{"title":"A systematic analysis of disability inclusion in domestic climate policies.","authors":"Sébastien Jodoin, Amanda Bowie-Edwards, Katherine Lofts, Sajneet Mangat, Bianca Adjei, Alexandra Lesnikowski","doi":"10.1038/s44168-025-00228-3","DOIUrl":"10.1038/s44168-025-00228-3","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We provide the first systematic analysis of whether, how, and to what extent people with disabilities and their human rights are included in two subsets of climate policies adopted by 195 parties to the Paris Agreement. We found that only 41 parties mention people with disabilities in their nationally determined contributions (NDCs), whereas only 75 do so in their adaptation policies. Moreover, these references are rarely accompanied by concrete measures to include people with disabilities, their rights, or their knowledge in climate decision-making. Our findings demonstrate that states are generally not abiding by their obligations to respect, protect, and fulfill the human rights of persons with disabilities under international and domestic law. This exposes people with disabilities to climate-related harm and reinforces, rather than disrupts, the inequities they face in societies around the world. It also fails to harness the multiple benefits associated with a disability-inclusive approach to climate action.</p>","PeriodicalId":519998,"journal":{"name":"npj climate action","volume":"4 1","pages":"24"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11876069/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143568852","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
npj climate actionPub Date : 2025-01-01Epub Date: 2025-03-29DOI: 10.1038/s44168-025-00212-x
Sarah Elven, Jorge Luis Castañeda Núñez, Samantha de Martino, Michelle Dugas, Sayan Kundu
{"title":"Behavioral savings sessions increase the pursuit of solar products among refugees in Uganda.","authors":"Sarah Elven, Jorge Luis Castañeda Núñez, Samantha de Martino, Michelle Dugas, Sayan Kundu","doi":"10.1038/s44168-025-00212-x","DOIUrl":"10.1038/s44168-025-00212-x","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>De facto exclusion of vulnerable populations from markets for energy-efficient technologies can result in multiple barriers to access. For example, exclusion can lead to limited knowledge about available products, an inability to distinguish high-quality from low-quality devices, and limited options for financing, making products seem unobtainable. However, behaviorally informed interventions can offer promising solutions in such contexts, even where exclusion is the result of structural causes. This paper uses a randomized control trial to consider the potential of such interventions for refugees in Uganda in the context of certified solar markets. We evaluate a behaviorally-informed information and savings session embedded in Village Savings and Lending Association (VSLA) meetings, finding evidence for increased pursuit of certified solar products in the treatment group two months later. Results manifest through the barriers described, with increased knowledge, trust in solar companies, financial inclusion through savings group support, and aspirations mediating effects.</p>","PeriodicalId":519998,"journal":{"name":"npj climate action","volume":"4 1","pages":"32"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11954683/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143757514","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
npj climate actionPub Date : 2025-01-01Epub Date: 2025-05-08DOI: 10.1038/s44168-025-00251-4
Boryana Todorova, David Steyrl, Matthew J Hornsey, Samuel Pearson, Cameron Brick, Florian Lange, Jay J Van Bavel, Madalina Vlasceanu, Claus Lamm, Kimberly C Doell
{"title":"Machine learning identifies key individual and nation-level factors predicting climate-relevant beliefs and behaviors.","authors":"Boryana Todorova, David Steyrl, Matthew J Hornsey, Samuel Pearson, Cameron Brick, Florian Lange, Jay J Van Bavel, Madalina Vlasceanu, Claus Lamm, Kimberly C Doell","doi":"10.1038/s44168-025-00251-4","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s44168-025-00251-4","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>While numerous studies have examined factors associated with climate-friendly beliefs and behaviors, a systematic, cross-national ranking of their key correlates is lacking. We use interpretable machine learning to quantify the extent to which different climate-relevant outcomes (climate change belief, policy support, willingness to share information on social media, and a pro-environmental behavioral task) are predictable and to rank 19 individual- and nation-level predictors in terms of their importance across 55 countries (<i>N</i> = 4635). We find notable differences in explained variance for the outcomes (e.g., 57% for climate change belief vs. 10% for pro-environmental behavior). Four predictors had consistent effects across all outcomes: environmentalist identity, trust in climate science, internal environmental motivation, and the Human Development Index. However, most of the predictors show divergent patterns, predicting some but not all outcomes or even having opposite effects. To better capture this complexity, future models should include multi-level factors and consider the different contexts (e.g., public vs private) in which climate-related cognition and action emerge.</p>","PeriodicalId":519998,"journal":{"name":"npj climate action","volume":"4 1","pages":"46"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12061775/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144061164","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
npj climate actionPub Date : 2025-01-01Epub Date: 2025-02-14DOI: 10.1038/s44168-024-00206-1
Simon Montfort, Lukas Fesenfeld, Karin Ingold, William F Lamb, Marina Andrijevic
{"title":"Political enablers of ambitious climate policies: a framework and thematic review.","authors":"Simon Montfort, Lukas Fesenfeld, Karin Ingold, William F Lamb, Marina Andrijevic","doi":"10.1038/s44168-024-00206-1","DOIUrl":"10.1038/s44168-024-00206-1","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Currently, most research explaining why countries lead or lag in climate policy assumes a problem-oriented perspective, focusing on barriers to climate policy adoption. Here, we argue that correcting for past failures, solving problems, and bringing climate policies back on track for the Paris Agreement requires a solution-oriented perspective on the political enablers of ambitious climate policies. We unite a growing research community that has previously been scattered across disciplinary subfields with various ontological and epistemological assumptions. Rooted in a thematic review of the scientific literature, we introduce a framework with a typology of six political enablers for ambitious climate policy at its core. For each enabler, we summarize key policy implications. We illustrate our framework with a case study on the adoption of emission trading systems in the transport and building sectors in Germany and the European Union (EU) allowing future solution-oriented research to build on our effort.</p>","PeriodicalId":519998,"journal":{"name":"npj climate action","volume":"4 1","pages":"14"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11828736/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143434804","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
npj climate actionPub Date : 2025-01-01Epub Date: 2025-04-26DOI: 10.1038/s44168-025-00246-1
Hannes Bluhm, Daniela Wohlschlager, Johanna Pohl, Severin Beucker, Jan Bieser, Daniel Schien, Kelly Widdicks, Adrian Friday, Gordon Shaw Blair
{"title":"Understanding digitalization's environmental impact: why LCA is essential for informed decision-making.","authors":"Hannes Bluhm, Daniela Wohlschlager, Johanna Pohl, Severin Beucker, Jan Bieser, Daniel Schien, Kelly Widdicks, Adrian Friday, Gordon Shaw Blair","doi":"10.1038/s44168-025-00246-1","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s44168-025-00246-1","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This comment critiques Gritsenko et al.'s dismissal of environmental assessments such as Life Cycle Analysis (LCA) in analyzing digitalization's environmental impacts. While acknowledging the need for action amidst uncertainty, we argue that LCA yet provides valuable insights into potential impacts, trade-offs, and areas to focus on in a supply chain. Especially in the rapidly evolving digital landscape, LCA helps manage decision-makers' uncertainty and informs targeted measures for sustainable digital infrastructure deployment and use.</p>","PeriodicalId":519998,"journal":{"name":"npj climate action","volume":"4 1","pages":"41"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12033082/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144059762","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
npj climate actionPub Date : 2025-01-01Epub Date: 2025-02-25DOI: 10.1038/s44168-025-00215-8
Markus Leippold, Saeid Ashraf Vaghefi, Dominik Stammbach, Veruska Muccione, Julia Bingler, Jingwei Ni, Chiara Colesanti Senni, Tobias Wekhof, Tobias Schimanski, Glen Gostlow, Tingyu Yu, Juerg Luterbacher, Christian Huggel
{"title":"Automated fact-checking of climate claims with large language models.","authors":"Markus Leippold, Saeid Ashraf Vaghefi, Dominik Stammbach, Veruska Muccione, Julia Bingler, Jingwei Ni, Chiara Colesanti Senni, Tobias Wekhof, Tobias Schimanski, Glen Gostlow, Tingyu Yu, Juerg Luterbacher, Christian Huggel","doi":"10.1038/s44168-025-00215-8","DOIUrl":"10.1038/s44168-025-00215-8","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Accurate identification of true versus false climate information in the digital age is critical. Misinformation can significantly affect public understanding and policymaking. Automated fact-checking seeks to validate claims against trustworthy factual data. This study tackles the challenge of fact-checking climate claims by leveraging the currently most capable Large Language Models (LLMs). To this end, we introduce Climinator, an acronym for CLImate Mediator for INformed Analysis and Transparent Objective Reasoning. It significantly boosts the performance of automated fact-checking by integrating authoritative, up-to-date sources within a novel debating framework. This framework provides a trustworthy and context-aware analysis incorporating multiple scientific viewpoints. Climinator helps identify misinformation in real time and facilitates informed dialog on climate change, highlighting AI's role in environmental discussions and policy with reliable data.</p>","PeriodicalId":519998,"journal":{"name":"npj climate action","volume":"4 1","pages":"17"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11860206/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143525984","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
npj climate actionPub Date : 2025-01-01Epub Date: 2025-03-24DOI: 10.1038/s44168-025-00236-3
Beatrice Magistro, Ramit Debnath, Paul O Wennberg, R Michael Alvarez
{"title":"Partisanship overcomes framing in shaping solar geoengineering perceptions: Evidence from a conjoint experiment.","authors":"Beatrice Magistro, Ramit Debnath, Paul O Wennberg, R Michael Alvarez","doi":"10.1038/s44168-025-00236-3","DOIUrl":"10.1038/s44168-025-00236-3","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The discourse on solar geoengineering (SG) is evolving, yet public perceptions of SG as a climate change solution remain underexplored, especially in the polarized US political landscape. We examine the relative importance of different SG narratives-framed as complementary, substitutive, or posing a moral hazard-and partisan information sources in shaping public attitudes. Using a conjoint experiment with 2123 American voters, we find that partisan alignment with the information source plays a decisive role in shaping trust in the messenger and support for SG, overshadowing any impact of message framing. Both Democrats and Republicans are more likely to trust the messenger and support SG when the information comes from a copartisan source. However, despite these strong partisan influences, policy preferences remain consistent with ideological baselines. These findings highlight the importance of partisanship in shaping perceptions of emerging climate technologies such as SG, even in contexts of low public awareness, and underscore the challenges of depolarizing public discourse on climate change solutions.</p>","PeriodicalId":519998,"journal":{"name":"npj climate action","volume":"4 1","pages":"29"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11932920/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143723086","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}