All Azimuth-A Journal of Foreign Policy and Peace最新文献_第3页

A Government Devoid of Strong Leadership: A Neoclassical Realist Explanation of Turkey’s Iraq War Decision in 2003 缺乏强有力领导的政府:2003年土耳其伊拉克战争决定的新古典现实主义解释

IF 1

All Azimuth-A Journal of Foreign Policy and Peace Pub Date : 2021-07-16 DOI: 10.20991/allazimuth.960684

Samet Yilmaz

引用次数: 2

Hedging as a Survival Strategy for Small States: The Case of Kuwait 作为小国生存战略的对冲:科威特的案例

IF 1

All Azimuth-A Journal of Foreign Policy and Peace Pub Date : 2021-07-12 DOI: 10.20991/allazimuth.960945

I. Telci, Mehmet Rakipoglu

引用次数: 1

Exogenous Dynamics and Leadership Traits: A Study of Change in the Personality Traits of Recep Tayyip Erdoğan 外生动力与领导特质:雷杰普·塔伊普人格特质变化研究Erdoğan

IF 1

All Azimuth-A Journal of Foreign Policy and Peace Pub Date : 2021-07-02 DOI: 10.20991/allazimuth.956105

Ibrahim Efe, A. Balcı

引用次数: 1

Towards Guanxi? Reconciling the “Relational Turn” in Western and Chinese International Relations Scholarship 对“关系”?调和中西方国际关系学术中的“关系转向”

IF 1

All Azimuth-A Journal of Foreign Policy and Peace Pub Date : 2021-06-25 DOI: 10.20991/allazimuth.952841

Siyang Liu, Jeremy Garlick, F. Qin

引用次数: 1

The Interactions of International Relations: Racism, Colonialism, Producer-Centred Research 国际关系的互动:种族主义、殖民主义、生产者中心研究

IF 1

All Azimuth-A Journal of Foreign Policy and Peace Pub Date : 2021-06-24 DOI: 10.20991/allazimuth.952743

Deep K. Datta-Ray

引用次数: 1

Alternatives to the State: Or, Why a Non-Western IR Must Be a Revolutionary Science 国家的替代品:或者，为什么非西方的国际关系必须是一门革命性的科学

IF 1

All Azimuth-A Journal of Foreign Policy and Peace Pub Date : 2020-06-10 DOI: 10.20991/allazimuth.747068

Erik Ringmar

引用次数: 5

Dialogue of the “Globals”: Connecting Global IR to Global Intellectual History “全球”对话:将全球国际关系与全球思想史联系起来

IF 1

All Azimuth-A Journal of Foreign Policy and Peace Pub Date : 2020-05-11 DOI: 10.20991/allazimuth.730127

Deniz Kuru

{"title":"Dialogue of the “Globals”: Connecting Global IR to Global Intellectual History","authors":"Deniz Kuru","doi":"10.20991/allazimuth.730127","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.20991/allazimuth.730127","url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to provide an exploratory analysis of Global IR, by pointing to its novelty as a tool for expanding our disciplinary frameworks, and furthermore, by connecting it to the quite simultaneously emerging field of Global Intellectual History. Such an approach enables a more comprehensive understanding of the dynamics that have led to an overall focus on the “global.” The first part elaborates how the idea of Global IR has emerged as a novel disciplinary tool, and pinpoints the various meanings it has gained. Second, the focus shifts to the novel scholarship of Global Intellectual History. Elaborating this field’s most significant contributions will make it possible to emphasize the useful role it can play in furthering the idea of Global IR in a more historically (self-)conscious manner. The importance of this approach will also be underlined by referring to the increased relevance of disciplinary critique in the specific context of IR-history (dis)connections. The third part turns its attention to various cases (as vignettes) that aim to visualize how connecting these two new “Globals” (i.e. Global IR and Global Intellectual History) could provide the discipline of IR with a better means to deal with the past and present of global politics. Therefore, by explaining the conceptual, ideational, and geo-epistemological divergences and commonalities whose roots can be more concretely studied through a broader engagement with Global Intellectual History, the article clarifies the advantages of this “inter-Global” connection. It concludes by discussing the value of Global IR in terms of its potential role for broadening the discipline not just in ways that are more (IR-)introspective but also in its bridge-building capacity to other fields with similar concerns, extending to Global Intellectual History and beyond, and provides a brief list of initial suggestions.","PeriodicalId":51976,"journal":{"name":"All Azimuth-A Journal of Foreign Policy and Peace","volume":"13 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2020-05-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"89802648","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 2

Widening the ‘Global Conversation’: Highlighting the Voices of IPE in the Global South 扩大“全球对话”:强调国际政治经济学在全球南方的声音

IF 1

All Azimuth-A Journal of Foreign Policy and Peace Pub Date : 2020-05-10 DOI: 10.20991/allazimuth.726271

Melisa Deciancio, C. Quiliconi

引用次数: 4

The Chinese School, Global Production of Knowledge, and Contentious Politics in the Disciplinary IR 中国学派、知识的全球生产和学科关系中的争议政治

IF 1

All Azimuth-A Journal of Foreign Policy and Peace Pub Date : 2020-05-06 DOI: 10.20991/allazimuth.725252

Yongjin Zhang

{"title":"The Chinese School, Global Production of Knowledge, and Contentious Politics in the Disciplinary IR","authors":"Yongjin Zhang","doi":"10.20991/allazimuth.725252","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.20991/allazimuth.725252","url":null,"abstract":"Chinese studies of International Relations constitute today an integral part of the claim of IR as a global discipline. This paper starts by providing a critical evaluation of the contribution made by the so-called ‘Chinese School of IR’ to the global production of knowledge. Against this background, it teases out a curious case of ‘schools of IR’ as commonly labelled in the global IR theoretical conversation and looks at how such labels have been used by the ‘core’ to create a parallel but explicitly inferior universe of knowledge production to localize theoretical noises from the ‘peripheries’. Situating the Chinese School of IR in such global context, it considers how ‘school’ label has been proactively appropriated by Chinese scholars to engage in a purposely contentious politics in the disciplinary IR, which questions the claim of the American ‘core’ as the creator, depositor, and distributor of universal knowledge, and seeks to unveil the geo-historical linkage between the political and the epistemic. School labelling therefore matters, it is argued, because it has become a site of contestation of geopolitics of knowledge and reflects the perils and promises in our collective pursuit of constructing a truly global IR.","PeriodicalId":51976,"journal":{"name":"All Azimuth-A Journal of Foreign Policy and Peace","volume":"90 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2020-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"84311594","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 2

The Idea of Dialogue of Civilizations and Core-Periphery Dialogue in International Relations 文明对话理念与国际关系中的核心与边缘对话

IF 1

All Azimuth-A Journal of Foreign Policy and Peace Pub Date : 2020-05-04 DOI: 10.20991/allazimuth.725234

H. Moshirzadeh

{"title":"The Idea of Dialogue of Civilizations and Core-Periphery Dialogue in International Relations","authors":"H. Moshirzadeh","doi":"10.20991/allazimuth.725234","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.20991/allazimuth.725234","url":null,"abstract":"The idea of dialogue of civilizations, as was envisaged in the late 1990s and early 2000s, includes multi-layer, multi-actor dialogues. Civilization, when defined as “correspondence between material conditions of existence and intersubjective meanings,” has epistemological and ontological elements that constitute the parameters of knowledge. One may easily claim that the existing knowledge of international relations has its roots in Western civilization and, if it is to become a truly global body of knowledge, it has to be nourished by contributions from various civilizations, mostly belonging to the “periphery”. Yet, even this is not enough if we just reach an archipelago consisting of various islands of knowledge without a connection to each other. What may help bridging these islands is dialogue. Dialogues among IR scholars from different civilizational backgrounds may lead to more mutual understanding and even may lead to some common grounds found in-between. Dialogues can be conducted both at inter-civilizational and intra-civilizational levels as civilizations cannot be taken as monolithic wholes. This article seeks to clarify the meaning and implications of dialogue of civilizations in IR. Furthermore, the way in which dialogue of civilizations in the discipline can be conducted and the expectations thereof are discussed.","PeriodicalId":51976,"journal":{"name":"All Azimuth-A Journal of Foreign Policy and Peace","volume":"19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2020-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"78825061","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0