{"title":"Ben Jonson’s Doors","authors":"Alexander Paulsson Lash","doi":"10.1086/708709","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1086/708709","url":null,"abstract":"hen Thomas Dekker, in his 1609 prose pamphlet The Gull’s Hornbook, describes how gallants should behave in the fashionable aisles w of St. Paul’s Cathedral, he encourages them to pay special attention to the doors: “first observe your doores of entrance, and your Exit; not much unlike the plaiers at the Theaters.” In noting how important doors of entrance and exit are to actors, Dekker is surely drawing on his own experience as a playwright. He may also have a more specific theatrical door in mind. Ben Jonson’s 1599 Every Man Out of His Humour includes a direct precursor to Dekker’s satirical look at behavior inside St. Paul’s, and this extended sequence, taking up the play’s third act, has its characters return again and again to the cathedral’s west door, a notorious site for the posting of advertisements. I propose that the attention lavished on this door is emblematic of Jonson’s dramaturgy. While “the plaiers at the Theaters” always needed to observe their entrances and exits, Jonson exploited the possibilities of the stage doors more consistently and creatively than any other period playwright. The crowded streets of London increasingly appear, in his plays, positioned offstage and out of sight. In turning to indoor settings, Jonson shows how control of doors allows for a larger mastery of urban space. For Jonson as playwright, this mastery extends into the theater itself. Inside the walls of a theater, characters and audience share an enclosed space, and Jonson uses this potentially claustrophobic situation to heighten both the comic energy and the antagonistic tensions that pass through the doors.","PeriodicalId":53676,"journal":{"name":"Renaissance Drama","volume":"48 1","pages":"31 - 55"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1086/708709","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43217994","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"“To Strike the Ear of Time”: Ben Jonson’s Poetaster and the Temporality of Art","authors":"J. Rickard","doi":"10.1086/708711","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1086/708711","url":null,"abstract":"eprints@whiterose.ac.uk https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/ Reuse Items deposited in White Rose Research Online are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved unless indicated otherwise. They may be downloaded and/or printed for private study, or other acts as permitted by national copyright laws. The publisher or other rights holders may allow further reproduction and re-use of the full text version. This is indicated by the licence information on the White Rose Research Online record for the item.","PeriodicalId":53676,"journal":{"name":"Renaissance Drama","volume":"48 1","pages":"57 - 81"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1086/708711","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48532807","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Performing the Sea: Fortune, Risk, and Audience Engagement in Pericles","authors":"Jane Hwang Degenhardt","doi":"10.1086/708967","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1086/708967","url":null,"abstract":"fter wielding the power to command storm and shipwreck throughout The Tempest, Prospero speaks an Epilogue in which he acknowledges a how his manipulation of the sea has always been subject to the indulgence of the audience. In comparing the audience’s compliance to favorable sea winds, Prospero’s speech plays upon a familiar association between theatrical performance and seafaring in the late sixteenth and early seventeenth centuries. The Prologue to ThomasMiddleton’sNoWit, NoHelp Like aWoman’s (1611) wonders “How is’t possible to please / Opinion tos’d in such wilde Seas?” given the sheer numbers of people who attend the theater and the diversity of their tastes. As Douglas Bruster has argued, The Tempest’s opening shipwreck can itself be read as an allegory for playhouse labor, since theatrical productions, like seafaring, required hard work and cooperation. Unwilling audiences interfered with this labor by disrupting the performance or its representational fictions, rather than helping to keep the ship afloat. Theater and seafaring also shared a precarious status as risky enterprises undergoing new forms of commercialization in early modern England. For early modern playwrights, the risks, dangers, and","PeriodicalId":53676,"journal":{"name":"Renaissance Drama","volume":"48 1","pages":"103 - 129"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1086/708967","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49007186","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Reading Plays as Books: Interpreting Readers’ Marks and Marginalia in Early Modern Play Quartos","authors":"Hannah August","doi":"10.1086/708708","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1086/708708","url":null,"abstract":"f the play is a book, it’s not a play.” Stephen Orgel’s claim has reverberated through the past two decades of scholarship in thefield of earlymodern drama, wending its way ever further from its original context in a discussion of how modern editors might or should render printed plays. One of the places it has resurfaced is in discussions of the historical perceptions of printed dramaheld by the earliest readers of Shakespeare and his contemporaries. Despite numerous claims for the “literariness” of early modern playbooks, Orgel’s statement has often been invoked in order to then be rejected or modified as part of a claim for printed drama’s theatricality.Richard Preiss, for instance, asserts that it “does not bear on the mentality of those earlymodern playgoers whowere being invited to attend performances and then to buy texts of them as modules of a single cultural activity.” Lucy Munro complicates the play/book dichotomy, arguing that it was mutable, and inhered not in the object but in the mode of reading: for early readers of John Marston’s The Fleer, “the playbook was sometimes a play, sometimes a book.” More recently, early modern readers have been tasked with the ability to read with “parted eye,” asHermia puts it inAMidsummer Night’s Dream, whereby they read","PeriodicalId":53676,"journal":{"name":"Renaissance Drama","volume":"48 1","pages":"1 - 30"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1086/708708","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45456002","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"False Evidence and Deceptive Eyewitnesses: The Theatricality of Uncertainty in The Picture and Cymbeline","authors":"L. Robertson","doi":"10.1086/708713","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1086/708713","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":53676,"journal":{"name":"Renaissance Drama","volume":"48 1","pages":"131 - 154"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1086/708713","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46314159","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Jessica’s Silence and the Feminine Pyrrhonic in Shakespeare’s The Merchant of Venice","authors":"Suzanne M. Tartamella","doi":"10.1086/708674","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1086/708674","url":null,"abstract":"ance 39/ cholarship on Shakespeare’s skepticism has rightly explored what his characters do and, more importantly, say in expressing their conflicting values and points of view, their moral uncertainties, and their limited powers of perception. Shakespeare often uses those moments to register doubt about language itself—about the ability of words to convey precisely what we mean to say or, in some cases, to help us discern what we mean. Building on the rhetorical underpinnings of literary skepticism but offering a new interpretive angle, this essay focuses on the skeptical, specifically Pyrrhonian, dimensions of Shakespeare’s dramatized silences. His Sonnets (1609) provide some clues about his perspective. There, Shakespeare compares himself to a tongue-tied “actor on","PeriodicalId":53676,"journal":{"name":"Renaissance Drama","volume":"48 1","pages":"83 - 101"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1086/708674","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45875535","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
R. Gaby, Alice Leonard, James D. Mardock, H. Ostovich
{"title":"To Nell and Back: Revisiting Mistress Quickly","authors":"R. Gaby, Alice Leonard, James D. Mardock, H. Ostovich","doi":"10.1086/705891","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1086/705891","url":null,"abstract":"Although the popularity of Shakespeare's Falstaff from 1597 to now receives frequent acknowledgement, his straight-woman, Mistress Quickly, has attracted relatively scant attention. She was popular enough, however, for Shakespeare to include her in four plays, within varied social contexts but with a consistently inconsistent voice. \u0000 \u0000This collaboration reviews the role of Mistress Quickly across all four plays — 1&2 Henry IV, Henry V and The Merry Wives of Windsor — drawing on our experience of editing the character electronically for Internet Shakespeare Editions. These papers report on the problems, choices, and insights that e-editing Mistress Quickly has exposed","PeriodicalId":53676,"journal":{"name":"Renaissance Drama","volume":"47 1","pages":"201 - 237"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1086/705891","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48792667","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Ways of Seeing in Renaissance Theater: Speculating on Invisibility","authors":"G. Woods","doi":"10.1086/705888","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1086/705888","url":null,"abstract":"n a list of goods bought for his company, the Lord Admiral’s Men, Philip Henslowe recordsmaking a payment for a rather remarkable garment: “a robe for to goo invisibell.”However, Henslowe himself does not seem particularly impressed by his acquisition. For all its magical promise, this robe of invisibility sits innocuously in the middle of a list of other costumes purchased since April 3, 1598, including such basics as a “payer of long black wollen stockens.” Furthermore, the invisibility robe was not especially expensive. “Bowght” with “a gown for Nembia,” it is jointly priced at £3 and 10s. It is impossible to know howmuch of this sum was spent individually on the robe and how much on the gown, but comparison with other items in the inventory provides a sense of the relative cheapness of the double purchase. According to the same section of the accounts, Henslowe paid more than a pound more for a “black satten dublett” and a “payer of rownd howsse paned of vellevett,” and about twice as much for “a dublett of whitt satten layd thicke with gowld lace, and a payer of rowne pandes hosse of cloth of sylver, the panes laydwith gowld lace.” Invisibility came cheaper than Elizabethan glamour. But although the sumptuous garments are fastidiously","PeriodicalId":53676,"journal":{"name":"Renaissance Drama","volume":"47 1","pages":"125 - 151"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1086/705888","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46010082","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}