Animal minds and neuroimaging--bridging the gap between science and ethics?

IF 2.3
Tom Buller
{"title":"Animal minds and neuroimaging--bridging the gap between science and ethics?","authors":"Tom Buller","doi":"10.1017/S0963180113000704","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>As Colin Allen has argued, discussions between science and ethics about the mentality and moral status of nonhuman animals often stall on account of the fact that the properties that ethics presents as evidence of animal mentality and moral status, namely consciousness and sentience, are not observable \"scientifically respectable\" properties. In order to further discussion between science and ethics, it seems, therefore, that we need to identify properties that would satisfy both domains. In this article I examine the mentality and moral status of nonhuman animals from the perspective of neuroethics. By adopting this perspective, we can see how advances in neuroimaging regarding (1) research into the neurobiology of pain, (2) \"brain reading,\" and (3) the minimally conscious state may enable us to identify properties that help bridge the gap between science and ethics, and hence help further the debate about the mentality and moral status of nonhuman animals. </p>","PeriodicalId":520577,"journal":{"name":"Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics : CQ : the international journal of healthcare ethics committees","volume":" ","pages":"173-81"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2014-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1017/S0963180113000704","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics : CQ : the international journal of healthcare ethics committees","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0963180113000704","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2014/2/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

As Colin Allen has argued, discussions between science and ethics about the mentality and moral status of nonhuman animals often stall on account of the fact that the properties that ethics presents as evidence of animal mentality and moral status, namely consciousness and sentience, are not observable "scientifically respectable" properties. In order to further discussion between science and ethics, it seems, therefore, that we need to identify properties that would satisfy both domains. In this article I examine the mentality and moral status of nonhuman animals from the perspective of neuroethics. By adopting this perspective, we can see how advances in neuroimaging regarding (1) research into the neurobiology of pain, (2) "brain reading," and (3) the minimally conscious state may enable us to identify properties that help bridge the gap between science and ethics, and hence help further the debate about the mentality and moral status of nonhuman animals.

动物思维和神经成像——弥合科学与伦理之间的鸿沟?
正如科林·艾伦(Colin Allen)所指出的那样,科学和伦理学之间关于非人类动物的心理和道德地位的讨论常常陷入僵局,因为伦理学作为动物心理和道德地位的证据而提出的属性,即意识和感知,并不是可观察到的“科学上值得尊敬的”属性。因此,为了在科学和伦理之间进行进一步的讨论,我们似乎需要确定同时满足这两个领域的属性。在这篇文章中,我从神经伦理学的角度审视了非人类动物的心理和道德地位。通过采用这种观点,我们可以看到神经成像在以下方面的进展:(1)对疼痛的神经生物学研究(2)“读脑”和(3)最低意识状态可能使我们能够识别有助于弥合科学与伦理之间鸿沟的属性,从而有助于进一步讨论关于非人类动物的心理和道德地位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书