发布求助
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献

The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
Abortion Rights and the Child Welfare System: How Dobbs Exacerbates Existing Racial Inequities and Further Traumatizes Black Families 堕胎权利与儿童福利制度：多布斯如何加剧现有的种族不平等并进一步创伤黑人家庭
The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics Pub Date : 2023-12-13 DOI: 10.1017/jme.2023.111
Elizabeth Tobin-Tyler
{"title":"Abortion Rights and the Child Welfare System: How Dobbs Exacerbates Existing Racial Inequities and Further Traumatizes Black Families","authors":"Elizabeth Tobin-Tyler","doi":"10.1017/jme.2023.111","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/jme.2023.111","url":null,"abstract":"<p>This article explores how abortion bans in states with large Black populations will exacerbate existing racial inequities in those states’ child welfare systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":501694,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics","volume":"82 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138633260","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
What Would Justice Blackmun Say? A Response to Dobbs 布莱克门大法官会怎么说？回应多布斯
The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics Pub Date : 2023-12-13 DOI: 10.1017/jme.2023.94
Radhika Rao
{"title":"What Would Justice Blackmun Say? A Response to Dobbs","authors":"Radhika Rao","doi":"10.1017/jme.2023.94","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/jme.2023.94","url":null,"abstract":"<p><span>Dobbs</span> appears more extreme when juxtaposed against <span>Roe</span>’s hidden history. Justice Blackmun was the author of <span>Roe</span>, but the opinion was the product of a remarkable collaboration that incorporated the suggestions of many Justices. Thus, <span>Roe</span>’s medical framing embodied the vision of the Court as a whole, not one individual.</p>","PeriodicalId":501694,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics","volume":"359 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138633273","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Understanding Shield Laws 了解屏蔽法
The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics Pub Date : 2023-12-13 DOI: 10.1017/jme.2023.103
David S. Cohen, Greer Donley, Rachel Rebouché, Isabelle Aubrun
{"title":"Understanding Shield Laws","authors":"David S. Cohen, Greer Donley, Rachel Rebouché, Isabelle Aubrun","doi":"10.1017/jme.2023.103","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/jme.2023.103","url":null,"abstract":"<p>In anticipation of extraterritorial application of antiabortion laws, many states have enacted laws that attempt to shield abortion providers, helpers, and patients from civil, professional, or criminal liability associated with legal abortion care. This essay analyzes and compares the statutory schemes of the seven early adopting shield states: California, Connecticut, Delaware, Illinois, Massachusetts, New Jersey, and New York. After describing what the laws do and how they operate, we offer reflections on coming disputes, areas of legal uncertainty, and ways to improve future shield laws.</p>","PeriodicalId":501694,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics","volume":"5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138633275","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
“A Vigorous Campaign against Abortion”: Views of American Leaders of Eugenics v. Supreme Court Distortions "大力开展反对堕胎运动"：美国优生学领袖的观点与最高法院的曲解
The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics Pub Date : 2023-12-13 DOI: 10.1017/jme.2023.90
Paul A. Lombardo
{"title":"“A Vigorous Campaign against Abortion”: Views of American Leaders of Eugenics v. Supreme Court Distortions","authors":"Paul A. Lombardo","doi":"10.1017/jme.2023.90","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/jme.2023.90","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The Supreme Court decided <span>Box v. Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky</span> in 2019. Justice Clarence Thomas’s opinion in the case claimed there was a direct connection between the legalization of abortion, in the late 20th Century, and the beginnings of the birth control movement a full three quarters of a century earlier. “Many eugenicists,” Thomas argued, “supported legalizing abortion.”</p><p>Justice Samuel Alito highlighted similar claims in <span>Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health</span>, citing a brief entitled “The Eugenic Era Lives on through the Abortion Movement.” That brief was an echo of Justice Thomas’ misguided attempt at history in the <span>Box</span> opinion. Similar claims reoccur in Judge Matthew Kacsmaryk’s opinion in the Texas mifepristone case, <span>Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine v. U.S. Food and Drug Administration</span>.</p><p>These false claims are the focus of this article. There is no evidence that early leaders of the eugenics movement supported abortion as part of the movement for birth control. It is accurate to describe those leaders as anti-abortion, and their followers as people who condemned abortion for moral, legal, and medical reasons.</p>","PeriodicalId":501694,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138633285","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Ethics and Medical Aid in Dying: Physicians’ Perspectives on Disclosure, Presence, and Eligibility 临终关怀的伦理与医疗援助：医生对披露、在场和资格的看法
The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics Pub Date : 2023-12-13 DOI: 10.1017/jme.2023.100
Matthew DeCamp, Julie Ressalam, Hillary D. Lum, Elizabeth R. Kessler, Dragana Bolcic-Jankovic, Vinay Kini, Eric G. Campbell
{"title":"Ethics and Medical Aid in Dying: Physicians’ Perspectives on Disclosure, Presence, and Eligibility","authors":"Matthew DeCamp, Julie Ressalam, Hillary D. Lum, Elizabeth R. Kessler, Dragana Bolcic-Jankovic, Vinay Kini, Eric G. Campbell","doi":"10.1017/jme.2023.100","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/jme.2023.100","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Medical aid in dying (MAiD), despite being legal in many jurisdictions, remains controversial ethically. Existing surveys of physicians’ perceptions of MAiD tend to focus on the legal or moral permissibility of MAiD in general. Using a novel sampling strategy, we surveyed physicians likely to have engaged in MAiD-related activities in Colorado to assess their attitudes toward contemporary ethical issues in MAiD.</p>","PeriodicalId":501694,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics","volume":"49 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138633291","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Reproductive Genetic Medicine in a Post-Dobbs World: Will it Make Life Harder for People with Genetic Disease? 后多布斯时代的生殖遗传医学：它会让遗传病患者的生活更加艰难吗？
The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics Pub Date : 2023-12-13 DOI: 10.1017/jme.2023.128
Sonia M. Suter, Laura Hercher
{"title":"Reproductive Genetic Medicine in a Post-Dobbs World: Will it Make Life Harder for People with Genetic Disease?","authors":"Sonia M. Suter, Laura Hercher","doi":"10.1017/jme.2023.128","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/jme.2023.128","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Post-<span>Dobbs</span> abortion restrictions impact access and choice in the context of reproductive genetic medicine, raising serious reproductive justice concerns. The consequences of these restrictions are particularly acute and far-reaching for individuals with genetic conditions and their families.</p>","PeriodicalId":501694,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics","volume":"5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138633283","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Beyond Roe: Implications for End-of-Life Decision-Making During Pregnancy 超越罗伊：对孕期生命终结决策的影响
The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics Pub Date : 2023-12-13 DOI: 10.1017/jme.2023.130
Joan H. Krause
{"title":"Beyond Roe: Implications for End-of-Life Decision-Making During Pregnancy","authors":"Joan H. Krause","doi":"10.1017/jme.2023.130","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/jme.2023.130","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The end of <span>Roe v. Wade</span> has significant implications for the autonomy of pregnant patients at the end of life. At least thirty states restrict the choice to withhold/withdraw life-sustaining treatments from pregnant patients without decisional capacity, invalidating prior advance directives and prohibiting others from choosing these options for the patient. Many restrictions are based on the <span>Roe</span> framework, applying after “viability” or similar considerations of fetal development or prospect for live birth. Scholars have also relied on the abortion framework, arguing that the restrictions impose an undue burden. The end of <span>Roe</span> will free states from having to craft limited restrictions designed to work around prior abortion jurisprudence. Similarly, advocates will no longer be able to draw support from the abortion framework, forcing them to rely instead on cases supporting rights to autonomy/bodily integrity in medical decision-making.</p>","PeriodicalId":501694,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138633284","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Prosecutorial Discretion for Self-Managed Abortion Helpers 对自我管理的堕胎帮助者的起诉裁量权
The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics Pub Date : 2023-12-13 DOI: 10.1017/jme.2023.115
Patty Skuster
{"title":"Prosecutorial Discretion for Self-Managed Abortion Helpers","authors":"Patty Skuster","doi":"10.1017/jme.2023.115","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/jme.2023.115","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Elected prosecutors have pledged not to enforce abortion laws, in response to state-level abortion bans. For their pledges to be meaningful, prosecutors must exercise their discretion in cases of individuals who face legal risk, including people who help others self-manage their abortions. With a harm-reduction approach to improving abortion access, prosecutors should aim to reduce abortion helpers’ involvement with the criminal justice system.</p>","PeriodicalId":501694,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics","volume":"196 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138633288","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
首页 上一页
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整，为了账户安全，请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们：info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务，方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号：481959085
Book学术官方微信