{"title":"Response to Michael W. Clune’s A Defense of Judgment","authors":"Theo Davis","doi":"10.1353/mfs.2024.a928341","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/mfs.2024.a928341","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract: This essay explores how questions of equality and difference operate in Michael W. Clune’s A Defense of Judgment and frames the book as an example of the challenge of pursuing intellectual work in dialogue with emerging academic institutional structures.","PeriodicalId":509181,"journal":{"name":"MFS Modern Fiction Studies","volume":"87 13","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141231225","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Introduction to Special Issue on Michael W. Clune’s A Defense of Judgment","authors":"Robert S. Lehman","doi":"10.1353/mfs.2024.a928338","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/mfs.2024.a928338","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":509181,"journal":{"name":"MFS Modern Fiction Studies","volume":"9 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141231804","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Judgment and Its Publics","authors":"Elizabeth S. Anker","doi":"10.1353/mfs.2024.a928339","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/mfs.2024.a928339","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract: This response essay overviews the timely interventions of Michael W. Clune’s A Defense of Judgment , which was published amid a larger sociopolitical crisis in expert judgment. Clune productively develops an account of the specialized nature of literary expertise. However, this essay also asks whether too much force is attributed to the logic of the market, and it similarly questions the vision of the public implicit to Clune’s model of literary studies.","PeriodicalId":509181,"journal":{"name":"MFS Modern Fiction Studies","volume":"37 22","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141233104","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"The Place of Judgment in the Conversation: A Reply to Michael W. Clune","authors":"Richard Moran","doi":"10.1353/mfs.2024.a928345","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/mfs.2024.a928345","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract: I find much to admire in Michael W. Clune’s book A Defense of Judgment . I have some points of disagreement as well. I think the argument concedes too much to the bad idea that political egalitarianism implies a lack of difference among judgments of value. I have reservations about the idea of “expertise” (let alone deference to experts) in philosophy or literary studies. And I believe that Clune’s use of an essay of mine does not accurately portray its content or purpose. Nonetheless I think the book is a powerful and insightful intervention.","PeriodicalId":509181,"journal":{"name":"MFS Modern Fiction Studies","volume":"25 18","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141234925","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Judgment Takes Care of Itself","authors":"Todd Cronan","doi":"10.1353/mfs.2024.a928340","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/mfs.2024.a928340","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract: Aesthetic judgment does not require defense, because moral judgment saturates our language and our experience. In the first part of this essay, I look at the writings of Iris Murdoch, Stanley Cavell, and G. E. M. Anscombe to show how judgments shape our most intimate dealings with the world. In the second part, I examine a strong instance of practical criticism: the writings of Clement Greenberg on Impressionism and Henri Matisse. Greenberg’s Kantian attempt to separate aesthetic judgment from moral judgment breaks down in practice, a testimony to the depth of his engagement with art and the ubiquity of moral judgment.","PeriodicalId":509181,"journal":{"name":"MFS Modern Fiction Studies","volume":"5 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141230374","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Judgment all the Way Down","authors":"Simon During","doi":"10.1353/mfs.2024.a928342","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/mfs.2024.a928342","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract: This essay appraises Michael W. Clune’s arguments for the importance of literary judgment. It mainly supports Clune’s case but argues that judgment in fact goes deeper and extends further than Clune recognizes.","PeriodicalId":509181,"journal":{"name":"MFS Modern Fiction Studies","volume":"26 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141229454","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"A Change of Heart: What It’s Like to Live in Tolstoy’s The Death of Ivan Ilyich","authors":"Yi-Ping Ong","doi":"10.1353/mfs.2024.a928346","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/mfs.2024.a928346","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract: Michael W. Clune argues in A Defense of Judgment that aesthetic education can unleash our capacity to critique our values and transform our preferences and desires. Works of art hold the possibility of self-transcendence and unselfing; expertise in aesthetic judgment enables us to enter into this possibility. But how do we come to want to change what we want within a culture that conceals the value of this practice? Tolstoy’s The Death of Ivan Ilyich (1886) stages how a change of heart in the midst of everyday reality can reorient us to the possibility of a new life.","PeriodicalId":509181,"journal":{"name":"MFS Modern Fiction Studies","volume":"11 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141234074","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Toward an Epistemology of Literary Judgment","authors":"Alex King","doi":"10.1353/mfs.2024.a928343","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/mfs.2024.a928343","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract: This essay examines an epistemological thread that runs through Michael W. Clune’s A Defense of Judgment . The first half raises worries about Humean judgment, ultimately doubting whether it can vindicate all it has been asked to. The second half argues that expertise can be grounded in fully tacit knowledge, though that fact inevitably—and rightly—introduces outsider skepticism. The explicitness of that tacit knowledge is not a requirement of expertise as such, but rather a contingent feature of the requirements of academic life. But this, among other things, may be what makes literary education a worthy pursuit.","PeriodicalId":509181,"journal":{"name":"MFS Modern Fiction Studies","volume":"19 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141235018","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Anxiety and Community: Clune on Judgment","authors":"Robert S. Lehman","doi":"10.1353/mfs.2024.a928344","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/mfs.2024.a928344","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract: In my response to Michael W. Clune’s A Defense of Judgment , I express some reservations about the notion of “community” that Clune invokes when he describes the sort of aesthetic judgment characteristic of a community of experts. More exactly, I ask whether a community focused on works of art and coming into being in a situation determined by modernism in the arts can ever cohere in quite the way that Clune needs it to, whether it can (or should even want to) attain the kind of sureness characteristic of, say, a scientific community.","PeriodicalId":509181,"journal":{"name":"MFS Modern Fiction Studies","volume":"43 49","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141232759","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Questions of Judgment","authors":"Michael W. Clune","doi":"10.1353/mfs.2024.a928348","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/mfs.2024.a928348","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":509181,"journal":{"name":"MFS Modern Fiction Studies","volume":"18 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141231866","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}