Surgical Endoscopy最新文献

{"title":"Surgeon stress, anxiety, and workload: a descriptive study of participant reported responses to fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery exercises","authors":"Aaron K. Budden, Amanda Henry, Claire E. Wakefield, Jason A. Abbott","doi":"10.1007/s00464-024-11238-3","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-024-11238-3","url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Background</h3><p>Stress while operating is an important contributor to surgeon health and burnout. Measuring stress is key to improving surgeon and patient outcomes, however biological responses to stress during surgery are variable and difficult to interpret. Participant reported measures of stress have been suggested as an alternative, but the most appropriate measure has not been defined. This study’s primary aim was to assess measures of anxiety, stress, and workload before and after surgical simulation and characterize the relationship between these measures.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>Surgeons completed three laparoscopic exercises from the fundamentals of laparoscopy program (peg transfer, pattern cutting, intracorporeal suturing) in a neutral environment and “stressed” environment (ergonomic, noise, or time pressure). State trait anxiety and self-reported stress on a visual analogue scale were collected prior to simulation and again immediately afterwards. The NASA task load index (TLX) was also administered post-simulation.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>Of the 26 participants from gynecological and general surgery specialties, state anxiety increased in 98/148 simulations (62%) with a significant mean increase during simulation (32.9 ± 7.9 vs 39.4 ± 10.2, <i>p</i> &lt; .001). Self-reported stress increased in 107/148 simulations (72%), with a significant increase in mean scores during simulation (38.7 ± 22.5 vs 48.9 ± 23.7, <i>p</i> &lt; .001). NASA-TLX scores immediately after simulation ranged from 40 to 118 (mean 60.5 ± 28.7). Greater anxiety and stress scores were reported in “stressed” simulations (43.6 ± 23.1 vs 54.2 ± 23.3; 68.7 ± 27.0 vs 52.4 ± 28.2 respectively) with a significant interaction effect of the “stressed” environment and type of exercise. Anxiety and stress were moderately positively correlated prior to simulation (<i>r</i> = .40) and strongly positively correlated post-simulation (<i>r</i> = .70), however only stress was strongly correlated to workload (<i>r</i> = .79).</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusion</h3><p>Stress and anxiety varied by type of laparoscopic exercise and simulation environment. Correlations between anxiety and stress are stronger post-simulation than prior to simulation. Stress, but not anxiety, is highly correlated with workload.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Graphical Abstract</h3>\u0000","PeriodicalId":501625,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Endoscopy","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142257878","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Comparison of distance versus in-person laparoscopy training using a low-cost laparoscopy simulator—a randomized controlled multi-center trial","authors":"Mark Enrik Geißler, Jean-Paul Bereuter, Rona Berit Geissler, Guus Mattheus Johannes Bökkerink, Luisa Egen, Karl-Friedrich Kowalewski, Caelan Haney","doi":"10.1007/s00464-024-11069-2","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-024-11069-2","url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Introduction</h3><p>Simulation training programs are essential for novice surgeons to acquire basic experience to master laparoscopic skills. However, current state-of-the-art laparoscopy simulators are still expensive, limiting the accessibility to practical training lessons. Furthermore, training is time intensive and requires extensive spatial capacity, limiting its availability to surgeons. New laparoscopic simulators offer a cost-effective alternative, which can be used to train in a digital environment, allowing flexible, digital and personalized laparoscopic training. This study investigates if training on low-cost simulators in a digital environment is comparable to in-person training formats.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Materials and methods</h3><p>From June 2023 to December 2023, 40 laparoscopic novices participated in this multi-center, prospective randomized controlled trial. All participants were randomized to either the ‟distance” (intervention) or the “in-person” (control) group. They were trained in a standardized laparoscopic training curriculum to reach a predefined level of proficiency. After completing the curriculum, participants performed four different laparoscopic tasks on the ForceSense system. Primary endpoints were overall task errors, the overall time for completion of the tasks, and force parameters.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>In total, 40 laparoscopic novices completed digital or in-person training. Digital training showed no significant differences in developing basic laparoscopic skills compared to in-person training. There were no significant differences in median overall errors between both training groups for all exercises combined (intervention 3 vs. control 4; <i>p</i> value = 0.74). In contrast, the overall task completion time was significantly lower for the group trained digitally (intervention 827.92 s vs. control 993.42; <i>p</i> value = 0.015). The applied forces during the final assessment showed no significant differences between both groups for all exercises. Overall, over 90% of the participants rated the training as good or very good.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusion</h3><p>Our study shows that students that underwent digital laparoscopic training completed tasks with a similar number of errors but in a shorter time than students that underwent in-person training. Nevertheless, the best strategies to implement such digital training options need to be evaluated further to support surgeons’ personal preferences and expectations.</p>","PeriodicalId":501625,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Endoscopy","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142207260","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Concomitant hiatal hernia repair with transoral incisionless fundoplication for the treatment of refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease: a systematic review","authors":"Fouad Jaber, Mohammed Ayyad, Fares Ayoub, Kalpesh K. Patel, Konstantinos I. Makris, Ruben Hernaez, Wasseem Skef","doi":"10.1007/s00464-024-11201-2","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-024-11201-2","url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Background</h3><p>Transoral incisionless fundoplication (TIF) is safe and effective in select patients with hiatal hernias ≤ 2 cm with refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). For patients with hiatal hernias &gt; 2 cm, concomitant hiatal hernia (HH) repair with TIF (cTIF) is offered as an alternative to conventional anti-reflux surgery (ARS). Yet, data on this approach is limited. Through a comprehensive systematic review, we aim to evaluate the efficacy and safety of cTIF for managing refractory GERD in patients with hernias &gt; 2 cm.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Study design</h3><p>We conducted a systematic review of studies evaluating cTIF outcomes from PubMed, EMBASE, SCOPUS, and Cochrane databases up to February 14, 2024. Primary outcomes included complete cessation of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs). Secondary outcomes included objective GERD assessment, adverse events, and treatment-related side effects. Pooled analysis was employed wherever feasible.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>Seven observational studies (306 patients) met the inclusion criteria. Five were retrospective cohort studies and two were prospective observational studies. The median rate of discontinuation of PPIs was 73.8% (range 56.4–94.4%). Significant improvements were observed in disease-specific, validated GERD questionnaires. The median rate for complications was 4.4% (range 0–7.9%), and the 30-day readmission rate had a median of 3.3% (range 0–5.3%). The incidence of dysphagia was 11 out of 164 patients, with a median of 5.3% (range 0–8.3%), while the incidence of gas bloating was 15 out of 127 patients, with a median of 6.9% (range 0–13.8%).</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusion</h3><p>Current data on cTIF suggests a promising alternative to ARS with comparable short-term efficacy and safety profile for managing refractory GERD with a low side effect profile. However, longer-term data and comparative efficacy studies are needed.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Graphical abstract</h3>\u0000","PeriodicalId":501625,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Endoscopy","volume":"78 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142257873","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Elevated preoperative lower esophageal sphincter pressure predicts improved clinical outcomes after per oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM)","authors":"Hamza Nasir Chatha, Joshua Lyons, Christina S. Boutros, Saher-Zahra Khan, Patrick Wieland, Iris Levine, Jamie Benson, Christine Alvarado, Guy Katz, Jeffrey M. Marks","doi":"10.1007/s00464-024-11229-4","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-024-11229-4","url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Background</h3><p>Although per oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) has shown to be beneficial for the treatment of achalasia, it can be difficult to predict who will have a robust and long-lasting response. Historically, it has been shown that higher lower esophageal sphincter pressures have been associated with poorer responses to alternative endoscopic therapies such as Botox therapy and pneumatic dilation. This study was designed to evaluate if modern preoperative manometric data could similarly predict response to therapy after POEM.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>This was a retrospective study of 237 patients who underwent POEM at a single institution over a period of 13 years (2011–2023) and who had a high-resolution manometry performed preoperatively and an Eckardt symptom score performed both preoperative and postoperatively. The achalasia type and integrated relaxation pressures (IRP) were tested for potential correlation with the need for any further achalasia interventions postoperatively as well as the degree of Eckardt score reduction using a linear regression model.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>The Achalasia type on preoperative manometry was not predictive for further interventions or degree of Eckardt score reduction (<i>p</i> = 0.76 and 0.43, respectively). A higher IRP was not predictive of the need for further interventions, however, it was predictive of a greater reduction in postoperative Eckardt scores (<i>p</i> = 0.03) as shown by the non-zero regression slope.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusion</h3><p>In this study, achalasia type was not a predictive factor in the need for further interventions or the degree of symptom relief. Although IRP was not predictive of the need for further interventions, a higher IRP did predict better symptomatic relief postoperatively. This result is opposite that of other endoscopic treatment modalities (Botox and pneumatic dilation). Therefore, patients with higher IRP on preoperative high-resolution manometry would likely benefit from POEM which provides significant symptomatic relief postoperatively.</p>","PeriodicalId":501625,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Endoscopy","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142257919","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic-assisted extended mesorectal excision: a comprehensive meta-analysis and systematic review of perioperative and long-term outcomes","authors":"Ahmed Abdelsamad, Mohammed Khaled Mohammed, Aya Sayed Ahmed Said Serour, Ibrahim Khalil, Zeyad M. Wesh, Laila Rashidi, Mike Ralf Langenbach, Florian Gebauer, Khaled Ashraf Mohamed","doi":"10.1007/s00464-024-11222-x","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-024-11222-x","url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Background</h3><p>Concurrent neoadjuvant chemo-radiation (nCRT) with total mesorectal excision (TME) alone sometimes fails to cure lateral lymph node metastasis (LLNM). Therefore, additional lateral lymph node dissection (LLND) can help in the treatment of these patients. This is what we refer to as extended total mesorectal excision (eTME). Such operations (TME alone or eTME) can be performed using conventional laparoscopic techniques and robotic-assisted techniques as well. Our meta-analysis aims to compare the results of robot-assisted (R-eTME) versus laparoscopic-assisted extended mesorectal excision (L-eTME) in terms of short- and long-term outcomes.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methodology</h3><p>Databases searched using title and abstract included Medline (via PubMed), Web of Science, Scopus, and Embase, up to February 20, 2024. All studies that documented robotic versus laparoscopic procedures for extended total mesorectal excision (R-eTME versus L-eTME) and reported more than two relevant outcomes, were included in the study.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>Our meta-analysis demonstrates four significant outcomes (operative time, urinary complications, overall recurrence, and admission days) between the laparoscopic and robotic groups. The robotic approach shows advantages over the laparoscopic approach in these outcomes except for the operative time (minute), which was longer in the robotic group compared to the laparoscopic group. The laparoscopic group is associated with a higher overall recurrence than the robotic group with an Odds Ratio of 2(95% CI, 1–4, <i>p </i>= 0.05).</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusion</h3><p>This meta-analysis study showed that the R-eTME group had a lower recurrence rate compared to the L-eTME group. Additionally, hospital admission days increased significantly in the laparoscopic group. Other long-term outcomes did not differ significantly between the two groups. Short-term outcomes were similar, except for more urinary complications in the laparoscopic group. In conclusion, the study suggests that robotic surgery may offer advantages over laparoscopic surgery for eTME. Further research and analysis could provide further insight into the potential benefits of robotic surgery in this procedure, particularly when surgeon experience, center volume, and learning curve are taken into consideration.</p>","PeriodicalId":501625,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Endoscopy","volume":"57 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142207258","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Conventional versus rubber band traction-assisted endoscopic submucosal dissection for rectal neuroendocrine tumors: a single-center retrospective study (with video)","authors":"Jinbang Peng, Jiajia Lin, Lina Fang, Jingjing Zhou, Yaqi Song, Chaoyu Yang, Yu Zhang, Binbin Gu, Ziwei Ji, Yandi Lu, Xinli Mao, Lingling Yan","doi":"10.1007/s00464-024-11244-5","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-024-11244-5","url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Background</h3><p>Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a safe and effective technique for the treatment of gastrointestinal tumors, including rectal neuroendocrine tumors (r-NETs). However, the relative advantages of traction-assisted ESD for the treatment of small rectal lesions are still debated.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Aims</h3><p>We conducted a study to compare the efficacy and safety of rubber band traction-assisted ESD (RBT-ESD) to conventional ESD (C-ESD).</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>This study retrospectively analyzed consecutive patients with r-NET treated with ESD between October 2021 and October 2023. Our study assessed differences between the groups in the complete resection rate of lesions, muscular layer injury, surgical complications, operation time, resection speed, time to liquid diet, postoperative hospital stay, hospital cost, and recurrence rate.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>A total of 119 patients with r-NETs participated in this study (RBT-ESD group, <i>n</i> = 27; C-ESD group, <i>n</i> = 92). The operation time in RBT-ESD group was shorter than in C-ESD group, but the difference was not statistically significant (16.0 min [9.0–22.0 min] vs. 18.0 min [13.3–27.0 min], <i>P</i> = 0.056). However, the resection speed was significantly faster in the RBT-ESD group (6.7 vs. 4.1 mm²/min, <i>P</i> = 0.005). Furthermore, the RBT-ESD group showed significantly less muscular layer injury (<i>P</i> = 0.047) and faster diet recovery (<i>P</i> = 0.035). No significant differences were observed in the complete resection rate, surgical complications, postoperative hospital stay, hospital cost, or recurrence rate between the two groups.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusion</h3><p>For r-NETs of &lt; 2 cm in size, the RBT method did not significantly shorten the operation time but resulted in faster resection speed, less muscular layer injury, and earlier postoperative recovery to a liquid diet.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Graphical Abstract</h3>\u0000","PeriodicalId":501625,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Endoscopy","volume":"141 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142257917","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Comparable improvement and resolution of obesity-related comorbidities in endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty vs laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: single-center study","authors":"Stephanie Joseph, Vanessa N. Vandruff, Julia R. Amundson, Simon Che, Christopher Zimmermann, Shun Ishii, Kristine Kuchta, H. Mason Hedberg, Woody Denham, John Linn, Michael B. Ujiki","doi":"10.1007/s00464-024-11194-y","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-024-11194-y","url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Background</h3><p>Despite excellent surgical outcomes, a minority of qualified patients undergo weight loss surgery. Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty (ESG), an incisionless procedure, has proven to be effective in achieving weight loss and comorbidity improvement. We aim to compare outcomes of ESG to those of Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy (LSG).</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Method</h3><p>A retrospective review of a prospective database of patients who underwent ESG and LSG at NorthShore University HealthSystem from 2016 to 2023 was completed. Demographic and outcome data were analyzed. Pre- and post-surgical data were compared using chi-square and two-sample <i>t</i> tests. Improvement or resolution of obesity-related comorbidities were also assessed.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>A total of 212 LSG and 68 ESG patients were reviewed. ESG patients were older (47 ± 10 vs. 43 ± 12, <i>p</i> = 0.006) and less obese (BMI 37.0 ± 5.5 vs. 45.8 ± 0.4, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001) than LSG patients. Median length of stay after ESG was 0 days and after LSG 1 day (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). Severe adverse events were seen less frequent after ESG (1.47%, vs 3.77%). LSG achieved more significant %TBWL at 6 months (25.2 ± 8.9 vs 14.9 ± 7.4), 1 year (27.5 ± 10.8 vs 14.1 ± 9.8), and 2 years (25.7 ± 10.8 vs 10.5 ± 8.8, all <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001) after surgery when compared to ESG. LSG achieved significantly greater %EWL compared to ESG at 6 months (57.0 ± 20.7 vs 50.4 ± 29.2, <i>p</i> = 0.137), 1 year (61.4 ± 24.6 vs 46.5 ± 34.0, <i>p</i> = 0.026), and 2 years postoperatively (59.7 ± 25.5 vs 32.6 ± 28.2, <i>p</i> = 0.001). There were no statistically significant differences in rates of improvement or resolution of diabetes, obstructive sleep apnea, hyperlipidemia, or hypertension.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusion</h3><p>ESG is an effective procedure for weight loss and comorbidity resolution. Obesity-related comorbidities are comparably improved and resolved following ESG vs LSG. Although the weight loss in LSG is significantly higher, patients can expect a shorter hospital length of stay and a lower rate of complications after ESG. ESG continues to show promise for long-term weight loss and improvement in health.</p>","PeriodicalId":501625,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Endoscopy","volume":"42 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142257876","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"One year follow-up of the colon cancer patient cohort treated with a novel miniaturized robotic-assisted surgery device (mRASD)","authors":"John H. Marks, Michael A. Jobst, Deborah S. Keller, Jorge A. Lagares-Garcia, Henry P. Schoonyoung, Shane M. Farritor, Dmitry Oleynikov","doi":"10.1007/s00464-024-11179-x","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-024-11179-x","url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Background</h3><p>With the proven benefits of minimally invasive surgery, there is steady growth in robotic surgery use and interest in novel robotic platforms. A miniaturized Robotic-Assisted Surgery Device (mRASD) has been in clinical use under a multi-center, investigational device exemption (IDE) study for right and left colectomy. The goal of this work was to report the short-term and 12-month outcomes specifically for the cohort of colon cancer patients that underwent surgery using the mRASD.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Method</h3><p>From the IDE study that included both benign and malignant diseases, long-term follow-up was only conducted for patients with colon cancer. The main outcome measures were the oncologic quality metrics (Overall Survival, OS and Disease-free Survival, DFS). Secondary outcomes included incidence of intra-operative, device-related, and procedure-related adverse events. Frequency statistics were performed to assess the measures of central tendency and variability in short (within 30 days) and long-term (1-year) outcomes.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>Thirty total patients underwent a colectomy with mRASD; 17 (57%) were diagnosed with a malignancy and included in this analysis. The mean patient age was 59.9 ± 13.2 years. There were no intraoperative or device-related adverse events. In 100% of cases (<i>n</i> = 17), the primary dissection was completed and hemostasis maintained using the mRASD, and negative margins were achieved. At 30 days postoperatively, the major complication rate was 6%, and there was one unplanned reoperation for anastomotic leak. At one-year follow-up, the OS and DFS rates were 100 and 94%, respectively. In one patient, omental implants were discovered at the time of surgery, and the patient opted to not undergo additional therapy.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusions</h3><p>The first experience with mRASD for colectomy in colon cancer demonstrated technical effectiveness and an acceptable surgical safety profile in line with other minimally invasive procedures. The study continues to monitor disease recurrence and survival outcomes in this cohort.</p>","PeriodicalId":501625,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Endoscopy","volume":"21 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142257920","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"A novel color-aided system for diagnosis of early gastric cancer using magnifying endoscopy with narrow-band imaging","authors":"Hui Zhang, Rongwei Ruan, Jin Fang, Jiangping Yu, Shengsen Chen, Yali Tao, Shuwen Zhu, Shi Wang","doi":"10.1007/s00464-024-11235-6","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-024-11235-6","url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Background</h3><p>The Pink Zone Pattern (PP) sign is a typical color alteration of early gastric cancer (EGC) under magnifying endoscopic narrow-band imaging (ME-NBI). By integrating the color changes (PP sign) with the “vessel plus surface (VS)” classification system, we developed an innovative diagnostic system for EGC and named it “Pink Microsurface Microvascular (PSV)” system. Here, we aimed to elucidate the diagnostic performance of the PSV system for EGC.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>We conducted a single-center prospective clinical study (before-after design) consisting of 2 cross-sectional studies at 2 separate periods. In the before phase, 184 suspected lesions were evaluated using the VS system under ME-NBI; in the after phase, 183 suspected lesions were evaluated using the PSV system. We compared the diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) between the VS group and the PSV group.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>The accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of the VS system for EGC were 84.6%, 87.0%, 83.6%, 67.8%, and 94.2%, respectively, and those for the PSV system were 93.0%, 92.0%, 93.4%, 85.2%, and 96.6%, respectively. The accuracy, specificity, and PPV of the PSV system were superior to those of the VS system. However, the sensitivity and NPV did not significantly differ between the VS system and the PSV system. The VS system was inconclusive for 22 lesions (12.0%) and the PSV system was inconclusive for 11 lesions (6.0%). The PSV system could identify more suspicious lesions than the VS system.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusions</h3><p>We propose a new PSV diagnostic system by combining the VS system and the PP sign. Compared with the VS system, the PSV system could identify more suspected lesions and improve the diagnostic performance of EGC.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Graphical abstract</h3>\u0000","PeriodicalId":501625,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Endoscopy","volume":"26 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142207261","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Comparative anatomic and symptomatic recurrence outcomes of diaphragmatic suture cruroplasty versus biosynthetic mesh reinforcement in robotic hiatal and paraesophageal hernia repair","authors":"Niloufar Salehi, Teagan Marshall, Blake Christianson, Hala Al Asadi, Haythem Najah, Yeon Joo Lee-Saxton, Abhinay Tumati, Parima Safe, Alexander Gavlin, Manjil Chatterji, Brendan M. Finnerty, Thomas J. Fahey, Rasa Zarnegar","doi":"10.1007/s00464-024-11257-0","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-024-11257-0","url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Background</h3><p>Hiatal and paraesophageal hernia (HH/PEH) recurrence is the most common cause of failure after gastroesophageal anti-reflux surgery. Crural reinforcement with mesh has been suggested to address this issue, but its efficacy remains debated. In this study, we aimed to determine the impact of biosynthetic mesh reinforcement compared to suture cruroplasty on anatomic and symptomatic hernia recurrence.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Method</h3><p>Data of patients who underwent robotic HH/PEH repair with suture cruroplasty with or without biosynthetic mesh reinforcement between January 2012 and April 2024 were retrospectively reviewed. Gastroesophageal reflux disease symptoms and anatomic hernia recurrence were assessed at short-term (3 months to 1 year) and longer-term (≥ 1 year) follow-up. Symptomatic hernia recurrence was defined as having both anatomic recurrence and symptoms.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>Out of the 503 patients in the study, 308 had undergone biosynthetic mesh repair, while 195 had suture-only repair. After the surgery, both groups demonstrated comparable improvements in symptoms. Short-term anatomic hernia recurrence rates were 11.8% and 15.6% for mesh and suture groups, respectively (<i>p</i> = 0.609), while longer-term rates were 24.7% and 44.9% (<i>p</i> = 0.015). The rates of symptomatic hernia recurrence in the same group were 8.8% and 14.6% in the short-term (<i>p</i> = 0.256), and 17.2% and 42.2% in longer-term follow-ups (<i>p</i> = 0.003). In the repair of medium and large-size hernias, mesh reinforcement resulted in a 50.0% relative risk reduction in anatomic hernia recurrences and a 59.2% reduction in symptomatic hernia recurrences at ≥ 1-year follow-up.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusion</h3><p>After more than a year of follow-up, it has been found that using biosynthetic mesh for medium and large hiatal or paraesophageal hernia repair significantly reduces the likelihood of both anatomic and symptomatic recurrence compared to using only suture cruroplasty. These findings strongly support the use of biosynthetic mesh to manage larger hernias. However, further long-term multicenter randomized studies are needed to provide more conclusive evidence.</p>","PeriodicalId":501625,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Endoscopy","volume":"30 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142257916","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}