{"title":"Mound builders, mound blunders: mythmaking in nineteenth century American archaeology.","authors":"T J Perkins","doi":"10.1007/s40656-025-00711-4","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40656-025-00711-4","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In this paper, I critically examine and overturn a narrative from the history of American archaeology wherein historians have classified the overthrowing of the Mound Builders mythology in the late 19th century as a triumph for science. Despite there being ample evidence that Indigenous peoples constructed the mound earthworks of the eastern USA, a mythical \"lost race\" was invented that embodied the colonial aims of the new America. The triumph for science view relies on a naïve demarcation criterion, wherein science is identifiable by its association with the correct hypothesis. I argue that the triumph narrative obscures the historical development of archaeological practice that progressed in steps, offering a view of science that is continuous and cumulative, making it difficult to draw a fine line between science and mythmaking at any point in the 19th century. I call for the reclassification of this episode as a demonstration of the ways that epistemically rigorous methodologies can still contribute to falsehoods in a science entangled with cultural aims.</p>","PeriodicalId":56308,"journal":{"name":"History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences","volume":"48 1","pages":"1"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145764364","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Reframing the significance of menstruation: evolutionary insights from an organismal-relational perspective.","authors":"Arantza Etxeberria, Ainhoa Rodriguez-Muguruza","doi":"10.1007/s40656-025-00710-5","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40656-025-00710-5","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cultural stigma and medical pathologization have long shaped scientific and social perceptions of menstruation, limiting both research and clinical attention. This paper outlines three major sources of negative perceptions and examines their influence on scientific discourse and cultural attitudes. To counter these biases and misconceptions, evolutionary accounts of menstruation are explored, which emphasize its crucial role in human physiology and reproduction. Two evolutionary approaches to adaptation are compared: one adopts a functionalist stance that assigns specific functions to traits. While this perspective offers a naturalized and positive understanding of menstruation, it remains insufficient to capture the phenomenon's full complexity. In response, the paper draws on a second approach, organismal and relational, which emphasizes whole-organism adaptation within developmental and ecological contexts. This contrast is also reflected in evolutionary medicine, where organismal approaches support integrative views of disease patterns. Revisiting late 20th-century debates on whether menstruation is adaptive or a byproduct, the paper presents key elements of the alternative organismal-relational perspective. This framework makes it possible to distinguish three broad categories of menstrual pathologies and supports the claim that organismal evolutionary perspectives offer a richer understanding of menstrual health.</p>","PeriodicalId":56308,"journal":{"name":"History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences","volume":"48 1","pages":"2"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12708708/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145764505","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Clarissa Machado Pinto Leite, Ítalo Nascimento de Carvalho, Jeferson Gabriel da Encarnação Coutinho, Charbel N El-Hani
{"title":"Regulation in ecological systems: an overview.","authors":"Clarissa Machado Pinto Leite, Ítalo Nascimento de Carvalho, Jeferson Gabriel da Encarnação Coutinho, Charbel N El-Hani","doi":"10.1007/s40656-025-00707-0","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40656-025-00707-0","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The concept of regulation is used in biology to explain properties such as stability, robustness, and long-term persistence of biological systems. Regulation claims often focus, however, on the capabilities of these systems, rather than the mechanisms underlying them. In an attempt to produce a full-fledged theoretical account of regulation, a stricter concept has been proposed by Bich and colleagues based on the theory of biological autonomy. According to these authors, regulation is exerted by specialized subsystems that can change the constitutive regime of a system (enabling it to deal with a wider range of perturbations) but whose dynamics are not specified by the latter. In this paper, we present a brief survey on how regulation has been treated in biology and, more specifically, in ecology. We show how the ecological literature attributes regulatory powers either to organismic phenomena or to the propagation of perturbations through the network of relations in ecological systems. We were not able to find any study proposing a specialized subsystem dedicated to regulation in an ecological system. This raises doubts about the feasibility of a regulatory subsystem such as conceived by Bich and colleagues. Nonetheless, we argue that ecological systems may encompass more than just dynamic stability and feedback mechanisms, such that it can be worthy applying their concept to investigate regulation in these systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":56308,"journal":{"name":"History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences","volume":"47 4","pages":"58"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12686030/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145703183","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Early transitions in the evolution of cognition.","authors":"Arsham Nejad Kourki","doi":"10.1007/s40656-025-00709-y","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40656-025-00709-y","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This paper examines the early evolution of cognition in animals through the lens of the Transitions in Structural Complexity approach. By focusing on the emergence and transformation of coordination systems, the study identifies three progressive stages: collective, specialised, and integrated coordination. Each stage is characterised by distinct structural innovations-ranging from contractile epithelia and cytoskeletal coupling to the development of neurons, neurosecretory cells, and integrated nervous tissues-and is shaped by the processes of modularisation, subfunctionalisation, and integration. By conceptualising coordination as a transferable biological function, this approach offers an analysis of the evolution of this capacity without presupposing specific mechanisms or structures. Rather than defining cognition in advance, this approach tracks how functions associated with cognition become structurally embodied in multicellular systems through the progressive reorganisation of coordination across levels of biological organisation. Besides offering a general schema for analysing the early stages of cognitive evolution in metazoans, this approach has broader implications for the comparative study of cognition and the structural focus within the major evolutionary transitions framework.</p>","PeriodicalId":56308,"journal":{"name":"History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences","volume":"47 4","pages":"57"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12675608/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145671031","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Kristien Hens, Christina Stadlbauer, Bart Vandeput
{"title":"Attuning to the deep on the opportunities of thinking with art for an ethics and science of the deep sea.","authors":"Kristien Hens, Christina Stadlbauer, Bart Vandeput","doi":"10.1007/s40656-025-00705-2","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40656-025-00705-2","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In this paper, we explore the ethical complexities of deep-sea mining and scientific exploration. We focus on the extractivist underpinnings of Western scientific discovery, arguing that the desire to make the unknown known often leads to exploitative practices that jeopardize fragile ecosystems. Traditional ethical frameworks, which require knowledge of the subjects of moral consideration, are inadequate for reflecting on the scientific exploration of the vast unknowns of the deep-sea. Instead, we propose an ethics of attunement—a relational approach that emphasizes engagement without extraction. Drawing on examples from art and historical scientific practices, we show how non-extractive modes of knowing can inspire ethical scientific exploration. The works of Eugen van Ransonnet and Marianne North exemplify ways of observing ecosystems without disrupting their integrity. The paper further explores the potential of sound as a medium for attunement, leveraging Pauline Oliveros’ Deep Listening concept. We suggest that engaging with art can foster imaginative frameworks necessary for non-extractivist scientific exploration.</p>","PeriodicalId":56308,"journal":{"name":"History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences","volume":"47 4","pages":"56"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145649976","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Measurement under uncertainty: theory-measurement relations in early electrophysiological research.","authors":"Maria Şerban","doi":"10.1007/s40656-025-00708-z","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40656-025-00708-z","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Recent work in philosophy of measurement has converged on a \"theory-dependence consensus\", according to which measurement reliability requires sophisticated theoretical scaffolding. This consensus has been largely shaped by case studies from physics and high-precision metrology. This paper questions whether this consensus adequately captures measurement practices in biology, where researchers often operate under significant uncertainty about their target phenomena. Through detailed historical analysis of early electrophysiological research-from Carlo Matteucci through Emil du Bois-Reymond, Hermann von Helmholtz, and Ludimar Hermann-I examine how quantitative measurement practices emerged under theoretical uncertainty. The cases reveal recurring patterns including productive theoretical inadequacy and instrumental constraint-driven discovery, supporting an analytical framework that distinguishes multiple levels of theoretical involvement in measurement. Building on these cases, I argue that biological measurement practices function productively as strategies for causal discovery, and theoretically inadequate frameworks prove epistemically valuable by structuring empirical inquiry to reveal previously unrecognised causal factors.</p>","PeriodicalId":56308,"journal":{"name":"History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences","volume":"47 4","pages":"55"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12669311/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145649964","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Physical explanations in evolutionary biology.","authors":"Margarida Hermida, James Ladyman","doi":"10.1007/s40656-025-00704-3","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40656-025-00704-3","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The consensus in philosophy of biology seems to be that although nothing in biological systems is strictly incompatible with physical laws, biology is to a very great extent autonomous from physics. The main thesis of this paper is that, although biology is autonomous from the physical sciences in several ways, it is not explanatorily independent from physics. Physical explanations are pervasive and important in biology, including in evolutionary biology. The paper presents three case studies of physical explanations in evolutionary biology: a case of adaptation to pressure in deep-sea invertebrates, which illustrates how a physical parameter imposes selective pressures that organisms adapt to by changing their own physical properties; the case of water viscosity and the evolution of multicellularity, which shows how a global change in a physical parameter is thought to have triggered a macroevolutionary event; and the case of quantum tunnelling in respiration, which shows how quantum physics is relevant to the evolution of sex in eukaryotes.</p>","PeriodicalId":56308,"journal":{"name":"History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences","volume":"47 4","pages":"54"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12662889/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145643409","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Andrew Bollhagen, Zachary J Mayne, Christa S Merzdorf
{"title":"The entanglement of individuation and explanation in the discovery of xenogastrulation.","authors":"Andrew Bollhagen, Zachary J Mayne, Christa S Merzdorf","doi":"10.1007/s40656-025-00706-1","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40656-025-00706-1","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This paper analyzes an episode of scientific work that was prompted by observations of a novel defect in early embryonic development, which was unexpectedly induced in an experimental context and has tentatively been dubbed \"xenogastrulation.\" The researchers worked to individuate this as a novel phenomenon-both by distinguishing it from what it is not (e.g., exogastrulation) and by forming a positive conception of what it is-in order to facilitate further inquiry. Our analysis provides new insights into the role of explanatory reasoning in nascent experimental research programs. We argue that the researchers' efforts to individuate the novel phenomenon were entangled with their efforts to explain it. By this, we mean that tentative answers to the individuative question, \"what is it?\" also served as tentative answers to the explanatory question, \"by what means does it occur?\" This case study therefore demonstrates that explanation need not wait until an explanandum has been clearly individuated but instead can be deeply entangled with the process of individuating the explanandum in the first place.</p>","PeriodicalId":56308,"journal":{"name":"History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences","volume":"47 4","pages":"53"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12660397/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145643451","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"The problem of isolating and measuring empathy.","authors":"Riana Betzler","doi":"10.1007/s40656-025-00702-5","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40656-025-00702-5","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In 1949, the social psychologists Leonard S. Cottrell, Jr. and Rosalind Dymond wrote a paper calling for increased attention to the empathic responses in empirical social psychology. The empathic responses, they wrote, \"occupy a crucial position in human interaction and adjustment\" (Psychiatry 12(4):355-359, 1949, https://doi.org/10.1080/00332747.1949.11022747 ). Not only practically important for therapy and communication, the empathic responses were considered to be foundational for the very development of the self. In this paper, I examine challenges that arose in the 1940s and 1950s, when researchers attempted to subject empathy to scientific scrutiny. I focus specifically on conceptual and methodological problems that Dymond faced in developing her measures of empathy, which are typically considered to be the first in existence. This foray into the history of empathy measures offers a case study for considering questions about validity and coherence in the philosophy of psychological measurement.</p>","PeriodicalId":56308,"journal":{"name":"History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences","volume":"47 4","pages":"52"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145643453","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Social construction of algorithmic success: between good science and political feasibility in marine conservation planning.","authors":"Matt P Lukacz","doi":"10.1007/s40656-025-00696-0","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40656-025-00696-0","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In the decade between the mid-1980s and mid-1990s, critical voices within the conservation biology community argued that site selection for protected areas was most often done in a way that was unscientific. Conservation practitioners, many of whom became acutely aware of the constraints of the policy world through direct participation, believed that they needed to think pragmatically about establishing a scientific basis for the design of protected areas. Some of the conservation practitioners came to see rationalistic tools such as optimization algorithms embedded within decision-support systems as means of reconciling social, economic, and environmental interests. This paper recapitulates the history of the first significant policy initiative that purported to use algorithmic decision support software, MARXAN, by interweaving environmental history, history of computing, and history of science. Specifically, it is a historical reconstruction of the use of MARXAN in its first large-scale conservation policy project: a rezoning of Australia's Great Barrier Reef that took place between 1998 and 2004. This paper asks: how exactly was MARXAN used in the conservation policy planning initiative? And, what role did MARXAN play in narratives about the success of the policy initiative? I argue that in Australian case, it was the commitment to political value of democratic deliberation and not the allure of algorithmic objectivity that stood behind what was by many considered an agenda-setting marine conservation policy. These findings add support to the growing consensus in critical algorithmic studies against algorithmic determinism by situating the agency of the users of MARXAN within a larger context of a \"drama\" as reported (Hilgartner in Science on Stage: Expert Advice as Public Drama. Stanford University Press, Stanford, 2000) of science advice.</p>","PeriodicalId":56308,"journal":{"name":"History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences","volume":"47 4","pages":"48"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2025-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145254031","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}