Avian diseases最新文献

{"title":"Cover Advertisements","authors":"","doi":"10.1637/1938-4351-67.4.c2","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1637/1938-4351-67.4.c2","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":516846,"journal":{"name":"Avian diseases","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140486552","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"West Nile Virus Infection in a Pekin Duck ( <i>Anas platyrhynchos domesticus</i> ) Developer Flock.","authors":"Richard M Fulton","doi":"10.1637/aviandiseases-D-23-00055","DOIUrl":"10.1637/aviandiseases-D-23-00055","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Developer ducks are ducks being reared for breeding. Like breeder candidate chickens, they are raised with appropriate light and feed programs. A commercial Pekin duck (<i>Anas platyrhynchos domesticus</i>) developer flock experienced an extraordinary, elevated mortality event at 6 wk of age. Weekly mortality rate that week was 162 ducklings out of a flock of 6420 (2.5%). Mortality jumped to 988 (15.4%) ducklings the next week. On first elevated mortality, six dead ducks from that flock were submitted for diagnostic investigation at Michigan State University Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory. Myocarditis, pale striping or diffuse pallor of the epicardium, was grossly evident in five of the six submitted ducklings. All of the ducklings had hydropericardium, three had ascites, and three had congested meninges. Histology confirmed myocarditis with myocardial necrosis. Cerebrum and brainstem had lymphocytic vasculitis with rare neuronal necrosis in affected areas, as well as Purkinje cells in the cerebellum. West Nile virus was confirmed by PCR the day after submittal and by immunohistochemistry soon thereafter.</p>","PeriodicalId":516846,"journal":{"name":"Avian diseases","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139652543","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Elucidating the Varying Impact of Necrotic Enteritis Using Performance and Health Indicators in Broiler Infection Models.","authors":"S A S van der Klein, C Evans, J L M Marchal, K Gibbs","doi":"10.1637/aviandiseases-D-23-00048","DOIUrl":"10.1637/aviandiseases-D-23-00048","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Necrotic enteritis (NE) continues to be a significant burden to the poultry industry, compounded by pressure to reduce antibiotic use. Researchers use NE-challenge models to study the infection biology of NE and as screening tools to develop potential novel interventions. Currently, data are limited comparing such models between research establishments, and few indicate which quantitative metrics provide the most accurate measure for determining the efficacy of interventions. We compared data from 10 independent NE-challenge trials incorporating six challenge models employed in four geographical regions to determine the extent of variability in bird responses and to determine, using principal component analysis (PCA), which variables discriminated most effectively between nonchallenged control (NC) and challenged control (CC) groups. Response variables related to growth performance (weight gain, feed intake, feed conversion), health (mortality, lesion scores, NE induction rate), and, in three trials only, gut integrity (tight junction protein claudin-1, claudin-2, and zonula occludens-1 expression, coccidia counts, and intestinal permeability [assessed by FITC-dextran assay]). Treatments included a CC, which varied between trials (for example, in <i>Eimeria</i> predisposition, <i>Clostridium perfringens</i> strain, and days of inoculation), and a NC. The degree of response to challenge in CC birds varied significantly among models and trials. In all trials, lesion scores 1 to 4 days postchallenge were increased in CC <i>vs.</i> NC birds and varied both within and among models (by 0.29-1.17 points and 0.05-2.50 points, respectively). In addition, NE-related mortality at day 28 was increased in CC <i>vs.</i> NC, both within and among models (by 1.79%-4.72% and 0.02%-16.70%, respectively), and final (day 35 or 42) body weight was reduced by 3.9%-14.4% and overall FCR increased by up to 27% across trials (<i>P</i> , 0.05). A PCA on the combined dataset including only performance indicators failed to adequately differentiate NC and CC groups. However, the combination of performance and gut integrity variables and standardization of data by trial and phase achieved greater resolution between groups. This indicated that the inclusion of both types of variables in future NE-challenge studies would enable the generation of more robust predictions about intervention efficacy from different types of infection models. A final PCA based on a subset of key indicator variables, including body weight, feed intake, feed conversion ratio, mortality, and lesion score, achieved a good level of separation between NC and CC status of birds and could, with further research, be a useful supplement to existing approaches for assessing and predicting the NE status of birds in the field.</p>","PeriodicalId":516846,"journal":{"name":"Avian diseases","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139652538","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Early Detection of Histomoniasis in Blood Samples by PCR and Sequencing.","authors":"Vijay Durairaj, Emily Barber, Ryan Vander Veen","doi":"10.1637/aviandiseases-D-23-00026","DOIUrl":"10.1637/aviandiseases-D-23-00026","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Histomoniasis is a deadly disease of turkeys causing devastating economic losses to the poultry industry. In field outbreaks, a presumptive diagnosis is made based on gross pathology lesions and confirmed by histopathology. An early detection tool with quick turnaround time is needed to prevent the spread of histomoniasis. With this objective, two studies were conducted in turkeys. In Study 1, 40 poults were housed in two pens (20 poults/pen) and challenged at 14 days of age with <i>Histomonas meleagridis</i> by intracloacal route. Blood samples were collected 4 days postchallenge. Fifty-five percent (22/40) of the blood samples tested positive for <i>H. meleagridis</i> based on PCR using primers targeted against the 18S rRNA gene and confirmed by sequencing. In Study 2, 40 poults were housed in two groups and raised in floor pens. Groups 1 and 2 served as negative and challenge controls, respectively. At 14 days of age, the birds in Group 2 were challenged with <i>H. meleagridis</i> by intracloacal route. Blood samples were collected 2 days postchallenge. Five percent (1/20) of the blood samples tested positive for <i>H. meleagridis</i>, based on PCR and confirmed by sequencing. The results from both studies indicate that <i>H. meleagridis</i> DNA can be detected in the blood samples by PCR and confirmed by sequencing as early as 4 days postchallenge. This early detection method could be applied in field outbreaks to detect and confirm histomoniasis as early as possible.</p>","PeriodicalId":516846,"journal":{"name":"Avian diseases","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139652537","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Pros and Cons on Use of Live Viral Vaccines in Commercial Chicken Flocks.","authors":"Kannan Ganapathy, Sivamurthy Parthiban","doi":"10.1637/aviandiseases-D-23-99998","DOIUrl":"10.1637/aviandiseases-D-23-99998","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The poultry industry is the largest source of meat and eggs for the growing human population worldwide. Key concerns in poultry farming are nutrition, management, flock health, and biosecurity measures. As part of the flock health, use of live viral vaccines plays a vital role in the prevention of economically important and common viral diseases. This includes diseases and production losses caused by Newcastle disease virus, infectious bronchitis virus, infectious laryngotracheitis virus, infectious bursal disease virus, Marek's disease virus, chicken infectious anemia virus, avian encephalomyelitis virus, fowlpox virus, and avian metapneumovirus. These viruses cause direct and indirect harms, such as financial losses worth millions of dollars, loss of protein sources, and threats to animal welfare. Flock losses vary by type of poultry, age of affected animals, co-infections, immune status, and environmental factors. Losses in broiler birds can consist of high mortality, poor body weight gain, high feed conversion ratio, and increased carcass condemnation. In commercial layers and breeder flocks, losses include higher than normal mortality rate, poor flock uniformity, drops in egg production and quality, poor hatchability, and poor day-old-chick quality. Despite the emergence of technology-based vaccines, such as inactivated, subunit, vector-based, DNA or RNA, and others, the attenuated live vaccines remain as important as before. Live vaccines are preferred in the global veterinary vaccine market, accounting for 24.3% of the global market share in 2022. The remaining 75% includes inactivated, DNA, subunit, conjugate, recombinant, and toxoid vaccines. The main reason for this is that live vaccines can induce innate, mucosal, cellular, and humoral immunities by single or multiple applications. Some live vaccine combinations provide higher and broader protection against several diseases or strains of viruses. This review aimed to explore insights on the pros and cons of attenuated live vaccines commonly used against major viral infections of the global chicken industry, and the future road map for improvement.</p>","PeriodicalId":516846,"journal":{"name":"Avian diseases","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139652540","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Development and Licensing of Avian Vaccines - Perspective from the Vaccine Industry.","authors":"Frédéric Descamps, Rebecca Grieve, Mahesh Kumar, Gregory Nitzel, Sara Rodenberg, Ellen Snellings, Roni Thebo","doi":"10.1637/aviandiseases-D-23-99999","DOIUrl":"10.1637/aviandiseases-D-23-99999","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Veterinary vaccines need to be authorized by relevant authorities before they can be used in the field. This paper briefly describes the development and authorization process of vaccines. It also highlights important regulatory trends, challenges and opportunities from the veterinary vaccine industry standpoint in EU, US, Asia and Latin America, with a specific focus on avian vaccines' relevant topics.</p>","PeriodicalId":516846,"journal":{"name":"Avian diseases","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139652536","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Note from Editor.","authors":"","doi":"10.1637/1938-4351-67.4.297","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1637/1938-4351-67.4.297","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":516846,"journal":{"name":"Avian diseases","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139652539","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Retrospective Broiler Health Survey: Scope, Parameters, and Overall Trends.","authors":"Hector M Cervantes, Lynne Billard, Gene M Pesti","doi":"10.1637/aviandiseases-D-23-00056","DOIUrl":"10.1637/aviandiseases-D-23-00056","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A retrospective analysis encompassing 18 yr (1999-2016) of broiler chicken health surveys from broiler production complexes throughout the United States was conducted to identify trends and areas of opportunity. The analysis used necropsy data from 19,577 broiler chickens considered to be \"healthy\" or \"clinically normal\" by visual assessment. The very low incidence of dehydrated (0.01%) or undersized (0.02%) broilers is evidence that the objective of examining \"healthy\" birds was achieved. The results of the correlation analysis were what was expected for \"healthy\" broilers, with these birds having positive correlations with skin color and size of the bursa of Fabricius. The average age of broilers included in this analysis ranged from 26.2 days in 2008 to 33.7 days in 2013. The percentage of \"normal\" broilers (those without visible lesions or abnormalities) varied from 5.63% in 2012 to 28.33% in 1999. The results of this study identified four areas of opportunity for improving poultry health: 1) coccidiosis, 2) oral lesions and gizzard erosions, 3) retained yolks, and 4) pododermatitis.</p>","PeriodicalId":516846,"journal":{"name":"Avian diseases","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139652541","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Veterinary Autogenous Vaccines for Poultry in Europe-Many Ways to Crack an Egg.","authors":"Tarik Sulejmanovic, Jana Schnug, Hans-Christian Philipp","doi":"10.1637/aviandiseases-D-23-99991","DOIUrl":"10.1637/aviandiseases-D-23-99991","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In the past decade, European animal farming has increasingly used autogenous vaccines for the prevention of nonnotifiable diseases. In Europe, these vaccines are exclusively inactivated bacterial and viral vaccines, with a set of specific regulations that differentiate them from conventional vaccines. The highest number of applications most likely occurs in poultry, as these animal species are farmed in the highest numbers compared with other types of food-producing animals. In 2019, autogenous vaccines came within the scope of harmonized European regulation for the first time, although many important aspects are still missing and need to be further developed. Consequently, several important legal provisions remain in national legislations and can vary tremendously between different member states of the European Union. The inclusion of autogenous vaccines in the management of certain diseases of poultry is justified by the nonavailability of licensed vaccines and the evolution and diversity of antigens in the field that are not covered by licensed vaccines. In addition, these vaccines aid in reducing the use of antibiotics. The methods for isolating and typing pathogenic isolates to obtain relevant antigens are pathogen specific and require a careful approach based on clinical evidence. Manufacturing processes are optimized according to regulatory standards, and they represent the most critical factor influencing the quality of autogenous vaccines and their placement on the market. This review presents the important requirements for manufacturing autogenous vaccines for poultry in addition to the relevant regulatory considerations. The results from a survey of several European Union member states regarding specific provisions within their national legislations are also presented.</p>","PeriodicalId":516846,"journal":{"name":"Avian diseases","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139652542","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}