Family Court Review最新文献_第2页

Inadequate housing is not neglect: How the family regulation system punishes parents for a housing crisis out of their control 住房不足不是忽视：家庭监管制度如何惩罚父母的住房危机超出了他们的控制

IF 0.7

Family Court Review Pub Date : 2025-04-02 DOI: 10.1111/fcre.12857

Ainslie Martin

{"title":"Inadequate housing is not neglect: How the family regulation system punishes parents for a housing crisis out of their control","authors":"Ainslie Martin","doi":"10.1111/fcre.12857","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/fcre.12857","url":null,"abstract":"This article examines the role that inadequate housing plays in key stages of a family regulation case. Inadequate housing is broadly defined as any housing related issue that a family regulation agency might consider relevant to a child's safety. With some of the highest housing costs in the country, New York City presents an interesting case study on the impact of inadequate housing on involvement with the family regulation system. Despite providing an explicit defense for parents who cannot afford to provide housing for their children, New York law and policy routinely facilitates the removal of children from their families, the adjudication of parents as neglectful, and even the termination of parental rights, due to inadequate housing. In this way, the family regulation system unfairly punishes parents for housing issues outside of their control and to the detriment of the children the system purports to protect. In order to prevent unnecessary and harmful family separations related to inadequate housing, New York should allocate more funding towards increasing both the supply of affordable housing and the availability of subsidized housing programs. Though limited to budget constraints, the state could finance this by shifting funding away from the family regulation system and towards subsidized housing instead. Additionally, narrowing New York's mandatory reporting and state central registry laws could help limit the negative impact housing issues have on affected families.","PeriodicalId":51627,"journal":{"name":"Family Court Review","volume":"63 2","pages":"368-382"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7,"publicationDate":"2025-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143871476","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Securing our tomorrow by caring for America's children today: Implementing an attainable universal child care model in the United States 通过照顾今天的美国儿童来保障我们的明天：在美国实施一个可实现的普遍儿童保育模式

IF 0.7

Family Court Review Pub Date : 2025-03-25 DOI: 10.1111/fcre.12850

Maya Sabu

引用次数: 0

Don't throw the baby out with the bathwater: Protecting children against CSAM deepfakes without banning ai technology 不要把婴儿连同洗澡水一起倒掉：在不禁止人工智能技术的情况下，保护儿童免受CSAM深度造假的侵害

IF 0.7

Family Court Review Pub Date : 2025-03-25 DOI: 10.1111/fcre.12854

Jasmine Ende

引用次数: 0

Editorial note 编辑注意

IF 0.7

Family Court Review Pub Date : 2025-03-22 DOI: 10.1111/fcre.12855

Barbara A. Babb, Marsha Kline Pruett

引用次数: 0

The impact of cultural competence in family law: An overview of Buddhism, Islam, Hinduism, and Judaism 文化能力对家庭法的影响：佛教、伊斯兰教、印度教和犹太教的概述

IF 0.7

Family Court Review Pub Date : 2025-01-28 DOI: 10.1111/fcre.12847

Tracy Ann Moore-Grant, Stephanie Robins, Neena Saxena, Suchika Siotia

{"title":"The impact of cultural competence in family law: An overview of Buddhism, Islam, Hinduism, and Judaism","authors":"Tracy Ann Moore-Grant, Stephanie Robins, Neena Saxena, Suchika Siotia","doi":"10.1111/fcre.12847","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/fcre.12847","url":null,"abstract":"In contemporary multicultural societies, the family law profession requires a nuanced understanding of diverse cultural backgrounds to facilitate equitable and effective resolutions. Cultural competence in the family law profession entails recognizing and respecting the beliefs, values, and practices of individuals from different cultural backgrounds. Understanding the impact of religion on family dynamics, decision-making processes, and conflict resolution is essential for family law professionals to navigate sensitive issues such as divorce, custody arrangements, and parental rights. By delving into the teachings, traditions, and rituals of Buddhism, Islam, Hinduism, and Judaism, this paper elucidates the unique cultural considerations that influence family law disputes within these religious communities. It examines key aspects such as dietary preferences, religious observances, and extended family dynamics, shedding light on how these factors shape co-parenting arrangements and legal proceedings. Furthermore, this paper underscores the importance of incorporating cultural sensitivity into the family law process to promote mutual understanding, respect, and cooperation among parties. By fostering an environment where diverse religious perspectives are acknowledged and valued, mediators can facilitate more equitable and satisfactory outcomes for families from different cultural backgrounds. Ultimately, this paper advocates for the integration of cultural competence training into family law practices, emphasizing the need for mediators to continuously educate themselves on the religious and cultural nuances of the diverse populations they serve. By embracing cultural competence, family law practitioners can better serve the needs of all families, regardless of their religious affiliations, and contribute to a more inclusive and just legal system.","PeriodicalId":51627,"journal":{"name":"Family Court Review","volume":"63 1","pages":"86-104"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7,"publicationDate":"2025-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143253438","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Custody cases involving transgender and gender-expansive youth: Building toward best practices using interdisciplinary and child-centered perspectives 涉及跨性别和性别膨胀青年的监护案件：利用跨学科和以儿童为中心的观点建立最佳实践

IF 0.7

Family Court Review Pub Date : 2025-01-28 DOI: 10.1111/fcre.12846

Stef Sloan, Katherine A. Kuvalanka, Nesta N. Johnson, Cammy Bellis, Leah Davis

{"title":"Custody cases involving transgender and gender-expansive youth: Building toward best practices using interdisciplinary and child-centered perspectives","authors":"Stef Sloan, Katherine A. Kuvalanka, Nesta N. Johnson, Cammy Bellis, Leah Davis","doi":"10.1111/fcre.12846","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/fcre.12846","url":null,"abstract":"There is an increasing number of high-conflict custody cases involving transgender and gender expansive (TGE) youth within family courts. The current sociopolitical climate, giving rise to an unprecedented amount of anti-transgender legislation, adds further complexity to decision-making and creates a contentious and unpredictable climate for TGE youth and affirming parents in family court. Although researchers in health, child development, and well-being have generated a robust body of evidence supporting the importance of affirming family and community for TGE youth, there remains a disconnect between evidence-based best practices and actual practice in the family courts. Courts are frequently diverted by the question of whether the child is TGE, or who is “to blame” for the child's TGE identity, rather than seeking to determine which parent is better able to meet the needs of the whole child—including, but not limited to, needs related to the child's gender identity and expression. Contested custody litigation provides an opportunity for family courts to prevent harm and promote the well-being of TGE youth and families by facilitating access to care, education, and support, which can promote more effective approaches to decision-making for complex cases involving TGE youth, and better establish post-separation success for families. This paper proposes a mental map that leverages the body of interdisciplinary research on gender identity development and expression coupled with the use of a child-centered approach, and provides strategies for applying the mental map, with the goal of improving family court practices for cases involving TGE youth.","PeriodicalId":51627,"journal":{"name":"Family Court Review","volume":"63 1","pages":"52-70"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7,"publicationDate":"2025-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143253439","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Born this way and stuck in the middle: The queer child at the center of parental conflict1 天生如此，夹在中间：父母冲突中心的酷儿

IF 0.7

Family Court Review Pub Date : 2025-01-17 DOI: 10.1111/fcre.12844

Lindsey Sank Davis, Nathaniel Currie

{"title":"Born this way and stuck in the middle: The queer child at the center of parental conflict1","authors":"Lindsey Sank Davis, Nathaniel Currie","doi":"10.1111/fcre.12844","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/fcre.12844","url":null,"abstract":"While there is significant extant literature on lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, and other sexual orientation and gender minority (LGBTQ+) parents and a large and growing body of research on the mental health of LGBTQ+ youth, there remains a dearth of empirical literature focused on the experiences of LGBTQ+ youth facing parental conflict, separation, and divorce. This unfortunate trend is telling as to the perceived legitimacy of LGBTQ+ identities in children and adolescents and highlights critical gaps in need of amelioration. This paper reviews and applies interdisciplinary research on LGBTQ+ youth and families, addressing complex questions raised by two de-identified cases involving the navigation of co-parenting conflicts surrounding a bisexual adolescent and a transgender adolescent. The literature review highlights the heightened mental health risks LGBTQ+ youth experience due to minority stress and familial rejection. The wider sociopolitical and legal contexts affecting LGBTQ+ youth and their families, including the harmful effects of anti-LGBTQ+ legislation, are also addressed. Family court professionals are advised to take a careful multi-perspective approach to cases involving LGBTQ+ youth and to engage in advocacy and educational efforts in their respective fields to foster inclusive and supportive psycholegal environments for LGBTQ+ families in the United States and worldwide.","PeriodicalId":51627,"journal":{"name":"Family Court Review","volume":"63 1","pages":"120-137"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7,"publicationDate":"2025-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143252716","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Gaslight, gatekeep, girlboss: Succession support for daughters in the family business 煤气灯、门卫、女老板：为家族企业中的女儿提供接班支持

IF 0.7

Family Court Review Pub Date : 2025-01-15 DOI: 10.1111/fcre.12837

Alexa M. Sabatini

引用次数: 0

Consideration of culture in Canadian courtrooms: Before and after the Divorce Act amendments 对加拿大法庭文化的思考：《离婚法》修订前后

IF 0.7

Family Court Review Pub Date : 2025-01-10 DOI: 10.1111/fcre.12842

Terry Singh, Traci Bannister, Marc Massie

引用次数: 0

Introduction: Family court review special issue on the importance of cultural considerations in parental access matters 简介：家事法庭审查特别问题的重要性，文化方面的考虑，在父母访问事项