Surgical Endoscopy最新文献

{"title":"Impact of operative time on textbook outcome after minimally invasive esophagectomy, a risk-adjusted analysis from a high-volume center","authors":"Yuxin Yang, Chao Jiang, Zhichao Liu, Kaiyuan Zhu, Boyao Yu, Chang Yuan, Cong Qi, Zhigang Li","doi":"10.1007/s00464-024-10834-7","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-024-10834-7","url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Background</h3><p>We aimed to study the impact of operative time on textbook outcome (TO), especially postoperative complications and length of postoperative stay in minimally invasive esophagectomy.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>Patients undergoing esophagectomy for curative intent within a prospectively maintained database from 2016 to 2022 were retrieved. Relationships between operative time and outcomes were quantified using multivariable mixed-effects models with medical teams random effects. A restricted cubic spline (RCS) plotting was used to characterize correlation between operative time and the odds for achieving TO.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>Data of 2210 patients were examined. Median operative time was 270 mins (interquartile range, 233–313) for all cases. Overall, 902 patients (40.8%) achieved TO. Among non-TO patients, 226 patients (10.2%) had a major complication (grade ≥ III), 433 patients (19.6%) stayed postoperatively longer than 14 days. Multivariable analysis revealed operative time was associated with higher odds of major complications (odds ratio 1.005, <i>P</i> &lt; 0.001) and prolonged postoperative stay (≥ 14 days) (odds ratio 1.003, <i>P</i> = 0.006). The relationship between operative time and TO exhibited an inverse-U shape, with 298 mins identified as the tipping point for the highest odds of achieving TO.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusions</h3><p>Longer operative time displayed an adverse influence on postoperative morbidity and increased lengths of postoperative stay. In the present study, the TO displayed an inverse U-shaped correlation with operative time, with a significant peak at 298 mins. Potential factors contributing to prolonged operative time may potentiate targets for quality metrics and risk-adjustment process.</p>","PeriodicalId":501625,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Endoscopy","volume":"17 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140613578","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"TAVAC: comprehensive review of currently available hemostatic products as adjunct to surgical hemostasis","authors":"Iswanto Sucandy, Sharona Ross, Jonathan DeLong, Michael Tran, Fred Qafiti, David Pechman, Tim Snow, Salvatore Docimo, Allyson Lim-Dy, Maria Christodoulou, David Renton","doi":"10.1007/s00464-024-10806-x","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-024-10806-x","url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Background</h3><p>The use of hemostatic agents by general surgeons during abdominal operations is commonplace as an adjunctive measure to minimize risks of postoperative bleeding and its downstream complications. Proper selection of products can be hampered by marginal understanding of their pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. While a variety of hemostatic agents are currently available on the market, the choice of those products is often confusing for surgeons. This paper aims to summarize and compare the available hemostatic products for each clinical indication and to ultimately better guide surgeons in the selection and proper use of hemostatic agents in daily clinical practice.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>We utilized PubMed electronic database and published product information from the respective pharmaceutical companies to collect information on the characteristics of the hemostatic products.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>All commercially available hemostatic agents in the US are described with a description of their mechanism of action, indications, contraindications, circumstances in which they are best utilized, and expected results.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusion</h3><p>Hemostatic products come with many different types and specifications. They are valuable tools to serve as an adjunct to surgical hemostasis. Proper education and knowledge of their characteristics are important for the selection of the right agent and optimal utilization.</p>","PeriodicalId":501625,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Endoscopy","volume":"35 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140613189","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Towards a tailored approach for patients with acute diverticulitis and abscess formation. The DivAbsc2023 multicentre case–control study","authors":"Mauro Podda, Marco Ceresoli, Marcello Di Martino, Monica Ortenzi, Gianluca Pellino, Francesco Pata, Benedetto Ielpo, Valentina Murzi, Andrea Balla, Pasquale Lepiane, Nicolo’ Tamini, Giulia De Carlo, Alessia Davolio, Salomone Di Saverio, Luca Cardinali, Emanuele Botteri, Nereo Vettoretto, Pier Paolo Gelera, Belinda De Simone, Antonella Grasso, Marco Clementi, Danilo Meloni, Gaetano Poillucci, Francesco Favi, Roberta Rizzo, Giulia Montori, Giuseppa Procida, Irene Recchia, Ferdinando Agresta, Francesco Virdis, Stefano Piero Bernardo Cioffi, Martina Pellegrini, Massimo Sartelli, Federico Coccolini, Fausto Catena, Adolfo Pisanu","doi":"10.1007/s00464-024-10793-z","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-024-10793-z","url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Background</h3><p>This multicentre case–control study aimed to identify risk factors associated with non-operative treatment failure for patients with CT scan Hinchey Ib-IIb and WSES Ib-IIa diverticular abscesses.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>This study included a cohort of adult patients experiencing their first episode of CT-diagnosed diverticular abscess, all of whom underwent initial non-operative treatment comprising either antibiotics alone or in combination with percutaneous drainage. The cohort was stratified based on the outcome of non-operative treatment, specifically identifying those who required emergency surgical intervention as cases of treatment failure. Multivariable logistic regression analysis to identify independent risk factors associated with the failure of non-operative treatment was employed.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>Failure of conservative treatment occurred for 116 patients (27.04%). CT scan Hinchey classification IIb (aOR 2.54, 95%CI 1.61;4.01, <i>P</i> &lt; 0.01), tobacco smoking (aOR 2.01, 95%CI 1.24;3.25, <i>P</i> &lt; 0.01), and presence of air bubbles inside the abscess (aOR 1.59, 95%CI 1.00;2.52, <i>P</i> = 0.04) were independent predictors of failure. In the subgroup of patients with abscesses &gt; 5 cm, percutaneous drainage was not associated with the risk of failure or success of the non-operative treatment (aOR 2.78, 95%CI − 0.66;3.70, <i>P</i> = 0.23).</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusions</h3><p>Non-operative treatment is generally effective for diverticular abscesses. Tobacco smoking's role as an independent risk factor for treatment failure underscores the need for targeted behavioural interventions in diverticular disease management. IIb Hinchey diverticulitis patients, particularly young smokers, require vigilant monitoring due to increased risks of treatment failure and septic progression. Further research into the efficacy of image-guided percutaneous drainage should involve randomized, multicentre studies focussing on homogeneous patient groups.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Graphical abstract</h3>","PeriodicalId":501625,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Endoscopy","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140613157","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Endoscopic closure techniques of bariatric surgery complications: a meta-analysis","authors":"William N. Doyle, Alexander Netzley, Rahul Mhaskar, Abdul-Rahman F. Diab, Samer Ganam, Joseph Sujka, Christopher DuCoin, Salvatore Docimo","doi":"10.1007/s00464-024-10799-7","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-024-10799-7","url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Background</h3><p>Leaks following bariatric surgery, while rare, are potentially fatal due to risk of peritonitis and sepsis. Anastomotic leaks and gastro-gastric fistulae following Roux-En-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) as well as staple line leaks after sleeve gastrectomy have historically been treated multimodally with surgical drainage, aggressive antibiotic therapy, and more recently, endoscopically. Endoscopic clipping using over-the-scope clips and endoscopic suturing are two of the most common approaches used to achieve full thickness closure.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>A systematic literature search was performed in PubMed to identify articles on the use of endoscopic clipping or suturing for the treatment of leaks and fistulae following bariatric surgery. Studies focusing on stents, and those that incorporated multiple closure techniques simultaneously, were excluded. Literature review and meta-analysis were performed with the PRISMA guidelines.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>Five studies with 61 patients that underwent over-the-scope clip (OTSC) closure were included. The pooled proportion of successful closure across the studies was 81.1% (95% CI 67.3 to 91.7). The successful closure rates were homogeneous (<i>I</i>² = 39%, <i>p</i> = 0.15). Three studies with 92 patients that underwent endoscopic suturing were included. The weighted pooled proportion of successful closure across the studies was shown to be 22.4% (95% CI 14.6 to 31.3). The successful closure rates were homogeneous (<i>I</i>² = 0%, <i>p</i> = 0.44). Three of the studies, totaling 34 patients, examining OTSC deployment reported data for reintervention rate. The weighted pooled proportion of reintervention across the studies was 35.0% (95% CI 11.7 to 64.7). We noticed statistically significant heterogeneity (<i>I</i>² = 68%, <i>p</i> = 0.04). One study, with 20 patients examining endoscopic suturing, reported rate of repeat intervention 60%.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusion</h3><p>Observational reports show that patients managed with OTSC were more likely to experience healing of their defect than those managed with endoscopic suturing. Larger controlled studies comparing different closure devices for bariatric leaks should be carried out to better understand the ideal endoscopic approach to these complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":501625,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Endoscopy","volume":"19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140613223","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Safety of advanced laparoscopic hepatectomy for elderly patients: a Japanese nationwide analysis","authors":"Jiro Kusakabe, Kojiro Taura, Masayuki Nakashima, Masato Takeuchi, Etsuro Hatano, Koji Kawakami","doi":"10.1007/s00464-024-10818-7","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-024-10818-7","url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Background</h3><p>Although basic laparoscopic hepatectomy (LH) has become the standard procedure for hepatectomy, the safety of advanced LH remains to be clarified, especially in elderly patients. We investigated the safety of advanced LH in elderly Japanese patients.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>Elderly patients (≥ 65 years) who underwent advanced LH between 2016 and 2021 were analyzed using a nationwide claims database in Japan. The perioperative outcomes of patients who underwent open hepatectomy (OH group) or LH (LH group) were compared using propensity score matching (PSM). The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. The <i>E</i>-value method was performed to assess the strength of the outcome point estimates against possible unmeasured confounding factors.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>Among 5,021 patients, eligible patients were classified into the OH (<i>n</i> = 4,152) and LH (<i>n</i> = 527) groups. The median patient age was 74 years in both groups. Hepatocellular carcinoma and metastatic liver tumors were the major indications for hepatectomy (OH: 52.5% versus 30.6%; LH: 60.7% versus 26.4%). After PSM, in-hospital mortality rates for OH and LH were 1.7 and 0.76%, respectively. The risk ratio was 0.45 (95% confidence interval, 0.16–1.25; <i>E</i>-value = 3.87). Compared with OH, LH was associated with a longer anesthesia time (411 versus 432 min), lower rate of blood product use (red blood concentrate: 33.5% versus 20.3%; fresh frozen plasma: 29.2% versus 17.1%), and shorter hospital stay (13 versus 12 days).</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusions</h3><p>In elderly patients, the safety of advanced LH was similar to that of advanced OH, or might be better in Japan under the current policy of hospital accreditation.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Graphical abstract</h3>\u0000","PeriodicalId":501625,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Endoscopy","volume":"33 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140613149","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Trends in minimally invasive and open inguinal hernia repair: an analysis of ACGME general surgery case logs","authors":"Alex I. Halpern, Margaret Klein, Benjamin McSweeney, Hoang-Viet Tran, Sangrag Ganguli, Victoria Haney, Salem I. Noureldine, Khashayar Vaziri, Hope T. Jackson, Juliet Lee","doi":"10.1007/s00464-024-10805-y","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-024-10805-y","url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Background</h3><p>Groin hernia repair is one of the most commonly performed surgical procedures and is often performed by surgical interns and junior residents. While traditionally performed open, minimally invasive (MIS) groin hernia repair has become an increasingly popular approach. The purpose of this study was to determine the trends in MIS and open inguinal and femoral hernia repair in general surgery residency training over the past two decades.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) national case log data of general surgery residents from 1999 through 2022 were reviewed. We collected means and standard deviations of open and MIS inguinal and femoral hernia repairs. Linear regression and ANOVA were used to identify trends in the average annual number of open and MIS hernia repairs logged by residents. Cases were distinguished between level of resident trainees: surgeon-chief (SC) and surgeon-junior (SJ).</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>From July 1999 to June 2022, the average annual MIS inguinal and femoral hernia repairs logged by general surgery residents significantly increased, from 7.6 to 47.9 cases (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001), and the average annual open inguinal and femoral hernia repairs logged by general surgery residents significantly decreased, from 51.9 to 39.7 cases (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). SJ resident results were consistent with this overall trend. For SC residents, the volume of both MIS and open hernia repairs significantly increased (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001).</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusions</h3><p>ACGME case log data indicates a trend of general surgery residents logging overall fewer numbers of open inguinal and femoral hernia repairs, and a larger proportion of open repairs by chief residents. This trend warrants attention and further study as it may represent a skill or knowledge gap with significant impact of surgical training.</p>","PeriodicalId":501625,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Endoscopy","volume":"28 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140613156","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"The performance of artificial intelligence large language model-linked chatbots in surgical decision-making for gastroesophageal reflux disease","authors":"Bright Huo, Elisa Calabrese, Patricia Sylla, Sunjay Kumar, Romeo C. Ignacio, Rodolfo Oviedo, Imran Hassan, Bethany J. Slater, Andreas Kaiser, Danielle S. Walsh, Wesley Vosburg","doi":"10.1007/s00464-024-10807-w","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-024-10807-w","url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Background</h3><p>Large language model (LLM)-linked chatbots may be an efficient source of clinical recommendations for healthcare providers and patients. This study evaluated the performance of LLM-linked chatbots in providing recommendations for the surgical management of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD).</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>Nine patient cases were created based on key questions addressed by the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) guidelines for the surgical treatment of GERD. ChatGPT-3.5, ChatGPT-4, Copilot, Google Bard, and Perplexity AI were queried on November 16th, 2023, for recommendations regarding the surgical management of GERD. Accurate chatbot performance was defined as the number of responses aligning with SAGES guideline recommendations. Outcomes were reported with counts and percentages.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>Surgeons were given accurate recommendations for the surgical management of GERD in an adult patient for 5/7 (71.4%) KQs by ChatGPT-4, 3/7 (42.9%) KQs by Copilot, 6/7 (85.7%) KQs by Google Bard, and 3/7 (42.9%) KQs by Perplexity according to the SAGES guidelines. Patients were given accurate recommendations for 3/5 (60.0%) KQs by ChatGPT-4, 2/5 (40.0%) KQs by Copilot, 4/5 (80.0%) KQs by Google Bard, and 1/5 (20.0%) KQs by Perplexity, respectively. In a pediatric patient, surgeons were given accurate recommendations for 2/3 (66.7%) KQs by ChatGPT-4, 3/3 (100.0%) KQs by Copilot, 3/3 (100.0%) KQs by Google Bard, and 2/3 (66.7%) KQs by Perplexity. Patients were given appropriate guidance for 2/2 (100.0%) KQs by ChatGPT-4, 2/2 (100.0%) KQs by Copilot, 1/2 (50.0%) KQs by Google Bard, and 1/2 (50.0%) KQs by Perplexity.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusions</h3><p>Gastrointestinal surgeons, gastroenterologists, and patients should recognize both the promise and pitfalls of LLM’s when utilized for advice on surgical management of GERD. Additional training of LLM’s using evidence-based health information is needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":501625,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Endoscopy","volume":"230 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140613197","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Management of symptomatic, asymptomatic, and recurrent hiatal hernia: a systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Nader M. Hanna, Sunjay S. Kumar, Amelia T. Collings, Yagnik K. Pandya, James Kurtz, Keshav Kooragayala, Meghan W. Barber, Mykola Paranyak, Marina Kurian, Jeffrey Chiu, Ahmed Abou-Setta, Mohammed T. Ansari, Bethany J. Slater, Geoff Kohn, Shaun Daly","doi":"10.1007/s00464-024-10816-9","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-024-10816-9","url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Background</h3><p>The surgical management of hiatal hernia remains controversial. We aimed to compare outcomes of mesh versus no mesh and fundoplication versus no fundoplication in symptomatic patients; surgery versus observation in asymptomatic patients; and redo hernia repair versus conversion to Roux-en-Y reconstruction in recurrent hiatal hernia.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>We searched PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane Library and the ClinicalTrials.gov databases between 2000 and 2022 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs), observational studies, and case series (asymptomatic and recurrent hernias). Screening was performed by two trained independent reviewers. Pooled analyses were performed on comparative data. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool and Newcastle Ottawa Scale for randomized and non-randomized studies, respectively.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>We included 45 studies from 5152 retrieved records. Only six RCTs had low risk of bias. Mesh was associated with a lower recurrence risk (RR = 0.50, 95%CI 0.28, 0.88; <i>I</i>² = 57%) in observational studies but not RCTs (RR = 0.98, 95%CI 0.47, 2.02; <i>I</i>² = 34%), and higher total early dysphagia based on five observational studies (RR = 1.44, 95%CI 1.10, 1.89;<i> I</i>² = 40%) but was not statistically significant in RCTs (RR = 3.00, 95%CI 0.64, 14.16). There was no difference in complications, reintervention, heartburn, reflux, or quality of life. There were no appropriate studies comparing surgery to observation in asymptomatic patients. Fundoplication resulted in higher early dysphagia in both observational studies and RCTs ([RR = 2.08, 95%CI 1.16, 3.76] and [RR = 20.58, 95%CI 1.34, 316.69]) but lower reflux in RCTs (RR = 0.31, 95%CI 0.17, 0.56, <i>I</i>² = 0%). Conversion to Roux-en-Y was associated with a lower reintervention risk after 30 days compared to redo surgery.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusions</h3><p>The evidence for optimal management of symptomatic and recurrent hiatal hernia remains controversial, underpinned by studies with a high risk of bias. Shared decision making between surgeon and patient is essential for optimal outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":501625,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Endoscopy","volume":"18 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140613228","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"A prospective case series to evaluate subcostal nerve injury with high-resolution ultrasound in posterior retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy","authors":"Allon van Uitert, Hossein A. Chaman-Baz, Selina E. I. van der Wal, Xiaoye Zhu, Juerd Wijntjes, Henri J. L. M. Timmers, J. Alfred Witjes, Nens van Alfen, Johan F. Langenhuijsen","doi":"10.1007/s00464-024-10836-5","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-024-10836-5","url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Background</h3><p>Posterior retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy has several advantages over transabdominal laparoscopic adrenalectomy regarding operating time, blood loss, postoperative pain, and recovery. However, postoperatively several patients report chronic pain or hypoesthesia. We hypothesized that these symptoms may be the result of damage to the subcostal nerve, because it passes the surgical area.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>A prospective single-center case series was performed in adult patients without preoperative pain or numbness of the abdominal wall who underwent unilateral posterior retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy. Patients received pre- and postoperative questionnaires and a high-resolution ultrasound scan of the subcostal nerve and abdominal wall muscles was performed before and directly after surgery. Clinical evaluation at 6 weeks was performed with repeat questionnaires, physical examination, and high-resolution ultrasound. Long-term recovery was evaluated with questionnaires, and photographs from the patients were examined for abdominal wall asymmetry.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>A total of 25 patients were included in the study. There were no surgical complications. Preoperative visualization of the subcostal nerve was possible in all patients. At 6 weeks, ultrasound showed nerve damage in 15 patients, with no significant association between nerve damage and postsurgical pain. However, there was a significant association between nerve damage and hypoesthesia (<i>p</i> = 0.01), sensory (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001), and motor (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001) dysfunction on physical examination. After a median follow-up of 18 months, 5 patients still experienced either numbness or muscle weakness, and one patient experienced chronic postsurgical pain.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusion</h3><p>In this exporatory case series the incidence of postoperative damage to the subcostal nerve, both clinically and radiologically, was 60% after posterior retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy. There was no association with pain, and the spontaneous recovery rate was high.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Graphical Abstract</h3>\u0000","PeriodicalId":501625,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Endoscopy","volume":"49 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140613226","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Robotic gastrectomy was reliable option for overweight patients with gastric cancer: a propensity score matching study","authors":"Ling-Hua Wei, Hua-Long Zheng, Zhen Xue, Bin-Bin Xu, Hong-Hong Zheng, Li-Li Shen, Zhi-Wei Zheng, Jian-Wei Xie, Chao-Hui Zheng, Chang-Ming Huang, Qi-Yue Chen, Ping Li","doi":"10.1007/s00464-024-10845-4","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-024-10845-4","url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Background</h3><p>The role of minimally invasive surgery using robotics versus laparoscopy in resectable gastric cancer patients with a high body mass index (BMI) remains controversial.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>A total of 482 gastric adenocarcinoma patients with BMI ≥ 25 kg/m² who underwent minimally invasive radical gastrectomy between August 2016 and December 2019 were retrospectively analyzed, including 109 cases in the robotic gastrectomy (RG) group and 321 cases in the laparoscopic gastrectomy (LG) group. Propensity score matching (PSM) with a 1:1 ratio was performed, and the perioperative outcomes, lymph node dissection, and 3-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) rates were compared.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>After PSM, 109 patients were included in each of the RG and LG groups, with balanced baseline characteristics. Compared with the LG group, the RG group had similar intraoperative estimated blood loss [median (IQR) 30 (20–50) vs. 35 (30–59) mL, median difference (95%CI) − 5 (− 10 to 0)], postoperative complications [13.8% vs. 18.3%, OR (95%CI) 0.71 (0.342 to 1.473)], postoperative recovery, total harvested lymph nodes [(34.25 ± 13.43 vs. 35.44 ± 14.12, mean difference (95%CI) − 1.19 (− 4.871 to 2.485)] and textbook outcomes [(81.7% vs. 76.1%, OR (95%CI) 1.39 (0.724 to 2.684)]. Among pathological stage II–III patients receiving chemotherapy, the initiation of adjuvant chemotherapy in the RG group was similar to that in the LG group [median (IQR): 28 (25.5–32.5) vs. 32 (27–38.5) days, median difference (95%CI) − 3 (− 6 to 0)]. The 3-year OS (RG vs. LG: 80.7% vs. 81.7%, HR = 1.048, 95%CI 0.591 to 1.857) and DFS (78% vs. 76.1%, HR = 0.996, 95%CI 0.584 to 1.698) were comparable between the two groups.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusion</h3><p>RG conferred comparable lymph node dissection, postoperative recovery, and oncologic outcomes in a selected cohort of patients with BMI ≥ 25 kg/m².</p>","PeriodicalId":501625,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Endoscopy","volume":"188 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140613193","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}