Cultural Studies Review最新文献_第9页

Questions of Address: For Meaghan Morris 致词问题:向梅根·莫里斯提问

Cultural Studies Review Pub Date : 2018-11-15 DOI: 10.5130/CSR.V24I1.5958

J. Frow

{"title":"Questions of Address: For Meaghan Morris","authors":"J. Frow","doi":"10.5130/CSR.V24I1.5958","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5130/CSR.V24I1.5958","url":null,"abstract":"In beginning to prepare this tribute to Meaghan Morris’s work I went to the bulging folder that contains the letters and postcards and draft papers she sent me over a period of about twenty years, from the early 1980s to the early 2000s (more recently we’ve communicated almost entirely by email). One of the things that strikes me, looking through these pages with their typewritten text full of crossings-out and handwritten marginalia, is the enormous care Meaghan gives to her intellectual relationships, in my case with someone she didn’t know all that well, who lived on the other side of the country, and with whom there were significant points of intellectual difference. One of the letters I’m going to quote from is ten closely typed pages long, and to write it she would first have to have read, closely and carefully, a dense and abstruse paper of mine, set in what looks like 8-point font and to me today almost unreadable. Now consider that I was just one of Meaghan’s correspondents. I don’t know how many people received letters like this from her, but I’m pretty sure she had ongoing written conversations with a number of other people in Australia and elsewhere. Meaghan was and is a teacher: she takes intellectual debate as seriously as anyone I’ve ever known, and she conducts it with care, with tact, and with passion.","PeriodicalId":51871,"journal":{"name":"Cultural Studies Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"90962341","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Towards an Ethic of Reciprocity: The Messy Business of Co-creating Research with Voices from the Archive 走向互惠的伦理:与档案中的声音共同创造研究的混乱事务

Cultural Studies Review Pub Date : 2018-10-10 DOI: 10.5130/CSR.V24I2.5896

Rebecca Mclaughlan

{"title":"Towards an Ethic of Reciprocity: The Messy Business of Co-creating Research with Voices from the Archive","authors":"Rebecca Mclaughlan","doi":"10.5130/CSR.V24I2.5896","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5130/CSR.V24I2.5896","url":null,"abstract":"Do contemporary practices of attribution go far enough in acknowledging the contribution that others make to our work, particularly when they speak from the archive? The autobiographical fiction Faces in the Water (1961) from acclaimed author Janet Frame (1924-2004) draws on her experiences of residing in various New Zealand mental hospitals between 1945 and 1953. It is a rare and comprehensive account of the patient experience of these institutions that provided a critical lens for my doctoral research. Perhaps more importantly, through this text Frame taught me how difficult histories should be written, about the ambiguities we must accept and the value adjustments to be made in order to make sense of confounding inhumanity. Nowhere within my dissertation is the depth of this contribution acknowledged; a position developed out of respect for her family’s active opposition to the ‘patronising’ and ‘pathologising discourse’ that continues to haunt contemporary receptions of Frame’s work. Within this paper I employ autoethnography to make explicit the process of working through a question that haunted me well beyond the completion of my doctoral research: whether contemporary practices of citation and acknowledgement are sufficient to value research contributions from beyond the grave. I will examine whether Frame’s contribution is commensurate with contemporary qualifications for co-authorship and the burdens of academic practice that act to suppress these conversations.","PeriodicalId":51871,"journal":{"name":"Cultural Studies Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"86876133","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 3

Unearthing the Optics of War 发掘战争的光学

Cultural Studies Review Pub Date : 2018-10-10 DOI: 10.5130/CSR.V24I2.6317

Peter Hobbins

引用次数: 0

A history of the convergence of ethnography, cultural studies and digital media 民族志、文化研究和数字媒体融合的历史

Cultural Studies Review Pub Date : 2018-10-10 DOI: 10.5130/CSR.V24I2.6316

Jolynna Sinanan

引用次数: 1

Trump Studies: The Double Refusal And Silent Majorities In Theoretical Times 特朗普研究:理论时代的双重拒绝和沉默的大多数

Cultural Studies Review Pub Date : 2018-10-10 DOI: 10.5130/CSR.V24I2.5628

T. Brabazon, S. Redhead, Runyararo Sihle Chivaura