Liesa J Weiler-Wichtl, Verena Fohn-Erhold, Verena Rosenmayr, Rita Hansl, Maximilian Hopfgartner, Jonathan Fries, Carina Schneider, Kristina Herzog, Tobias Schellenberg, Barbara Schönthaler, Nicole Stember, Iris Lein-Köhler, Rahel Hoffmann, Alina Kollmann, Nicole Salzmann, Stefanie Essl, Katharina Pal-Handl, Verena Wasinger-Brandweiner, Sarah Rinner, Lisa Schubert, Sandra Lange, Ulrike Leiss
{"title":"Preparing Children for Invasive Medical Cancer Treatment with \"My Logbook\": Preliminary Results of a Pilot Study.","authors":"Liesa J Weiler-Wichtl, Verena Fohn-Erhold, Verena Rosenmayr, Rita Hansl, Maximilian Hopfgartner, Jonathan Fries, Carina Schneider, Kristina Herzog, Tobias Schellenberg, Barbara Schönthaler, Nicole Stember, Iris Lein-Köhler, Rahel Hoffmann, Alina Kollmann, Nicole Salzmann, Stefanie Essl, Katharina Pal-Handl, Verena Wasinger-Brandweiner, Sarah Rinner, Lisa Schubert, Sandra Lange, Ulrike Leiss","doi":"10.1007/s13187-024-02481-2","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s13187-024-02481-2","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Pediatric cancer is one of the most burdensome chronic diseases, necessitating a variety of severe medical interventions. As a result, the disease and its treatment cause numerous acute and long-term medical, psychological, and socioeconomic strains for young patients and their families. Therefore, psychosocial care using evidence-based interventions (EBIs) before, during, and after medical treatments is essential to ensure that patients receive adequate information and to minimize the adverse emotional and psychosocial impacts such as insecurity, fear, and shame. The present study reports the first promising results of applying cancer-specific psychosocial methods developed in the quality improvement project \"My Logbook.\" The four assessed tools are specifically designed to adequately prepare pediatric cancer patients for surgery, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and stem cell transplantation. Self and proxy ratings were used to assess the patients' subjective knowledge and emotional well-being before and after each intervention session. The results showed that patient-centered interventions using various creative and developmentally adapted methodologies (e.g., psychoeducation, crafting, games) have the potential to effectively enhance patient health literacy (V = 120.5, p < .001, r = 0.33) and well-being as manifested in more positive (slope = 0.121, p = .016) and less negative (slope = - 0.350, p < .001) or neutral emotions (slope = - 0.202, p = .002). These findings highlight the importance of developing and implementing psychosocial tools in pediatric oncology to prevent psychological overload and negative emotions and to increase subjective control beliefs, autonomy, and empowerment. Moreover, the effective application and systematic evaluation of evidence-based psychosocial tools can facilitate the establishment of standardized guidelines for psychosocial care in pediatric oncology. Thereby, the final goal is to ensure the quality of care and to use education to increase the quality of life for all pediatric cancer patients.Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04474678 (July 17, 2020).</p>","PeriodicalId":50246,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cancer Education","volume":" ","pages":"132-141"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11846727/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141898763","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Shriya Veluri, Jiwon Park, Clark Anderson, Joshua Asper, Margaret Walsh, Mark Bonnen, Caesar Ramirez, Shraddha Dalwadi
{"title":"Breast Radiation Therapy Survivorship and Cancer Support Groups: an Opportunity for Community Engagement and Education Through the Addressing Breast Cancer Dermatologic Side Effects (ABCDEs) Program.","authors":"Shriya Veluri, Jiwon Park, Clark Anderson, Joshua Asper, Margaret Walsh, Mark Bonnen, Caesar Ramirez, Shraddha Dalwadi","doi":"10.1007/s13187-024-02477-y","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s13187-024-02477-y","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Breast cancer is the most commonly diagnosed cancer and the second leading cause of cancer deaths in women in the USA. To serve under-insured breast cancer patients in South Texas, we designed a patient education program to improve health literacy of secondary dermatologic changes after completing radiation therapy. A needs assessment survey was distributed to better understand the patients' stage of treatment, experiences with radiation-induced dermatologic side effects, and over-the-counter skin products and home remedies used. Of the 33 patients that participated in this program, nearly all patients (93.94%, n = 31) are either currently undergoing treatment or have completed treatment. Of the 31 individuals, 74.19% of patients (n = 23) have completed treatment at least 9-12 months ago, 22.58% (n = 7) are currently receiving chemotherapy, and 3.23% (n = 1) are currently undergoing radiation therapy. Among the dermatologic side effects, patients experienced changes to skin color, redness, and burns/burning sensation at the greatest severity. The top products used by survey participants were prescription-strength topical corticosteroids (65.63%) followed by oral analgesics (28.13%) and compression sleeves (25.00%). Aloe vera (15.63%) was the most used complementary and alternative therapeutic treatment. By surveying experiences of radiation-induced dermatologic side effects in predominantly under-resourced and minority communities, we can better tailor patient education programs to reflect patients' experiences. Overall, this program can enhance clinicians' insight on under-resourced patient experiences to improve health literacy and dispel common misconceptions surrounding breast cancer treatment, management, and survivorship.</p>","PeriodicalId":50246,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cancer Education","volume":" ","pages":"93-101"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141789740","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Kelsey H Jordan, Julie A Stephens, Kaleigh Niles, Nina Hoffmeyer, Michael L Pennell, Jill M Oliveri, Electra D Paskett
{"title":"STEPS (Study To Examine Parent, Patient/Dental Provider Systems) to Prevent Human Papillomavirus (HPV)-Related Cancers: A Piloted Dental Patient and Provider Evaluation of Current and Future HPV Education.","authors":"Kelsey H Jordan, Julie A Stephens, Kaleigh Niles, Nina Hoffmeyer, Michael L Pennell, Jill M Oliveri, Electra D Paskett","doi":"10.1007/s13187-024-02465-2","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s13187-024-02465-2","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Oropharyngeal human papillomavirus (HPV) cancers are prevalent, but HPV education in dental clinics is uncommon. The purpose of this study was to evaluate dental provider and patient knowledge from, attitudes towards, and preferences for HPV education, then assess perceptions of existing HPV educational materials for use at dental visits. Appalachian Ohio dental patients (n = 13) and general/pediatric dental providers (n = 10) completed an initial, close-ended survey on current HPV knowledge and HPV educational attitudes, participation, and resource preferences. Select individuals reviewed existing HPV educational videos and toolkits via virtual focus groups (n = 9) or independent review surveys (n = 6). Using a discussion guide, participants responded to overall, visual, auditory, and content satisfaction statements, orally (focus groups) or with Likert scales (independent reviews). Surveys were summarized with frequencies/percentages; transcripts were qualitatively coded to identify potential material modifications. Dental providers and patients were more comfortable with HPV and oral cancer education (87% and 96%, respectively) and screening (96%) than with HPV vaccine education (74%) and referrals (61%) during dental visits. Providers were neither sharing HPV educational materials (80%) nor initiating educational conversations with dental patients (100%). The American Cancer Society videos and the \"Team Maureen\" toolkit were the most liked resources (i.e., fewer negative/disagree statements) by all participant groups. Findings indicate that future dental HPV educational efforts should be informed by currently available materials. Additional interventions are needed to promote dental provider discussions and sharing of educational materials with patients to increase education and promotion of the HPV vaccine and reduce oropharyngeal cancers.</p>","PeriodicalId":50246,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cancer Education","volume":" ","pages":"44-53"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11846729/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141499517","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Transitioning from Health Disparities to Health Equity.","authors":"Karen Patricia Williams","doi":"10.1007/s13187-025-02576-4","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s13187-025-02576-4","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":50246,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cancer Education","volume":" ","pages":"1-2"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143384028","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"An Antidote to Decreasing Interest in Radiation Oncology: Earlier Engagement.","authors":"Catherine Sport, Nophar Yarden, Emma C Fields","doi":"10.1007/s13187-024-02478-x","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s13187-024-02478-x","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>In recent years, there has been a national decline in applicants to radiation oncology (RO) residencies, partly due to limited exposure to RO during medical school. Student Interest Groups (SIGs) give students early exposure to a variety of specialties. This study investigates the efficacy of a RO-SIG to increase knowledge and interest in the field.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>First and second-year medical students attending an RO-SIG event or shadowing experience completed surveys both prior and following participation. Students ranked their interest in oncology, in RO, and their perceived accessibility of mentors in oncology. Questions were rated on a Likert scale from 0 to 5 (5 highest, 0 lowest). The survey included one short response question about the understanding of the role of the RO, which was evaluated qualitatively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>44 students (42 M1s, 2 M2s) completed the pre-survey and 18 (41%, 17 M1s, 1 M2) completed the post-survey. Of the 18 matched responses, interest in oncology increased from 3.67 pre-SIG to 3.89 (p = 0.19) and in RO specifically from 3.17 to 3.89 (p < 0.01). The mean perceived accessibility of faculty mentors in oncology increased from 3.18 to 3.72 (p < 0.01). After interacting with the RO-SIG, the short response answers were more detailed in the understanding of the role of RO.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>RO-SIGs can increase interest in RO through early exposure to the field. In a time where RO has seen a decline in student interest, RO-SIGs are an option to increase engagement, develop interest, and form relationships with mentors in pre-clinical years.</p>","PeriodicalId":50246,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cancer Education","volume":" ","pages":"111-114"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11846744/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141728213","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Emad Shash, Fatma Bektash, Mona Elhosary, Ghada Emam, Asmaa El-Sayed, Dalia Abdelmenam, Rania Abdulmonem A L Najar, Reem Eid
{"title":"Enhancing Patient Outcomes Through Integrated Education and Navigation Programs at the Breast Cancer Comprehensive Center, National Cancer Institute, Cairo University.","authors":"Emad Shash, Fatma Bektash, Mona Elhosary, Ghada Emam, Asmaa El-Sayed, Dalia Abdelmenam, Rania Abdulmonem A L Najar, Reem Eid","doi":"10.1007/s13187-024-02472-3","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s13187-024-02472-3","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Breast cancer remains a significant global health challenge, particularly in low- and middle-income countries where disparities in healthcare exacerbate the disease burden. The Breast Cancer Comprehensive Center at the National Cancer Institute, Cairo University, has implemented integrated patient navigation and education programs aimed at enhancing patient outcomes and healthcare quality. This study evaluated the effectiveness of these programs involving 2202 participants over 12 months. The methodology included systematic data collection, material preparation, and the application of tailored educational strategies to facilitate the patient's journey from diagnosis to treatment. The study utilized three-phased patient navigation assistance to provide comprehensive support. The programs significantly improved patient satisfaction, with over 90% of participants reporting high levels of contentment with the services received. Key improvements included enhanced understanding of breast cancer (including risk factors, symptoms, importance of seeking early care, and treatment options), reduction in patient anxiety, improved treatment adherence, and streamlined diagnostic and treatment processes. Notably, the use of audio-visual educational tools effectively bridged the literacy gap among patients. The integration of patient navigation and education systems at BCCC-NCI has proven to be a highly effective model for improving breast cancer care. This model not only enhances patient understanding and treatment compliance but also facilitates a more efficient healthcare process. The study underscores the potential for replicating this approach in similar healthcare settings globally, suggesting that such integrations can significantly improve cancer care outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":50246,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cancer Education","volume":" ","pages":"65-72"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141621654","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Mary T Mahoney, Lauren C Linkowski, Trudy C Wu, Jie Jane Chen, Beth K Neilsen, Petria S Thompson, Michael D Mix, Karna T Sura, Malcolm D Mattes
{"title":"Analysis of Oncology and Radiation Therapy Representation on the National Board of Medical Examiners Official Practice Material for the United States National Standardized Medical Board Examinations.","authors":"Mary T Mahoney, Lauren C Linkowski, Trudy C Wu, Jie Jane Chen, Beth K Neilsen, Petria S Thompson, Michael D Mix, Karna T Sura, Malcolm D Mattes","doi":"10.1007/s13187-024-02475-0","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s13187-024-02475-0","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Radiation therapy (RT) is a critical component of multidisciplinary cancer care, but has inconsistent curricular exposure. We characterize the radiation oncology (RO) content on the standardized undergraduate medical examinations by comparing its context and prevalence with other domains in oncology. National Board of Medical Examiners (NBME) self-assessments and sample questions for the United States Medical Licensing Exam (USMLE) Steps 1-3 and NBME clinical science shelf examinations were accessed (n = 3878). Questions were inductively analyzed for content pertaining to oncology and treatment modalities of RT, systemic therapy (ST), and surgical intervention (SI). Questions were coded using USMLE Physician Tasks/Competencies and thematic analysis. Descriptive statistics and analyses using the Kruskal-Wallis test are reported. A total of 337 questions (8.6%) within the USMLE and shelf exams included oncology content, with 101 questions (2.6%) referencing at least one cancer treatment modality (n = 35 RT, 45 ST, 57 SI). Treatment questions were more common on USMLE Step 2 CK (n = 35/101, 32%) compared to Step 1 (n = 23/101, 23%) and Step 3 (n = 8/101, 8%) (p < 0.001). RT was significantly less likely to be the correct answer (2/35, 6%) compared to ST (4/45, 9%) and SI (18/57, 32%) (p = 0.003). Therapeutic oncology questions are uncommon on the examination material, with an under-representation of radiation-related content, and contextual bias favoring surgical approaches. We advocate for greater RO involvement in the content creation of such examinations to help trainees better understand multidisciplinary cancer care.</p>","PeriodicalId":50246,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cancer Education","volume":" ","pages":"79-87"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11846759/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141602006","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Francesco Laurelli, Federico Guerini, Edoardo Caimi
{"title":"Letter to the Editor Regarding: Factors Influencing the Decision of Individuals with Breast Cancer to Join an Exercise Oncology Trial.","authors":"Francesco Laurelli, Federico Guerini, Edoardo Caimi","doi":"10.1007/s13187-024-02467-0","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s13187-024-02467-0","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":50246,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cancer Education","volume":" ","pages":"142-143"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141433265","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Using Patient-Related Outcomes Data to Inform About a Novel Exercise Program in Oncology Patients.","authors":"Anjali Sibley, Lidia Schapira, Kavitha Ramchandran","doi":"10.1007/s13187-024-02470-5","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s13187-024-02470-5","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":50246,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cancer Education","volume":" ","pages":"144-145"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141494103","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Geina M Iskander, Adriana Cavazos, Chinenye Lynette Ejezie, Victoria Cox, Hunter Cheng, Shelby Perez, Albert C Koong, Jonathan Nguyen, Joseph Herman, Sam Beddar, Zhongxing Liao, Debra Nana Yeboa
{"title":"Protocol-in-a-Day Workshop: Expediting IRB Approval for Junior and Senior Faculty.","authors":"Geina M Iskander, Adriana Cavazos, Chinenye Lynette Ejezie, Victoria Cox, Hunter Cheng, Shelby Perez, Albert C Koong, Jonathan Nguyen, Joseph Herman, Sam Beddar, Zhongxing Liao, Debra Nana Yeboa","doi":"10.1007/s13187-024-02460-7","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s13187-024-02460-7","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Delays in research protocol development may be a single factor that hinders the career progression of academic faculty. Structured educational guidance during this phase proves crucial in mitigating setbacks in Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval and expediting trial implementation. To address this, the Protocol-in-a-Day (PIAD) workshop, a comprehensive 1-day event involving members from six critical facets of RO clinical trial implementation, was established, offering significant input to individual protocols. Efficacy and satisfaction of the PIAD workshop were assessed through a 5-question survey and the average time from submission to IRB initial approval. The normality of the data was analyzed using the Shapiro-Wilk Test. Nonparametric data was analyzed using a Mann-Whitney U test for significance. A total of 18 protocols that went through the PIAD workshop were activated. The mean time to IRB approval for protocols that went through PIAD was 39.8 days compared to 58.4 days for those that did not go through the PIAD workshop. Based on survey results, 100% of PIAD participants said the PIAD workshop was useful and 94% of participants stated that the PIAD workshop improved the overall quality of their protocol. Participant surveys further highlighted substantial improvements in trial quality, language, and statistical design and revealed that all participants found the workshop helpful. Therefore, both junior and senior faculty benefitted from this educational program during protocol development, as both groups demonstrated shorter times to IRB approval than non-participants. This acceleration not only fosters efficient trial implementation but also supports academic faculty in their career development.</p>","PeriodicalId":50246,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cancer Education","volume":" ","pages":"11-15"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141447410","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}