Disputatio (Spain)最新文献_第6页

Fortress of Form, Robber of Consciousness: Theorizing Visuality in Islam 形式的堡垒，意识的强盗:伊斯兰教视觉的理论化

IF 0.1

Disputatio (Spain) Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI: 10.1484/m.disput-eb.5.122380

W. Shaw

引用次数: 0

Reliquaries and the Boundaries of Vision: Relics, Crystals, Mirrors, and the ‘Vision Effect’ 圣物匣与视觉的边界:圣物、水晶、镜子与“视觉效应”

IF 0.1

Disputatio (Spain) Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI: 10.1484/m.disput-eb.5.122384

C. Hahn

引用次数: 0

Channelling the Gaze: Squints in Late Medieval Screens 引导凝视:中世纪晚期屏幕上的斜眼人

IF 0.1

Disputatio (Spain) Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI: 10.1484/m.disput-eb.5.122385

Tina Bawden

引用次数: 0

The Liveliness of the Methexic Image 美的形象的活泼

IF 0.1

Disputatio (Spain) Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI: 10.1484/m.disput-eb.5.122382

B. Pentcheva

引用次数: 0

Do Old Testament texts substantiate Geocentrism 旧约经文证实地心说吗

IF 0.1

Disputatio (Spain) Pub Date : 2020-12-31 DOI: 10.5281/ZENODO.4625605

Pons Poblet, Josep María

{"title":"Do Old Testament texts substantiate Geocentrism","authors":"Pons Poblet, Josep María","doi":"10.5281/ZENODO.4625605","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.4625605","url":null,"abstract":"espanolA menudo leemos textos del Antiguo Testamento donde parece ponerse de manifiesto la idea de la tierra entendida como centro de la creacion con el sol moviendose a su entorno. Es lo comunmente conocido como geocentrismo (γeωκeντρισμός), formulacion perfectamente compatible con la filosofia contemporanea de fuerte matriz aristotelica. Nos encontramos, por lo tanto, en un periodo —que duraria varios siglos— donde el pensamiento teologico y el pensamiento filosofico cohabitan perfectamente. En el presente articulo se presentan algunos de estos textos veterotestamentarios, que literalmente coinciden con el generalizado geocentrismo de la epoca. Para ello, se han tomado ejemplos de distintos Libros correspondientes a etapas de redaccion diversas. EnglishWe often read excerpts from the Old Testament that appear to evince an understanding of the Earth as the centre of creation, with the Sun revolving around it. That conception is commonly known as Geocentrism (γeωκeντρισμός), a formulation perfectly consistent with the philosophy of that age, which was strongly rooted in Aristotelianism. Therefore, we are talking about a period which lasted for several centuries in which theological and philosophical thought coexisted faultlessly. This essay contains some such Old Testament texts, which prove to concur literally with the Geocentrism prevalent at the time. To that end, examples have been extracted from a number of Books pertaining to different writing stages.","PeriodicalId":52369,"journal":{"name":"Disputatio (Spain)","volume":"5 1","pages":"147-165"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2020-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"87323948","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Replies 回复

IF 0.1

Disputatio (Spain) Pub Date : 2020-12-01 DOI: 10.2478/disp-2020-0015

Andrea Iacona

引用次数: 0

Varieties of Logical Form 逻辑形式的变化

IF 0.1

Disputatio (Spain) Pub Date : 2020-12-01 DOI: 10.2478/disp-2020-0011

M. Sainsbury

引用次数: 1

The Proportionality Argument and the Problem of Widespread Causal Overdetermination 比例论证与广泛的因果超决定问题

IF 0.1

Disputatio (Spain) Pub Date : 2020-12-01 DOI: 10.2478/disp-2020-0016

A. Aliyev

{"title":"The Proportionality Argument and the Problem of Widespread Causal Overdetermination","authors":"A. Aliyev","doi":"10.2478/disp-2020-0016","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2478/disp-2020-0016","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The consensus is that repeatable artworks cannot be identified with particular material individuals. A perennial temptation is to identify them with types, broadly construed. Such identification, however, faces the so-called “Creation Problem.” This problem stems from the fact that, on the one hand, it seems reasonable to accept the claims that (1) repeatable artworks are types, (2) types cannot be created, and (3) repeatable artworks are created, but, on the other hand, these claims are mutually inconsistent. A possible solution to the Creation Problem is to argue that claim (2) can be rejected because (a) the only motivation for it is that a type, being abstract, cannot stand in causal relations, but (b) this motivation is ungrounded, since types can, in fact, stand in such relations. Clearly, in order for this solution to be successful, it is necessary to substantiate the possibility of types to be causally efficacious. In this essay, I examine an attempt to do this with the help of Yablo’s principle of proportionality, which has been undertaken by Walters (2013) and, more recently, Juvshik (2018). Although the argument they advance may seem to provide strong support for the causal efficacy of types, I think it actually fails to do this. To explain why this is so, I first show that this argument commits us to the existence of widespread causal overdetermination involving types and then argue that this commitment is both epistemically and ontologically problematic.","PeriodicalId":52369,"journal":{"name":"Disputatio (Spain)","volume":"27 1","pages":"331 - 355"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"73165847","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Logical Form through Abstraction 抽象逻辑形式

IF 0.1

Disputatio (Spain) Pub Date : 2020-12-01 DOI: 10.2478/disp-2020-0012

Z. Szabó

{"title":"Logical Form through Abstraction","authors":"Z. Szabó","doi":"10.2478/disp-2020-0012","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2478/disp-2020-0012","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In a recent book, Logical Form: between Logic and Natural Language, Andrea Iacona argues that semantic form and logical form are distinct. The semantic form of a sentence is something that (together with the meanings of its parts) determines what it means; the logical from of a sentence is something that (all by itself) determines whether it is a logical truth. Semantic form does not depend on context but logical form does: for example, whether ‘This is this’ is a logical truth depends on whether the two occurrences of ‘this’ are used to demonstrate the same individual. I respond by claiming that logical form is indifferent to reference and is sensitive only to obligatory co-reference. When the speaker intends both occurrences of ‘this’ to be interpreted the same way the logical from of ‘This is this’ is a=a, while in a context where the speaker has no such intention it is a=b. This proposal allows a much more conservative revision of the traditional picture than the one suggested by Iacona. Instead of identifying the logical form of a natural language sentence by seeking a formalization in an artificial language, we obtain it through abstraction from its syntactic analysis: replacing the non-logical expressions by schematic letters, making sure that we use identical ones if and only if the speaker intended co-reference.","PeriodicalId":52369,"journal":{"name":"Disputatio (Spain)","volume":"15 1","pages":"251 - 263"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"76607326","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Logical Form, Truth Conditions, and Adequate Formalization 逻辑形式，真值条件和适当的形式化

IF 0.1

Disputatio (Spain) Pub Date : 2020-12-01 DOI: 10.2478/disp-2020-0010

Mario Gómez-Torrente

引用次数: 0