Response to Michael W. Clune’s A Defense of Judgment

Theo Davis
{"title":"Response to Michael W. Clune’s A Defense of Judgment","authors":"Theo Davis","doi":"10.1353/mfs.2024.a928341","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract: This essay explores how questions of equality and difference operate in Michael W. Clune’s A Defense of Judgment and frames the book as an example of the challenge of pursuing intellectual work in dialogue with emerging academic institutional structures.","PeriodicalId":509181,"journal":{"name":"MFS Modern Fiction Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MFS Modern Fiction Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/mfs.2024.a928341","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract: This essay explores how questions of equality and difference operate in Michael W. Clune’s A Defense of Judgment and frames the book as an example of the challenge of pursuing intellectual work in dialogue with emerging academic institutional structures.
回应迈克尔-W-克吕尼的《为判决辩护
摘要:这篇文章探讨了平等与差异问题如何在迈克尔-W-克吕尼的《为判决辩护》中发挥作用,并以该书为例,说明了在与新兴学术体制结构对话的过程中开展知识工作所面临的挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信