Simon Lo, Samuel Chao, Eleanor Harris, Jonathan Knisely, Join Y Luh, Pranshu Mohindra, Tony S Quang, Jason Ye, William Small, Naomi R Schechter
{"title":"ACR-ARS Practice Parameter for Radiation Oncology.","authors":"Simon Lo, Samuel Chao, Eleanor Harris, Jonathan Knisely, Join Y Luh, Pranshu Mohindra, Tony S Quang, Jason Ye, William Small, Naomi R Schechter","doi":"10.1097/COC.0000000000001079","DOIUrl":"10.1097/COC.0000000000001079","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This practice parameter was revised collaboratively by the American College of Radiology (ACR), and the American Radium Society. This practice parameter provides updated reference literature regarding radiation oncology practice and its key personnel.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This practice parameter was developed according to the process described under the heading The Process for Developing ACR Practice Parameters and Technical Standards on the ACR website ( https://www.acr.org/Clinical-Resources/Practice-Parameters-and-Technical-Standards ) by the Committee on Practice Parameters-Radiation Oncology of the ACR Commission on Radiation Oncology in collaboration with the American Radium Society.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This practice parameter provides a comprehensive update to the reference literature regarding radiation oncology practice in general. The overall roles of the radiation oncologist, the Qualified Medical Physicist, and other specialized personnel involved in the delivery of external-beam radiation therapy are discussed. The use of radiation therapy requires detailed attention to equipment, patient and personnel safety, equipment maintenance and quality assurance, and continuing staff education. Because the practice of radiation oncology occurs in a variety of clinical environments, the judgment of a qualified radiation oncologist should be used to apply these practice parameters to individual practices. Radiation oncologists should follow the guiding principle of limiting radiation exposure to patients and personnel while accomplishing therapeutic goals.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This practice parameter can be used as an effective tool to guide radiation oncology practice by successfully incorporating the close interaction and coordination among radiation oncologists, medical physicists, dosimetrists, nurses, and radiation therapists.</p>","PeriodicalId":50812,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Clinical Oncology-Cancer Clinical Trials","volume":" ","pages":"201-209"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139049702","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Pretreatment Characteristics of Carcinoid Tumors of the Lung Which Predict Aggressive Behavior: Erratum.","authors":"","doi":"10.1097/COC.0000000000001038","DOIUrl":"10.1097/COC.0000000000001038","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":50812,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Clinical Oncology-Cancer Clinical Trials","volume":" ","pages":"e1"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138489008","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Brian Chou, Jae Han Lee, Lonnie Saetern, Bhanu Prasad Venkatesulu, James S Welsh, Matthew M Harkenrider
{"title":"Bombarding Oligoprogression: Oncologic Outcomes After Radiation to Patients With Oligoprogressive Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer on Maintenance Systemic Therapy.","authors":"Brian Chou, Jae Han Lee, Lonnie Saetern, Bhanu Prasad Venkatesulu, James S Welsh, Matthew M Harkenrider","doi":"10.1097/COC.0000000000001077","DOIUrl":"10.1097/COC.0000000000001077","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of radiotherapy (RT) to oligoprogressive metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a retrospective analysis of 23 patients with metastatic NSCLC on maintenance systemic therapy, developed oligoprogression (1 to 5 sites), and all oligoprogressive sites amenable to and treated with RT. The primary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS) and median time to start next-line therapy (MTT). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and log-rank testing were performed using R-Studio software.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-three patients met the inclusion criteria. The median overall survival for the entire cohort was 31.3 months (interquartile range [IQR]: 17.86 to 45.4). The median event-free survival for the entire cohort was 8.3 months (IQR: 2.7 to 12). Patients with no prior radiation had longer median event-free survival of 11.9 months (IQR: 8.4 to 18.2) compared with patients with a history of prior radiation at 4.1 months (IQR: 2.7 to 12; P = 0.041). The local control rate for the treated lesions was 97.5%. At 12 months follow-up, 6 (43%) of 14 living patients maintained systemic therapy without initiating next-line therapy. The median PFS for the entire cohort was 8.4 months (IQR: 4.1 to 17.5). Patients who did not receive prior radiation had longer median PFS of 11.9 months (IQR: 8.4 to 18.2) compared with patients who received prior radiation 6.2 months (IQR: 2.7 to 8.5; P = 0.018). Two patients (9%) had grade 3 chronic toxicity related to RT and were medically managed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We identified that in patients with oligoprogressive metastatic NSCLC, targeted RT to all progressive sites yielded high LC and favorable rates of PFS and MTT.</p>","PeriodicalId":50812,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Clinical Oncology-Cancer Clinical Trials","volume":" ","pages":"155-160"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139405041","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Krishan R Jethwa, Ed Kim, Jordan Berlin, Christopher J Anker, Leila Tchelebi, Gerard Abood, Christopher L Hallemeier, Salma Jabbour, Timothy Kennedy, Rachit Kumar, Percy Lee, Navesh Sharma, William Small, Vonetta Williams, Suzanne Russo
{"title":"Executive Summary of the American Radium Society Appropriate Use Criteria for Neoadjuvant Therapy for Nonmetastatic Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: Systematic Review and Guidelines.","authors":"Krishan R Jethwa, Ed Kim, Jordan Berlin, Christopher J Anker, Leila Tchelebi, Gerard Abood, Christopher L Hallemeier, Salma Jabbour, Timothy Kennedy, Rachit Kumar, Percy Lee, Navesh Sharma, William Small, Vonetta Williams, Suzanne Russo","doi":"10.1097/COC.0000000000001076","DOIUrl":"10.1097/COC.0000000000001076","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>For patients with locoregionally confined pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), margin-negative surgical resection is the only known curative treatment; however, the majority of patients are not operable candidates at initial diagnosis. Among patients with resectable disease who undergo surgery alone, the 5-year survival remains poor. Adjuvant therapies, including systemic therapy or chemoradiation, are utilized as they improve locoregional control and overall survival. There has been increasing interest in the use of neoadjuvant therapy to obtain early control of occult metastatic disease, allow local tumor response to facilitate margin-negative resection, and provide a test of time and biology to assist with the selection of candidates most likely to benefit from radical surgical resection. However, limited guidance exists regarding the relative effectiveness of treatment options. In this systematic review, the American Radium Society multidisciplinary gastrointestinal expert panel convened to develop Appropriate Use Criteria evaluating the evidence regarding neoadjuvant treatment for patients with PDAC, including surgery, systemic therapy, and radiotherapy, in terms of oncologic outcomes and quality of life. The evidence was assessed using the Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcome, and Study (PICOS) design framework and \"Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses\" 2020 methodology. Eligible studies included phases 2 to 3 trials, meta-analyses, and retrospective analyses published between January 1, 2012 and December 30, 2022 in the Ovid Medline database. A summary of recommendations based on the available literature is outlined to guide practitioners in the management of patients with PDAC.</p>","PeriodicalId":50812,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Clinical Oncology-Cancer Clinical Trials","volume":" ","pages":"185-199"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138832767","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Aitor Martinez Aguirre-Betolaza, Jon Cacicedo, Arkaitz Castañeda-Babarro
{"title":"Creatine Supplementation and Resistance Training in Patients With Breast Cancer (CaRTiC Study): Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Aitor Martinez Aguirre-Betolaza, Jon Cacicedo, Arkaitz Castañeda-Babarro","doi":"10.1097/COC.0000000000001070","DOIUrl":"10.1097/COC.0000000000001070","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Creatine supplementation is an effective ergogenic nutrient for athletes, as well as for people starting a health or fitness program. Resistance training has previously been identified as an important method of increasing muscle mass and strength, especially in people with cancer to avoid sarcopenia. The potential of creatine supplementation for adaptations produced by resistance training in patients with cancer is still unknown. The primary aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of a supervised resistance training program intervention with and without creatine supplementation in patients with breast cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Is a multicentre, randomized, blind, placebo-controlled study. Patients will be randomly assigned to a control group and 2 experimental groups. The first training resistance group (RG) will perform resistance training, while the second experimental resistance-creatine group will perform the same resistance training as the RG and will also receive a 5 g/d creatine supplementation during the intervention. RG participants will follow the same daily dosing protocol, but in their case, with dextrose/maltodextrin. Resistance training will be a 16-week supervised workout that will consist of a series of resistance exercises (leg press, knee extension, knee bends, chest press, sit-ups, back extensions, pull-ups, and shoulder press) that involve the largest muscle groups, performed 3 times a week on nonconsecutive days. Both the RG and the resistance-creatine group will receive a supplement of soluble protein powder (20 to 30 g) daily.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This intervention will help to better understand the potential of nonpharmacological treatment for improving strength and well-being values in patients with breast cancer with and without creatine supplementation.</p>","PeriodicalId":50812,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Clinical Oncology-Cancer Clinical Trials","volume":" ","pages":"161-168"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138453007","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Paul E Wallner, Don C Yoo, Jeremie Calais, Freddy E Escorcia, Carina Mari Aparici, Jeff Michalski, Michael Morris, Zachary S Morris, Daniel Pryma, Bryan M Rabatic, Navesh Sharma, Neha Vapiwala, Munir V Ghesani, Rathan M Subramaniam, William Small, Naomi R Schechter
{"title":"ACR-ACNM-ARS-ASTRO-SNMMI Practice Parameter for the Performance of Therapy With Radiopharmaceuticals.","authors":"Paul E Wallner, Don C Yoo, Jeremie Calais, Freddy E Escorcia, Carina Mari Aparici, Jeff Michalski, Michael Morris, Zachary S Morris, Daniel Pryma, Bryan M Rabatic, Navesh Sharma, Neha Vapiwala, Munir V Ghesani, Rathan M Subramaniam, William Small, Naomi R Schechter","doi":"10.1097/COC.0000000000001072","DOIUrl":"10.1097/COC.0000000000001072","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This practice parameter was revised collaboratively by the American College of Radiology (ACR), the American College of Nuclear Medicine, the American Radium Society, the American Society for Radiation Oncology, and the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging. The document is intended to serve as a resource for appropriately trained and licensed physicians who perform therapeutic procedures with unsealed sources, referred to in the document using the more inclusive terminology of radiopharmaceuticals, for which a written directive is required for authorized users under NRC 10 CFR 35.300.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This practice parameter was developed according to the process described under the heading The Process for Developing ACR Practice Parameters and Technical Standards on the ACR website ( https://www.acr.org/Clinical-Resources/Practice-Parameters-and-Technical-Standards ) by the Committee on Practice Parameters-Radiation Oncology of the ACR Commission on Radiation Oncology in collaboration with the American Radium Society.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This practice parameter addresses the overall role of the applicable physician-authorized user, Qualified Medical Physicist, and other specialized personnel involved in the delivery of radiopharmaceutical therapy. Therapeutic radiopharmaceuticals include those administered as elemental radioactive isotopes (radionuclides) or the radioactive element incorporated into a targeting molecule (ligand) by one or more chemical bonds. This document provides guidance regarding general principles of radionuclide therapies and indications of various alpha, beta, gamma, and mixed emission agents with references to several recent practice parameters on new and commonly performed radiopharmaceutical therapies.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This document addresses clinical circumstances, elements of available agents, and the qualifications and responsibilities of various members of the radiation care team, specifications of consultation and other clinical documentation, post-therapy follow-up, radiation safety precautions, elements of quality control and improvement programs, infection control, and patient education to ensure optimal patient care and safety when utilizing radiopharmaceuticals.</p>","PeriodicalId":50812,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Clinical Oncology-Cancer Clinical Trials","volume":" ","pages":"169-176"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138832855","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Gina Nicholson, Katherine B Carlson, Rohini K Hernandez, Jennifer Schenfeld, Benoit Cadieux, David Henry, Vitor Jose De Sousa Barbosa, Hossam Saad
{"title":"Treatment Patterns of Bone-targeting Agents Among Solid Tumor Patients With Bone Metastases: An Analysis of Electronic Health Record Data in the United States From 2014 to 2018.","authors":"Gina Nicholson, Katherine B Carlson, Rohini K Hernandez, Jennifer Schenfeld, Benoit Cadieux, David Henry, Vitor Jose De Sousa Barbosa, Hossam Saad","doi":"10.1097/COC.0000000000001075","DOIUrl":"10.1097/COC.0000000000001075","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study evaluated real-world treatment patterns of approved bone-targeting agents (BTAs) with various mechanisms of action-pamidronate, zoledronic acid, and denosumab-for the prevention of skeletal-related events in patients with bone metastases (BM) from solid tumors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Adult patients with BM secondary to solid tumors between January 1, 2014, and December 31, 2018, were identified from the Flatiron Health Oncology Services Comprehensive Electronic Records database and categorized by BTA use and therapy type. Time from diagnosis to initiation, persistence (mean time on treatment), and compliance (≥12 administrations/year) with BTA with up to 4 years of follow-up were examined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study included 27,268 patients with BM (breast cancer, 32.7%; lung cancer, 16.5%; prostate cancer, 17.2%; and other solid tumors, 33.6%); of these, 41.4% initiated denosumab after BM diagnosis; 21.3%, zoledronic acid; 0.6%, pamidronate; and 36.7% had no treatment record. Mean (SD) time to initiation for denosumab or zoledronic acid was 68.6 (157.0) days (denosumab, 70.3 (160.4) days; zoledronic acid, 65.2 [150.2] days). Mean persistence and compliance (first year of treatment) were significantly higher for denosumab than for zoledronic acid (22.0 vs. 14.9 mo [ P <0.0001] and 42.3% vs. 34.8% [ P <0.0001], respectively). Treatment compliance was the highest in patients with breast cancer (denosumab, 48.2%; zoledronic acid, 39.1%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Real-world BTA treatment patterns in the United States suggest that over one-third of patients with BM secondary to solid tumors remain untreated and less than 50% of the patients received ≥12 administrations/year of BTA therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":50812,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Clinical Oncology-Cancer Clinical Trials","volume":" ","pages":"177-184"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139418508","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Diagnosis of Malignant Pulmonary Nodules Using a Combination of Tumor-associated Autoantibodies and Computed Tomography.","authors":"Xiao Liu, Qing Shen, Yuchan Wen, Zhijiao Jiang, Zheng Ma, Pinqiang Zeng, Jian He, Yu Liao, Yong Huang, Jing Huang","doi":"10.1097/COC.0000000000001069","DOIUrl":"10.1097/COC.0000000000001069","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Diagnosis of malignant pulmonary nodules can greatly reduce the occurrence of lung cancer death, and computed tomography (CT) is commonly used in diagnosis. In addition, tumor-associated autoantibodies (TAAbs) show high specificity and stability. We aim to establish a computable risk model of pulmonary nodules by combining CT with TAAb detection.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The concentrations of 7 TAAbs (p53, PGP9.5, SOX2, GAGE7, GBU4-5, CAGE, MAGEA1, and CAGE) were assayed using the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay in 136 patients with pulmonary nodules (84 with newly diagnosed lung adenocarcinoma, 21 with squamous cell carcinoma, and 31 with benign nodules) and 42 control subjects without pulmonary nodules. We then drew receiver operating characteristic curves and conducted logistic regression to analyze the diagnostic efficiency of our method in the detection of lung cancer.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The positivity rate of the 7 TAAbs was 49.5%, and the specificity was 83.6%. Our regression results indicated 65% overall accuracy, 44.76% sensitivity, and 76.71% specificity. Notably, when combined with CT imaging and the demographic characteristics, diagnostic accuracy increased to 73.4%, sensitivity to 61.5%, and specificity to 87.1%. The positive predictive value and negative predictive value were 93% and 41%, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study provides a method that combines 7 serum TAAbs with imaging and demographic characteristics to diagnose malignant pulmonary nodules more accurately than existing methods.</p>","PeriodicalId":50812,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Clinical Oncology-Cancer Clinical Trials","volume":" ","pages":"149-154"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138489007","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Mark F deBettencourt, Yirong Liu, Scott J Cotler, Chris A Molvar, Tamer Abdelrahman, Tarita O Thomas
{"title":"SBRT vs. Y90: HCC Treatment Outcomes and Costs.","authors":"Mark F deBettencourt, Yirong Liu, Scott J Cotler, Chris A Molvar, Tamer Abdelrahman, Tarita O Thomas","doi":"10.1097/COC.0000000000001064","DOIUrl":"10.1097/COC.0000000000001064","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) and Yttrium-90 (Y90) are among the ablative therapies used as treatment options for localized hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). To date, direct comparisons of the 2 modalities' outcomes and costs are lacking. This study aimed to analyze demographic, treatment, and cost information for patients with HCC treated with SBRT and Y90.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with HCC treated with SBRT or Y90 radioembolization between January 2018 and January 2020 at one institution were retrospectively reviewed. Demographic and treatment data were compared utilizing χ 2 tests. Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank tests were applied to compare overall survival and progression-free survival in different treatment groups. Cox proportional hazard models were applied to analyze the unadjusted and adjusted survival differences. Ten SBRT and 10 Y90 patients were randomly selected for Medicare cost analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-three patients received Y90, and 21 received SBRT. On univariable and multivariable analysis, there was no significant difference in overall survival or progression-free survival between the Y90 and SBRT cohorts. SBRT patients had higher American Joint Committee on Cancer staging ( P =0.039), greater tumor size (4.07 vs. 2.96 cm, P =0.013), and greater rates of prior liver-directed therapy (71.4% SBRT vs. 12.7% Y90, P <0.001). The average cost for SBRT was $15,148, and Y90 was $41,360.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>SBRT and Y90 are effective therapies in the treatment of HCC, specifically having similar overall survival and progression-free survival. Y90 was found to have a significantly higher cost than SBRT. This study demonstrates the need for prospective studies to assess these modalities in treating HCC.</p>","PeriodicalId":50812,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Clinical Oncology-Cancer Clinical Trials","volume":" ","pages":"99-104"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138048452","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Alexandra N De Leo, Anjay Shah, Jonathan Li, Christopher G Morris, Frank J Bova, William A Friedman, Robert J Amdur
{"title":"Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Vestibular Schwannoma With Radiographic Brainstem Compression.","authors":"Alexandra N De Leo, Anjay Shah, Jonathan Li, Christopher G Morris, Frank J Bova, William A Friedman, Robert J Amdur","doi":"10.1097/COC.0000000000001065","DOIUrl":"10.1097/COC.0000000000001065","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The safety of single-treatment stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for vestibular schwannoma (VS) with radiographic evidence of brainstem compression but without motor deficit is controversial. Data on linear accelerator (linac)-based SRS in this setting are scarce. We address this with an outcomes report from an unselected series of patients with VS with radiographic brainstem compression treated with linac SRS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We included 139 patients with unilateral VS (any size) with radiographic brainstem compression (all without serious brainstem neurological deficits). The SRS prescription dose was 12.5 Gy (single fraction) using 6MV linac-produced photon beams, delivered with a multiple arc technique. Inclusion criteria required at least 1 year of radiographic follow-up with magnetic resonance imaging. The primary endpoint was freedom from serious brainstem toxicity (≥grade 3 Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v5); the secondary was freedom from enlargement (tumor progression or any requiring intervention). We assessed serious cranial nerve complications, excluding hearing loss, defined as Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v5 grade 3 toxicity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Median magnetic resonance imaging follow-up time was 5 years, and median tumor size was 2.5 cm in greatest axial dimension and 5 ml in volume. The median brainstem D0.03 ml=12.6 Gy and median brainstem V10 Gy=0.4 ml. At 5 years, the actuarial freedom from serious brainstem toxicity was 100%, and freedom from tumor enlargement (requiring surgery and/or due to progression) was 90%. Severe facial nerve damage in patients without tumor enlargement was 0.9%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Linac-based SRS, as delivered in our series for VS with radiographic brainstem compression, is safe and effective.</p>","PeriodicalId":50812,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Clinical Oncology-Cancer Clinical Trials","volume":" ","pages":"110-114"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138048453","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}