Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics最新文献_第3页

Abstracts from the PRIM&R 2023 Advancing Ethical Research Conference. PRIMR23 经验摘要。

IF 1.3 4区哲学

Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics Pub Date : 2024-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-26 DOI: 10.1177/15562646241231839

引用次数: 0

The "3 Ps" of EmPowerment, Partnership and Protection - Stakeholder Perceptions of Beneficial Outcomes of Engagement in HIV Prevention Trials. EmPowerment、Partnership 和 Protection 这 "3P"--利益相关者对参与艾滋病预防试验的有益结果的看法。

IF 1.3 4区哲学

Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics Pub Date : 2024-02-01 Epub Date: 2023-12-17 DOI: 10.1177/15562646231221259

Abigail Wilkinson, Siyabonga Thabethe, Jessica Salzwedel, Catherine Slack

{"title":"The \"3 Ps\" of EmPowerment, Partnership and Protection - Stakeholder Perceptions of Beneficial Outcomes of Engagement in HIV Prevention Trials.","authors":"Abigail Wilkinson, Siyabonga Thabethe, Jessica Salzwedel, Catherine Slack","doi":"10.1177/15562646231221259","DOIUrl":"10.1177/15562646231221259","url":null,"abstract":"Background: Stakeholder engagement is increasingly recognized as a key component of ethical research in leading ethics guidelines. Ethics commentators have also argued that engagement has several beneficial outcomes for the field. Aim: This paper reports on the beneficial outcomes of stakeholder engagement in HIV prevention trials as perceived by stakeholders in the field. Method: We conducted 28 interviews between 2019 and 2021 with interviewees from various stakeholder groups in 12 countries and used thematic analysis to analyze the transcripts. Findings: We found three major themes - namely emPowerment where engagement is perceived to empower stakeholders, Partnerships where engagement is perceived to build equitable relationships and Protections where engagement is perceived to strengthen protections for participants and community stakeholders and to improve science. Conclusions: These findings map closely onto beneficial outcomes envisaged by ethics guidelines, however, the relationship between outcomes seen as beneficial deserves further exploration.","PeriodicalId":50211,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10958749/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138812533","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

"My Blood, You Know, My Biology Being out There…": Consent and Participant Control of Biological Samples. "我的血液，我的生物体......"：生物样本的同意和参与者控制。

IF 1.3 4区哲学

Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics Pub Date : 2024-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-08 DOI: 10.1177/15562646231222665

Susan Racine Passmore, Abigail Gerbitz, Gregory R Hancock, Laura Evans, Gina Green-Harris, Dorothy Farrar Edwards, Tyson Jackson, Stephen B Thomas

{"title":"\"My Blood, You Know, My Biology Being out There…\": Consent and Participant Control of Biological Samples.","authors":"Susan Racine Passmore, Abigail Gerbitz, Gregory R Hancock, Laura Evans, Gina Green-Harris, Dorothy Farrar Edwards, Tyson Jackson, Stephen B Thomas","doi":"10.1177/15562646231222665","DOIUrl":"10.1177/15562646231222665","url":null,"abstract":"The widespread and persistent underrepresentation of groups experiencing health disparities in research involving biospecimens is a barrier to scientific knowledge and advances in health equity. To ensure that all groups have the opportunity to participate in research and feel welcome and safe doing so, we must understand how research studies may be shaped to promote inclusion. In this study, we explored the decision to participate in hypothetical research scenarios among African American adults (n = 169) that varied on the basis of four attributes (form of consent, reason for research, institutional affiliation and race of the researcher). Findings indicate that participants were largely willing to contribute to biobanks but significantly preferred opportunities where they had control over the use of their biological samples through tiered or study-specific forms of consent. Broad consent procedures, although common and perhaps preferred by participants with high trust in researchers, may amount to an exclusionary practice.","PeriodicalId":50211,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10957312/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139405024","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

When a Negative Experience Sticks With You: Does the Revised Outcome Debriefing Counteract the Consequences of Experimental Ostracism in Psychological Research? 当负面经历挥之不去时：修订后的结果汇报能否抵消心理学研究中实验性排斥的后果？

IF 1.3 4区哲学

Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics Pub Date : 2024-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-23 DOI: 10.1177/15562646241227065

Stefanie Miketta, Malte Friese

{"title":"When a Negative Experience Sticks With You: Does the Revised Outcome Debriefing Counteract the Consequences of Experimental Ostracism in Psychological Research?","authors":"Stefanie Miketta, Malte Friese","doi":"10.1177/15562646241227065","DOIUrl":"10.1177/15562646241227065","url":null,"abstract":"For research purposes, it is generally accepted that experimental ostracism manipulations can lead to a reduction of participants' well-being. To eventually restore participants' well-being, researchers rely on post-experimental debriefings that discredit prior deception. However, evidence suggests that discredited beliefs can persevere. The present research investigates whether a potent debriefing procedure restores participants' well-being after an experimentally induced ostracism experience. In two studies, participants were either excluded or included in a Cyberball game, indicated their well-being, and were debriefed. In two additional conditions, participants were debriefed before indicating their well-being. Ostracism compared to inclusion led to decreased positive and increased negative mood. The debriefing did not counteract this effect (Studies 1 & 2). Unwanted aftereffects of the manipulation persevered for more than one day after the experimental session (Study 2). These findings question the effectiveness of debriefings and raise issues about research ethics.","PeriodicalId":50211,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10958747/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139543559","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Public and Patients' Perspectives Towards Data and Sample Sharing for Research: An Overview of Empirical Findings. 公众和患者对研究数据和样本共享的看法：实证研究综述。

IF 1.3 4区哲学

Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics Pub Date : 2023-12-01 Epub Date: 2023-11-07 DOI: 10.1177/15562646231212644

María C Sánchez, Juan Carlos Hernández Clemente, Fernando J García López

引用次数: 0

Ethical Considerations for Engaging Children and Adolescents Living with HIV in Research in African Countries: A Systematic Review. 让感染艾滋病毒的儿童和青少年参与非洲国家研究的伦理考虑：系统综述。

IF 1.7 4区哲学

Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics Pub Date : 2023-12-01 Epub Date: 2023-10-23 DOI: 10.1177/15562646231208991

Emma Gillette, Winstone Nyandiko, Ashley Chory, Michael Scanlon, Josephine Aluoch, Nandini Choudhury, Daniel Lagat, Celestine Ashimosi, Whitney Biegon, Dennis Munyoro, Janet Lidweye, Jack Nyagaya, Ilene Wilets, Allison DeLong, Rami Kantor, Rachel Vreeman, Violet Naanyu

{"title":"Ethical Considerations for Engaging Children and Adolescents Living with HIV in Research in African Countries: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Emma Gillette, Winstone Nyandiko, Ashley Chory, Michael Scanlon, Josephine Aluoch, Nandini Choudhury, Daniel Lagat, Celestine Ashimosi, Whitney Biegon, Dennis Munyoro, Janet Lidweye, Jack Nyagaya, Ilene Wilets, Allison DeLong, Rami Kantor, Rachel Vreeman, Violet Naanyu","doi":"10.1177/15562646231208991","DOIUrl":"10.1177/15562646231208991","url":null,"abstract":"Research engaging children and adolescents living with HIV (CALWH) is critical for youth-friendly services and HIV care, and researchers need to ensure that such engagement is ethical. We conducted a systematic review to identify key ethical considerations for the engagement of CALWH in research. The review focused on primary research articles conducted in African countries that examined ethical issues in CALWH engaged in research. Ten studies met the inclusion criteria; the following seven key domains were extracted: 1) justifications for engaging CALWH in research; 2) community involvement; 3) informed consent/assent; 4) caregiver involvement; 5) perceptions of benefits; 6) perception of the risks of involvement; and 7) confidentiality. These domains can inform the ethical engagement of CALWH in research.","PeriodicalId":50211,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11325447/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49693433","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

"Dogs on Call": A Community-Engaged Human Subjects Training with Hospital Based Therapy Dog Teams. “随叫随到的狗”:社区参与的人类受试者训练与医院治疗犬队。

IF 1.3 4区哲学

Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics Pub Date : 2023-12-01 Epub Date: 2023-09-03 DOI: 10.1177/15562646231191962

Lisa Townsend, Nyssa Towsley, Nancy R Gee

{"title":"\"Dogs on Call\": A Community-Engaged Human Subjects Training with Hospital Based Therapy Dog Teams.","authors":"Lisa Townsend, Nyssa Towsley, Nancy R Gee","doi":"10.1177/15562646231191962","DOIUrl":"10.1177/15562646231191962","url":null,"abstract":"Problem: As community-engaged research (CER) methods evolve, Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) must adapt policies to facilitate CER research. This paper describes a novel collaboration between hospital-based therapy dog volunteer teams (CERs), academic faculty, and an IRB. Subjects: CER volunteers delivered a canine-assisted intervention to hospitalized adults in a clinical trial. Methods: IRB members and faculty developed a human subjects protections training tailored to the volunteer handlers' role as study interventionists including an interactive video- and discussion-based training with a knowledge assessment. Findings: Fourteen volunteer handlers were trained. The expedited IRB review period was similar to national average rates (18 days.) Volunteer handlers have conducted 107 research visits with little patient attrition. Conclusion: Tailored human subjects trainings facilitate research with interventions delivered by people who are not typically involved in research. Bespoke CER human subjects training requires collaboration between researchers and IRBs and flexibility in IRB policy regarding CER.","PeriodicalId":50211,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10143985","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Evaluation of Informed Consent with Teach-Back and Audio Assistance to Improve Willingness to Participate in a Clinical Trial Among Underrepresented Minorities: A Randomized Pilot Trial. 在代表性不足的少数群体中评估知情同意与反馈和音频辅助以提高参与临床试验的意愿：一项随机试点试验。

IF 1.3 4区哲学

Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics Pub Date : 2023-12-01 Epub Date: 2023-10-12 DOI: 10.1177/15562646231207266

Brenda Jamerson, Barry Shuster

引用次数: 0

Promoting Transparent and Equitable Discussion of Controversial Research. 促进对有争议的研究进行透明和公平的讨论。

IF 1.3 4区哲学

Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics Pub Date : 2023-10-01 Epub Date: 2023-07-12 DOI: 10.1177/15562646231188573

Valerie J Flaherman, Victoria Nankabirwa, Amy Sarah Ginsburg

引用次数: 0

Adolescents' and Parents' Perspectives on a Novel Decision-Making Process for Return of Results in Genomic Research. 青少年和父母对基因组研究结果返回的新决策过程的看法。

IF 1.3 4区哲学

Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics Pub Date : 2023-10-01 Epub Date: 2023-07-25 DOI: 10.1177/15562646231190826

Kelly A Matula, Amy A Blumling, Melanie F Myers, Michelle L McGowan, Ellen A Lipstein

引用次数: 0