Communications最新文献_第2页

The experience of social (in)visibility in narratives about ostracism 关于排斥的叙述中的社会（不）可见性体验

Communications Pub Date : 2024-07-23 DOI: 10.1515/commun-2023-0153

Agnieszka Konieczna

{"title":"The experience of social (in)visibility in narratives about ostracism","authors":"Agnieszka Konieczna","doi":"10.1515/commun-2023-0153","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/commun-2023-0153","url":null,"abstract":"This work involves a comprehensive review of qualitative research focused on analysing the experience of social ostracism. The voices of the ostracized are essential for uncovering that subtle, small, invisible, and silent practices of social exclusion, such as not paying attention, treating someone like air, lack of interest, or being left out, are sufficiently real and painful enough for those who have to deal with them. The term “social (in)visibility” allows us to openly name feelings that are an internal response to external ostracism, but which remain unexpressed in everyday interactions. The article focuses on understanding the role of social attention and social recognition in social encounters. As the social challenges described document a set of practices that prevent engagement in social interactions and reinforce cultural otherness, the construct of “social (in)visibility” may thus provide a framework for explaining how the lack of acknowledgment of someone’s presence in an appropriate manner in a given situation initiates the process of excluding those with so-called ‘spoiled identities’ and may help reveal mechanisms of escalating negativity. The work concludes with reflections on future research areas and the practical implications of social (in)visibility within the context of social relationships, co-presence, and social encounters.","PeriodicalId":501361,"journal":{"name":"Communications","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141776386","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

The Silicon Valley paradox: A qualitative interview study on the social, cultural, and ideological foundations of a global innovation center 硅谷悖论：关于全球创新中心的社会、文化和意识形态基础的定性访谈研究

Communications Pub Date : 2024-06-14 DOI: 10.1515/commun-2023-0045

Thorsten Quandt, Johanna Klapproth

引用次数: 0

Bonding over bashing: Discussing LGBTI topics in far-right alternative news media comments sections 在谩骂中增进感情：在极右另类新闻媒体的评论区讨论 LGBTI 话题

Communications Pub Date : 2024-06-14 DOI: 10.1515/commun-2023-0084

Emma Verhoeven

引用次数: 0

What makes audiences resilient to disinformation? Integrating micro, meso, and macro factors based on a systematic literature review 是什么让受众对虚假信息具有抵抗力？在系统性文献回顾的基础上整合微观、中观和宏观因素

Communications Pub Date : 2024-05-16 DOI: 10.1515/commun-2023-0078

Jülide Kont, Wim Elving, Marcel Broersma, Çiğdem Bozdağ

引用次数: 0

Evans, C., & Lundgren, L. (2023). No heavenly bodies: A history of satellite communications infrastructure. MIT Press, 256 pp. Evans, C., & Lundgren, L. (2023)。没有天体：卫星通信基础设施史。麻省理工学院出版社，256 页。

Communications Pub Date : 2024-05-04 DOI: 10.1515/commun-2024-0031

Graham Minenor-Matheson

引用次数: 0

Publishing strategies and professional demarcations: Enacting media logic(s) in European academic climate communication through open letters 出版战略与专业划分：通过公开信实现欧洲学术氛围传播的媒体逻辑

Communications Pub Date : 2024-04-11 DOI: 10.1515/commun-2023-0033

Carin Graminius

引用次数: 0

It’s the political economy after all: Implications of the case of Israel’s media system transition on the theory of media systems 毕竟是政治经济学：以色列媒体系统转型案例对媒体系统理论的启示

Communications Pub Date : 2024-04-03 DOI: 10.1515/commun-2023-0063

Moshe Schwartz, Hillel Nossek

引用次数: 0

COVID-19 vaccine reviews on YouTube: What do they say? YouTube 上的 COVID-19 疫苗评论：他们怎么说？

Communications Pub Date : 2024-03-13 DOI: 10.1515/commun-2023-0056

Da-Young Kang, Eyun-Jung Ki

{"title":"COVID-19 vaccine reviews on YouTube: What do they say?","authors":"Da-Young Kang, Eyun-Jung Ki","doi":"10.1515/commun-2023-0056","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/commun-2023-0056","url":null,"abstract":"After the Covid-19 vaccination started, social media users created an enormous amount of content on the vaccines. Especially in the early stages of vaccination, people searched and watched YouTube videos sharing personal experiences after getting the vaccines (i.e., vaccine review videos), usually titled “I got the COVID-19 vaccine.” Few studies have examined the characteristics and impacts of vaccine review videos on viewers’ responses (e.g., likes, dislikes, comments). This study investigates the content of, and reactions to, the most-viewed Covid-19 vaccine review videos on YouTube, based on the social communication framework. A quantitative content analysis of 148 vaccine review videos revealed their unique characteristics, including source expertise, message valence, narration, and topics. Most of the videos had a positive tone, with some urging vaccination and showing pro-vaccine attitudes. Furthermore, source expertise and hybrid message types (messages conveyed in narrative and informative ways) were not significantly related to positive responses. Rather, non-expert videos received more positive responses. The findings concern the public opinions surrounding new vaccines, including related concerns and attitudes. Given the positive tone of the content, vaccine review content made by diverse groups can be encouraged by public health institutions regardless of the creators’ expertise.","PeriodicalId":501361,"journal":{"name":"Communications","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140152446","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Hate speech mainstreaming in the Greek virtual public sphere: A quantitative and qualitative approach 希腊虚拟公共领域的仇恨言论主流化：定量和定性方法

Communications Pub Date : 2024-02-29 DOI: 10.1515/commun-2023-0051

Yannis Tsirbas, Lina Zirganou-Kazolea

引用次数: 0

Oldies but goldies? Comparing the trustworthiness and credibility of ‘new’ and ‘old’ information intermediaries 老而弥坚？比较 "新 "和 "旧 "信息中介的可信度和公信力

Communications Pub Date : 2024-02-20 DOI: 10.1515/commun-2023-0020

Lisa Weidmüller, Sven Engesser

{"title":"Oldies but goldies? Comparing the trustworthiness and credibility of ‘new’ and ‘old’ information intermediaries","authors":"Lisa Weidmüller, Sven Engesser","doi":"10.1515/commun-2023-0020","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/commun-2023-0020","url":null,"abstract":"People increasingly access news through ‘new’, algorithmic intermediaries such as search engines or aggregators rather than the ‘old’ (i. e., traditional), journalistic intermediaries. As algorithmic intermediaries do not adhere to journalistic standards, their trustworthiness comes into question. With this study, we (1) summarize the differences between journalistic and algorithmic intermediaries as found in previous literature; (2) conduct a cross-media comparison of information credibility and intermediary trustworthiness; and (3) examine how key predictors (such as modality, reputation, source attribution, and prior experience) affect the trustworthiness and credibility assessments. Results from a quasi-experimental online survey (n = 485) confirm that recipients assess journalistic intermediaries more positively than algorithmic intermediaries and audio more positively than text intermediaries. Furthermore, we found reputation and information credibility to be the most important predictors of intermediary trustworthiness, while general media trust is the most important predictor of information credibility. Implications and directions for future research are discussed.","PeriodicalId":501361,"journal":{"name":"Communications","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139919112","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0