Concomitant hiatal hernia repair with transoral incisionless fundoplication for the treatment of refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease: a systematic review

Fouad Jaber, Mohammed Ayyad, Fares Ayoub, Kalpesh K. Patel, Konstantinos I. Makris, Ruben Hernaez, Wasseem Skef
{"title":"Concomitant hiatal hernia repair with transoral incisionless fundoplication for the treatment of refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease: a systematic review","authors":"Fouad Jaber, Mohammed Ayyad, Fares Ayoub, Kalpesh K. Patel, Konstantinos I. Makris, Ruben Hernaez, Wasseem Skef","doi":"10.1007/s00464-024-11201-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Background</h3><p>Transoral incisionless fundoplication (TIF) is safe and effective in select patients with hiatal hernias ≤ 2 cm with refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). For patients with hiatal hernias &gt; 2 cm, concomitant hiatal hernia (HH) repair with TIF (cTIF) is offered as an alternative to conventional anti-reflux surgery (ARS). Yet, data on this approach is limited. Through a comprehensive systematic review, we aim to evaluate the efficacy and safety of cTIF for managing refractory GERD in patients with hernias &gt; 2 cm.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Study design</h3><p>We conducted a systematic review of studies evaluating cTIF outcomes from PubMed, EMBASE, SCOPUS, and Cochrane databases up to February 14, 2024. Primary outcomes included complete cessation of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs). Secondary outcomes included objective GERD assessment, adverse events, and treatment-related side effects. Pooled analysis was employed wherever feasible.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>Seven observational studies (306 patients) met the inclusion criteria. Five were retrospective cohort studies and two were prospective observational studies. The median rate of discontinuation of PPIs was 73.8% (range 56.4–94.4%). Significant improvements were observed in disease-specific, validated GERD questionnaires. The median rate for complications was 4.4% (range 0–7.9%), and the 30-day readmission rate had a median of 3.3% (range 0–5.3%). The incidence of dysphagia was 11 out of 164 patients, with a median of 5.3% (range 0–8.3%), while the incidence of gas bloating was 15 out of 127 patients, with a median of 6.9% (range 0–13.8%).</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusion</h3><p>Current data on cTIF suggests a promising alternative to ARS with comparable short-term efficacy and safety profile for managing refractory GERD with a low side effect profile. However, longer-term data and comparative efficacy studies are needed.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Graphical abstract</h3>\n","PeriodicalId":501625,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Endoscopy","volume":"78 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical Endoscopy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-024-11201-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Transoral incisionless fundoplication (TIF) is safe and effective in select patients with hiatal hernias ≤ 2 cm with refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). For patients with hiatal hernias > 2 cm, concomitant hiatal hernia (HH) repair with TIF (cTIF) is offered as an alternative to conventional anti-reflux surgery (ARS). Yet, data on this approach is limited. Through a comprehensive systematic review, we aim to evaluate the efficacy and safety of cTIF for managing refractory GERD in patients with hernias > 2 cm.

Study design

We conducted a systematic review of studies evaluating cTIF outcomes from PubMed, EMBASE, SCOPUS, and Cochrane databases up to February 14, 2024. Primary outcomes included complete cessation of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs). Secondary outcomes included objective GERD assessment, adverse events, and treatment-related side effects. Pooled analysis was employed wherever feasible.

Results

Seven observational studies (306 patients) met the inclusion criteria. Five were retrospective cohort studies and two were prospective observational studies. The median rate of discontinuation of PPIs was 73.8% (range 56.4–94.4%). Significant improvements were observed in disease-specific, validated GERD questionnaires. The median rate for complications was 4.4% (range 0–7.9%), and the 30-day readmission rate had a median of 3.3% (range 0–5.3%). The incidence of dysphagia was 11 out of 164 patients, with a median of 5.3% (range 0–8.3%), while the incidence of gas bloating was 15 out of 127 patients, with a median of 6.9% (range 0–13.8%).

Conclusion

Current data on cTIF suggests a promising alternative to ARS with comparable short-term efficacy and safety profile for managing refractory GERD with a low side effect profile. However, longer-term data and comparative efficacy studies are needed.

Graphical abstract

Abstract Image

治疗难治性胃食管反流病的经口无切口胃底折叠术与食管裂孔疝修补术:系统性综述
背景经口无切口胃底折叠术(TIF)对部分食管裂孔疝≤2 厘米且伴有难治性胃食管反流病(GERD)的患者安全有效。对于食管裂孔疝> 2厘米的患者,TIF(cTIF)同时修复食管裂孔疝(HH)可作为传统抗反流手术(ARS)的替代方法。然而,有关这种方法的数据却很有限。研究设计我们对截至 2024 年 2 月 14 日的 PubMed、EMBASE、SCOPUS 和 Cochrane 数据库中评估 cTIF 结果的研究进行了系统性回顾。主要结果包括完全停用质子泵抑制剂(PPI)。次要结果包括客观胃食管反流评估、不良事件和治疗相关副作用。结果七项观察性研究(306 名患者)符合纳入标准。其中五项为回顾性队列研究,两项为前瞻性观察研究。停用 PPIs 的中位比例为 73.8%(范围为 56.4-94.4%)。在疾病特异性胃食管反流病有效问卷调查中观察到显著改善。并发症发生率的中位数为 4.4%(范围为 0-7.9%),30 天再入院率的中位数为 3.3%(范围为 0-5.3%)。164 名患者中,吞咽困难发生率为 11 例,中位数为 5.3%(范围为 0-8.3%);127 名患者中,胃胀发生率为 15 例,中位数为 6.9%(范围为 0-13.8%)。然而,还需要更长期的数据和疗效比较研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信