Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal最新文献

{"title":"Caring for a Child with a Cleft Lip and/or Palate: A Narrative Review.","authors":"Nicola M Stock, Debora Blaso, Matthew Hotton","doi":"10.1177/10556656241280071","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10556656241280071","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Raising a child with healthcare needs places additional demands on caregivers. In 2012, Nelson and colleagues authored a review of 57 papers pertaining to parents' experiences of caring for a child with cleft lip and/or palate (CL/P). Thanks in large part to this review, available literature on this topic has grown considerably. The aim of the present review was to update and critically appraise recent literature, with the wider goal of assessing progress in the field and setting recommendations for future work. All original, peer-reviewed articles pertaining to the psychological adjustment of parents of children with CL/P living in high-income countries (published May 2009 to May 2024) were examined. A total of 126 articles were included. Findings were narratively synthesised according to three salient themes: Emotional Impact; Social Experiences; and Care Delivery. Recent research has built on Nelson et al.'s recommendations, addressing some prior gaps in knowledge. Nonetheless, some areas remained largely unexplored and critical methodological limitations were still evident. Recommendations for clinical practice include: improved informational resources for parents and non-specialist health professionals, regular audit of services in collaboration with parents and families, routine psychological screening for known risk factors and integrated psychological support from diagnosis onward. Recommendations for future research include the design of multicentre, prospective, longitudinal studies with sufficient sample sizes and appropriate control/reference groups, inclusion of families from diverse ethnic and socioeconomic backgrounds, further examination of factors contributing to psychological growth, the development and evaluation of psychological interventions, and cross-condition learning.</p>","PeriodicalId":49220,"journal":{"name":"Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2024-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142156457","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Expanding Accessibility in Cleft Care: The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Improving Literacy of Alveolar Bone Grafting Information.","authors":"Artur Manasyan, Sasha Lasky, Marah Jolibois, Tayla Moshal, Idean Roohani, Naikhoba Munabi, Mark M Urata, Jeffrey A Hammoudeh","doi":"10.1177/10556656241281453","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10556656241281453","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The American Medical Association (AMA) recommends patient education materials (PEMs) be written at or below a sixth grade reading level. This study seeks to determine the quality, readability, and content of available alveolar bone grafting (ABG) PEMs and determine if artificial intelligence can improve PEM readability.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Review of free online PEMs.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Online ABG PEMs were retrieved from different authoring body types (hospital/academic center, medical society, or private practice).</p><p><strong>Patients, participants: </strong>None.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Content was assessed by screening PEMs for specific ABG-related topics. Quality was evaluated with the Patient Education Material Assessment Tool (PEMAT), which has measures of understandability and actionability. Open-access readability software (WebFX) determined readability with Flesch Reading Ease, Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level, and Gunning-Fog Index. PEMs were rewritten with ChatGPT, and readability metrics were reassessed.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measure(s): </strong>Quality, readability, and content of ABG PEMs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>34 PEMs were analyzed. Regarding quality, the average PEMAT-understandability score was 67.0 ± 16.2%, almost at the minimum acceptable score of 70.0% (p = 0.281). The average PEMAT-actionability score was low at 33.0 ± 24.1%. Regarding readability, the average Flesch Reading Ease score was 64.6 ± 12.8, categorized as \"standard/plain English.\" The average Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level was 8.0 ± 2.3, significantly higher than AMA recommendations (p < 0.0001). PEM rewriting with ChatGPT improved Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level to 6.1 ± 1.3 (p < 0.0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Available ABG PEMs are above the recommended reading level, yet ChatGPT can improve PEM readability. Future studies should improve areas of ABG PEMs that are most lacking, such as actionability.</p>","PeriodicalId":49220,"journal":{"name":"Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2024-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142156459","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Effect of Age and Gender on Nasalance Across the Lifespan: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Valerie J Pereira, Emily See-Man Ching, Joanna Hoi-Man She, Wilson Shing Yu, Kendy Lau, Michael Chi-Fai Tong, Kathy Yuet-Sheung Lee","doi":"10.1177/10556656241276675","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10556656241276675","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Nasometer^® is a widely used clinical and research tool with diagnosis and outcome measurement utility. The objective of this study was to systematically examine the effect of age and gender on nasalance across the lifespan.</p><p><p>A systematic review was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews (PRISMA 2020).</p><p><p>University.</p><p><p>Children, adolescents, adults, and older adults.</p><p><p>Covidence Better Systematic Review Management; Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network Methodology (SIGN) Checklist 3 for risk of bias; Levels of evidence, Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine Levels of Evidence hierarchy; and effect size calculations using G*Power 3.</p><p><p>Nasalance (%) from the Nasometer™.</p><p><p>50 studies (from N = 1884) were included in the review. All were Level 3 (non-randomized controlled cohort) observational-analytic type studies. Only 10 (20%) of studies met a High Quality (low risk of bias) rating. Effect sizes were moderate for adults versus children (<i>d </i>= 0.717) and adults versus adolescents (<i>d </i>= 0.521) for oral text/passage. Gender differences were clinically significant for adolescent males and females with a moderate effect size (<i>d </i>= 0.545) for oronasal text/passage.</p><p><p>The systematic review provides objective and defined evidence as to the effects of age and gender on nasalance. Separate normative databases are implicated for specific age subgroups across the lifespan and for gender, particularly in adolescence. Review findings are applicable to other clinical groups where acquisition and/or progression occurs in adulthood/older adulthood.</p>","PeriodicalId":49220,"journal":{"name":"Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2024-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142156458","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Postoperative Feeding in Cleft Surgery: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Patricia Fuentes, Soroush Farsi, Jose A Garcia, Wassim Najjar, Adam Johnson, Usama Hamdan","doi":"10.1177/10556656241283186","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10556656241283186","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Postoperative feeding is crucial for the recovery of children after cleft surgery. The literature outlines diverse feeding methods with varying recommendations on the duration of non-nipple feeding postsurgery. This study aims to explore reported postoperative feeding modalities for infants undergoing primary cleft lip/palate repair, concentrating on their influence on feeding improvement and complication reduction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PubMed, Cochrane, and Web of Science databases were queried for original English articles without any date restrictions. This review was conducted in accordance with the 2020 PRISMA. The MINORS criteria was used to assess quality of studies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 696 abstracts, 9 full-text articles were included, consisting of 459 children with cleft lip (n = 221) & cleft lip/palate (n = 238). Feeding modalities included bottle, breastfeeding, spoon, syringe, and nasogastric tube. Two studies found a significant increase in weight with breastfeeding compared to spoon or cup. Two studies found partial wound dehiscence using spoons, and two studies reported dehiscence using bottles. Post-palatoplasty, two studies showed a decrease in hospital stay in infants breastfed (2.1 & 5.8 days) vs spoon-fed (6 days). Analgesia was reduced in the breastfed group vs spoon/nasogastric tube.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This review highlights the importance of postoperative feeding in the recovery of infants with cleft lip/palate. Evidence suggests that breastfeeding may offer advantages in terms of weight gain and reduced hospital stay, while potentially minimizing the need for postoperative analgesia. The limited number of studies and variability in their outcomes underscore the need for further research to establish evidence-based guidelines for postoperative feeding.</p>","PeriodicalId":49220,"journal":{"name":"Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2024-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142156460","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Reduction Cranioplasty in Cases of Hydrocephalic Macrocephaly: Pearls and Pitfalls of Computer-Assisted Surgery.","authors":"David L Best, Elizabeth Nyabuto, Kevin C Lee, Renée M Reynolds, Michael R Markiewicz","doi":"10.1177/10556656241271661","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10556656241271661","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Reduction cranioplasty may be indicated to address functional or cosmetic sequelae of hydrocephalic macrocephaly. With the advent of CAD/CAM digital workflow, surgeons can design and fabricate craniotomy guides, templates, and models that allow for precise cranial reconstruction. Although there are several advantages of virtual planning, pre-determined surgical plans may limit intraoperative flexibility, requiring surgeons to troubleshoot errors in pre-operative planning or model design. The purpose of this report is to present a series of cases demonstrating our institution's technique for single-stage reduction cranioplasty using a CAD/CAM workflow. This report will highlight the benefits and challenges associated with a contemporary digital workflow for reduction cranioplasty.</p>","PeriodicalId":49220,"journal":{"name":"Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2024-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142157197","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"The Source of Nasal Rustle (Nasal Turbulence): An Overview of Current Evidence.","authors":"Michael Rollins, Ann Kummer","doi":"10.1177/10556656241278935","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10556656241278935","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong><i>Nasal rustle</i> (also called <i>nasal turbulence</i>) refers to a loud distracting sound that sometimes occurs with audible nasal emission (ANE) during the production of pressure-sensitive consonants in patients with velopharyngeal insufficiency (VPI). This article examines evidence for two hypotheses of causality: vibration of the soft palate (<i>velar flutter</i>) and periodic motion of mucus above the velopharyngeal port (<i>turbulent mucus</i>).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A review of the relevant literature shows inconclusive evidence to support velar flutter as a cause of nasal rustle. In contrast, clinical observations and research involving high-speed nasopharyngoscopy suggest that nasal rustle is the result of turbulent mucus above a small velopharyngeal opening. Therefore, it is our contention that a plausible explanation for nasal rustle is one of turbulent mucus and not velar flutter.</p>","PeriodicalId":49220,"journal":{"name":"Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2024-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142082410","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Cleft Lip Repair Comparison Between Inpatient and Outpatient Surgeries: A Multi-Surgeon Experience.","authors":"Haven M Howell, Laura I Galarza, Laura S Humphries, Ian C Hoppe","doi":"10.1177/10556656241278569","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10556656241278569","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Great variability exists as to whether cleft lip (CL) repair is performed as an inpatient or outpatient surgery. This study's aim is to investigate the authors' institutional experience to see if there is an increase in complications, emergency department (ED) visits, or readmissions to the hospital when performed as outpatient.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This study reviewed patients who underwent CL repair between 2012 and 2023 at the authors' institution. Data collected included patient demographics, perioperative details, ED visits and readmissions within thirty days of surgery, and complications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred forty-five patients met inclusion measures. When the surgery was performed as outpatient, there was no significant difference in returning to the ED (p = 0.767) or readmission to the hospital (p = 0.447) within thirty days as compared to inpatient surgeries. Outpatients did not have more postoperative complications (p = 0.698). Bilateral cleft lips were more likely to be performed as inpatient (p = 0.001). Inpatients had a lower weight at time of repair (p = 0.033). Patients with a respiratory (p = .006), gastrointestinal (p = 0.003), or hematologic (p = 0.013) comorbidity had a higher readmission rate. Patients were more likely to be readmitted if they had a younger gestational age (p = 0.005).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There was no increased return to the ED or readmission for patients undergoing inpatient versus outpatient CL repair. CL repair can be performed safely in an outpatient setting with careful patient selection.</p>","PeriodicalId":49220,"journal":{"name":"Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2024-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142086377","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Facial Expressions of Emotion in Children with Cleft Lip and Palate.","authors":"Robert Brinton Fujiki, Fangyun Zhao, Paula M Niedenthal, Susan L Thibeault","doi":"10.1177/10556656241271650","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10556656241271650","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine the facial movements children with cleft lip and palate (CLP) employ to express basic emotions. Ability of observers to interpret facial expressions of children with CLP was also considered.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Prospective case-control design.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Outpatient craniofacial anomalies clinic.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Twenty-five children with CLP (age 8 to 12) and 25 age/sex-matched controls.</p><p><strong>Outcome measures: </strong>Children were video recorded making facial expressions representing anger, disgust, fear, happiness, sadness, and surprise. Magnitude of children's facial movements was quantified and compared using OpenFace. Subsequently, emotion videos were presented to 19 adults who were asked to identify the emotion conveyed in each facial expression. Accuracy of emotion recognition was compared across groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared with controls, children with CLP employed significantly (<i>P </i>< .05) smaller magnitude superior and lateral perioral movements to express disgust (Cohen's d = .50), happiness (Cohen's d = 1.1), and fear (Cohen's d = .93). For disgust and sadness, children with CLP employed significantly greater magnitude movements of the nose and chin, presumably to compensate for reduced perioral range of motion. For anger, happiness, and sadness, children with CLP employed smaller magnitude movements of the upper face when compared with controls. Observers identified disgust (OR = 1.26), and fear (OR = 2.44) significantly less accurately in children with CLP when compared with controls.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Children with CLP employed different facial movements to express certain emotions. Observers less accurately identified some emotions conveyed by facial expressions in children with CLP when compared with controls, likely due in part to differences in facial movements. Future research should explore the implications of these differences for social communication.</p>","PeriodicalId":49220,"journal":{"name":"Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2024-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142082409","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Publication Trends and Surgeon Perceptions: A Comprehensive Analysis of Gender Disparities in Craniofacial Surgery.","authors":"Molly F MacIsaac, Iman F Khan, Rafael Felix P Tiongco, Joshua M Wright, Fatima Qamar, Carisa M Cooney, Richard J Redett, Jordan N Halsey","doi":"10.1177/10556656241274020","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10556656241274020","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In academic craniofacial surgery, gender disparities exist across various metrics including faculty positions, leadership roles, and conference representation. This study benchmarks the academic productivity of craniofacial surgeons in 2022 and surveys their perspectives regarding diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI).</p><p><p>Total, first author, and senior author PubMed publications in 2022 were recorded for 193 craniofacial attendings and fellows. Craniofacial surgeons were also surveyed regarding academic experience, leadership roles, and DEI perceptions.</p><p><p>Electronic.</p><p><p>26 craniofacial attendings.</p><p><p>Total, first author, and senior author publication counts in 2022.</p><p><p>Women comprised 27% (n = 53) of the craniofacial surgeon cohort. Men led total publications (81% vs 19%, p < 0.001), senior-author publications (84% vs 16%, p < 0.001), average total publications (6.6 vs 4.0, p = 0.043), and average senior-author publications (3.1 vs 1.5, p = 0.02). Sub-analysis of craniofacial fellows showed a higher proportion of women (65%) with no statistical difference in total or average publication counts. Survey responses (n = 26) included a perceived lack of female representation in academic and leadership roles. Barriers included inadequate support from current leadership, systemic issues, and biases. Recommendations for improvement included mentorship programs, targeted recruitment, and equitable conference speaker selection.</p><p><p>Ongoing gender disparities are evident in craniofacial surgery, particularly in academic metrics. However, trends in younger cohorts exhibit more balanced gender representation, publication records, and leadership positions, indicating potential improvements. Further studies are needed to examine these cohorts more comprehensively and longitudinally. Sustained commitment, including mentorship programs and enhanced DEI efforts, is needed to continue this progress.</p>","PeriodicalId":49220,"journal":{"name":"Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2024-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142086388","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"What Free Flaps Are Surgeons Using for Palatal Fistula Repair in Patients with Cleft Palate? A Systematic Review.","authors":"Eugene E Zheng, Lauren Gates-Tanzer, Sai Cherukuri, Samir Mardini, M Hassan Murad, Uldis Bite, Waleed Gibreel","doi":"10.1177/10556656241266243","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10556656241266243","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Recalcitrant palatal fistulas in patients with cleft palate history sometimes require free flap reconstruction. This study reviews the literature on described flaps and outcomes.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A systematic review was conducted per the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>All study designs were included. Non-English articles were excluded.</p><p><strong>Patients and participants: </strong>Patients with a history of cleft palate who underwent free flap reconstruction for a oronasal fistula.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Free tissue transfer for a palatal fistula repair.</p><p><strong>Main outcomee measures: </strong>Information regarding defect and flap characteristics were reviewed. Surgical outcomes such as flap loss rates, rates of recurrent fistula formation, and speech outcomes were also obtained.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our search returned 894 articles, of which 23 were included. All studies were retrospective case series and reports. A total of 65 patients were described with an average age of 19.3 (range 3-55) years and a median fistula size of 8.00 cm² (range 2.54 cm² - 24 cm²). The most common flap was the radial forearm flap (n = 37). Nine patients (13.8%) had recurrent fistula formation with surgical revision successful in all cases in which the patient returned to the operating room. There were two partial flap losses and no total flap losses. Speech outcomes showed improvement in 27 patients across 10 studies.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Palatal fistula repair with free tissue transfer is safe with an acceptable risk profile and low flap loss rate. Early recurrence due to partial flap necrosis and dehiscence are successfully managed with flap readvancement.</p>","PeriodicalId":49220,"journal":{"name":"Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2024-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142037459","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}