Alternatives to laboratory animals : ATLA最新文献_第4页

A general approach for evaluating stepwise testing strategies. 评估逐步测试策略的一般方法。

IF 2.7

Alternatives to laboratory animals : ATLA Pub Date : 1999-01-01 DOI: 10.1177/026119299902700115

A P Worth, J H Fentem

{"title":"A general approach for evaluating stepwise testing strategies.","authors":"A P Worth, J H Fentem","doi":"10.1177/026119299902700115","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/026119299902700115","url":null,"abstract":"A stepwise (hierarchical) testing strategy is an approach to hazard evaluation based on the sequential application of one or more alternative methods prior to the use of any animal tests which are considered necessary. The purpose of a stepwise testing strategy is to reduce and refine the use of animals in toxicity testing without compromising human safety. An example of such a strategy is the proposed OECD testing and evaluation strategy for eye irritation/corrosion (1), which is based on a proposal made at the OECD Workshop on Harmonization of Validation and Acceptance Criteria for Alternative Toxicological Test Methods, held in Solna, Sweden, in January 1996 (2). A common motif in recent proposals for stepwise testing strategies (including the proposed OECD testing strategy for eye irritation/corrosion) is the sequential application of three steps based on alternative methods. These steps are based on the use of: a) structure-activity relationships (SARs), where available; b) physicochemical methods (for example, measurements of pH [acidity/alkalinity] and acid/alkali reserve [buffering capacity]); and c) in vitro tests (Figure 1). The basic principle is that these steps will be applied in sequence before any animal tests are conducted. If any one of the alternative methods predicts the chemical of interest to be toxic, a classification is assigned and testing is stopped. Otherwise, testing continues to the next step. The purpose of the tiered approach is that toxic chemicals will be screened out by the alternative methods, so that the animal test(s) conducted in the final step will merely confirm the predictions of non-toxicity made in previous steps. In this way, the tiered approach is expected to reduce and refine the use of animals in toxicity testing. The purpose of this study was to illustrate a general approach to the evaluation of stepwise testing strategies by focusing on the basic design described above. Thus, the three steps (SAR, physicochemical and in vitro) were applied both on their own and as a sequence (Figure 1) to the chemicals used in the European Commission/ British Home Office (EC/HO) validation study (3). There was a need to compare the predictivities of nine in vitro tests, but there were no prediction models (PMs) available for converting the in vitro test results into predictions of eye irritation potential (irritant [I]/non-irritant [NI]). Therefore, a method was devised (which we have termed the “percentile method”) for deriving PMs which would be of comparable sensitivity, but which would be distinguishable in terms of their specificities (or false positive rates). A similar approach for evaluating stepwise testing strategies has also been applied to the proposed OECD testing strategy for skin corrosion (4).","PeriodicalId":520549,"journal":{"name":"Alternatives to laboratory animals : ATLA","volume":" ","pages":"161-77"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"1999-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/026119299902700115","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"32836431","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 18