Journal of Medical Screening最新文献

{"title":"Attitudes towards being offered a choice of self-sampling or clinician sampling for cervical screening: A cross-sectional survey of women taking part in a clinical validation of HPV self-collection devices.","authors":"Laura Marlow, Hannah Drysdale, Jo Waller","doi":"10.1177/09691413241283356","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09691413241283356","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Primary human papillomavirus (HPV) testing in cervical screening offers the opportunity for women to be given a choice between HPV self-sampling and traditional clinician screening. This study assessed attitudes towards a choice and anticipated future preference among women who had collected a vaginal self-sample alongside their usual cervical screen.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Thirty-eight general practices across five areas in England.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Overall, 2323 women (24-65 years; response rate: 48%) completed a survey after collecting a self-sample and having a clinician screen at their GP practice. We asked which test they preferred and assessed attitudes to being offered a choice. We explored age, education, ethnicity and screening experience as predictors of attitudes towards a choice and anticipated future choice.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most participants felt they would like a choice between self-sampling and clinician screening (85%) and thought this would improve screening for them (72%). However, 23% felt it would be difficult to choose, 15% would worry about making a choice, and nearly half would prefer a recommendation (48%). Compared with women with degree-level education, those with fewer qualifications were more likely to say they would worry about having a choice or would not want a choice (p < 0.001). The majority said they would choose to self-sample at home if offered a choice in the future (69%; n = 1602/2320).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Self-sampling is likely to be popular, but offering a choice could cause worry for some people and many would prefer a recommendation. Supporting people to make a choice will be important, particularly for those with lower levels of education.</p>","PeriodicalId":51089,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Screening","volume":" ","pages":"9691413241283356"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142395033","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Newborn screening for biliary atresia using direct bilirubin: An implementation science study.","authors":"Tebyan Rabbani, Jay Shah","doi":"10.1177/09691413241284243","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09691413241284243","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Biliary atresia (BA) is a liver disease of infancy characterized by obstruction of the biliary tree. Infants with BA have the best outcomes when identified early and the Kasai portoenterostomy is performed before 45 days of life (DoL). In our hospital system, the average age at Kasai was 60 DoL. To address the problem of late presentation, we implemented a two-stage BA screening strategy utilizing direct bilirubin (DB).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>New institutional policies were established that all newborns were tested at 24-48 h of life, and those with levels ≥0.5 mg/dL were followed further. The infant's primary care provider was contacted to recommend a repeat DB at 2 weeks of life. If the repeat DB was ≥1.0 mg/dL, the patient was evaluated by gastroenterology.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Over the 16 months, 3880 infants were born and 3861 (99.5%) were screened; 53 infants (1.3%) had DB levels ≥0.5 mg/dL initially. Upon repeat testing at 2 weeks, there were three groups of infants: not retested (<i>n</i> = 1), retested <1.0 mg/dL (<i>n</i> = 40), and retested ≥1.0 mg/dL (<i>n</i> = 12). The average time to be seen by gastroenterology was 4.3 days or 18.3 DoL.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The screening included a series of steps that needed to be implemented effectively. Screening had a net false positive rate of 0.3% (12 out of 3861) and identified causes of cholestasis other than BA. BA was excluded by 28 DoL on average. Our results can provide a template for other institutions interested in implementing a BA screening protocol in their practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":51089,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Screening","volume":" ","pages":"9691413241284243"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142331923","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Improving access to cervical cancer screening: The impact of a Saturday pap smear clinic.","authors":"Brittany Strelow, Joy Stevens, Stephanie Fink, Kristin Cole, Danielle O'Laughlin","doi":"10.1177/09691413241281653","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09691413241281653","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The implementation of cervical cancer screening and human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination has significantly reduced cervical cancer rates. However, it remains the fourth most common cancer among women globally. Barriers to screening include personal, health system, and insurance factors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>To address these barriers, a \"Saturday Pap smear Clinic\" was established to increase accessibility. The study included female patients aged 21 to 65 from Southeast Minnesota, USA, who attended the clinic from September 2021 to April 2023.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 357 women attended the Saturday clinic, with a median age of 44 years; 70.6% were White. Abnormal Pap smear results were found in 13.8% of attendees, with 7.8% testing positive for HPV. Additional health maintenance was addressed. The majority of patients had a physician primary care provider (58.3%), followed by residents (26.3%), and nurse practitioner/physician associates (15.4%).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The clinic demonstrated a high fill rate of 86.15%, indicating demand for non-traditional appointment times. Despite this, disparities in access were noted, with primarily White and English-speaking women utilizing the clinic. The clinic showed improved outcomes compared to national screening rates, highlighting the importance of timely preventative care.</p>","PeriodicalId":51089,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Screening","volume":" ","pages":"9691413241281653"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142331922","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Women's experience of the information provided along with invitation to participate in BreastScreen Norway.","authors":"Nataliia Moshina, Marie Burns Bergan, Åsne Sørlien Holen, Gunhild Mangerud, Solveig Hofvind","doi":"10.1177/09691413241280791","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09691413241280791","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To explore how women aged 50-69 invited to BreastScreen Norway perceived the information provided along with the invitation letter, as well as time spent on reading this information.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An anonymous questionnaire was sent, as a paper-based form along with a physical invitation letter, or as a link to a digital form in a digital invitation letter, to 84,543 women invited to BreastScreen Norway in 2022. The paper-based forms were handed in upon screening attendance. The women were invited to screening by physical or digital invitation including an information leaflet describing benefits and harms, or a link to similar information on a webpage. The questionnaire assessed women's perception of the information and time spent on reading it. Responses were presented by screening invitation type (physical/digital).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 9.9% (8355/84,543) of the women responded to the questionnaire. Among women invited by a physical letter, information about the screening examination and about benefits and harms was considered sufficient by 90% (4338/4797) and 89% (4246/4790), respectively, and 92% (4246/4790) reported the information to be sufficient to make an informed decision on participation. Among those invited digitally, the percentages were 83% (2788/3379), 78% (2618/3369), and 88% (2962/3370), respectively. About 59% (4807/8169) spent <5 min reading the information.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Most of the respondents perceived the information received upon invitation to BreastScreen Norway sufficient to make an informed decision on participation and used <5 min to read the information. The results should be interpreted with caution due to the low response rate.</p>","PeriodicalId":51089,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Screening","volume":" ","pages":"9691413241280791"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142331924","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Anxiety and disease awareness in individuals with heredity for abdominal aortic aneurysm.","authors":"Nina Fattahi, Olga Nilsson, Sverker Svensjö, Joy Roy, Anneli Linné, Rebecka Hultgren","doi":"10.1177/09691413241278224","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09691413241278224","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The psychological consequences of being aware of an increased risk of developing abdominal aortic aneurysm as a first-degree relative of a person with abdominal aortic aneurysm are hitherto unexplored. This study investigates the awareness of heritability and anxiety in male and female adult offspring of abdominal aortic aneurysm patients compared to controls. Health-related quality of life among participants with aortic pathology was compared to participants with normal aortic diameters.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a cross-sectional point prevalence study based on the participants examined in the Detecting Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm in First Degree Relatives Trial (DAAAD; 752 adult offspring, 756 matched controls), 2020-2022. Questionnaires about health-related quality of life and study-specific questions regarding awareness of heritability were collected prior to the aortic ultrasound.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Attendance rate was higher among individuals with heredity compared to controls (67% vs. 52%, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Of 1508 adult offspring examined, 65% reported having a close relative with abdominal aortic aneurysm (6% in controls). Female adult offspring reported higher awareness of heritability than controls (38% vs. 12%, <i>p</i> < 0.001), as did males (32% vs. 8%, <i>p</i> < 0.001). A slight majority of participants with awareness reported anxiety (54% of female offspring; 51% of male). There were no measured differences in health-related quality of life between the groups when standard health-related quality of life instruments were used.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The higher-than-expected proportion of adult offspring with awareness of heritability and anxiety about such risk indicates that we fail to communicate risk to this group appropriately via the current channels of information within the healthcare system. This calls for the development of dedicated strategies for improved communication of abdominal aortic aneurysm risk to patients and their next of kin.</p>","PeriodicalId":51089,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Screening","volume":" ","pages":"9691413241278224"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142156576","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Percentage mammographic density or absolute breast density for risk stratification in breast screening: Possible implications for socioeconomic health disparity.","authors":"Sue Hudson, Nahid Kamangari, Louise S Wilkinson","doi":"10.1177/09691413241274291","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09691413241274291","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Obesity levels and mortality from breast cancer are higher in more deprived areas of the UK, despite lower breast cancer incidence. Supplemental imaging for women with dense breasts has been proposed as a potential improvement to screening, but it is not clear how stratification by percentage mammographic density (%MD) would be reflected across socioeconomic groups. This study aims to clarify the associations between breast composition (dense and fatty tissue) and socioeconomic status in a multi-ethnic screening population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Demographic characteristics were collected for 62,913 participants in a UK breast screening programme (age, ethnicity, Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD)). Automated mammographic measurements were derived: dense volume (DV), non-dense volume (NDV) and percent density (%MD). Correlations between deprivation and mammographic composition were examined before and after adjustment for age, ethnicity and NDV, using non-dense breast volume as a proxy for body mass index (BMI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was negligible correlation between deprivation and DV (r = 0.017; <i>P</i> < 0.001 in all cases), but NDV increased with increasing deprivation (Pearson r = 0.101). Correlations were weaker in the Asian and Chinese ethnic groups. %MD decreased with deprivation (r = -0.094) and adjustment for ethnicity did not alter the association between %MD and IMD (relative change, most to least deprived quintile IMD: 1.18; 95% confidence interval: 1.16, 1.21).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Deprivation-related differences in %MD in the screening population are largely explained by differences in breast fat volume (NDV) which reflects BMI. Women in more deprived areas, where obesity and breast cancer mortality rates are higher, have increased breast adiposity and may miss out on risk-adapted screening if stratification is based solely on %MD or BIRADS classification.</p>","PeriodicalId":51089,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Screening","volume":" ","pages":"9691413241274291"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142127252","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Breast cancer mortality during the COVID-19 pandemic.","authors":"Camilla Mattiuzzi, Giuseppe Lippi","doi":"10.1177/09691413241278129","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09691413241278129","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Several lines of evidence suggest that breast cancer screening and treatment may have been compromised during the early phase of the COVID-19 pandemic. Using data from the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) WONDER database, we estimated the age-adjusted mortality rates for female breast cancer between 2018 and 2023. We found that the age-adjusted death rate for breast cancer decreased gradually from 2018 to 2019 and 2020. This downward trend reversed in 2021, with an increase in breast cancer mortality, which then declined further in 2022 and 2023. These findings indicate that breast cancer mortality may have increased slightly in 2021, possibly as a result of limited access to screening and timely treatment during the first phase of the COVID-19 pandemic, although the age-adjusted mortality rate continued to decline in the following two years.</p>","PeriodicalId":51089,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Screening","volume":" ","pages":"9691413241278129"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142127251","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Examining the impact of COVID-19 disruptions on population-based breast cancer screening in Ireland.","authors":"Jessica O'Driscoll, Therese Mooney, Paul Kearney, Yvonne Williams, Suzanne Lynch, Alissa Connors, Aideen Larke, Sorcha McNally, Ann O'Doherty, Laura Murphy, Kathleen E Bennett, Patricia Fitzpatrick, Maeve Mullooly, Fidelma Flanagan","doi":"10.1177/09691413241232899","DOIUrl":"10.1177/09691413241232899","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Many population-based breast screening programmes temporarily suspended routine screening following the COVID-19 pandemic onset. This study aimed to describe screening mammography utilisation and the pattern of screen-detected breast cancer diagnoses following COVID-19-related screening disruptions in Ireland.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using anonymous aggregate data from women invited for routine screening, three time periods were examined: (1) January-December 2019, (2) January-December 2020, and (3) January-December 2021. Descriptive statistics were conducted and comparisons between groups were performed using chi-square tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In 2020, screening mammography capacity fell by 67.1% compared to 2019; recovering to 75% of mammograms performed in 2019, during 2021. Compared to 2019, for screen-detected invasive breast cancers, a reduction in Grade 1 (14.2% vs. 17.2%) and Grade 2 tumours (53.4% vs. 58.0%) and an increase in Grade 3 tumours (32.4% vs. 24.8%) was observed in 2020 (<i>p</i> = 0.03); whereas an increase in Grade 2 tumours (63.3% vs. 58.0%) and a reduction in Grade 3 tumours (19.6% vs. 24.8%) was found in 2021 (<i>p</i> = 0.02). No changes in oestrogen receptor-positive or nodal-positive diagnoses were observed; however the proportion of oestrogen/progesterone receptor-positive breast cancers significantly increased in 2020 (76.2%; <i>p</i> < 0.01) and 2021 (78.7%; <i>p</i> < 0.001) compared to 2019 (67.8%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings demonstrate signs of a grade change for screen-detected invasive breast cancers early in the pandemic, with recovery evident in 2021, and without an increase in nodal positivity. Future studies are needed to determine the COVID-19 impact on long-term breast cancer outcomes including mortality.</p>","PeriodicalId":51089,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Screening","volume":" ","pages":"182-190"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11330080/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140177640","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Risk stratification in medical screening.","authors":"Nicholas J Wald, Stephen W Duffy, Allan Hackshaw","doi":"10.1177/09691413241255623","DOIUrl":"10.1177/09691413241255623","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":51089,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Screening","volume":" ","pages":"119-120"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141155510","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"The prognostic potential of mammographic growth rate of invasive breast cancer in the Nijmegen breast cancer screening cohort.","authors":"Jim Peters, Jos A A M van Dijck, Sjoerd G Elias, Johannes D M Otten, Mireille J M Broeders","doi":"10.1177/09691413231222765","DOIUrl":"10.1177/09691413231222765","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Insight into the aggressiveness of potential breast cancers found in screening may optimize recall decisions. Specific growth rate (SGR), measured on mammograms, may provide valuable prognostic information. This study addresses the association of SGR with prognostic factors and overall survival in patients with invasive carcinoma of no special type (NST) from a screened population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this historic cohort study, 293 women with NST were identified from all participants in the Nijmegen screening program (2003-2007). Information on clinicopathological factors was retrieved from patient files and follow-up on vital status through municipalities. On consecutive mammograms, tumor volumes were estimated. After comparing five growth functions, SGR was calculated using the best-fitting function. Regression and multivariable survival analyses described associations between SGR and prognostic factors as well as overall survival.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Each one standard deviation increase in SGR was associated with an increase in the Nottingham prognostic index by 0.34 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.21-0.46]. Each one standard deviation increase in SGR increased the odds of a tumor with an unfavorable subtype (based on histologic grade and hormone receptors; odds ratio 2.14 [95% CI: 1.45-3.15]) and increased the odds of diagnosis as an interval cancer (versus screen-detected; odds ratio 1.57 [95% CI: 1.20-2.06]). After a median of 12.4 years of follow-up, 78 deaths occurred. SGR was not associated with overall survival (hazard ratio 1.12 [95% CI: 0.87-1.43]).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>SGR may indicate prognostically relevant differences in tumor aggressiveness if serial mammograms are available. A potential association with cause-specific survival could not be determined and is of interest for future research.</p>","PeriodicalId":51089,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Screening","volume":" ","pages":"166-175"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11330081/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139652141","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}