Vrinda Munjal, Katherine M Schupack, Nathaniel E Miller, Christopher L Boswell, Matthew R Meunier, Kathy L MacLaughlin, Gregory M Garrison
{"title":"与巴氏试验不满意相关的临床和患者因素的回顾性分析。","authors":"Vrinda Munjal, Katherine M Schupack, Nathaniel E Miller, Christopher L Boswell, Matthew R Meunier, Kathy L MacLaughlin, Gregory M Garrison","doi":"10.1177/09691413251367834","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectivesGuidelines advise repeat screening within four months if Papanicolaou (Pap) results are unsatisfactory for evaluation. This utilizes healthcare system resources and may decrease patient satisfaction due to needing a second clinic appointment. We assessed unsatisfactory Pap test (UPT) rates and associations with clinician and patient characteristics to inform future interventions to decrease UPTs.SettingMultisite midwestern United States primary care practice.MethodsRetrospective analysis of women aged 21-65 with a Pap between 7/1/2021 and 6/30/2023. Bivariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses were conducted to assess for associations between UPTs and clinician gender, degree, residency status, and experience.ResultsOf 51,195 Paps completed, 2.3% were unsatisfactory. Female clinicians performed the most Pap tests (83.2%) with slightly less likelihood of UPTs compared with male clinicians (<i>p</i> = 0.015). There was no significant difference comparing physicians to advanced practice providers in UPTs (<i>p</i> = 0.18). Residency training level did not affect UPT rates (<i>p</i> = 0.95). Clinician experience was associated with higher UPT rates in first and fourth quartiles (least and most Paps performed) compared to middle two quartiles (<i>p</i> = 0.004). UPTs were more likely among women aged > 50 years old (<i>p</i> < 0.001), married (<i>p</i> < 0.001), and Asian (<i>p</i> < 0.001).ConclusionsClinician characteristics played a small role in predicting UPTs but patient age may be the factor most amenable to intervention to lower UPTs. Transitioning to primary human papillomavirus (HPV) screening in peri/post-menopausal women could decrease UPTs given Paps are performed on the clinician-collected cervical specimen only if HPV testing is positive.</p>","PeriodicalId":51089,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Screening","volume":" ","pages":"9691413251367834"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Retrospective analysis of clinician and patient factors associated with unsatisfactory Pap tests.\",\"authors\":\"Vrinda Munjal, Katherine M Schupack, Nathaniel E Miller, Christopher L Boswell, Matthew R Meunier, Kathy L MacLaughlin, Gregory M Garrison\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/09691413251367834\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>ObjectivesGuidelines advise repeat screening within four months if Papanicolaou (Pap) results are unsatisfactory for evaluation. This utilizes healthcare system resources and may decrease patient satisfaction due to needing a second clinic appointment. We assessed unsatisfactory Pap test (UPT) rates and associations with clinician and patient characteristics to inform future interventions to decrease UPTs.SettingMultisite midwestern United States primary care practice.MethodsRetrospective analysis of women aged 21-65 with a Pap between 7/1/2021 and 6/30/2023. Bivariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses were conducted to assess for associations between UPTs and clinician gender, degree, residency status, and experience.ResultsOf 51,195 Paps completed, 2.3% were unsatisfactory. Female clinicians performed the most Pap tests (83.2%) with slightly less likelihood of UPTs compared with male clinicians (<i>p</i> = 0.015). There was no significant difference comparing physicians to advanced practice providers in UPTs (<i>p</i> = 0.18). Residency training level did not affect UPT rates (<i>p</i> = 0.95). Clinician experience was associated with higher UPT rates in first and fourth quartiles (least and most Paps performed) compared to middle two quartiles (<i>p</i> = 0.004). UPTs were more likely among women aged > 50 years old (<i>p</i> < 0.001), married (<i>p</i> < 0.001), and Asian (<i>p</i> < 0.001).ConclusionsClinician characteristics played a small role in predicting UPTs but patient age may be the factor most amenable to intervention to lower UPTs. Transitioning to primary human papillomavirus (HPV) screening in peri/post-menopausal women could decrease UPTs given Paps are performed on the clinician-collected cervical specimen only if HPV testing is positive.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51089,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Medical Screening\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"9691413251367834\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Medical Screening\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/09691413251367834\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Screening","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09691413251367834","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
Retrospective analysis of clinician and patient factors associated with unsatisfactory Pap tests.
ObjectivesGuidelines advise repeat screening within four months if Papanicolaou (Pap) results are unsatisfactory for evaluation. This utilizes healthcare system resources and may decrease patient satisfaction due to needing a second clinic appointment. We assessed unsatisfactory Pap test (UPT) rates and associations with clinician and patient characteristics to inform future interventions to decrease UPTs.SettingMultisite midwestern United States primary care practice.MethodsRetrospective analysis of women aged 21-65 with a Pap between 7/1/2021 and 6/30/2023. Bivariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses were conducted to assess for associations between UPTs and clinician gender, degree, residency status, and experience.ResultsOf 51,195 Paps completed, 2.3% were unsatisfactory. Female clinicians performed the most Pap tests (83.2%) with slightly less likelihood of UPTs compared with male clinicians (p = 0.015). There was no significant difference comparing physicians to advanced practice providers in UPTs (p = 0.18). Residency training level did not affect UPT rates (p = 0.95). Clinician experience was associated with higher UPT rates in first and fourth quartiles (least and most Paps performed) compared to middle two quartiles (p = 0.004). UPTs were more likely among women aged > 50 years old (p < 0.001), married (p < 0.001), and Asian (p < 0.001).ConclusionsClinician characteristics played a small role in predicting UPTs but patient age may be the factor most amenable to intervention to lower UPTs. Transitioning to primary human papillomavirus (HPV) screening in peri/post-menopausal women could decrease UPTs given Paps are performed on the clinician-collected cervical specimen only if HPV testing is positive.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Medical Screening, a fully peer reviewed journal, is concerned with all aspects of medical screening, particularly the publication of research that advances screening theory and practice. The journal aims to increase awareness of the principles of screening (quantitative and statistical aspects), screening techniques and procedures and methodologies from all specialties. An essential subscription for physicians, clinicians and academics with an interest in screening, epidemiology and public health.