{"title":"Outcomes in Patients With Heel Ulcerations that Underwent Below the Knee Amputations Versus Vertical Contour Calcanectomy: Importance of Selection Criteria","authors":"","doi":"10.1053/j.jfas.2024.06.010","DOIUrl":"10.1053/j.jfas.2024.06.010","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The aim of the study was to compare preoperative factors and postoperative outcomes in patients with heel ulcerations that primarily had a transtibial (below the knee) amputation (N = 38) versus vertical contour calcanectomy (n = 62). The groups had no statistical difference between their Charlson Comorbidity Index Score, a prognostic score of 10-year survival in patients with multiple comorbidities. The odds of primary closure were 21.1 times higher in patients that underwent below knee amputation compared to patients that underwent vertical contour calcanectomy (OR 21.1 [95% CI 3.89-114.21]). The odds of positive soft tissue culture at time of closure were 17.1 times higher for patients that underwent vertical contour calcanectomy (OR 17.1 [95% CI 5.40-54.16]). The odds of a patent posterior tibial artery were 3.3 times higher for patients that underwent vertical contour calcanectomy (OR 3.3 [95% 1.09-10.09]). The secondary aim of the study was to evaluate preoperative factors and postoperative outcomes in patients with failed vertical contour calcanectomy, defined as needing a below knee amputation. The odds of vertical contour calcanectomy failure was 13.7 times higher in male patients (OR 13.7 [95% CI 1.80-107.60]). Vertical contour calcanectomy failure was 5.7 times higher in patients with renal disease (OR 5.7 [95% CI 1.10-30.30]), and vertical contour calcanectomy failure was 16.1 times higher for patients who needed additional surgery post closure (OR 16.1 [95% CI 1.40-183.20]).</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50191,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery","volume":"63 6","pages":"Pages 684-693"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2024-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141535821","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Utilizing the Frailty Index to Predict Long-term Mortality in Patients Undergoing Major Lower Extremity Amputation","authors":"","doi":"10.1053/j.jfas.2024.06.012","DOIUrl":"10.1053/j.jfas.2024.06.012","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>The 5-factor modified Frailty<span> Index (mFI-5) is a risk-stratification tool utilized to predict complications and mortality following major lower extremity (LE) amputation. However, its prognostic value for long-term mortality is unknown. The study aim was to assess whether a high mFI-5 score relates to long-term mortality following major LE amputation for chronic wounds. Patients ≥60 years who underwent major LE amputation from 2017 to 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. Data regarding demographics, comorbidities, perioperative factors, amputation type, and postoperative complications was collected and mFI-5 was calculated. Survival analysis was performed with Kaplan-Meier curves and differences were assessed with Log-Rank test. A total of 172 patients were identified. Mean age was 70.7 ± 8.0 years. Median time to ambulation was 3.7 months (IQR 4.0). By final follow-up of 17.5 ± 15.9 months, ambulatory rate was 51.7% (n = 89), overall mortality 36.0% (n = 62), 1-year mortality 14.0% (n = 24), and 3-year mortality 27.9% (n = 48). Patients with an mFI-5 of ≥4 (26.7%, n = 46) compared with patients with mFI-5 <4 (73.3%, n = 126) had a higher rate of prolonged postoperative LOS (34.8% vs 19.8%, </span></span><em>p</em> = .042), overall mortality (52.2% vs 30.2%, <em>p</em> = .008), 1-year mortality (23.9% vs 10.3%, <em>p</em> = .023), and 3-year mortality (45.7% vs 21.4%, <em>p</em><span> = .002). Multivariate analysis demonstrated mFI-5 was an independent predictor of 3-year mortality (OR 2.35, </span><em>p</em> = .043). At a threshold ≥4, the mFI-5 demonstrated utility in predicting long-term mortality. The value of this prognostic indicator is in its preoperative application of assessing risk of mortality, which should be utilized in conjunction with other measures.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50191,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery","volume":"63 5","pages":"Pages 608-613"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2024-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141499500","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Immediate Weightbearing after Modified Lapidus Arthrodesis Using a Medial Plate: A Retrospective Descriptive Cohort Study","authors":"","doi":"10.1053/j.jfas.2024.06.004","DOIUrl":"10.1053/j.jfas.2024.06.004","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The modified Lapidus procedure has emerged as a versatile solution for various pedal pathologies, particularly hallux abducto valgus. There have been numerous modifications over time regarding fixation techniques, joint preparation methods, graft utilization, and weightbearing protocols. However, concerns persist regarding prolonged nonweightbearing postoperatively, prompting the need for alternative approaches. This retrospective descriptive cohort analysis assessed the outcomes of 40 feet from 34 patients who underwent the modified Lapidus procedure with a medial plating system, aimed to evaluate immediate weightbearing outcomes on union rate, fixation-related complications, and functional outcomes. Among the 40 feet, findings showed a 95% (38/40) union rate within 6 months, with 2.5% (1/40) experiencing delayed union and 2.5% (1/40) facing fixation-related complications. There is a single case of malunion in the cohort. Additionally, statistically significant improvements were observed across all domains of the Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire at <em>p</em> < .001. These findings suggest immediate weightbearing as a potential alternative to traditional nonweightbearing protocols. However, the study's retrospective nature and lack of a comparative group warrant cautious interpretation. Further research is essential to validate these findings and refine postoperative care protocols. By challenging conventional practices, this study underscores the complexity of optimizing patient outcomes in modified Lapidus procedure management. Tailored approaches and prospective investigations are imperative for establishing definitive guidelines and enhancing surgical techniques in this domain.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50191,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery","volume":"63 6","pages":"Pages 661-667"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2024-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141472160","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"External Versus Internal Fixation Techniques for Ankle Arthrodesis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis","authors":"","doi":"10.1053/j.jfas.2024.05.010","DOIUrl":"10.1053/j.jfas.2024.05.010","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Ankle arthrodesis is an effective surgical intervention for end-stage arthritis or severe ankle joint deformity. Both internal (IF) and external fixation (EF) techniques are valid options, but there is controversy regarding the most effective technique. This study compares the safety and efficacy of EF and IF fixation techniques for ankle arthrodesis. A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted according to the Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) Guidelines. A literature search of electronic databases, including MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), was performed to identify all studies directly comparing the two techniques. Both fixed and random effects models of analysis were used depending on heterogeneity. Odds of union in the EF and IF groups were comparable (OR = 0.60, CI 0.36-1.02, <em>p</em> = .06) however, EF was associated with greater odds of deep hardware infections (OR = 3.67, 1.97-6.83, <em>p</em> < .05) and amputations (OR = 3.17, CI 1.06-9.54, <em>p</em> = .04). Odds of revision surgery and superficial wound complications were similar between groups. EF techniques had significantly longer operation times (MD = 31.23, CI-25.11-37.34, <em>p</em> < .05) and intraoperative blood loss (MD = 44.1, CI 28.77-59.43, <em>p</em> < .05<strong>)</strong>. No significant difference was noted in pain and functionality scores. IF and EF techniques have reasonable union rates with similar postoperative outcomes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50191,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery","volume":"63 6","pages":"Pages 769-775"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2024-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141472159","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Secondary Surgery Following Lapidus Bunionectomy","authors":"","doi":"10.1053/j.jfas.2024.05.011","DOIUrl":"10.1053/j.jfas.2024.05.011","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>While the Lapidus bunionectomy is a common procedure utilized to address hallux valgus, the incidence of secondary surgery is not well established. Our primary goal was to determine the incidence of revision surgery and hardware removal following the Lapidus bunionectomy in addition to the risk factors associated with each. A retrospective nested case-control study of adult patients who underwent a Lapidus bunionectomy for symptomatic hallux valgus over a 9-year period was performed. The incidence rates and 95% confidence intervals (CI) of secondary surgery in the 3 years following the procedure along with the estimated independent associations and odds ratios between baseline demographic, clinical, and radiographic characteristics were calculated. Of the original cohort of 2540 patients, 127 were identified (5.0%; CI: 4.1%, 5.8%) who underwent revision surgery and 165 (6.5%; CI: 5.5%, 7.5%) who underwent hardware removal following Lapidus bunionectomy. Initially, the hallux valgus angle, intermetatarsal angle, and tibial sesamoid position were risk factors for revision surgery. However, in adjusted analyses for revision surgery, using a screw for third point of fixation emerged as the only independent risk factor (odds ratio [OR] = 3.01; CI: 1.59, 5.69). In adjusted analyses for hardware removal, female sex (OR = 2.33; CI: 1.08, 5.00) and third point of fixation (OR = 2.92; CI: 1.82, 4.69) emerged as independent risk factors. While the overall risks associated with Lapidus bunionectomy are low and the need for revision surgery are low, this study helps to identify specific risk factors for secondary surgery and hardware removal to help in evaluation and discussion with patients.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50191,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery","volume":"63 6","pages":"Pages 653-660"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2024-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141447459","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Applicant Perception and Content Exploration of the 2024 podiatric Residency Interview Process","authors":"","doi":"10.1053/j.jfas.2024.06.006","DOIUrl":"10.1053/j.jfas.2024.06.006","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span><span>Considerable resources are dedicated on an annual basis to the podiatric medicine and surgery residency interview by both students and programs. Despite this, relatively little is known about student perception of the process, nor the format and content of interview. The objective of this investigation was to study and organize experiences of fourth-year podiatric medical students following the 2024 Centralized Residency Interview Program (CRIP) process. An anonymous and voluntary survey was developed and made available to fourth year podiatric medical students. It was relatively common for there to be academic, social/personal, case work-up, and rapid-fire academic question components to the interview. It was also very common to be provided with the opportunity to ask programs questions. It was relatively uncommon for there to be ethical/moral questions, personality/psychologic assessments, logic assessments, and hands-on demonstrations. The most common hands-on demonstrations were suturing, hand ties and performance of fixation principles. Relatively high yield academic topics included plain film radiography interpretation, rearfoot/ankle osseous trauma, </span>diabetic foot infection, advanced imaging interpretation, and fixation constructs/principles. When evaluating programs, students placed high value on surgical volume, surgical variety, relative resident </span>autonomy<span><span><span>, program location, exposure to outpatient clinics, </span>salary, future connections as a program alumnus, unique off-service rotations, exposure to business management/coding/billing, </span>scope of practice<span>, exposure to inpatient management, resident salary, and who the senior co-residents would be. The results of this investigation provide unique information for both medical students and residency programs with respect to the perception, format and content of the podiatric residency interview process.</span></span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":50191,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery","volume":"63 5","pages":"Pages 603-607"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2024-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141447458","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Analyzing Learning Curve Effects: Total Ankle Replacement Design Switch and Long-Term Survival","authors":"","doi":"10.1053/j.jfas.2024.06.002","DOIUrl":"10.1053/j.jfas.2024.06.002","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>Different aspects of the learning curve in total ankle replacement<span><span> (TAR) have been studied in the short to mid-term, with 30 cases often considered critical. However, its impact on long-term (10- and 15-year) survival remains unclear. Therefore, we retrospectively analyzed 77 consecutive TARs performed by one orthopedic surgeon. The main outcome was long-term survival between cases 1-30 and 31-77 using the Kaplan-Meier with Competing Risk Analyses<span>. Secondarily, we used Moving Average Method with LOESS regression to confirm the learning curve based on the perioperative complications. Thirdly, associations between perioperative complications and operation time on long-term survival were assessed using Cox </span></span>proportional hazard models. The 10-year survival of cases 1-30 was 89.9% (95% CI 70.4-96.5), and of 31-77, 92.4% (95% CI 7745- 97.5) (</span></span><em>p</em> = .58). The 15-year survival was 81.8% (95% CI 59.5-91.8) and 74.8% (95% CI 52.4-86.6), respectively (<em>p</em> = .97). The long-term survival rate for the TAR that endured perioperative complication was 96.70% (95% CI 90.28-103.12), and for the uncomplicated TAR 87.50% (95% CI 77.12-97.88%) (<em>p</em> = .24). Operating time nor occurrence of perioperative fractures were significantly associated with long-term survival (<em>p</em> = .11 and 0.26, respectively). However, moving average method revealed a significant decreasing trend with a cut-off value of 33 procedures regarding the marginal probability of perioperative osseous complications (<em>p</em><span><span> < .01). In conclusion, surgeons should note a learning curve when adapting arthroplasty procedures. After the </span>prosthesis design switch, the learning curve regarding perioperative osseous complications was confirmed at 33 TAR. The switch did not affect long-term survival.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":50191,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery","volume":"63 5","pages":"Pages 593-597"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2024-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141443647","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Biomechanical Consequences of Proximal Screw Placement in Minimally Invasive Surgery for Hallux Valgus Correction","authors":"","doi":"10.1053/j.jfas.2024.06.007","DOIUrl":"10.1053/j.jfas.2024.06.007","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Hallux valgus is one of the most common surgically corrected forefoot deformities. Studies evaluating clinical outcomes of minimally invasive chevron and akin (MICA) procedure have shown shorter operation time, faster recovery, and smaller scars compared to the open approach. Previous biomechanical cadaveric studies have largely focused on the open approach with minimal on MICA. To our knowledge, no studies have compared different proximal screw placements in MICA which can either be three-point fixation or intramedullary. This study aims to compare the biomechanical properties of fixation between these 2 techniques in MICA. Six matched pairs of human fresh frozen cadaveric feet were randomized to either 3-point fixation or intramedullary groups. Both procedures were performed by a single fellowship-trained orthopedic foot and ankle surgeon. Using a material testing machine, each specimen underwent 1000 cycles of plantar-to-dorsal uniaxial loads from 0 to 31 N in cantilever configuration while monitoring bending stiffness and distal fragment dorsal angulation. They were then subjected to load until failure at a compression rate of 10 mm/min. Specimens from both groups tolerated the walking fatigue test. Mean bending stiffness of 3-point fixation was 84% higher than intramedullary constructs (<em>p</em> = .002). Mean dorsal angulation of intramedullary was thrice that of 3-point fixation constructs (<em>p</em> = .008). Mean load to failure of 3-point fixation was 30% higher than intramedullary constructs (<em>p</em> = .001). Three-point fixation provide superior biomechanical stability compared to intramedullary proximal screw placement. The surgical technique using 3-point proximal screw fixation can offer robust fixation and lead to better clinical outcomes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50191,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery","volume":"63 6","pages":"Pages 672-679"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2024-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141443648","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Treatment for Lateral Ray Polydactyly with Brachydactyly of the Foot","authors":"","doi":"10.1053/j.jfas.2024.06.003","DOIUrl":"10.1053/j.jfas.2024.06.003","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>Surgical methods<span><span> for lateral ray polydactyly with </span>brachydactyly of the foot include simple </span></span>toe<span><span> ablation and toe lengthening. However, there are few reports on comparative studies, and there is no standard treatment. We retrospectively investigated cases of lateral ray polydactyly with brachydactyly treated at our department and related facilities. In our study, the prevalence of Hirai-Togashi classification type IV was 8.8% (13/147 toes). Five patients did not request toe lengthening and underwent simple ablation, resulting in a shortened remaining toe in these 5 patients. The surgical methods for toe lengthening were pedicle </span>bone grafting in 2 cases and on-top formation in 6 cases. Good results can be obtained in the most common phalangeal type cases, but care must be taken in cases with block-shaped metatarsal heads to avoid poor toe alignment.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":50191,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery","volume":"63 5","pages":"Pages 598-602"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2024-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141443650","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Open Ankle Fractures in Older Individuals: A Multi-center Study","authors":"","doi":"10.1053/j.jfas.2024.06.001","DOIUrl":"10.1053/j.jfas.2024.06.001","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The purpose of this study is to identify demographics, etiology, comorbidities, treatment, complications, and outcomes for older patients with open ankle fractures. Patients ≥60 years old who sustained an open ankle fracture between January 1, 2004 and March 31, 2014 at 6 Level 1 trauma centers were retrospectively reviewed. Univariate analysis using chi-squared or Student's <em>t</em> test was performed to identify associations between preoperative variables and 2 postoperative outcomes of interest: amputation and 1-year mortality. Multivariate analysis was performed using stepwise logistical regression to identify independent predictors of postoperative amputation and 1-year mortality. Of the 162 total patients, the most common mechanism of injury was a ground-level fall (51.9%). The most common fracture types were bimalleolar fractures (52.5%) followed by trimalleolar fractures (26.5%), with 41.5% of the fractures classified as Gustilo Anderson Classification Type 2 and 38.6% classified as Type 3A. The average number of surgeries required per patient was 2.1. Complications included: 15.4% superficial infection rate, 9.9% deep infection rate, and 9.3% amputation rate. The 1-year mortality rate was 13.6% and the overall mortality rate was 25.9%. Male gender and fracture type were found to be independent predictors for amputation after surgery (<em>p = .009, .005,</em> respectively). Older age and having diabetes were independent predictors for 1-year mortality after surgery (<em>p = .021, .005</em> respectively). Overall, open ankle fractures in older individuals were associated with high rates of amputation and mortality.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50191,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery","volume":"63 6","pages":"Pages 631-636"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2024-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141443649","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}