The Impact of a Community Partner Research Training Program.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Oluwademilade Adefarati, Rickisa Yearwood, Yawei Song, Amy E Leader, Karen Glanz, Evelyn T Gonzalez, Scott W Keith, Nilsa Graciani, Thierry Fortune, Charnita M Zeigler-Johnson
{"title":"The Impact of a Community Partner Research Training Program.","authors":"Oluwademilade Adefarati, Rickisa Yearwood, Yawei Song, Amy E Leader, Karen Glanz, Evelyn T Gonzalez, Scott W Keith, Nilsa Graciani, Thierry Fortune, Charnita M Zeigler-Johnson","doi":"10.1007/s13187-025-02718-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>As part of its mission to address disparities in cancer outcomes and research participation, the Philadelphia Communities Conquering Cancer (PC3) coalition conducted a Community Partner Research Training program. The goal was to increase knowledge about cancer research and to prepare community members to partner on research activities. Eighteen out of 36 applicants were selected for a 5-week training program on research methods. Trainees completed baseline (N = 18) and follow-up surveys (N = 10) to measure knowledge acquisition. Demographic data were analyzed with descriptive statistics. For repeated cross-sectional group comparisons, Wilcoxon nonparametric tests were used to test statistical differences between medians on baseline and follow-up surveys. P-values ≤ 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Trainees were mostly female (78%). Median age was 61.5 years. Forty-four percent were Black, 22% White, 17% Asian, and 17% other race. Twenty-eight percent were Hispanic. Forty-four percent were cancer survivors. We observed that perceived knowledge about research generally increased post-training from a median of 2 to 4 across a 5-point Likert scale (p < 0.001). This increase is shown for several items, including \"how to conduct a research study\" and \"how to share findings with the community.\" Program ratings averaged 4 out of 5, indicating positive participant experiences in program organization and content. Involving diverse populations in cancer research is crucial for reducing health disparities. This training program demonstrated that it is feasible to increase knowledge about cancer research methodology among community partners. These results will be used to guide future research activities with PC3.</p>","PeriodicalId":50246,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cancer Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cancer Education","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-025-02718-8","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As part of its mission to address disparities in cancer outcomes and research participation, the Philadelphia Communities Conquering Cancer (PC3) coalition conducted a Community Partner Research Training program. The goal was to increase knowledge about cancer research and to prepare community members to partner on research activities. Eighteen out of 36 applicants were selected for a 5-week training program on research methods. Trainees completed baseline (N = 18) and follow-up surveys (N = 10) to measure knowledge acquisition. Demographic data were analyzed with descriptive statistics. For repeated cross-sectional group comparisons, Wilcoxon nonparametric tests were used to test statistical differences between medians on baseline and follow-up surveys. P-values ≤ 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Trainees were mostly female (78%). Median age was 61.5 years. Forty-four percent were Black, 22% White, 17% Asian, and 17% other race. Twenty-eight percent were Hispanic. Forty-four percent were cancer survivors. We observed that perceived knowledge about research generally increased post-training from a median of 2 to 4 across a 5-point Likert scale (p < 0.001). This increase is shown for several items, including "how to conduct a research study" and "how to share findings with the community." Program ratings averaged 4 out of 5, indicating positive participant experiences in program organization and content. Involving diverse populations in cancer research is crucial for reducing health disparities. This training program demonstrated that it is feasible to increase knowledge about cancer research methodology among community partners. These results will be used to guide future research activities with PC3.

社区合作伙伴研究培训计划的影响。
作为解决癌症结果和研究参与差异的使命的一部分,费城社区征服癌症(PC3)联盟开展了一项社区合作伙伴研究培训计划。其目标是增加对癌症研究的认识,并使社区成员做好参与研究活动的准备。36名申请者中有18人被选中参加为期5周的研究方法培训课程。学员完成基线调查(N = 18)和随访调查(N = 10),以测量知识获取情况。人口统计资料用描述性统计进行分析。对于重复的横断面组比较,使用Wilcoxon非参数检验来检验基线和随访调查中位数之间的统计学差异。p值≤0.05认为有统计学意义。受训者主要是女性(78%)。中位年龄为61.5岁。44%是黑人,22%是白人,17%是亚洲人,17%是其他种族。28%是西班牙裔。44%是癌症幸存者。我们观察到,在5点李克特量表上,对研究的感知知识通常在训练后从2到4的中位数增加
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Cancer Education
Journal of Cancer Education 医学-医学:信息
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
6.20%
发文量
122
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Cancer Education, the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education (AACE) and the European Association for Cancer Education (EACE), is an international, quarterly journal dedicated to the publication of original contributions dealing with the varied aspects of cancer education for physicians, dentists, nurses, students, social workers and other allied health professionals, patients, the general public, and anyone interested in effective education about cancer related issues. Articles featured include reports of original results of educational research, as well as discussions of current problems and techniques in cancer education. Manuscripts are welcome on such subjects as educational methods, instruments, and program evaluation. Suitable topics include teaching of basic science aspects of cancer; the assessment of attitudes toward cancer patient management; the teaching of diagnostic skills relevant to cancer; the evaluation of undergraduate, postgraduate, or continuing education programs; and articles about all aspects of cancer education from prevention to palliative care. We encourage contributions to a special column called Reflections; these articles should relate to the human aspects of dealing with cancer, cancer patients, and their families and finding meaning and support in these efforts. Letters to the Editor (600 words or less) dealing with published articles or matters of current interest are also invited. Also featured are commentary; book and media reviews; and announcements of educational programs, fellowships, and grants. Articles should be limited to no more than ten double-spaced typed pages, and there should be no more than three tables or figures and 25 references. We also encourage brief reports of five typewritten pages or less, with no more than one figure or table and 15 references.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信