Cognitive Semiotics最新文献_第6页

Creativity, reuse, and regularity in music and language 音乐和语言的创造性、重用性和规律性

Cognitive Semiotics Pub Date : 2020-05-01 DOI: 10.1515/cogsem-2020-2021

G. Trousdale

引用次数: 12

Creativity within and outside the linguistic system 语言系统内外的创造力

Cognitive Semiotics Pub Date : 2020-05-01 DOI: 10.1515/cogsem-2020-2025

Alexander T. Bergs, N. Kompa

引用次数: 9

Creative intentions — The fine line between ‘creative’ and ‘wrong’ 创造性意图——“创造性”和“错误”之间的界限

Cognitive Semiotics Pub Date : 2020-05-01 DOI: 10.1515/cogsem-2020-2027

P. Uhrig

引用次数: 10

Learning formulaic creativity: Chunking in verbal art and speech – a response to Cristóbal Pagán Cánovas 学习公式化创造力:语言艺术和演讲中的分块——对Cristóbal Pagán Cánovas的回应

Cognitive Semiotics Pub Date : 2020-05-01 DOI: 10.1515/cogsem-2020-2024

Alexander T. Bergs

引用次数: 3

Coda: Literature, language, and creativity 结语:文学、语言和创造力

Cognitive Semiotics Pub Date : 2020-05-01 DOI: 10.1515/cogsem-2020-2030

Karin Kukkonen

{"title":"Coda: Literature, language, and creativity","authors":"Karin Kukkonen","doi":"10.1515/cogsem-2020-2030","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/cogsem-2020-2030","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Literature is often considered the creative expression of language par excellence. This coda considers how the perspectives from Construction Grammar, as they are outlined in this special issue, can enter into dialogue with recent developments in how literary studies address creativity. Construction Grammar concerns itself with the productive generation and manipulation of language in everyday contexts, but, as this special issue goes to show, these processes can also be discussed in terms of creativity and deployed to shed light on creative processes in the arts. Convergences between Construction Grammar and (cognitive) literary studies appear to emerge in particular around the question of creative practice in literary language and (1) in how far writing gives rise to particular kinds of creativity; (2) how one can generalize between different creative media, such as literature, painting and music; and (3) how writing-based creativity can be investigated. Literary studies with its interests in media environments, social/historical context and textual analysis might provide a larger testing ground for claims about the compatibility and incompatibility of everyday and literary creativity as they are put forward in this special issue.","PeriodicalId":52385,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Semiotics","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"86986884","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 2

Playing by/with the rules: Creativity in language, games, and art 按规则行事:语言、游戏和艺术中的创造力

Cognitive Semiotics Pub Date : 2020-05-01 DOI: 10.1515/cogsem-2020-2026

B. Cappelle

{"title":"Playing by/with the rules: Creativity in language, games, and art","authors":"B. Cappelle","doi":"10.1515/cogsem-2020-2026","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/cogsem-2020-2026","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Bergs and Kompa (Creativity within and outside the linguistic system. Cognitive Semiotics 13. 1, 2020) discuss creativity in language, which they see as largely rule-bound, as opposed to ‘true,’ rule-breaking creativity in the arts. However, the distinction between intra- and extra-system creativity is not always easy to make. Languages have evolved into efficient systems for communication and occasionally allow for divergences of their own norms, within limits of comprehensibility, just like games are developed to enable maximum player creativity or even rule bending (as in the case of Monopoly Cheaters Edition). The paradox of systems licencing violations of their own norms and rules is similar to the one underlying avant-garde as one or more movements in the history of art, when breaking with expectations was the vogue of the time — hence, somehow to be expected. Judging art as innovative or not also depends on what we adopt as our artistic frame of reference. Furthermore, single works of art or single artists can be ahead of the times in some respects but not in others. Turning again to language, I agree with Bergs and Kompa that competent speakers abide by the rules, which implies such language users also know (perhaps not always fully consciously) how to exploit in-built mechanisms that make them sound creative.","PeriodicalId":52385,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Semiotics","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"82682760","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 3

Coda: Creativity in psychological research versus in linguistics – Same but different? 结语:心理学研究中的创造力与语言学中的创造力——相同但不同?

Cognitive Semiotics Pub Date : 2020-05-01 DOI: 10.31234/osf.io/asbrx

S. Weiss, O. Wilhelm

{"title":"Coda: Creativity in psychological research versus in linguistics – Same but different?","authors":"S. Weiss, O. Wilhelm","doi":"10.31234/osf.io/asbrx","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/asbrx","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Understanding the very nature of creativity is a hot topic in research across various disciplines and has profound societal relevance. In this contribution, we discuss verbal creativity by highlighting its definition, psychometric measurement, and relations with other personality dispositions. We relate psychological research with findings from linguistics presented in this issue and depict similarities and differences between both approaches. More specifically, we relate the linguistic terminology of F-creativity to fluency and flexibility, whereas we identify E-creativity as akin to originality. We propose latent semantic analysis as a possible approach for evaluating originality and compare this approach with more commonly applied human ratings. Based on contributions in this issue, we discuss creativity as a domain-general process that is (e. g., in applied arts) often driven by the recombination of mental elements. Lastly, we propose several intelligence and personality dispositions as determinants of individual differences in creativity. We conclude that creativity research in linguistic and psychology has many communalities and interdisciplinary work bears strong promises for the future.","PeriodicalId":52385,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Semiotics","volume":"13 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"76981416","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 4

Speakers are creative, within limits — a response to Peter Uhrig 演讲者在一定范围内是有创造力的——这是对彼得·乌里格的回应

Cognitive Semiotics Pub Date : 2020-05-01 DOI: 10.1515/cogsem-2020-2028

Thomas Hoffmann

引用次数: 1

Constructions and creativity 结构与创意

Cognitive Semiotics Pub Date : 2020-01-15 DOI: 10.1515/cogsem-2020-2019

Mark B. Turner

{"title":"Constructions and creativity","authors":"Mark B. Turner","doi":"10.1515/cogsem-2020-2019","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/cogsem-2020-2019","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The first principle of cognitive linguistics is to look for the origins of linguistic powers in robust mental operations not specific to language. For millennia, language science has assumed that human beings possess mental operations for unifying, combining, and merging patterns to create expressions, and that, conversely, they can analyze expressions they encounter to recognize patterns that were combined to produce them. The third section of this article reviews some of the literature concerned with these powers to combine patterns into expressions and to analyze expressions into patterns that were blended to create them. Any assumption about such a linguistic power takes out a loan on theory that must be cashed out with a non-language-specific explanation if the theory is to count as cognitive. One can stipulate to the existence of some unexplained power that is needed for linguistic performance, but that stipulation is insubstantial until it is grounded in a demonstrated non-language-specific operation. An assumption or stipulation about a linguistic power is cashed out when we locate and model the non-language-specific cognitive operations that make that linguistic power possible. The first section of this article presents the proposition that the non-language-specific mental operation that accounts for these linguistic powers is blending, otherwise known as conceptual integration. The second section provides a topical review of blending in specific communicative form-meaning pairs and their combination. Blending is the foundation of creativity in communication, or, more specifically, in the creation and combining of form-meaning pairs, also called “constructions.”","PeriodicalId":52385,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Semiotics","volume":"75 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"82292631","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 11

Chronillogicalities : Déjà vus and hallucinations in the digital semiosphere 时间逻辑性:数字符号圈中的幻影和幻觉

Cognitive Semiotics Pub Date : 2019-11-01 DOI: 10.1515/cogsem-2019-2012

M. Leone

引用次数: 1