超声引导下不同入路坐骨神经阻滞对踝关节骨折患者坐骨神经深度及疼痛程度的影响。

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q2 Medicine
Haiyun Dong, Penglei Ma, Jingyu Li, Yulin Wu, Wei Wang, Caixia Wang
{"title":"超声引导下不同入路坐骨神经阻滞对踝关节骨折患者坐骨神经深度及疼痛程度的影响。","authors":"Haiyun Dong, Penglei Ma, Jingyu Li, Yulin Wu, Wei Wang, Caixia Wang","doi":"10.1053/j.jfas.2025.01.013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To investigate the clinical efficacy of using different approach sciatic nerve blocks on the sciatic nerve depth and pain degree in patients with ankle fracture. A retrospective analysis was conducted on 151 patients with ankle fractures who were admitted to the hospital from May 2020 to May 2023. The patients were divided into a control group (n=76) using the greater trochanteric plane approach (GTA) and an observation group (n=75) using the suprapopliteal approach (PA). Perioperative related indexes, pain levels, muscle strength, hemodynamic indexes, and adverse reactions were compared between the two groups. There was no significant difference in operation time between the two groups. The nerve block operation time and onset time were lower in the observation group, while the maintenance time of nerve block was higher in the observation group(P<0.05). The visual analogue scale (VAS) scores at 2h, 12h, and 24h postoperatively were lower in the observation group. Muscle strength of the posterior femoral muscle group was significantly better in the observation group at 8h after surgery. Hemodynamic indexes were lower in the observation group at 15minutes and 30minutes after anesthesia. The total incidence of adverse reactions was lower in the observation group compared to the control group. Ultrasound-guided sciatic nerve block using the suprapopliteal approach in patients with ankle fractures can help stabilize muscle strength and hemodynamics, alleviate pain symptoms, and avoid motor block and adverse reactions. This approach is recommended for adoption.</p>","PeriodicalId":50191,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effect of sciatic nerve block on sciatic nerve depth and pain level in patients with ankle fracture based on different approaches under ultrasound guidance.\",\"authors\":\"Haiyun Dong, Penglei Ma, Jingyu Li, Yulin Wu, Wei Wang, Caixia Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1053/j.jfas.2025.01.013\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>To investigate the clinical efficacy of using different approach sciatic nerve blocks on the sciatic nerve depth and pain degree in patients with ankle fracture. A retrospective analysis was conducted on 151 patients with ankle fractures who were admitted to the hospital from May 2020 to May 2023. The patients were divided into a control group (n=76) using the greater trochanteric plane approach (GTA) and an observation group (n=75) using the suprapopliteal approach (PA). Perioperative related indexes, pain levels, muscle strength, hemodynamic indexes, and adverse reactions were compared between the two groups. There was no significant difference in operation time between the two groups. The nerve block operation time and onset time were lower in the observation group, while the maintenance time of nerve block was higher in the observation group(P<0.05). The visual analogue scale (VAS) scores at 2h, 12h, and 24h postoperatively were lower in the observation group. Muscle strength of the posterior femoral muscle group was significantly better in the observation group at 8h after surgery. Hemodynamic indexes were lower in the observation group at 15minutes and 30minutes after anesthesia. The total incidence of adverse reactions was lower in the observation group compared to the control group. Ultrasound-guided sciatic nerve block using the suprapopliteal approach in patients with ankle fractures can help stabilize muscle strength and hemodynamics, alleviate pain symptoms, and avoid motor block and adverse reactions. This approach is recommended for adoption.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50191,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jfas.2025.01.013\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jfas.2025.01.013","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

探讨不同入路坐骨神经阻滞对踝关节骨折患者坐骨神经深度及疼痛程度的影响。对2020年5月至2023年5月我院收治的151例踝关节骨折患者进行回顾性分析。将患者分为对照组(n=76)和观察组(n=75),分别采用大转子平面入路(GTA)和髌上入路(PA)。比较两组围手术期相关指标、疼痛程度、肌力、血流动力学指标及不良反应。两组手术时间差异无统计学意义。观察组神经阻滞手术时间和起效时间较低,神经阻滞维持时间较低(P
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The effect of sciatic nerve block on sciatic nerve depth and pain level in patients with ankle fracture based on different approaches under ultrasound guidance.

To investigate the clinical efficacy of using different approach sciatic nerve blocks on the sciatic nerve depth and pain degree in patients with ankle fracture. A retrospective analysis was conducted on 151 patients with ankle fractures who were admitted to the hospital from May 2020 to May 2023. The patients were divided into a control group (n=76) using the greater trochanteric plane approach (GTA) and an observation group (n=75) using the suprapopliteal approach (PA). Perioperative related indexes, pain levels, muscle strength, hemodynamic indexes, and adverse reactions were compared between the two groups. There was no significant difference in operation time between the two groups. The nerve block operation time and onset time were lower in the observation group, while the maintenance time of nerve block was higher in the observation group(P<0.05). The visual analogue scale (VAS) scores at 2h, 12h, and 24h postoperatively were lower in the observation group. Muscle strength of the posterior femoral muscle group was significantly better in the observation group at 8h after surgery. Hemodynamic indexes were lower in the observation group at 15minutes and 30minutes after anesthesia. The total incidence of adverse reactions was lower in the observation group compared to the control group. Ultrasound-guided sciatic nerve block using the suprapopliteal approach in patients with ankle fractures can help stabilize muscle strength and hemodynamics, alleviate pain symptoms, and avoid motor block and adverse reactions. This approach is recommended for adoption.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery
Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery ORTHOPEDICS-SURGERY
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
234
审稿时长
29.8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery is the leading source for original, clinically-focused articles on the surgical and medical management of the foot and ankle. Each bi-monthly, peer-reviewed issue addresses relevant topics to the profession, such as: adult reconstruction of the forefoot; adult reconstruction of the hindfoot and ankle; diabetes; medicine/rheumatology; pediatrics; research; sports medicine; trauma; and tumors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信