindu religion. The article also highlights the role of Ambedkar in the making of Article 48. The article is divided into three sections, wherein the first section looks at the Hindu conservatives’ attempts at securing support for a law against cow slaughter, the second and third sections analyze the debate over the question of cow-slaughter in the Constituent Assembly of India.","PeriodicalId":56338,"journal":{"name":"India Review","volume":"22 1","pages":"1 - 27"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46586277","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Temple diplomacy and India’s soft power: a cultural approach to diplomacy in Southeast Asian States 寺庙外交与印度的软实力：东南亚国家外交的文化视角

IF 0.8 3区社会学

India Review Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI: 10.1080/14736489.2022.2142758

Harsh Mahaseth, Udipto Koushik Sarmah, Shifa Qureshi

{"title":"Temple diplomacy and India’s soft power: a cultural approach to diplomacy in Southeast Asian States","authors":"Harsh Mahaseth, Udipto Koushik Sarmah, Shifa Qureshi","doi":"10.1080/14736489.2022.2142758","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14736489.2022.2142758","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT India’s pursuit of a position within the structure of Southeast Asian States has seen its most extensive ‘soft power’ campaign in all probability. One of the most effective forms of these soft power campaigns is its cultural diplomacy invoked through a shared cultural heritage with the Southeast Asian States. This cultural diplomacy takes the form of a multitude of instruments. However, the instrument of temple restoration as a form of cultural diplomacy is rarely analyzed irrespective of its steady presence in the last decades. This article is an attempt to fill in the gaps between the understanding of soft power and cultural diplomacy through temple restorations. The authors in this article examine India’s restoration of temples across the Southeast Asian States as a form of its cultural diplomacy and analyzes the effectiveness of the same as an instrument of soft power. In the first section, the authors examine the concept of ‘soft power’ and India’s efforts in the exercise of the same through the restoration of temples. In the second section, the author analyzes India’s exercise and development of ‘soft power’ with specific reference to how Buddhism enables India to develop its relations with Southeast Asian States. In the third section, the author examines whether India’s cultural diplomacy through its restoration of temples has actually had a positive impact in developing India’s relations with other Southeast Asian States. Finally, the authors analyze whether there is any merit to a continuation of such measures of its cultural diplomacy as an instrument of its soft power.","PeriodicalId":56338,"journal":{"name":"India Review","volume":"22 1","pages":"28 - 42"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43441510","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0