Retrospective analysis of clinician and patient factors associated with unsatisfactory Pap tests.

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Vrinda Munjal, Katherine M Schupack, Nathaniel E Miller, Christopher L Boswell, Matthew R Meunier, Kathy L MacLaughlin, Gregory M Garrison
{"title":"Retrospective analysis of clinician and patient factors associated with unsatisfactory Pap tests.","authors":"Vrinda Munjal, Katherine M Schupack, Nathaniel E Miller, Christopher L Boswell, Matthew R Meunier, Kathy L MacLaughlin, Gregory M Garrison","doi":"10.1177/09691413251367834","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectivesGuidelines advise repeat screening within four months if Papanicolaou (Pap) results are unsatisfactory for evaluation. This utilizes healthcare system resources and may decrease patient satisfaction due to needing a second clinic appointment. We assessed unsatisfactory Pap test (UPT) rates and associations with clinician and patient characteristics to inform future interventions to decrease UPTs.SettingMultisite midwestern United States primary care practice.MethodsRetrospective analysis of women aged 21-65 with a Pap between 7/1/2021 and 6/30/2023. Bivariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses were conducted to assess for associations between UPTs and clinician gender, degree, residency status, and experience.ResultsOf 51,195 Paps completed, 2.3% were unsatisfactory. Female clinicians performed the most Pap tests (83.2%) with slightly less likelihood of UPTs compared with male clinicians (<i>p</i> = 0.015). There was no significant difference comparing physicians to advanced practice providers in UPTs (<i>p</i> = 0.18). Residency training level did not affect UPT rates (<i>p</i> = 0.95). Clinician experience was associated with higher UPT rates in first and fourth quartiles (least and most Paps performed) compared to middle two quartiles (<i>p</i> = 0.004). UPTs were more likely among women aged  > 50 years old (<i>p</i> < 0.001), married (<i>p</i> < 0.001), and Asian (<i>p</i> < 0.001).ConclusionsClinician characteristics played a small role in predicting UPTs but patient age may be the factor most amenable to intervention to lower UPTs. Transitioning to primary human papillomavirus (HPV) screening in peri/post-menopausal women could decrease UPTs given Paps are performed on the clinician-collected cervical specimen only if HPV testing is positive.</p>","PeriodicalId":51089,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Screening","volume":" ","pages":"9691413251367834"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Screening","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09691413251367834","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ObjectivesGuidelines advise repeat screening within four months if Papanicolaou (Pap) results are unsatisfactory for evaluation. This utilizes healthcare system resources and may decrease patient satisfaction due to needing a second clinic appointment. We assessed unsatisfactory Pap test (UPT) rates and associations with clinician and patient characteristics to inform future interventions to decrease UPTs.SettingMultisite midwestern United States primary care practice.MethodsRetrospective analysis of women aged 21-65 with a Pap between 7/1/2021 and 6/30/2023. Bivariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses were conducted to assess for associations between UPTs and clinician gender, degree, residency status, and experience.ResultsOf 51,195 Paps completed, 2.3% were unsatisfactory. Female clinicians performed the most Pap tests (83.2%) with slightly less likelihood of UPTs compared with male clinicians (p = 0.015). There was no significant difference comparing physicians to advanced practice providers in UPTs (p = 0.18). Residency training level did not affect UPT rates (p = 0.95). Clinician experience was associated with higher UPT rates in first and fourth quartiles (least and most Paps performed) compared to middle two quartiles (p = 0.004). UPTs were more likely among women aged  > 50 years old (p < 0.001), married (p < 0.001), and Asian (p < 0.001).ConclusionsClinician characteristics played a small role in predicting UPTs but patient age may be the factor most amenable to intervention to lower UPTs. Transitioning to primary human papillomavirus (HPV) screening in peri/post-menopausal women could decrease UPTs given Paps are performed on the clinician-collected cervical specimen only if HPV testing is positive.

与巴氏试验不满意相关的临床和患者因素的回顾性分析。
目的指南建议,如果巴氏涂片(Pap)结果不能令人满意,应在4个月内重复筛查。这利用了医疗保健系统资源,并可能降低患者满意度,因为需要第二次门诊预约。我们评估了不满意的巴氏涂片检查(UPT)率及其与临床医生和患者特征的关系,以告知未来干预措施以减少UPT。背景:美国中西部多地点初级保健实践。方法回顾性分析2021年7月1日至2023年6月30日期间接受Pap检查的21-65岁女性。进行了双变量和多变量logistic回归分析,以评估upt与临床医生性别、学位、住院状态和经验之间的关系。结果在完成的51,195份pap中,不满意的占2.3%。与男性临床医生相比,女性临床医生进行Pap检查最多(83.2%),upt的可能性略低(p = 0.015)。医师与高级执业医师在upt方面无显著差异(p = 0.18)。住院医师培训水平不影响UPT率(p = 0.95)。与中间两个四分位数(p = 0.004)相比,临床医生经验与第一和第四四分位数(最少和最多pap)的较高UPT率相关(p = 0.004)。upt更可能发生在50岁至50岁的女性中
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Medical Screening
Journal of Medical Screening 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
3.40%
发文量
40
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Medical Screening, a fully peer reviewed journal, is concerned with all aspects of medical screening, particularly the publication of research that advances screening theory and practice. The journal aims to increase awareness of the principles of screening (quantitative and statistical aspects), screening techniques and procedures and methodologies from all specialties. An essential subscription for physicians, clinicians and academics with an interest in screening, epidemiology and public health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信