Lancet Regional Health-Europe最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
Getting to the heart of it: sex and gender considerations in the management of cardiovascular disease 抓住核心:心血管疾病管理中的性和性别因素
IF 13.6
Lancet Regional Health-Europe Pub Date : 2024-09-18 DOI: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2024.101076
{"title":"Getting to the heart of it: sex and gender considerations in the management of cardiovascular disease","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.lanepe.2024.101076","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.lanepe.2024.101076","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":53223,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Regional Health-Europe","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":13.6,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666776224002436/pdfft?md5=3ca55856641c0e48e142c847130913fe&pid=1-s2.0-S2666776224002436-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142238074","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Blood microRNA testing in participants with suspicious low-dose CT findings: follow-up of the BioMILD lung cancer screening trial 对低剂量 CT 检查结果可疑的参与者进行血液 microRNA 检测:BioMILD 肺癌筛查试验的后续研究
IF 13.6
Lancet Regional Health-Europe Pub Date : 2024-09-16 DOI: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2024.101070
{"title":"Blood microRNA testing in participants with suspicious low-dose CT findings: follow-up of the BioMILD lung cancer screening trial","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.lanepe.2024.101070","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.lanepe.2024.101070","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The proper management of suspicious radiologic findings is crucial to optimize the effectiveness of low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) lung cancer screening trials. In the BioMILD study, we evaluated the utility of combining a plasma 24-microRNA signature classifier (MSC) and LDCT to define the individual risk and personalize screening strategies. Here we aim to assess the utility of repeated MSC testing during annual screening rounds in 1024 participants with suspicious LDCT findings.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The primary outcome was two-year lung cancer incidence in relation to MSC test results, reported as relative risk (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI). Lung cancer incidence and mortality were estimated using extended Cox models for time-dependent covariates, yielding the respective hazard ratios (HR). <span><span>Clinicaltrials.gov</span><svg><path></path></svg></span> ID: <span><span>NCT02247453</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>.</p></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><p>With a median follow-up of 8.5 years, the full study set included 1403 indeterminate LDCT (CTind) and 584 positive LDCT (CT+) results. A lung cancer RR increase in MSC+ compared to MSC- participants was observed in both the CTind (RR: 2.5; 95% CI: 1.4–4.32) and CT+ (RR: 2.6; 95% CI: 1.81–3.74) groups and was maintained when considering stage I or resectable tumors only. A 98% negative predictive value in CTind/MSC− and a 30% positive predictive value in CT+/MSC+ lesions were recorded. At seven years’ follow-up, MSC+ participants had a cumulative HR of 4.4 (95% CI: 3.0–6.4) for lung cancer incidence and of 8.1 (95% CI: 2.7–24.5) for lung cancer mortality.</p></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><p>Our study shows that MSC can be reliably performed during LDCT screening rounds to increase the accuracy of lung cancer risk and mortality prediction and supports its clinical utility in the management of LDCT findings of uncertain malignancy.</p></div><div><h3>Funding</h3><p>Italian Association for <span>Cancer Research</span>; <span>Italian Ministry of Health</span>; <span>Horizon2020</span>; <span>National Cancer Institute</span> (NCI); <span>Gensignia LifeScience</span>.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":53223,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Regional Health-Europe","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":13.6,"publicationDate":"2024-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666776224002370/pdfft?md5=80bf92de5915924fb0056eb8a035384e&pid=1-s2.0-S2666776224002370-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142240008","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Early intervention for obstructive sleep apnoea in Down syndrome – making a difference? 早期干预唐氏综合征患者的阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停--效果如何?
IF 13.6
Lancet Regional Health-Europe Pub Date : 2024-09-13 DOI: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2024.101074
{"title":"Early intervention for obstructive sleep apnoea in Down syndrome – making a difference?","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.lanepe.2024.101074","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.lanepe.2024.101074","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":53223,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Regional Health-Europe","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":13.6,"publicationDate":"2024-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666776224002412/pdfft?md5=9f4c1c34cf72629f5a424149fe87a449&pid=1-s2.0-S2666776224002412-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142228740","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Functional dependence following intensive care unit-treated sepsis: three-year follow-up results from the prospective Mid-German Sepsis Cohort (MSC) 重症监护室治疗败血症后的功能依赖性:前瞻性中德败血症队列(MSC)的三年随访结果
IF 13.6
Lancet Regional Health-Europe Pub Date : 2024-09-12 DOI: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2024.101066
{"title":"Functional dependence following intensive care unit-treated sepsis: three-year follow-up results from the prospective Mid-German Sepsis Cohort (MSC)","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.lanepe.2024.101066","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.lanepe.2024.101066","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Surviving sepsis can lead to chronic physical, psychological and cognitive impairments, which affect millions of patients worldwide, including survivors after COVID-19 viral sepsis. We aimed to characterize the magnitude and trajectory of functional dependence and new impairments post-sepsis.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We conducted a prospective cohort study including sepsis survivors who had been discharged from five German intensive care units (ICUs), until 36 months post-discharge. Primary outcome was functional dependence, defined as ≥1 impaired activity of daily living (ADL; 10-item ADL score &lt;100), self-reported nursing care dependence or nursing care level. Secondary outcome was post-sepsis morbidity in the physical, psychological or cognitive domain. We used a multistate, competing risk model to address competing events in the course of dependence, and conducted multiple linear regression analyses to identify predictors associated with the ADL score.</p></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><p>Of 3210 sepsis patients screened, 1968 survived the ICU treatment (61.3%). A total of 753 were included in the follow-up assessments of the Mid-German Sepsis cohort. Patients had a median age of 65 (Q1–Q3 56–74) years, 64.8% (488/753) were male and 76.1% (573/753) had a septic shock. Considering competing risk modelling, the probability of still being functional dependent was about 25%, while about 30% regained functional independence and 45% died within the three years post-sepsis. Patients reported a high burden of new and often overlapping impairments until three years post-sepsis. In the subgroup of three-year survivors (n = 330), new physical impairments affected 91.2% (n = 301) while new cognitive and psychological impairments were reported by 57.9% (n = 191) and 40.9% (n = 135), respectively. Patients with pre-existing functional limitations and higher age were at risk for low ADL scores three years after sepsis.</p></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><p>Sepsis survivorship was associated with a broad range of new impairments and led to functional dependence in around one quarter of patients. Targeted measures are needed to mitigate the burden of this Post-Sepsis-Syndrome and increase the proportion of patients that achieve functional improvements.</p></div><div><h3>Funding</h3><p>This work was supported by the <span>Integrated Research and Treatment Center</span>, <span>Center for Sepsis Control and Care</span> (CSCC) at the <span>Jena University Hospital</span> funded by the German <span>Ministry of Education and Research</span> and by the Rudolf Presl GmbH &amp; Co, Kreischa, Germany.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":53223,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Regional Health-Europe","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":13.6,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666776224002333/pdfft?md5=1cee67b34dc818cab85aab45e5f07faa&pid=1-s2.0-S2666776224002333-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142172983","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Correction to “Protecting infants against RSV disease: an impact and cost-effectiveness comparison of long-acting monoclonal antibodies and maternal vaccination” [The Lancet Regional Health – Europe 38 (2024) 100829] 保护婴儿免受 RSV 疾病:长效单克隆抗体和孕产妇疫苗接种的影响和成本效益比较"[《柳叶刀》区域健康--欧洲 38 (2024) 100829]更正
IF 13.6
Lancet Regional Health-Europe Pub Date : 2024-09-11 DOI: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2024.101073
{"title":"Correction to “Protecting infants against RSV disease: an impact and cost-effectiveness comparison of long-acting monoclonal antibodies and maternal vaccination” [The Lancet Regional Health – Europe 38 (2024) 100829]","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.lanepe.2024.101073","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.lanepe.2024.101073","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":53223,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Regional Health-Europe","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":13.6,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666776224002400/pdfft?md5=7cc8e529861b59997135016ec0de715f&pid=1-s2.0-S2666776224002400-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142167202","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
More or less “modest” versus significant excess mortality due to COVID-19 deaths in Europe 欧洲 COVID-19 死亡造成的死亡率过高与过低的对比
IF 13.6
Lancet Regional Health-Europe Pub Date : 2024-09-11 DOI: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2024.101060
{"title":"More or less “modest” versus significant excess mortality due to COVID-19 deaths in Europe","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.lanepe.2024.101060","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.lanepe.2024.101060","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":53223,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Regional Health-Europe","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":13.6,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666776224002278/pdfft?md5=dc8848415539f39d5d3f891ccbfa7e2e&pid=1-s2.0-S2666776224002278-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142167201","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Time to enhance COVID-19 vaccination in women of reproductive age 加强育龄妇女 COVID-19 疫苗接种的时机已到
IF 13.6
Lancet Regional Health-Europe Pub Date : 2024-09-10 DOI: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2024.101069
{"title":"Time to enhance COVID-19 vaccination in women of reproductive age","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.lanepe.2024.101069","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.lanepe.2024.101069","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":53223,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Regional Health-Europe","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":13.6,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666776224002369/pdfft?md5=42ec4ffa56377b36eb84b3344bc92593&pid=1-s2.0-S2666776224002369-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142164730","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Efficacy and safety of interim oncology treatments introduced for solid cancers during the COVID-19 pandemic in England: a retrospective evidence-based analysis 英格兰 COVID-19 大流行期间针对实体瘤引入的临时肿瘤治疗的有效性和安全性:基于证据的回顾性分析
IF 13.6
Lancet Regional Health-Europe Pub Date : 2024-09-10 DOI: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2024.101062
{"title":"Efficacy and safety of interim oncology treatments introduced for solid cancers during the COVID-19 pandemic in England: a retrospective evidence-based analysis","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.lanepe.2024.101062","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.lanepe.2024.101062","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The COVID-19 global pandemic placed unprecedented pressure on cancer services, requiring new interim Systemic Anti-Cancer Treatments (SACT) options to mitigate risks to patients and maintain cancer services. In this study we analyse interim COVID-19 SACT therapy options recommended in England, evaluating the evidence supporting inclusion and delineating how these have been integrated into routine cancer care.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We performed a retrospective analysis of interim Systemic Anti-Cancer Treatments endorsed by NHS England during the COVID-19 pandemic. Interim therapy options were compared to baseline (replacement) therapies by comparing data from the key pivotal trial(s) in terms of clinical efficacy and potential benefits (e.g., reduced immunosuppression or improved adverse effect profile) within the context of the pandemic. Furthermore, we evaluated the evolution of these interim SACT options, exploring if these have been integrated into current treatment pathways or are no longer accessible at the pandemic end.</p></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><p>31 interim oncology treatment options, across 36 indications, for solid cancers were endorsed by NHS England between March 2020 and August 2021. Interim therapies focused on the metastatic setting (83%; 30/36), allowing greater utilisation of immune checkpoint inhibitors (45%; 14/31) and targeted therapies (26%; 8/31), in place of cytotoxic chemotherapy. Overall, 36% (13/36) of therapies could not have efficacy compared with baseline treatments due to a paucity of evidence. For those which could, 39% (9/23) had superior efficacy (e.g., overall survival), 26% (6/23) had equivocal efficacy and 35% (8/23) lower efficacy. 53% (19/36) of interim therapies had better or equivocal toxicity profiles (when assessable), and/or were associated with reduced immunosuppression. Almost half (47%; 17/36) of interim therapies did not have UK market authorisation, being classified as ‘off label’ use. Analysing access to interim options at the end of the pandemic (May 2023) identified 19 (53% 19/36) interim options were fully available, and a further four (11% 4/36) therapies were partially available.</p></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><p>Interim SACT options, introduced in England, across a range of solid cancers supported delivery of cancer services during the pandemic. Most interim therapies did not demonstrate superior efficacy, but provided other important benefits (e.g., reduced immunosuppression) in the context of the pandemic.</p></div><div><h3>Funding</h3><p>None.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":53223,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Regional Health-Europe","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":13.6,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666776224002291/pdfft?md5=d54bd28d46d919cc8ed8f3df19f0ef77&pid=1-s2.0-S2666776224002291-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142163065","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Non-invasive brain stimulation therapy in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: are we ready for clinical use? 肌萎缩性脊髓侧索硬化症的非侵入性脑刺激疗法:临床应用准备好了吗?
IF 13.6
Lancet Regional Health-Europe Pub Date : 2024-09-06 DOI: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2024.101055
{"title":"Non-invasive brain stimulation therapy in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: are we ready for clinical use?","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.lanepe.2024.101055","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.lanepe.2024.101055","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":53223,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Regional Health-Europe","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":13.6,"publicationDate":"2024-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666776224002229/pdfft?md5=5eab71fd34331ef5f3f2f248e3cd7cac&pid=1-s2.0-S2666776224002229-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142148954","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Heat and cause-specific cardiopulmonary mortality in Germany: a case-crossover study using small-area assessment 德国高温与特定病因心肺死亡率:利用小区域评估进行的病例交叉研究
IF 13.6
Lancet Regional Health-Europe Pub Date : 2024-09-06 DOI: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2024.101049
{"title":"Heat and cause-specific cardiopulmonary mortality in Germany: a case-crossover study using small-area assessment","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.lanepe.2024.101049","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.lanepe.2024.101049","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>High temperatures have been associated with increased mortality, with evidence reported predominately in large cities and for total cardiovascular or respiratory deaths. This case-crossover study examined heat-related cause-specific cardiopulmonary mortality and vulnerability factors using small-area data from Germany.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We analyzed daily counts of cause-specific cardiopulmonary deaths from 380 German districts (2000–2016) and daily mean temperatures estimated by spatial–temporal models. We applied conditional quasi-Poisson regression using distributed lag nonlinear models to examine heat effects during May–September in each district and random-effects meta-analysis to pool the district-specific estimates. Potential individual- and district-level vulnerability factors were examined by subgroup analyses and meta-regressions, respectively.</p></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><p>Heat was associated with increased mortality risks for all cardiopulmonary sub-causes. The relative risk (RR) of total cardiovascular and respiratory mortality for a temperature increment from the 75th to the 99th percentile was 1.24 (95% confidence interval: 1.23, 1.26) and 1.34 (1.30, 1.38), respectively. The RRs of cardiovascular sub-causes ranged from 1.16 (1.13, 1.19) for myocardial infarction to 1.32 (1.29, 1.36) for heart failure. For respiratory sub-causes, the RR was 1.27 (1.22, 1.31) for COPD and 1.49 (1.42, 1.57) for pneumonia. We observed greater susceptibility related to several individual- and district-level characteristics, e.g., among females or in highly urbanized districts. Heat vulnerability factors remained consistent between urban and rural areas.</p></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><p>Our study highlights heat-related increases in cause-specific cardiopulmonary mortality across Germany and identifies key vulnerability factors, offering insights for improving public health practices to mitigate heat-related health impacts.</p></div><div><h3>Funding</h3><p>European Union's <span>Horizon 2020</span> research and innovation program; Helmholtz Associations Initiative and Networking Fund.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":53223,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Regional Health-Europe","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":13.6,"publicationDate":"2024-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666776224002163/pdfft?md5=3a34be1de8006041d88733fd42d3e406&pid=1-s2.0-S2666776224002163-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142147812","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信