{"title":"焦虑与共同体克吕尼论审判","authors":"Robert S. Lehman","doi":"10.1353/mfs.2024.a928344","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract: In my response to Michael W. Clune’s A Defense of Judgment , I express some reservations about the notion of “community” that Clune invokes when he describes the sort of aesthetic judgment characteristic of a community of experts. More exactly, I ask whether a community focused on works of art and coming into being in a situation determined by modernism in the arts can ever cohere in quite the way that Clune needs it to, whether it can (or should even want to) attain the kind of sureness characteristic of, say, a scientific community.","PeriodicalId":509181,"journal":{"name":"MFS Modern Fiction Studies","volume":"43 49","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Anxiety and Community: Clune on Judgment\",\"authors\":\"Robert S. Lehman\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/mfs.2024.a928344\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract: In my response to Michael W. Clune’s A Defense of Judgment , I express some reservations about the notion of “community” that Clune invokes when he describes the sort of aesthetic judgment characteristic of a community of experts. More exactly, I ask whether a community focused on works of art and coming into being in a situation determined by modernism in the arts can ever cohere in quite the way that Clune needs it to, whether it can (or should even want to) attain the kind of sureness characteristic of, say, a scientific community.\",\"PeriodicalId\":509181,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"MFS Modern Fiction Studies\",\"volume\":\"43 49\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"MFS Modern Fiction Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/mfs.2024.a928344\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MFS Modern Fiction Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/mfs.2024.a928344","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
摘要:在对迈克尔-W-克吕尼的《为判断力辩护》(A Defense of Judgment)一书的回应中,我对克吕尼在描述专家群体所特有的审美判断力时所援引的 "群体 "概念持保留意见。更确切地说,我想问的是,一个专注于艺术作品并在现代主义艺术所决定的情况下产生的群体,是否能够以克鲁尼所需要的方式凝聚在一起,是否能够(或者甚至应该想要)达到比如说科学群体所特有的那种确定性。
Abstract: In my response to Michael W. Clune’s A Defense of Judgment , I express some reservations about the notion of “community” that Clune invokes when he describes the sort of aesthetic judgment characteristic of a community of experts. More exactly, I ask whether a community focused on works of art and coming into being in a situation determined by modernism in the arts can ever cohere in quite the way that Clune needs it to, whether it can (or should even want to) attain the kind of sureness characteristic of, say, a scientific community.