对加拿大法庭文化的思考:《离婚法》修订前后

IF 0.7 Q4 FAMILY STUDIES
Terry Singh, Traci Bannister, Marc Massie
{"title":"对加拿大法庭文化的思考:《离婚法》修订前后","authors":"Terry Singh,&nbsp;Traci Bannister,&nbsp;Marc Massie","doi":"10.1111/fcre.12842","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In Canada, the federal <i>Divorce Act</i> was revised in 2021 to include enumerated best interests factors which include a child's linguistic, religious, cultural, and spiritual heritage and upbringing, including Indigenous heritage. In this study, the authors examine how Canadian courtrooms engaged in the consideration of cultural factors prior to the recent <i>Divorce Act</i> amendments and compare these findings to decisions published following the amendments that mandated this specific consideration. Specific manners in which the courts have considered culture are identified, and the resulting three ‘clusters’ of decisions—including those cases (a) prioritizing a child's established culture, (b) weighing the child's greater involvement with one culture versus increased bicultural competence, and (c) considering the effect on the child of the cultural interaction—are compared pre- and post- the recent <i>Divorce Act</i> amendments. Implications for family court professionals are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":51627,"journal":{"name":"Family Court Review","volume":"63 1","pages":"36-51"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Consideration of culture in Canadian courtrooms: Before and after the Divorce Act amendments\",\"authors\":\"Terry Singh,&nbsp;Traci Bannister,&nbsp;Marc Massie\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/fcre.12842\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>In Canada, the federal <i>Divorce Act</i> was revised in 2021 to include enumerated best interests factors which include a child's linguistic, religious, cultural, and spiritual heritage and upbringing, including Indigenous heritage. In this study, the authors examine how Canadian courtrooms engaged in the consideration of cultural factors prior to the recent <i>Divorce Act</i> amendments and compare these findings to decisions published following the amendments that mandated this specific consideration. Specific manners in which the courts have considered culture are identified, and the resulting three ‘clusters’ of decisions—including those cases (a) prioritizing a child's established culture, (b) weighing the child's greater involvement with one culture versus increased bicultural competence, and (c) considering the effect on the child of the cultural interaction—are compared pre- and post- the recent <i>Divorce Act</i> amendments. Implications for family court professionals are discussed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51627,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Family Court Review\",\"volume\":\"63 1\",\"pages\":\"36-51\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Family Court Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/fcre.12842\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"FAMILY STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Family Court Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/fcre.12842","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在加拿大,联邦《离婚法》于2021年进行了修订,纳入了列举的最佳利益因素,其中包括儿童的语言、宗教、文化和精神遗产和教养,包括土著遗产。在这项研究中,作者考察了加拿大法院在最近的《离婚法》修正案之前是如何考虑文化因素的,并将这些发现与强制考虑这一具体因素的修正案之后公布的裁决进行了比较。确定了法院考虑文化的具体方式,以及由此产生的三种“集群”判决-包括以下情况(a)优先考虑儿童的既定文化,(b)权衡儿童与一种文化的更多参与与增加的双文化能力,以及(c)考虑文化互动对儿童的影响-在最近的离婚法修正案之前和之后进行了比较。讨论了对家庭法庭专业人员的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Consideration of culture in Canadian courtrooms: Before and after the Divorce Act amendments

In Canada, the federal Divorce Act was revised in 2021 to include enumerated best interests factors which include a child's linguistic, religious, cultural, and spiritual heritage and upbringing, including Indigenous heritage. In this study, the authors examine how Canadian courtrooms engaged in the consideration of cultural factors prior to the recent Divorce Act amendments and compare these findings to decisions published following the amendments that mandated this specific consideration. Specific manners in which the courts have considered culture are identified, and the resulting three ‘clusters’ of decisions—including those cases (a) prioritizing a child's established culture, (b) weighing the child's greater involvement with one culture versus increased bicultural competence, and (c) considering the effect on the child of the cultural interaction—are compared pre- and post- the recent Divorce Act amendments. Implications for family court professionals are discussed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
57
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信