Endoscopic closure techniques of bariatric surgery complications: a meta-analysis

William N. Doyle, Alexander Netzley, Rahul Mhaskar, Abdul-Rahman F. Diab, Samer Ganam, Joseph Sujka, Christopher DuCoin, Salvatore Docimo
{"title":"Endoscopic closure techniques of bariatric surgery complications: a meta-analysis","authors":"William N. Doyle, Alexander Netzley, Rahul Mhaskar, Abdul-Rahman F. Diab, Samer Ganam, Joseph Sujka, Christopher DuCoin, Salvatore Docimo","doi":"10.1007/s00464-024-10799-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Background</h3><p>Leaks following bariatric surgery, while rare, are potentially fatal due to risk of peritonitis and sepsis. Anastomotic leaks and gastro-gastric fistulae following Roux-En-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) as well as staple line leaks after sleeve gastrectomy have historically been treated multimodally with surgical drainage, aggressive antibiotic therapy, and more recently, endoscopically. Endoscopic clipping using over-the-scope clips and endoscopic suturing are two of the most common approaches used to achieve full thickness closure.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>A systematic literature search was performed in PubMed to identify articles on the use of endoscopic clipping or suturing for the treatment of leaks and fistulae following bariatric surgery. Studies focusing on stents, and those that incorporated multiple closure techniques simultaneously, were excluded. Literature review and meta-analysis were performed with the PRISMA guidelines.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>Five studies with 61 patients that underwent over-the-scope clip (OTSC) closure were included. The pooled proportion of successful closure across the studies was 81.1% (95% CI 67.3 to 91.7). The successful closure rates were homogeneous (<i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 39%, <i>p</i> = 0.15). Three studies with 92 patients that underwent endoscopic suturing were included. The weighted pooled proportion of successful closure across the studies was shown to be 22.4% (95% CI 14.6 to 31.3). The successful closure rates were homogeneous (<i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 0%, <i>p</i> = 0.44). Three of the studies, totaling 34 patients, examining OTSC deployment reported data for reintervention rate. The weighted pooled proportion of reintervention across the studies was 35.0% (95% CI 11.7 to 64.7). We noticed statistically significant heterogeneity (<i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 68%, <i>p</i> = 0.04). One study, with 20 patients examining endoscopic suturing, reported rate of repeat intervention 60%.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusion</h3><p>Observational reports show that patients managed with OTSC were more likely to experience healing of their defect than those managed with endoscopic suturing. Larger controlled studies comparing different closure devices for bariatric leaks should be carried out to better understand the ideal endoscopic approach to these complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":501625,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Endoscopy","volume":"19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical Endoscopy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-024-10799-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Leaks following bariatric surgery, while rare, are potentially fatal due to risk of peritonitis and sepsis. Anastomotic leaks and gastro-gastric fistulae following Roux-En-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) as well as staple line leaks after sleeve gastrectomy have historically been treated multimodally with surgical drainage, aggressive antibiotic therapy, and more recently, endoscopically. Endoscopic clipping using over-the-scope clips and endoscopic suturing are two of the most common approaches used to achieve full thickness closure.

Methods

A systematic literature search was performed in PubMed to identify articles on the use of endoscopic clipping or suturing for the treatment of leaks and fistulae following bariatric surgery. Studies focusing on stents, and those that incorporated multiple closure techniques simultaneously, were excluded. Literature review and meta-analysis were performed with the PRISMA guidelines.

Results

Five studies with 61 patients that underwent over-the-scope clip (OTSC) closure were included. The pooled proportion of successful closure across the studies was 81.1% (95% CI 67.3 to 91.7). The successful closure rates were homogeneous (I2 = 39%, p = 0.15). Three studies with 92 patients that underwent endoscopic suturing were included. The weighted pooled proportion of successful closure across the studies was shown to be 22.4% (95% CI 14.6 to 31.3). The successful closure rates were homogeneous (I2 = 0%, p = 0.44). Three of the studies, totaling 34 patients, examining OTSC deployment reported data for reintervention rate. The weighted pooled proportion of reintervention across the studies was 35.0% (95% CI 11.7 to 64.7). We noticed statistically significant heterogeneity (I2 = 68%, p = 0.04). One study, with 20 patients examining endoscopic suturing, reported rate of repeat intervention 60%.

Conclusion

Observational reports show that patients managed with OTSC were more likely to experience healing of their defect than those managed with endoscopic suturing. Larger controlled studies comparing different closure devices for bariatric leaks should be carried out to better understand the ideal endoscopic approach to these complications.

Abstract Image

减肥手术并发症的内窥镜闭合技术:荟萃分析
背景减肥手术后的渗漏虽然罕见,但由于存在腹膜炎和败血症的风险,有可能致命。Roux-En-Y胃旁路术(RYGB)后的吻合口漏和胃-胃瘘以及袖状胃切除术后的缝合线漏历来都是通过手术引流、积极的抗生素治疗以及最近的内镜治疗等多模式治疗的。方法在 PubMed 上进行了系统的文献检索,以确定使用内镜下剪切或缝合治疗减肥手术后渗漏和瘘管的文章。排除了以支架为重点的研究和同时采用多种闭合技术的研究。根据 PRISMA 指南进行了文献综述和荟萃分析。结果共纳入了五项研究,61 名患者接受了范围外夹钳(OTSC)闭合术。所有研究的成功闭合比例为 81.1%(95% CI 67.3 至 91.7)。成功闭合率具有同质性(I2 = 39%,P = 0.15)。有三项研究共纳入了 92 名接受内镜缝合的患者。这些研究的成功缝合加权汇总比例为 22.4% (95% CI 14.6 至 31.3)。成功缝合率具有同质性(I2 = 0%,P = 0.44)。有三项研究(共 34 名患者)对 OTSC 部署情况进行了检查,并报告了再干预率数据。所有研究的加权再介入比例为 35.0% (95% CI 11.7 至 64.7)。我们注意到统计学上存在明显的异质性(I2 = 68%,P = 0.04)。一项有 20 名患者接受内窥镜缝合术的研究显示,重复干预率为 60%。为了更好地了解治疗这些并发症的理想内窥镜方法,应该开展更大规模的对照研究,比较不同的减肥漏孔闭合装置。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信