Journal of Arthroplasty最新文献

{"title":"Conflict of Interest Statement","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/S0883-5403(24)00895-7","DOIUrl":"10.1016/S0883-5403(24)00895-7","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":51077,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Arthroplasty","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2024-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142243422","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Letter to the Editor Commenting on “The Impact of Preoperative Weight Loss Timing on Surgical Outcomes in Total Hip Arthroplasty”","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.arth.2024.05.092","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.arth.2024.05.092","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":51077,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Arthroplasty","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2024-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142243962","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Letter to the Editor on “Impact of Reporting Bias, Conflict of Interest, and Funding Sources on Quality of Orthopaedic Research”","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.arth.2024.07.004","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.arth.2024.07.004","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":51077,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Arthroplasty","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2024-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142243960","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Response to “The Impact of Preoperative Weight Loss Timing on Surgical Outcomes in Total Hip Arthroplasty”","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.arth.2024.04.014","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.arth.2024.04.014","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":51077,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Arthroplasty","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2024-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142243963","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Response to Letter to the Editor on “Impact of Reporting Bias, Conflict of Interest, and Funding Sources on Quality of Orthopaedic Research”","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.arth.2024.07.003","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.arth.2024.07.003","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":51077,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Arthroplasty","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2024-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142243961","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Prognostic Implications of Unexpected Positive Intraoperative Cultures in Two-Stage Knee Arthroplasty Reimplantations: A Minimum Five-Year Retrospective Analysis.","authors":"Yu-Chih Lin, Jui-Ping Chen, Sheng-Hsun Lee, Chih-Hsiang Chang, Chih-Chien Hu, Sheng-Hsuan Lin","doi":"10.1016/j.arth.2024.08.049","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2024.08.049","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The clinical challenge of unexpected positive intraoperative cultures (UPICs) persists in two-stage resection arthroplasty for managing periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs) following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). This study aimed to investigate the incidence of UPICs during the definitive reimplantation phase of two-stage resection arthroplasty of the knee and to assess both the infection- and revision-free survivorship of the implanted prosthesis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study included 450 two-stage resection arthroplasties of primary knee prostheses performed between January 2012 and April 2017. Patients were excluded if they: (1) underwent three or more staged resections; (2) had ambiguous clinical documentation or deviated from the two-stage protocol; or (3) underwent revision arthroplasty prior to the PJI. Additionally, patients presumed aseptic before the second-stage reimplantation were excluded if they lacked joint aspiration or met the 2011 Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS) criteria for PJI before implantation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After exclusions, 300 patients were analyzed. Among them, 14% had UPIC during the second-stage reimplantation. The follow-up time was 2,316 (range, 1,888 to 3,737) days and 2,531 (range, 1,947 to 3,349) days for UPIC and negative intraoperative culture (NIC) groups, respectively. Re-revision due to subsequent PJI occurred in 26.2% of UPIC patients and 15.1% of NIC patients. The 2-year infection-free survival rates for the NIC, 1 UPIC, and ≥ 2 UPIC cohorts were 99.5, 98.2, and 94.3%, respectively, while the 5-year survival rates were 92.1, 91.1, and 54.3%, respectively. The unfavorable survivorship was significantly different in multiple UPIC cases (P < 0.001). Multiple UPICs with pathogens consistent with the first-stage findings were strongly associated with the risk of reinfection (P < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>An UPIC was identified in 14% of second-stage reimplantations. Patients who had multiple UPICs demonstrated truncated survivorship and suboptimal outcomes relative to the NIC and single UPIC cohorts, especially with pathogen consistency to the first-stage surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":51077,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Arthroplasty","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2024-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142141695","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Biofilm Formation is Durably Prevented on Pre-Fabricated Antibiotic Cement Spacers Compared to Cobalt Chrome and Polyethylene.","authors":"Shota Higashihira, Stefanie J Simpson, Christopher J Arnold, Evan R Deckard, R Michael Meneghini, Edward M Greenfield, Leonard T Buller","doi":"10.1016/j.arth.2024.08.046","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2024.08.046","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A two-stage revision remains the standard for managing chronic periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). Despite multiple spacer options, whether a particular one better resists biofilm formation remains unclear. Prefabricated polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) articulating spacers containing antibiotics and a proprietary pore structure were developed to increase antibiotic elution characterized by a rapid burst phase for the initial 1 to 2 days and an extended slow-release phase for > 28 days. This in vitro study determined whether biofilm formation is prevented during the initial rapid burst phase and/or the slow-release phase.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>S. aureus-Xen36 was incubated in 1.5 ml of Luria-Bertani broth with PMMA discs with the proprietary pore structure either with or without gentamycin and vancomycin, or with 'Hoffman style' positive-control discs (ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) or cobalt-chrome). Non-adherent bacteria were removed by three Phosphate Buffered Saline rinses every 20 to 24 hours. Planktonic bacterial growth in the culture broth and biofilm formation on the discs were measured by Colony Forming Unit (CFU) counting and resazurin reduction assays. Experiments were repeated > 4 times.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No detectable planktonic bacterial growth or biofilm formation occurred in cultures containing PMMA with antibiotics (≤ 15 CFUs/disc), whereas biofilms formed on PMMA without antibiotics, UHMWPE, and cobalt-chrome (1x10⁷ to 4x10⁸ CFUs/disc, P < 0.0001). Biofilm formation was confirmed by a 100-fold decrease in sensitivity to vancomycin. To determine whether the antibiotic slow-release phase is sufficient to block biofilm formation, PMMA discs with antibiotics were pre-eluted for 14 days with multiple saline changes prior to bacterial inoculation. After antibiotic elution, still no detectable biofilms formed on PMMA discs with antibiotics (≤ 15 CFUs/disc, P <0.0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Antibiotic release during both the initial and slow-release phases prevented biofilm formation on PMMA with the proprietary pore structure. This may translate into improved infection eradication rates clinically.</p>","PeriodicalId":51077,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Arthroplasty","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2024-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142134377","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Conversion of Tibial Plateau Fractures to Total Knee Arthroplasty is Associated with Worse Patient-Reported Outcomes, Increased Operative Time and Increased Complications.","authors":"Ian M Clapp, Cody Orton, Claire Kapron, Brenna Blackburn, Jeremy M Gililland, Lucas A Anderson, Christopher E Pelt, Christopher L Peters, Michael J Archibeck","doi":"10.1016/j.arth.2024.08.050","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2024.08.050","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Prior open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of tibial plateau fracture (TPF) adds complexity to subsequent total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The purpose of this study was to compare the outcomes of patients undergoing a TKA following prior ORIF of TPF to patients undergoing a primary TKA for osteoarthritis and an aseptic revision TKA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>There were 52 patients who underwent primary TKA following prior ORIF of TPF between January 2009 and June 2021, who were included and matched in a 1:4 ratio by sex, body mass index, and American Society of Anesthesiologists class to 208 patients undergoing primary TKA. A second 1:1 matched comparison to 52 aseptic revision TKA patients was also included. The Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement scores were obtained preoperatively and at 2-years postoperatively. Independent t-tests and Chi-square tests were used for statistical comparisons.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The TPF patients were significantly younger than both the primary and revision cohorts (55 ± 14.0 versus 63 ± 16.3 versus 64 ± 9.5, P < 0.001). Compared to primary TKA patients, the TPF group had worse KOOS JR scores at 2-years (46.9 ± 18.5 versus 66.2 ± 17.8, P = 0.0152), higher rates of wound complications (15.4 versus 3.9%, P = 0.0020), and increased operative times (140.2 ± 45.3 versus 95.2 ± 25.7, P < 0.0001). No significant differences in these metrics were seen between the TPF group and the revision group. Additionally, TPF patients were more likely to require a manipulation under anesthesia (MUA) than both primary and revision patients (21.2 versus 5.8 versus 5.8%, P = 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The TKAs following ORIF of TPF are more like revision TKAs than primary TKAs in terms of patient-reported outcomes, operative times, and wound complications. The rate of MUA was higher than in both matched groups. These findings provide valuable information that can affect preoperative patient education and postoperative management regimens for these patients. They also emphasize the need for a conversion to TKA code due to the increased complexity and complications seen in this more difficult subset of TKAs.</p>","PeriodicalId":51077,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Arthroplasty","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2024-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142134379","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Routine Prescription of Proton Pump Inhibitors in the Perioperative Period is Associated with Decreased Rates of 2-Year Revision Surgery after Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty.","authors":"Andrew B Harris, Amil R Agarwal, Vishal Hegde, Julius K Oni, Harpal S Khanuja","doi":"10.1016/j.arth.2024.08.042","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2024.08.042","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Proton Pump Inhibitors (PPIs) are often prescribed in conjunction with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) after total hip (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) due to their gastroprotective effects. In animal studies, it has been suggested that PPIs have immunosuppressive effects and impair fracture healing, however, the association between PPI use and adverse events following THA and TKA has not been well studied.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An administrative claims database was queried for patients who underwent elective THA from 2010 to 2019. The experimental group consisted of patients who did not have a prior history of gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding or gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and who received a PPI prescription in the perioperative period. A 1:1 propensity score matching was used to create control cohorts of patients who did not have any PPI prescription filled, also matching for age, sex, and Charlson comorbidity index. This same cohort selection and matching procedure was then repeated for patients undergoing elective TKA. In total, 11,450 patients were studied (3,103 TKA+PPI, 2,622 THA+PPI, 3,103 TKA Controls, and 2,622 THA Controls). The mean age was 64 years (range, 38 to 94), and 57% were women. Significance was considered at P < 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Perioperative PPI prescription in TKA patients was associated with significantly lower rates of all-cause revision (3.0 versus 4.1%, P < 0.01) and periprosthetic joint infection (1.0 versus 1.8%, P < 0.01). In THA patients, PPI prescription was associated with a lower all-cause revision rate (2.8 versus 4.0%, P = 0.02). No significant differences were found between PPI and non-PPI groups for aseptic loosening, periprosthetic fracture, gastrointestinal bleeding, or surgical site infection in either cohort.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients receiving routine PPI prescriptions in the perioperative period surrounding TKA and THA have a lower risk of all-cause revision surgery, and perioperative PPI use is associated with a decreased risk of PJI in patients undergoing TKA. As these results conflict with the few previous studies performed on this topic, additional controlled studies are warranted to fully elucidate the relationship between PPI use and adverse events after THA and TKA.</p>","PeriodicalId":51077,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Arthroplasty","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2024-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142134382","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"A Registry Study On Acetabular Revisions Using Jumbo Cups: Do We Really Need A More Complex Revision Strategy?","authors":"Claudio D'Agostino, Alberto Di Martino, Piergiorgio Cataldi, Francesco Schilardi, Matteo Brunello, Giuseppe Geraci, Barbara Bordini, Francesco Traina, Cesare Faldini","doi":"10.1016/j.arth.2024.08.041","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2024.08.041","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The increasing global performance of total hip arthroplasty (THA) has led to a corresponding rise in revision surgeries, primarily due to cup implant failure, with aseptic loosening and periprosthetic infection being common causes. Various techniques and implants, including jumbo cups (JCs), are employed to manage residual bone loss post-cup removal, facilitating enhanced surface area for improved host bone contact and biological osteointegration. The purpose of the present study was to determine the outcomes of acetabular revision arthroplasty using JC implants over a 20-year follow-up period by reporting overall survival, complications leading to re-revision surgery, and surgical strategy in the case of re-revision.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cohort study based on a large regional registry was conducted, examining revision THA surgeries utilizing JCs between 2000 and 2020. The study included all the revision acetabular procedures performed with cementless JCs, identified with a diameter ≥ 62 mm in women or ≥ 66 mm in men. All iliac fixation cups were excluded. Data on demographics, revision surgery indications, components, fixation types, causes of failure, and reintervention strategies were collected and analyzed. A total of 541 JCs implanted from January 2000 to December 2020 were evaluated. The most common revision indications were \"cup aseptic loosening\" (54.5%) and \"total aseptic loosening,\" which included both the cup and stem (32%).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Jumbo cup survival rates were 92.5% at 5 years, 85.8% at 10 years, and 81.5% at 15 years. Among the 70 failures, the main causes were \"cup aseptic loosening\" (40%), \"total aseptic loosening\" (17.1%), and \"septic loosening\" (12.8%). Revisions primarily involved acetabular cup revision surgery (54 cases), component explantation (11 cases), or insert/head revision (5 cases).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This registry-based study of JCs in revision THA demonstrates excellent 15-year survival rates and acceptable failure rates. It supports JCs as a viable option, offering relative surgical simplicity compared to alternatives like anti-protrusion cages, bone grafts, and augments.</p>","PeriodicalId":51077,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Arthroplasty","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2024-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142134376","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}