Shanada Monestime, Erika L Thompson, Monica Wilson, Tamara McCants, Lovoria B Williams
{"title":"提高HBCU健康培训生肺癌教育和筛查导航技能:CONNECT项目的试点研究。","authors":"Shanada Monestime, Erika L Thompson, Monica Wilson, Tamara McCants, Lovoria B Williams","doi":"10.1007/s13187-025-02704-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer death, disproportionately affecting Black communities due to delayed diagnoses and low screening rates. While these disparities persist, few educational interventions aim to equip health professional trainees-particularly those at Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCUs)-with the knowledge and confidence to address them. Empowering providers early in their training through culturally tailored education may help build a more prepared, equity-focused workforce. The purpose of this project was to evaluate a culturally tailored lung cancer education program, Program CONNECT, for health professional trainees at HBCUs. Program CONNECT was implemented in regions where lung cancer mortality among Black populations was ≥ 1.6 times higher than among White populations. From August to September 2024, healthcare trainees in nursing, medicine, pharmacy, and dentistry participated in a 90-min workshop covering lung cancer disparities, screening guidelines, and navigation strategies. A 21-item pre/post-test assessed changes in knowledge, beliefs, and self-efficacy. Participants (N = 100) were primarily nursing (63%), followed by pharmacy (29%), dentistry (5%), and medical (1%) students. While over half had healthcare experience, few had prior training in lung cancer navigation. Post-training, stigma related to personal responsibility for lung cancer significantly decreased (p = 0.005). Knowledge improved regarding risk factors, screening eligibility, disparities, and biomarker testing (p < 0.001). Confidence in identifying screening-eligible individuals, addressing barriers, and conducting difficult conversations improved significantly (p < 0.001). Recognition of ineligible screening scenarios increased, though shared decision-making knowledge remained unchanged. Interest in pursuing a cancer-related specialty rose from 66 to 78% (p < 0.001). Program CONNECT significantly improved knowledge and navigation self-efficacy among HBCU health trainees. Expanding this training across HBCUs may strengthen oncology workforce diversity and promote more equitable lung cancer outcomes in high-disparity communities.</p>","PeriodicalId":50246,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cancer Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Improving Lung Cancer Education and Screening Navigation Skills Among HBCU Health Trainees: A Pilot Study of Program CONNECT.\",\"authors\":\"Shanada Monestime, Erika L Thompson, Monica Wilson, Tamara McCants, Lovoria B Williams\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s13187-025-02704-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer death, disproportionately affecting Black communities due to delayed diagnoses and low screening rates. While these disparities persist, few educational interventions aim to equip health professional trainees-particularly those at Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCUs)-with the knowledge and confidence to address them. Empowering providers early in their training through culturally tailored education may help build a more prepared, equity-focused workforce. The purpose of this project was to evaluate a culturally tailored lung cancer education program, Program CONNECT, for health professional trainees at HBCUs. Program CONNECT was implemented in regions where lung cancer mortality among Black populations was ≥ 1.6 times higher than among White populations. From August to September 2024, healthcare trainees in nursing, medicine, pharmacy, and dentistry participated in a 90-min workshop covering lung cancer disparities, screening guidelines, and navigation strategies. A 21-item pre/post-test assessed changes in knowledge, beliefs, and self-efficacy. Participants (N = 100) were primarily nursing (63%), followed by pharmacy (29%), dentistry (5%), and medical (1%) students. While over half had healthcare experience, few had prior training in lung cancer navigation. Post-training, stigma related to personal responsibility for lung cancer significantly decreased (p = 0.005). Knowledge improved regarding risk factors, screening eligibility, disparities, and biomarker testing (p < 0.001). Confidence in identifying screening-eligible individuals, addressing barriers, and conducting difficult conversations improved significantly (p < 0.001). Recognition of ineligible screening scenarios increased, though shared decision-making knowledge remained unchanged. Interest in pursuing a cancer-related specialty rose from 66 to 78% (p < 0.001). Program CONNECT significantly improved knowledge and navigation self-efficacy among HBCU health trainees. Expanding this training across HBCUs may strengthen oncology workforce diversity and promote more equitable lung cancer outcomes in high-disparity communities.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50246,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cancer Education\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cancer Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-025-02704-0\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cancer Education","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-025-02704-0","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Improving Lung Cancer Education and Screening Navigation Skills Among HBCU Health Trainees: A Pilot Study of Program CONNECT.
Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer death, disproportionately affecting Black communities due to delayed diagnoses and low screening rates. While these disparities persist, few educational interventions aim to equip health professional trainees-particularly those at Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCUs)-with the knowledge and confidence to address them. Empowering providers early in their training through culturally tailored education may help build a more prepared, equity-focused workforce. The purpose of this project was to evaluate a culturally tailored lung cancer education program, Program CONNECT, for health professional trainees at HBCUs. Program CONNECT was implemented in regions where lung cancer mortality among Black populations was ≥ 1.6 times higher than among White populations. From August to September 2024, healthcare trainees in nursing, medicine, pharmacy, and dentistry participated in a 90-min workshop covering lung cancer disparities, screening guidelines, and navigation strategies. A 21-item pre/post-test assessed changes in knowledge, beliefs, and self-efficacy. Participants (N = 100) were primarily nursing (63%), followed by pharmacy (29%), dentistry (5%), and medical (1%) students. While over half had healthcare experience, few had prior training in lung cancer navigation. Post-training, stigma related to personal responsibility for lung cancer significantly decreased (p = 0.005). Knowledge improved regarding risk factors, screening eligibility, disparities, and biomarker testing (p < 0.001). Confidence in identifying screening-eligible individuals, addressing barriers, and conducting difficult conversations improved significantly (p < 0.001). Recognition of ineligible screening scenarios increased, though shared decision-making knowledge remained unchanged. Interest in pursuing a cancer-related specialty rose from 66 to 78% (p < 0.001). Program CONNECT significantly improved knowledge and navigation self-efficacy among HBCU health trainees. Expanding this training across HBCUs may strengthen oncology workforce diversity and promote more equitable lung cancer outcomes in high-disparity communities.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Cancer Education, the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education (AACE) and the European Association for Cancer Education (EACE), is an international, quarterly journal dedicated to the publication of original contributions dealing with the varied aspects of cancer education for physicians, dentists, nurses, students, social workers and other allied health professionals, patients, the general public, and anyone interested in effective education about cancer related issues.
Articles featured include reports of original results of educational research, as well as discussions of current problems and techniques in cancer education. Manuscripts are welcome on such subjects as educational methods, instruments, and program evaluation. Suitable topics include teaching of basic science aspects of cancer; the assessment of attitudes toward cancer patient management; the teaching of diagnostic skills relevant to cancer; the evaluation of undergraduate, postgraduate, or continuing education programs; and articles about all aspects of cancer education from prevention to palliative care.
We encourage contributions to a special column called Reflections; these articles should relate to the human aspects of dealing with cancer, cancer patients, and their families and finding meaning and support in these efforts.
Letters to the Editor (600 words or less) dealing with published articles or matters of current interest are also invited.
Also featured are commentary; book and media reviews; and announcements of educational programs, fellowships, and grants.
Articles should be limited to no more than ten double-spaced typed pages, and there should be no more than three tables or figures and 25 references. We also encourage brief reports of five typewritten pages or less, with no more than one figure or table and 15 references.