American Journal of Clinical Oncology-Cancer Clinical Trials最新文献

{"title":"Meta-analysis of Targeted Therapies in EGFR-mutated Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Efficacy and Safety of Osimertinib, Erlotinib, and Gefitinib as First-line Treatment.","authors":"Zaheer Qureshi, Faryal Altaf, Abdur Jamil, Rimsha Siddique","doi":"10.1097/COC.0000000000001138","DOIUrl":"10.1097/COC.0000000000001138","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Some of the non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cases enhance somatic mutations of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene within the tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) domain. In such cases, first-line treatments are EGFR-TKIs, including osimertinib, erlotinib, or gefitinib. Therefore, this meta-analysis aims to assess the safety and efficacy of first-line targeted therapies for EGFR-mutated advanced NSCLC patients, focusing on osimertinib, erlotinib, and gefitinib.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic electronic search was conducted on 3 electronic databases-Scopus, PubMed, and Web of Science-from inception to May 2024 to locate relevant trials reporting the safety and efficacy of osimertinib, erlotinib, or gefitinib in treating EGFR-mutated advanced NSCLC. No language or data restriction was applied to the search strategy. The assessed effects were objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR). RoB 2 tool was utilized to determine the risk of bias while R programming language performed all the statistical synthesis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 15,275 search results, only 19 trials were eligible for this meta-analysis. All the 3 EGFR-TKIs depicted effectiveness and safety among NSCLC patients, but osimertinib improved the ORR by 72% (95% CI: 65%, 78%) as compared with erlotinib (69% [95% CI: 58%, 79%]) and gefitinib (64% [95% CI: 64%, 78%]). Overall, the 3 EGFR-TKIs were effective by improving ORR 68% (95% CI: 63%, 73%). Similarly, osimertinib demonstrated highly effective impacts in disease control among NSCLC patients by 94% (95% CI: 91%, 97%) compared with gefitinib (68% [95% CI: 41%, 89%]). Overall, the 2 EGFR-TKIs were effective in disease control among NSCLC patients (82% [95% CI: 67%, 93%]).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The pooled analyses have shown that erlotinib, gefitinib, and osimertinib are safe and effective first-line treatment options for patients with EGFR-mutated advanced NSCLC. The meta-analysis outcomes have demonstrated that osimertinib, erlotinib, or gefitinib positively impact overall response rate and disease control.</p>","PeriodicalId":50812,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Clinical Oncology-Cancer Clinical Trials","volume":" ","pages":"44-54"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142300115","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Assessment of Radiotherapy as a Standalone Treatment Following Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Nonmetastatic Breast Cancer: A SEER Database Analysis.","authors":"Pierre Loap, Youlia Kirova","doi":"10.1097/COC.0000000000001146","DOIUrl":"10.1097/COC.0000000000001146","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Traditional breast cancer management involves surgery followed by systemic therapies. However, advancements in neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) raise questions about the necessity of surgery in cases with an excellent response to NACT. This study investigates the outcomes of radiotherapy without surgery in selected patients with nonmetastatic breast cancer after a complete or substantial response to NACT.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective study was conducted using the SEER database, reviewing records from 2010 to 2020 for patients with nonmetastatic breast cancer who received NACT, associated with a clinical response, followed by radiotherapy alone. The population included 123 patients, stratified into complete clinical response (cCR) and non-cCR (partial or unspecified clinical response) cohorts. Overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median follow-up was 41 months. Among the patients, 17 (13.82%) achieved cCR. The 5-year OS and CSS for the entire cohort were 65.8% and 71%, respectively, with the cCR group achieving 100% rates for both. Age above 60 and larger tumor size (T3 to T4) were associated with lower OS. The non-cCR group showed a 5-year OS of 61.5% and CSS of 67.1%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study indicates that omitting surgery in patients with a cCR to NACT may be feasible, as evidenced by this subgroup's 100% OS and CSS rates at 5 and 10 years. These promising results support further research into less invasive breast cancer management. However, prospective studies must validate these findings and identify suitable patients for nonsurgical approaches.</p>","PeriodicalId":50812,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Clinical Oncology-Cancer Clinical Trials","volume":" ","pages":"16-20"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142373495","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Does the Primary Tumor Site Drive Biology for Patients With Synovial Sarcoma?","authors":"Riddhi R Patel, George L Delclos, Stacia M DeSantis, Michael B Cannell, Philip J Lupo, Andrew J Bishop, Alexander J Lazar, Patrick P Lin, Robert S Benjamin, Shreyaskumar R Patel, Joseph Ludwig, Vinod Ravi, John Andrew Livingston, Neeta Somaiah, Maria Alejandra Zarzour, Anthony P Conley, Dejka M Araujo","doi":"10.1097/COC.0000000000001142","DOIUrl":"10.1097/COC.0000000000001142","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>We evaluated survival outcomes by primary tumor site in synovial sarcoma (SS) patients with localized and metastatic disease at diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective review of 504 SS patients diagnosed from 1974 to 2020. Kaplan-Meier method, log-rank test, and Cox-proportional hazards regression were used.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 504 patients, 401 (79.6%) presented with localized disease, and 103 (20.4%) with metastases. For patients with localized disease, (1) 5-year OS by tumor site was as follows: 80% (95% CI, 67%-89%) for head/neck, 30% (95% CI, 18%-42%) for intrathoracic, 51% (95% CI, 35%-65%) for abdomen/pelvis, 71% (95% CI, 62%-79%) for proximal-extremity, and 83% (71%, 91%) for distal-extremity. (2) On multivariable analysis, tumor site (compared with proximal-extremity: intrathoracic tumors [HR: 1.95; 95% CI, 1.22-3.16]; hand/foot [HR: 0.52; 95% CI, 0.28-0.97]), tumor size (compared with <5 cm, 5-10 cm [HR: 1.80; 95% CI, 1.14-2.85]; ≥10 cm [HR: 4.37; 95% CI, 2.69-7.11]), and use of neo/adjuvant radiation (HR: 0.54; 95% CI, 0.37-0.79) remained significantly associated with OS. For patients with metastatic disease, (1) 5-year OS was 12% (95% CI, 6%-21%) and (2) the only factor that remained significantly associated with OS on multivariable analysis was surgical resection for the primary tumor (HR: 0.14; 95% CI, 0.08-0.26).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The primary tumor location plays a significant role in predicting outcomes for patients with localized SS. Even though patients present with metastatic disease, surgical resection of the primary tumor improves their survival. These findings are critical for patient counseling and designing a personalized treatment plan that reflects the corresponding outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":50812,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Clinical Oncology-Cancer Clinical Trials","volume":" ","pages":"21-27"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142121064","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Efficacy and Safety of Abemaciclib in Combination With Endocrine Therapy for HR+/HER2- Advanced or Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Zaheer Qureshi, Abdur Jamil, Eeshal Fatima, Faryal Altaf, Rimsha Siddique","doi":"10.1097/COC.0000000000001143","DOIUrl":"10.1097/COC.0000000000001143","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Breast cancer, particularly the hormone receptor-positive (HR+) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) subtype, remains a major global health concern. Abemaciclib, a CDK4/6 inhibitor, has shown promising results in treating advanced cases. This study comprehensively assesses the efficacy and safety of abemaciclib in combination with endocrine therapy for HR+/HER2- advanced or metastatic breast cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Following PRISMA guidelines, a systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted. A thorough literature search was conducted on PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov til December 2023. Inclusion criteria encompassed randomized controlled trials and retrospective cohort studies reporting on abemaciclib in approved doses, either as monotherapy or in combination. Outcome assessments included progression-free survival (PFS), overall response rate (ORR), side effects/adverse effects (SE/AE), and overall survival (OS). Quality assessment utilized Cochrane's revised risk of bias tool and Newcastle-Ottawa scale.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Pooled results of 22 studies involving 14,010 patients revealed that abemaciclib significantly improved PFS (hazard ratio=0.53; 95% CI: 0.48-0.59; P =0.00; I 2 =0%), ORR (risk ratio=2.31; 95% CI: 1.93-2.75; P =0.00; I 2 =0%), and OS (risk ratio=0.76 (95% CI: 0.65-0.87; P =0.001; I 2 =0%). However, abemaciclib increased the risk of adverse events in the fulvestrant and nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor (NSAI) combinations, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Abemaciclib, particularly in combination with fulvestrant, emerges as an effective therapeutic option for HR+/HER2- advanced or metastatic breast cancer, improving PFS and OS. The higher toxicity profile warrants cautious use, especially in treatment-naive patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":50812,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Clinical Oncology-Cancer Clinical Trials","volume":" ","pages":"6-15"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142156564","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Impact of Surveillance Imaging in Patients With HPV-Associated Oropharyngeal Carcinoma Treated With Definitive Radiation and Chemotherapy.","authors":"Trisha Shang, Gabriel Raab, Linda Chen, Yao Yu, Achraff Shamseddine, Nadeem Riaz, Sean M McBride, Daphna Gelblum, Luc Gt Morris, Nancy Y Lee, Kaveh Zakeri","doi":"10.1097/COC.0000000000001144","DOIUrl":"10.1097/COC.0000000000001144","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Surveillance imaging for HPV-associated oropharyngeal carcinomas (OPCs) differs among physicians and institutions. Surveillance imaging can detect disease progression earlier, but can also contribute to anxiety and cost, without proven survival benefits. We sought to determine practice patterns of surveillance imaging and the number of surveillance scans needed to detect one recurrence in patients with HPV-associated OPCs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective cohort study between 2017 and 2019 (median follow-up: 39.9 mo) of consecutive patients with locally advanced HPV-associated OPC who received definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT) with 70 Gy at a single institution. Patients were followed post-CRT and their surveillance scans were recorded. Recurrences were classified as detected by first post-treatment scans, surveillance scans, clinical exams, or incidental findings. The number of surveillance scans needed to detect 1 recurrence was determined by dividing the number of surveillance scans by the number of recurrences detected by surveillance scans.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 276 patients with a median follow-up of 39.9 months, there were 28 recurrences. Of all recurrences, 11 (39.3%) were detected by the first post-treatment scan, 11 (39.3%) by surveillance scan, 5 (17.9%) by clinical exam, and 1 (3.6%) was incidentally found. A total of 694 surveillance scans were taken. The number of surveillance scans needed to detect 1 recurrence was 64 overall, 45 within 2 years, and 248 beyond 2 years from treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>First post-treatment scans and surveillance scans detected more recurrences than clinical exams. A high burden of surveillance scans is needed to detect 1 recurrence, especially beyond 2 years from treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":50812,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Clinical Oncology-Cancer Clinical Trials","volume":" ","pages":"28-33"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142331848","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Maintenance Therapy in Acute Myeloid Leukemia.","authors":"Giorgi Sabakhtarishvili, Amir Ansari, Imad A Tabbara","doi":"10.1097/COC.0000000000001140","DOIUrl":"10.1097/COC.0000000000001140","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) poses significant challenges due to its high relapse rates despite initial successful induction chemotherapy. Maintenance therapy aims to prevent disease recurrence, particularly in high-risk patients. This review explores current maintenance treatments, their impacts on patient outcomes, and ongoing studies shaping the treatment landscape for AML. Hypomethylating agents like azacitidine and decitabine have shown promise in improving relapse-free and overall survival, particularly in older patients with AML ineligible for transplantation. Combination regimens involving azacitidine and venetoclax have demonstrated encouraging outcomes post-hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Targeted therapies, particularly FLT3 inhibitors like midostaurin and quizartinib, have shown significant benefits in improving survival outcomes, especially in FLT3-mutated AML cases. Gilteritinib and sorafenib also exhibit the potential to reduce relapse rates post-transplant. Isocitrate dehydrogenase inhibitors, including ivosidenib and enasidenib, present novel options for postchemotherapy and posttransplantation maintenance. Immunotherapies, such as Wilms tumor 1 peptide-based vaccines and checkpoint inhibitors, are being explored, although results vary. Despite ongoing research, the role of maintenance chemotherapy remains uncertain, with inconsistent outcomes across trials. The approval of oral azacitidine represents a significant advancement, emphasizing the need for further investigation into personalized maintenance approaches. In conclusion, the evolving landscape of maintenance therapy and integrating targeted therapies in AML offers promising avenues for improving patient outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":50812,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Clinical Oncology-Cancer Clinical Trials","volume":" ","pages":"38-43"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142141688","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Concurrent Use of Radiotherapy and Ribociclib: Preliminary Results and Review of the Literature.","authors":"Jihane Bouziane, Pierre Loap, Paul Cottu, Laurence Escalup, Youlia Kirova","doi":"10.1097/COC.0000000000001131","DOIUrl":"10.1097/COC.0000000000001131","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>In the recent MONALEESA-2, MONALEESA-3, and MONALEESA-7 clinical trials, the addition of ribociclib, a CDK4/6 inhibitor, to standard endocrine therapy significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) compared with hormone therapy alone in the treatment of locally advanced or metastatic estrogen receptor-positive (ER) and HER2-negative breast cancer. However, its toxicity raises concerns when administered concomitantly with radiotherapy, leading most radiotherapists and medical oncologists to prefer to discontinue Ribociclib during radiotherapy (RT). Although there are insufficient published data on this combination, our preliminary experience with the first 2 patients treated at Institut Curie suggests promising results when using Ribociclib with Letrozole or Fulvestrant concurrently with palliative radiotherapy in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer. Our study aimed to evaluate the safety of combining Ribociclib with palliative radiotherapy in patients with metastatic breast cancer, providing crucial insights for clinical decision-making.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients treated for hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer with Ribociclib and concurrent radiotherapy at the Institut Curie (Paris, France) between September 2023 and April 2024. Among 38 patients who received Ribociclib and underwent irradiation, 36 temporarily suspended Ribociclib during radiotherapy, while 2 continued Ribociclib concurrently and were included in the analysis. Palliative radiotherapy was administered using volumetric modulated arc therapy, delivering 20 Gy in 5 fractions to bone metastatic sites. Ribociclib was given at 600 mg/day with hormonotherapy. Follow-up was conducted from the last day of RT until the last medical consultation. Toxicities were graded using CTCAE V5.0.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Two patients received Ribociclib concomitantly with radiotherapy, experiencing pain relief without interruptions in RT. However, Ribociclib treatment was halted in both cases due to grade 3 neutropenia and grade 1 QTc interval prolongation, respectively. One patient had a dose reduction to 400 mg due to neutropenia, with favorable outcomes observed. Both patients continued Ribociclib treatment, with one achieving complete remission and the other partial remission of bone disease. No late toxicities were observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite the need for further investigation, our results suggest safety consistent with pivotal trials, advocating for a prospective cooperative data collection initiative to explore this combined strategy further, potentially revolutionizing metastatic breast cancer management.</p>","PeriodicalId":50812,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Clinical Oncology-Cancer Clinical Trials","volume":" ","pages":"574-579"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141499616","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Outcomes of De Novo Oligometastatic Breast Cancer Treated With Surgery of Primary and Metastasis Directed Radiotherapy.","authors":"Lincoln Pujari, Arvind Suresh, Zachariah Chowdhury, Satyajit Pradhan, Mayank Tripathi, Anuj Gupta, Prarabdh Singh, Prashanth Giridhar, Ankita R Kapoor, Abhishek Shinghal, Bipinesh Sansar, Manikandan Mv","doi":"10.1097/COC.0000000000001129","DOIUrl":"10.1097/COC.0000000000001129","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>With sensitive imaging for breast cancer, the question arises whether present-day oncologists treat dOMBC with palliative systemic therapy (ST), which, a few years earlier, would have been treated with curative intent. We retrospectively analyzed outcomes of dOMBC treated with curative intent using a combination of surgery, metastasis-directed radiotherapy (RT), and adjuvant/neoadjuvant ST and have also explored the possible role of total lesional glycolysis of metastases and p53 immunohistochemistry in predicting outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were collected from a prospectively maintained database using electronic medical records and Radiation Oncology Information System. In the study, dOMBC was defined as up to 3 metastatic sites, all amenable to treatment with ablative RT and primary and axillary disease amenable to curative surgery. Patients were treated with surgery, ST, and RT.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients underwent either breast conservation surgery or modified radical mastectomy. Patients were treated with 6 to 8 cycles of chemotherapy in the neoadjuvant and/or adjuvant setting. Hormone receptor-positive patients received either tamoxifen or aromatase inhibitors. Trastuzumab was offered to Her-2-neu receptor-positive patients. RT included locoregional RT and metastases-directed ablative body RT. The median progression-free survival was 39 months (95% CI: -28.7 to 50.1 mo). Two and 3 year estimated disease-free survival (DFS) was 79% and 60.5%, respectively. The median overall survival was not reached. The estimated 3-year overall survival was 87.3%. Total lesional glycolysis of metastases score and p53 status did not affect DFS.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Combination treatment of surgery, metastases-directed ablative RT, and ST may provide prolonged DFS in dOMBC.</p>","PeriodicalId":50812,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Clinical Oncology-Cancer Clinical Trials","volume":" ","pages":"566-573"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141499618","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Assessing the Impact of Multidisciplinary Cancer Consultations on Cancer Quality Metrics.","authors":"Janeth I Sanchez, Michelle Doose, Chris Zeruto, Veronica Chollette, Natalie Gasca, Anand Singla, Sallie J Weaver","doi":"10.1097/COC.0000000000001136","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/COC.0000000000001136","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Multidisciplinary cancer consultations play a critical role in the delivery of quality cancer care by promoting treatment planning and collaborative decision-making. The objective of this study was to evaluate associations between multidisciplinary cancer consultations and receipt of guideline-recommended adjuvant treatments among breast, colorectal, or non-small cell lung cancer patients and assess these associations between and within racial and ethnic groups.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a population-based retrospective cohort study using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER), Medicare-linked data (2006-2016) to identify Medicare beneficiaries diagnosed with nonmetastatic breast, colorectal, or non-small cell lung cancer. Multidisciplinary cancer consultation was based on encounters with 2 or more oncology providers within 2 months of diagnosis. Cancer quality metrics assessed included receipt of guideline-recommended adjuvant cancer treatment for each cancer type.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients with multidisciplinary cancer consultations were more likely to receive adjuvant cancer treatment compared with patients without multidisciplinary cancer consultations within racial and ethnic groups. However, non-Hispanic Black and Hispanic breast cancer patients with multidisciplinary cancer consultations were 24% and 41% less likely to receive hormone and radiation therapy, respectively, compared with NHWs with multidisciplinary cancer consultations.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients with multidisciplinary cancer consultations were more likely to receive adjuvant cancer treatment, but racial and ethnic disparities in cancer care persist. Multidisciplinary cancer consultations are likely an important, but not fully sufficient, contributor to the receipt of adjuvant cancer treatment and may be a tool in the implementation of multipronged, team-based cancer care delivery models to reduce inequities in cancer-related outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":50812,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Clinical Oncology-Cancer Clinical Trials","volume":"47 12","pages":"595-606"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144152828","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Optimization Strategies in CAR T-cell Therapy: A Comprehensive Evaluation of Cytopenia, HLH/MAS, and Other Adverse Events.","authors":"Zaheer Qureshi, Faryal Altaf, Abdur Jamil, Rimsha Siddique","doi":"10.1097/COC.0000000000001124","DOIUrl":"10.1097/COC.0000000000001124","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy has emerged as a transformative treatment for various hematological malignancies. Still, its remarkable efficacy is accompanied by unique adverse events that must be carefully managed. This comprehensive literature review evaluates the safety profile of CAR T-cell therapy, focusing on cytopenia, hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH)/macrophage activation syndrome (MAS), and other potential complications. Cytopenia, characterized by reduced blood cell counts, affects a significant proportion of patients, with rates of anemia, neutropenia, and thrombocytopenia reaching up to 60%, 70%, and 80%, respectively. Risk factors include high tumor burden, prior chemotherapy, and bone marrow involvement. Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) occurs in 13% to 77% of patients and is linked to the cytokine storm induced by CAR T cells, target antigen expression, and preexisting immune dysregulation. Other notable adverse events discussed are cytokine release syndrome, neurotoxicity, and infections. Understanding the mechanisms, risk factors, and management strategies for these adverse events is crucial for optimizing patient outcomes and unlocking the full potential of this revolutionary therapy. The review highlights the need for continued research, interdisciplinary collaboration, and evidence-based approaches to enhance the safety and efficacy of CAR T-cell therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":50812,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Clinical Oncology-Cancer Clinical Trials","volume":" ","pages":"607-615"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141441073","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}