Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics : CQ : the international journal of healthcare ethics committees最新文献_第6页

Playing God: the rock opera that endeavors to become a bioethics education tool. 《扮演上帝:努力成为生命伦理教育工具的摇滚歌剧》。

IF 1.8

Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics : CQ : the international journal of healthcare ethics committees Pub Date : 2014-04-01 Epub Date: 2014-02-04 DOI: 10.1017/S0963180113000728

Tuija Takala, Matti Häyry, Laurence Laing

引用次数: 2

Commentary: The problematic proxy and the patient's best interests. 评论:有问题的代理人和病人的最大利益。

IF 1.8

Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics : CQ : the international journal of healthcare ethics committees Pub Date : 2014-04-01 DOI: 10.1017/S0963180113000777

David Campbell

引用次数: 0

Prognosis terminal: truth-telling in the context of end-of-life care. 预后终末期:在临终关怀的背景下讲真话。

IF 1.8

Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics : CQ : the international journal of healthcare ethics committees Pub Date : 2014-04-01 DOI: 10.1017/S0963180113000741

Ben A Rich

引用次数: 4

Animal minds and neuroimaging--bridging the gap between science and ethics? 动物思维和神经成像——弥合科学与伦理之间的鸿沟?

IF 1.8

Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics : CQ : the international journal of healthcare ethics committees Pub Date : 2014-04-01 Epub Date: 2014-02-04 DOI: 10.1017/S0963180113000704

Tom Buller

引用次数: 6

Neuroethics, painience, and neurocentric criteria for the moral treatment of animals. 神经伦理学，痛苦，以及动物道德治疗的神经中心标准。

IF 1.8

Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics : CQ : the international journal of healthcare ethics committees Pub Date : 2014-04-01 Epub Date: 2014-02-04 DOI: 10.1017/S0963180113000698

Sherry E Loveless, James Giordano

引用次数: 11

Neuroethics and animals: methods and philosophy. 神经伦理学与动物:方法与哲学。

IF 1.8

Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics : CQ : the international journal of healthcare ethics committees Pub Date : 2014-04-01 DOI: 10.1017/S0963180113000716

Tuija Takala, Matti Häyry

引用次数: 2

Crazy like a fox. Validity and ethics of animal models of human psychiatric disease. 像狐狸一样疯狂。人类精神疾病动物模型的有效性和伦理学。

IF 1.8

Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics : CQ : the international journal of healthcare ethics committees Pub Date : 2014-04-01 DOI: 10.1017/S0963180113000674

Michael D H Rollin, Bernard E Rollin

引用次数: 14

Narrative autonomy: three literary models of healthcare in the end of life. 叙事自主性:生命末期医疗的三种文学模式。

IF 1.8

Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics : CQ : the international journal of healthcare ethics committees Pub Date : 2014-04-01 DOI: 10.1017/S096318011300073X

Antonio Casado da Rocha

{"title":"Narrative autonomy: three literary models of healthcare in the end of life.","authors":"Antonio Casado da Rocha","doi":"10.1017/S096318011300073X","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S096318011300073X","url":null,"abstract":"This section welcomes submissions addressing literature as a means to explore ethical issues arising in healthcare. “Literature” will be understood broadly, including fiction and creative nonfiction, illness narratives, drama, and poetry; film studies might be considered if the films are adaptations from a literary work. Topics include in-depth analysis of literary works as well as theoretical contributions, discussions, and commentary about narrative approaches to disease and medicine, the way literature shapes the relationship between patients and healthcare professionals, the role of speculative fiction as a testing ground for future scenarios in healthcare, and so on. Articles discussing the uses of literature for bioethics education and outreach will be particularly appreciated. Research on literature not originally written in English will be considered as long as it has also been published in translation. Submissions should include an abstract and should conform to the CQ Guidelines for Contributors. To submit an article or discuss a suitable topic, write to Antonio Casado da Rocha at antonio.casado@ehu.es. Abstract: This article proposes a concept of narrative autonomy to supplement existing accounts in healthcare ethics. This is done by means of a comparison between three end-of-life scenarios: Tolstoy’s The Death of Ivan Ilyich and two related contemporary stories by Lorrie Moore and Bernhard Schlink, which explore some problems arising when extremely individualistic notions of patient autonomy are put into practice. It is argued that the best model for palliative care is a cooperative one in which patient autonomy is understood as essentially social, and that involves decisional, executive, informational, and narrative dimensions.","PeriodicalId":520577,"journal":{"name":"Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics : CQ : the international journal of healthcare ethics committees","volume":" ","pages":"200-8"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2014-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1017/S096318011300073X","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"32121895","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 6

Broadening the focus. 拓宽重点。

IF 1.8

Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics : CQ : the international journal of healthcare ethics committees Pub Date : 2014-04-01 Epub Date: 2014-02-04 DOI: 10.1017/S0963180113000650

Tom Buller, Adam Shriver, Martha Farah

{"title":"Broadening the focus.","authors":"Tom Buller, Adam Shriver, Martha Farah","doi":"10.1017/S0963180113000650","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0963180113000650","url":null,"abstract":"Over the past dozen or so years neuroethics has become a rich and dynamic field that has brought together individuals from a variety of disciplines and interests to consider issues that lie at the intersection of ethics and neuroscience. During this period there has been a significant amount of important empirical and philosophical work on a range of topics at this intersection; however, there has been comparatively little work on this intersection as it applies to nonhuman animals. In fact, it is fair to say that neuroethics has had a distinct and almost exclusive “humanistic focus.” Our hope with this special section is to broaden this focus and to provoke and encourage discussion of nonhuman animals within neuroethics. There are a number of explanations for neuroethics’ humanistic focus. Disciplines Animal Studies | Bioethics and Medical Ethics | Neuroscience and Neurobiology | Neurosciences Comments Special Section: Neuroethics and Animals This journal article is available at ScholarlyCommons: http://repository.upenn.edu/neuroethics_pubs/105 Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics (2014), 23 , 124–128 . © Cambridge University Press 2014. doi:10.1017/S0963180113000650 124 Special Section: Neuroethics and Animals","PeriodicalId":520577,"journal":{"name":"Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics : CQ : the international journal of healthcare ethics committees","volume":" ","pages":"124-8"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2014-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1017/S0963180113000650","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"32089039","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 2

Time, rationality, and human existence. 时间、理性和人的存在。

IF 1.8

Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics : CQ : the international journal of healthcare ethics committees Pub Date : 2014-01-01 Epub Date: 2013-10-22 DOI: 10.1017/S096318011300039X

Heta Aleksandra Gylling

引用次数: 0