{"title":"Investigating the reversed congruency effect of gaze through the lens of joint attention","authors":"Anna Lorenzoni, Mario Dalmaso","doi":"10.1016/j.concog.2026.104101","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.concog.2026.104101","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Recent evidence has highlighted differences in attentional shifting elicited by gaze and arrow stimuli. Specifically, in a spatial Stroop task, arrows consistently produce a standard congruency effect (SCE; faster reaction times on congruent vs. incongruent trials). In contrast, averted gaze stimuli produce a reversed congruency effect (RCE; faster reaction times on incongruent vs. congruent trials). The origin of this discrepancy is still under debate. One hypothesis suggests that the RCE for gaze is driven by joint attention (the shared focus of two individuals on the same object). According to this view, during incongruent trials, gaze stimuli appear to look toward the fixation stimulus, thus creating an episode of joint attention with the participant. To investigate this possibility, we conducted four experiments where participants identified the direction of a peripheral target (gaze or arrow). We also varied the fixation stimulus (symbolic cross or real-world object) and added an oculomotor component, to enhance joint attention contexts. Results consistently showed an SCE for arrows and an RCE for gaze, regardless of fixation type and the request to perform an eye movement, suggesting that joint attention, as operationalised in the present study, may not fully explain the RCE elicited by gaze.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51358,"journal":{"name":"Consciousness and Cognition","volume":"143 ","pages":"Article 104101"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148594405","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Liang He , Zhige Zhang , Yuetan Wang , Qiujian Meng , Yuying Jiang , Wei Xu , Jiangfen Wu , Jingwei Sheng , Zheng Ye , Xiaobin Ding
{"title":"Report-modulated prefrontal activity and consistent posterior representations during conscious visual perception","authors":"Liang He , Zhige Zhang , Yuetan Wang , Qiujian Meng , Yuying Jiang , Wei Xu , Jiangfen Wu , Jingwei Sheng , Zheng Ye , Xiaobin Ding","doi":"10.1016/j.concog.2026.104075","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.concog.2026.104075","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Understanding whether prefrontal cortex is necessary for conscious experience remains central to ongoing debates between global workspace and recurrent processing theories of consciousness. To dissociate neural processes underlying perceptual awareness from those related to report and access, we combined report and no-report visual masking paradigms with magnetoencephalography (MEG) to characterize the spatiotemporal and network dynamics of visual awareness. Across both report and no-report conditions, early and sustained responses emerged in occipital and temporal cortices, beginning at ∼60–70 ms post-stimulus. Posterior sensory regions consistently encoded stimulus presence and category information irrespective of reporting demands, and exhibited enhanced α-band recurrent coupling for visible stimuli, suggesting stable perceptual representations supported by local recurrent interactions. In contrast, prefrontal activity emerged only when explicit report was required, beginning at ∼100 ms and persisting thereafter. Time-resolved decoding revealed that anterior regions encoded stimulus information exclusively under report conditions and failed to represent categorical content when reporting was absent. Moreover, long-range fronto-posterior connectivity selectively increased during report, indicating task-dependent integration beyond posterior sensory processing. These findings demonstrate that posterior cortical dynamics are sufficient to support perceptual awareness, whereas prefrontal cortex contributes to report-related access and global integration. By disentangling awareness from reporting, this work provides evidence favoring posterior-centered accounts of phenomenal consciousness and clarifies the functional role of anterior cortex in conscious processing.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51358,"journal":{"name":"Consciousness and Cognition","volume":"142 ","pages":"Article 104075"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148139677","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Fragile memories for fleeting percepts","authors":"Howard Bowman , Alberto Avilés","doi":"10.1016/j.concog.2026.104073","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.concog.2026.104073","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Our perceptual systems are exceptionally good at searching our sensory environments for salient stimuli. A key question is the extent to which this search is performed subliminally. Consistent with our tokenized-percept theory, we hypothesis that it is. We explore this using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation (RSVP), by comparing detection performance with the memory left for distractors, the stimuli that have to be rejected as non-targets in the process of searching for targets. In agreement with our hypothesis, our findings are that “immediate” free recall of arbitrary distractors at RSVP rates is very poor, with a severe recency effect. Recognition performance was higher and less subject to recency, but still substantially lower than detection performance. These findings suggest that the brain does indeed subliminally search for salient stimuli, providing evidence for the tokenized-percept hypothesis, which links conscious perception to the process of episodically marking experiences.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51358,"journal":{"name":"Consciousness and Cognition","volume":"142 ","pages":"Article 104073"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148152108","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Self-relevance dominates memory, whereas partner-relevance depends on retrieval goals: evidence from event-related potentials","authors":"Kimiko Kato, Kazuhito Yoshizaki","doi":"10.1016/j.concog.2026.104074","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.concog.2026.104074","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Self-related information consistently receives privileged processing, a phenomenon known as the self-prioritization effect (SPE). In contrast, the joint memory effect (JME) refers to enhanced memory for information associated with a task partner. This study investigated temporal and functional dynamics of these effects during encoding and retrieval using event-related potentials (ERPs). In Experiment 1, participants performed an incidental encoding task followed by intentional retrieval. In Experiment 2, the same encoding task was followed by incidental retrieval. In the encoding task, participants judged whether each word belonged to the self-category. In the intentional retrieval task, they made old/new judgments for previously presented words, whereas in the incidental retrieval task, they counted target words. During encoding, self-related words elicited reduced N400 amplitudes, increased P3b amplitudes, and shorter P3b latencies, indicating greater expectancy, stronger attentional allocation, and faster evaluation. During retrieval, late positive components (LPCs) revealed robust SPEs under both intentional and incidental conditions, whereas the JME emerged only during intentional retrieval. These findings show that self-relevance exerts a pervasive influence on memory, independent of retrieval goals, whereas partner-related information depends more on task context. The results clarify how social labels modulate encoding and retrieval, highlighting the robustness of self-related prioritization and the conditional nature of joint memory.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51358,"journal":{"name":"Consciousness and Cognition","volume":"142 ","pages":"Article 104074"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148139662","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Chiara Saponaro , Andrea Nadalini , Daniel Casasanto , Davide Crepaldi , Roberto Bottini
{"title":"Unconscious semantic processing: Insights from metaphorical priming","authors":"Chiara Saponaro , Andrea Nadalini , Daniel Casasanto , Davide Crepaldi , Roberto Bottini","doi":"10.1016/j.concog.2026.104035","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.concog.2026.104035","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The limits of unconscious processing in the semantic domain are highly debated. While prior research presents polarized views on whether word representations are accessible when presented subliminally, this work proposes a more fine-grained investigation into which aspects of word meaning can be accessed unconsciously. Specifically, we explore the conditions under which high-level semantic information, such as metaphorical relations, can be processed subliminally. We rely on space–time and space-number metaphorical mappings, which have been observed in many experiments as well as in spontaneous behavior, such as the association of the past (or subtraction) and the future (or addition) with “left” and “right”, respectively. We exploited the fact that some of these conceptual associations (i.e., sagittal or vertical mappings) are also present in language (e.g., “you have a bright future in front of you”; “taxes are going down”), whereas others (i.e., lateral mapping) are not (e.g., “you have a bright future on your right”; “taxes are going left”). In two experiments, space–time and space-number semantic priming consistent with canonical metaphorical mappings emerged when both prime (e.g., “right”) and target (e.g., “tomorrow”) were consciously perceived, confirming their conceptual association. However, with masked priming, only language-encoded associations were activated. These results suggest that consciousness is necessary to process even ubiquitous and overlearned metaphorical associations and that putatively unconscious semantic priming, when present, may be lexical in nature.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51358,"journal":{"name":"Consciousness and Cognition","volume":"141 ","pages":"Article 104035"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147388004","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Emma Delhaye , Pauline Fritz , Charlotte Martial , Christine Bastin
{"title":"The role of visual imagery and verbal coding in short-term memory conjunctive binding: evidence from aphantasia","authors":"Emma Delhaye , Pauline Fritz , Charlotte Martial , Christine Bastin","doi":"10.1016/j.concog.2026.104036","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.concog.2026.104036","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Conjunctive binding − as opposed to relational binding − refers to our short-term memory for integrated representations of a series of features into a complex − unitized − object. The mechanisms necessary to encode conjunctive representations in memory are, to date, unknown. In this study, we tested whether mental visual imagery and verbal coding are necessary to encode conjunctive representations in short-term memory. We also explored the memory processes supporting retrieval of these representations. To explore specifically the role of visual imagery, we tested a population of aphantasic participants (N = 29) that we compared with typical imagers (N = 49), as assessed by the VVIQ. To assess the role of verbal coding, we had participants memorise colour-shape conjunctive representations while manipulating the ease with which labels could be used to define the shapes. Results showed a robust effect of the use of verbal coding on performance and confidence ratings, accompanied by an increase in both automatic and controlled memory processes. There was however no difference between aphantasics and typical imagers on these measures. In addition, even in the difficult-to-label condition, aphantasics performed well above chance, suggesting that neither visual imagery nor verbal coding are necessary to perform conjunctive binding. This supports the idea that binding is automatic, and the existing hypothesis according to which the first stage of conjunctive binding is implicit. It is possible that aphantasic participants used implicit representations, unavailable to their phenomenological experience, to solve the task, or non-visual spatial or sensorimotor strategies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51358,"journal":{"name":"Consciousness and Cognition","volume":"141 ","pages":"Article 104036"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147373552","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Marius Golubickis , Siobhan Caughey , Esther S. Selvaraj , Parnian Jalalian , Yadvi Sharma , Jessica Highflield , Rinki Kanakraj , C. Neil Macrae
{"title":"Social mindfulness is associated with reduced self-bias: A computational approach","authors":"Marius Golubickis , Siobhan Caughey , Esther S. Selvaraj , Parnian Jalalian , Yadvi Sharma , Jessica Highflield , Rinki Kanakraj , C. Neil Macrae","doi":"10.1016/j.concog.2026.104037","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.concog.2026.104037","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>An established literature has demonstrated the benefits that personal possession exerts on decision-making. Compared to items owned by others, objects belonging to the self are identified more rapidly and accurately, a phenomenon termed self-prioritization. What is not yet understood, however, is the extent to which individual differences are linked to the emergence of these facilitatory effects. Addressing this issue, here we considered whether social mindfulness — a psychological construct that captures how attuned people are to others — influences self-prioritization. Using an object-classification task, participants reported the ownership of previously assigned items (i.e., owned-by-self vs. owned-by-friend). As predicted, increased social mindfulness was accompanied by a reduction in self-bias. An additional modeling (i.e., Drift Diffusion Model) analysis identified the cognitive pathway through which this effect arose. Heightened social mindfulness was associated with weakened egocentrism (i.e., default-to-self response), the decisional strategy that underpins self-prioritization during object-classification tasks. Collectively, these findings further underscore the malleability of self-prioritization and provide a computational account of how social mindfulness impacts decision-making.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51358,"journal":{"name":"Consciousness and Cognition","volume":"141 ","pages":"Article 104037"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147388117","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"True or false: The effect of numerical magnitude on sense of agency","authors":"Ryuhei Yasuda, Kyoshiro Sasaki","doi":"10.1016/j.concog.2026.104042","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.concog.2026.104042","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Sense of agency (SoA) refers to the feeling that one’s actions cause environmental changes. A previous study showed that SoA is enhanced when keypress-triggered motion stimuli move faster, suggesting that SoA depends on the extent of action outcomes. We examined whether the numerical magnitude of action outcomes similarly affects SoA. Participants pressed a key, which triggered the presentation of dots (Experiments 1–2) or digit values (Experiment 3), and then rated their SoA on a 10-point scale. Results showed that SoA ratings increased with greater numerical magnitude. However, Experiments 4a and 4b, using an intentional binding paradigm, found that the interval between the keypress and dot onset was perceived as longer when more dots were presented. This contradicts Experiments 1–3 and suggests the observed SoA enhancement might stem from response bias (e.g., higher numerical magnitude of the outcomes leading to higher values in the rating/estimating phase). To test this, Experiments 5a and 5b replicated Experiment 2 with a reversed rating scale (1 = strongest, 10 = weakest) and support the response bias account. In contrast, the effect of motion speed was unaffected by rating direction, suggesting a genuine influence on SoA (Experiment 6). These findings highlight the importance of carefully distinguishing true effects from mere response biases when evaluating how outcome magnitude influences SoA.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51358,"journal":{"name":"Consciousness and Cognition","volume":"141 ","pages":"Article 104042"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147388005","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Crystal A. Silver , Benjamin W. Tatler , Ramakrishna Chakravarthi , Bert Timmermans
{"title":"Method matters: Diverging patterns in online measures of temporal binding","authors":"Crystal A. Silver , Benjamin W. Tatler , Ramakrishna Chakravarthi , Bert Timmermans","doi":"10.1016/j.concog.2026.104022","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.concog.2026.104022","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Temporal Binding (TB) refers to the subjective compression of time between an action and its outcome. While TB has been demonstrated across various paradigms, questions remain about its methodological reliability, particularly in online settings where technical control is limited. The present study examined whether two common interval judgement methods, estimation and replication, yield comparable TB effects when implemented online and whether either method is differentially sensitive to social contextual framing.</div><div>In Experiment 1, participants judged action-effect intervals using estimation or replication, across action-reaction and observation conditions. Results revealed that the two methods produced different and often opposing patterns of results across action-effect intervals.</div><div>Experiment 2 introduced a minimal social manipulation in which participants were led to believe that a previous participant generated interval outcomes. Again, method-specific patterns emerged, depending on different action-effect intervals.</div><div>These findings raise concerns about the robustness of TB effects as measured in online environments. The observed divergences across methods suggest that interval judgement paradigms may be highly sensitive to procedural and contextual factors. We suggest that TB effects obtained through online interval estimation or replication should be interpreted with caution, as the presence or absence of a TB effect may be due to the specific method used or the presented action-effect intervals.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51358,"journal":{"name":"Consciousness and Cognition","volume":"140 ","pages":"Article 104022"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146259986","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"On sensory similarities","authors":"Charles Spence , Nicola Di Stefano","doi":"10.1016/j.concog.2026.104019","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.concog.2026.104019","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Similarity has been a central concern for millennia, drawing the attention of philosophers, scientists, and artists. The issue of similarity is especially intriguing in the domain of the senses (and of sensory perception), where considerable research effort has been devoted to describing the affinities and divergences between different sensory modalities. In this work, we critically review the multiple different ways in which ‘sensory similarity’ has been theorized, highlighting how the similarities and analogies that researchers have proposed between the senses tend to constrain the theorization about how the senses operate. Similarities between different pairs of senses have been identified at multiple levels including in terms of stimuli/energy, transduction mechanisms, information-processing, synthetic/analytic analysis, perceptual organization, similarity of structure of the sensory space, and/or of the temporal evolution of different kinds of sensations. Based on the reviewed evidence, we propose an integrated framework, suggesting that sensory similarity can be understood as arising from (i) shared phenomenal qualities, (ii) analogous structural or organizational patterns, or (iii) convergent affective or semantic meanings, each grounded in increasingly cognitive and culturally-mediated processes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51358,"journal":{"name":"Consciousness and Cognition","volume":"140 ","pages":"Article 104019"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147285898","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}