Journal of Social Policy最新文献_第10页

Richard Bellamy, Sandra Kröger and Marta Lorimer (2022), Flexible Europe: Differentiated Integration, Fairness, and Democracy, Bristol: Policy Press, £47.99, pp. 200, pbk. Richard Bellamy、Sandra Kröger和Marta Lorimer（2022），《灵活的欧洲：差异化的一体化、公平和民主》，布里斯托尔：政策出版社，47.99英镑，第200页，pbk。

IF 2 3区社会学

Journal of Social Policy Pub Date : 2023-01-23 DOI: 10.1017/S0047279422001064

Katharina Zimmermann

引用次数: 0

Kenneth Nelson, Rense Nieuwenhuis and Mara Yerkes (eds) (2022), Social Policy in Changing European Societies: Research Agendas for the 21st Century, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, £99.00, pp. 328, hbk, Open Access. Kenneth Nelson, Rense Nieuwenhuis和Mara Yerkes(编辑)(2022)，不断变化的欧洲社会中的社会政策:21世纪的研究议程，切尔滕纳姆:爱德华埃尔加，£99.00，第328页，hbk，开放获取。

IF 2 3区社会学

Journal of Social Policy Pub Date : 2023-01-23 DOI: 10.1017/s0047279422001052

P. Taylor-Gooby

引用次数: 0

Outcome-based contracting and gaming practices in marketised public employment services. Dilemmas from the Italian case 市场化公共就业服务中以结果为本的承包和博弈做法。意大利案例中的困境

IF 2 3区社会学

Journal of Social Policy Pub Date : 2023-01-19 DOI: 10.1017/s0047279422001003

G. Scarano

引用次数: 0

Deserving more? A vignette study on the role of self-interest and deservingness opinions for popular support for wealth taxation in Germany 值得更多吗？关于个人利益的作用的小插曲研究和对德国财富税大众支持的意见

IF 2 3区社会学

Journal of Social Policy Pub Date : 2023-01-13 DOI: 10.1017/s004727942200099x

Patrick Sachweh, Debora Eicher

{"title":"Deserving more? A vignette study on the role of self-interest and deservingness opinions for popular support for wealth taxation in Germany","authors":"Patrick Sachweh, Debora Eicher","doi":"10.1017/s004727942200099x","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s004727942200099x","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 This paper investigates which factors shape popular support for the taxation of wealth in Germany, a country with one of the highest levels of wealth inequality in Western Europe. Although public support for progressive taxation in general is strong, no tax on personal net wealth is currently levied. Against this backdrop, we ask how objective and subjective self-interest, information about wealth inequality and deservingness valuations regarding the wealthy affect popular support for a personal wealth tax. Particular attention is paid to the interaction between self-interest and deservingness. Using original survey data and a vignette design, we find that subjective self-interest is more important than objective self-interest, and that providing information on aggregate wealth inequality can shift the attitudes of those who are otherwise indifferent in favour of wealth taxation. Furthermore, deservingness valuations impact support for taxation in important ways. Factors indicating meritocratic wealth accumulation reduce support, and this is especially pronounced among low-status respondents. By contrast, while non-meritocratic factors increase support for taxation, these effects are largely off-set in privileged groups. Altogether, these findings suggest that self-interest and deservingness valuations impact attitudes towards wealth taxation in opposing directions, and that providing information to those otherwise indifferent might increase redistributive preferences.","PeriodicalId":51438,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Social Policy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45563231","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Charities’ income during the COVID-19 pandemic: administrative evidence for England and Wales 新冠肺炎大流行期间慈善机构的收入：英格兰和威尔士的行政证据

IF 2 3区社会学

Journal of Social Policy Pub Date : 2023-01-13 DOI: 10.1017/s0047279422001015

D. Clifford, D. McDonnell, J. Mohan

{"title":"Charities’ income during the COVID-19 pandemic: administrative evidence for England and Wales","authors":"D. Clifford, D. McDonnell, J. Mohan","doi":"10.1017/s0047279422001015","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0047279422001015","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 This paper provides a detailed overview of how the COVID-19 pandemic has affected the income of charitable organisations – an under-researched theme within social policy, which thus far has largely focused on the impact of the pandemic on individuals’ and households’ wellbeing. It analyses a unique longitudinal dataset that follows through time c.90,000 charities in England and Wales. The results, for the first time, illustrate the scale of the pandemic’s financial impact on the charitable sector: the median charity experienced a 13% real decline in annual income, while a charity at the 25th percentile of the annual relative growth distribution experienced an income decline of 43%. Importantly these annual declines are much more sizeable than those associated with the Great Recession and subsequent period of public spending austerity. Smaller charities, particularly those with an income under £100k, have been most significantly affected. The declines have been pervasive, extending across most fields of charitable activity, though certain charitable fields have seen particularly acute declines. While there has rightly been considerable emphasis on the important role of voluntary action in responding to the pandemic, this new empirical evidence helps to communicate the extent of the recent challenges faced by the charitable sector.","PeriodicalId":51438,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Social Policy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43174050","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Weakly institutionalized, heavily contested: Does support for contemporary welfare reforms rely on norms of distributive justice? 制度化薄弱，争议重重：对当代福利改革的支持是否依赖于分配正义的规范？

IF 2 3区社会学

Journal of Social Policy Pub Date : 2023-01-13 DOI: 10.1017/s0047279422000964

Arno Van Hootegem, Koenraad Abts, B. Meuleman

{"title":"Weakly institutionalized, heavily contested: Does support for contemporary welfare reforms rely on norms of distributive justice?","authors":"Arno Van Hootegem, Koenraad Abts, B. Meuleman","doi":"10.1017/s0047279422000964","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0047279422000964","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 Three reforms each appealing to a different logic of (re)distribution are strongly politicized in contemporary welfare states: means-tested benefits, demanding activation policies and basic income schemes. While the policy design of means-tested benefits relies on the distributive justice principle of need, demanding activation policies are intrinsically related to the principle of equity and basic income schemes depend on equality. Based on the moral economy and policy feedback literatures, which assume that public opinion adapts to the normative conceptions of justice encapsulated by institutions, attitudes towards these welfare reforms are expected to be grounded on these distributive logics. However, as these reforms are weakly institutionalized and their underlying principles are politically contested, the normative foundation of their public support remains unclear. This study investigates how distributive justice preferences shape support for these proposals by applying structural equation modelling on data from the CRONOS panel linked to the European Social Survey round 8 (2016/2017). Results indicate that only basic income schemes and demanding activation policies are to some extent connected to each of the justice principles. Overall, this study nevertheless indicates that the justice principles have limited explanatory power, which confirms that attitudes towards contemporary welfare reforms rely weakly on justice norms.","PeriodicalId":51438,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Social Policy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47593379","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

A Framework for Evaluating the Adequacy of Disability Benefit Programs and its Application to the U.S. Social Security Disability Programs 残疾福利计划充分性评估框架及其在美国社会保障残疾计划中的应用

IF 2 3区社会学

Journal of Social Policy Pub Date : 2023-01-11 DOI: 10.1017/s0047279422000745

Zachary A. Morris

{"title":"A Framework for Evaluating the Adequacy of Disability Benefit Programs and its Application to the U.S. Social Security Disability Programs","authors":"Zachary A. Morris","doi":"10.1017/s0047279422000745","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0047279422000745","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 The degree to which disability benefit programs provide an adequate standard of living to those with work-limiting disabilities has long been overlooked in social policy research. This paper presents a framework for assessing disability-related decommodification and then applies that framework to an analysis of the Social Security Disability (SSD) programs in the United States. The paper draws on survey data from the Health and Retirement Study linked to administrative records from the Social Security Administration, and further compares the U.S. estimates to those from 27 other countries. The results indicate that more than 50 percent of older adults of working-age with work-disabilities in the U.S. do not receive SSD benefits, though rates of benefit receipt are higher than the average across other high-income countries. Those that receive SSD benefits, moreover, experience greater difficulty achieving an adequate standard of living, as measured by an index of financial security, than those with similar characteristics in the U.S. who do not receive disability benefits. The paper thus provides a framework for future policy research on benefit adequacy, while evaluating the availability and generosity of disability benefits in the U.S.","PeriodicalId":51438,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Social Policy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45139299","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Ute Klammer, Simone Leiber and Sigrid Leitner (eds) (2020), Social Work and the Making of Social Policy, Bristol: Policy Press, £26.99, pp. 256, pbk. Ute Klammer, Simone Leiber和Sigrid Leitner(编)(2020)，社会工作和社会政策的制定，布里斯托尔:政策出版社，26.99英镑，第256页，pbk。

IF 2 3区社会学

Journal of Social Policy Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI: 10.1017/S0047279422000824

Ayu Pratiwi

{"title":"Ute Klammer, Simone Leiber and Sigrid Leitner (eds) (2020), Social Work and the Making of Social Policy, Bristol: Policy Press, £26.99, pp. 256, pbk.","authors":"Ayu Pratiwi","doi":"10.1017/S0047279422000824","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047279422000824","url":null,"abstract":"tensions, critically reflecting on the implications of the German export-led growth model for increasing transnational macroeconomic instability. The fact that the individual contributions, despite their common objective, are not subordinate to a uniform and integrated theoretical approach makes it possible to capture a broad range of changes in different domains of Germany’s political economy (from skill formation systems to corporate governance and industrial relations) and on the most diverse levels (institutions, power relations, and ideas). However, the central finding of a generally growing imbalance remains somewhat vague against this background, since it is difficult to theoretically link the consequences of the various developments back to the architecture of the German economy as a whole. This would require a more dedicated theoretical examination of an ideal-typical concept of balance, against the background of which the individual shifts and changes could have been systematically classified and evaluated. A starting point for further development could be a critical examination of the manifold meanings of the concept of complementarity (see Crouch ; Deeg ; Höpner ), which implicitly and at least partially represents the antagonist to the concept of imbalance. This could provide a more nuanced diagnosis of changes, their mutual interrelation and implications in order to evaluate in how far transformations have resulted in social, political or economic disadvantage. Nevertheless, a reorientation towards imbalance as a central analysis dimension would clearly be profitable for future comparative analyses of political economies beyond the German case study.","PeriodicalId":51438,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Social Policy","volume":"52 1","pages":"e4 - e6"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43427048","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Paul Spicker (2022), How to Fix the Welfare State: Some Ideas for Better Social Services, Bristol: Policy Press, £27.99, pp. 168, pbk. 保罗·斯皮克(2022)，《如何修正福利国家:改善社会服务的一些想法》，布里斯托尔:政策出版社，27.99英镑，第168页。

IF 2 3区社会学

Journal of Social Policy Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI: 10.1017/s0047279422000836

H. Glennerster

引用次数: 0

JSP volume 52 issue 1 Cover and Back matter JSP第52卷第1期封面和封底问题

IF 2 3区社会学

Journal of Social Policy Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI: 10.1017/s0047279422001040

引用次数: 0