Medical Law Review最新文献_第5页

Mortier v Belgium [2022] ECHR 764: Warning Signs for Assisted Dying Regulation? Mortier诉比利时【2022】欧洲人权法院第764号：辅助死亡法规的警告标志？

IF 1.7 4区医学

Medical Law Review Pub Date : 2023-11-27 DOI: 10.1093/medlaw/fwad034

Chay M Burt

引用次数: 0

Jaime Lindsey, Reimagining the Court of Protection: Access to Justice in Mental Capacity Law Jaime Lindsey，《重新想象保护法庭:精神能力法中的司法途径》

4区医学

Medical Law Review Pub Date : 2023-10-10 DOI: 10.1093/medlaw/fwad035

Jordan Briggs

引用次数: 0

Daisy Cheung and Michael Dunn (eds), Advance Directives Across Asia: A Comparative Socio-legal Analysis 张黛西和迈克尔·邓恩主编，《跨亚洲的预先指令:比较社会-法律分析》

4区医学

Medical Law Review Pub Date : 2023-09-25 DOI: 10.1093/medlaw/fwad031

Daniel Bianchi

引用次数: 0

Xavier Symons, Why Conscience Matters: A Defence of Conscientious Objection in Healthcare 泽维尔·西蒙斯，《良心为何重要:为医疗保健中的良心反对辩护》

4区医学

Medical Law Review Pub Date : 2023-09-25 DOI: 10.1093/medlaw/fwad033

James E Hurford

引用次数: 0

Intellectual property protection for traditional medical knowledge in China's context: a round peg in a square hole? 中国传统医学知识的知识产权保护:方孔里的圆钉?

IF 1.7 4区医学

Medical Law Review Pub Date : 2023-08-25 DOI: 10.1093/medlaw/fwad006

Nan Xia

{"title":"Intellectual property protection for traditional medical knowledge in China's context: a round peg in a square hole?","authors":"Nan Xia","doi":"10.1093/medlaw/fwad006","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/medlaw/fwad006","url":null,"abstract":"This article is an examination of the extent to which traditional medical knowledge in China can be protected by intellectual property laws. The analysis begins by providing a global picture with regard to the historic origin of intellectual property, exploring the reasons why China does not have indigenous counterparts to the western system of intellectual property rights protecting its traditional knowledge (including traditional medical knowledge) and stating the problems of transplanting western intellectual property standards in China. A discussion follows on how China, under foreign pressure, has made efforts to comply with the changing standards mandated by various international, regional, and bilateral arrangements related to intellectual property, with examples of the development of China's patent law. China's approach towards the protection of traditional medical knowledge in various international fora related to intellectual property is explored. Finally, there is a specific examination of the compatibilities between the western system of intellectual property rights and traditional medical knowledge in China, at the national and community levels. This article argues that the system of intellectual property rights does not easily fit with China's traditional medical knowledge because of China's unique cultural traits, distinctive historical context and wide ethnic, religious, and local community diversity.","PeriodicalId":49146,"journal":{"name":"Medical Law Review","volume":"31 3","pages":"358-390"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2023-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10452053/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10075032","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 2

When is the processing of data from medical implants lawful? The legal grounds for processing health-related personal data from ICT implantable medical devices for treatment purposes under EU data protection law. 什么时候处理医疗植入物的数据是合法的?根据欧盟数据保护法，为治疗目的处理来自ICT植入式医疗设备的健康相关个人数据的法律依据。

IF 1.7 4区医学

Medical Law Review Pub Date : 2023-08-25 DOI: 10.1093/medlaw/fwac038

Sarita Lindstad, Kaspar Rosager Ludvigsen

{"title":"When is the processing of data from medical implants lawful? The legal grounds for processing health-related personal data from ICT implantable medical devices for treatment purposes under EU data protection law.","authors":"Sarita Lindstad, Kaspar Rosager Ludvigsen","doi":"10.1093/medlaw/fwac038","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/medlaw/fwac038","url":null,"abstract":"Medicine is one of the biggest use cases for emerging information technologies. Data processing brings huge advantages but forces lawmakers and practitioners to balance between privacy, autonomy, accessibility, and functionality. ICT-connected Implantable Medical Devices plant themselves firmly between traditional medical equipment and software that processes health-related personal data, and these implants face many data management challenges. It is essential that healthcare providers and others can identify and understand the legal grounds they rely on to process data. The European Union is currently updating its framework, and the special provisions in the GDPR, the current ePrivacy Directive, and the coming ePrivacy Regulation all provide enhanced thresholds for processing data. This article provides an overview and explanation of the applicability of the rules and the legal grounds for processing data. We find that only a cumulative application of the GDPR and the ePrivacy rules ensure adequate protection of this data and present the legal grounds for processing in these cases. We discuss the challenges in obtaining and maintaining valid consent and necessity as a legal ground for processing and offer use case-specific discussions of the role of consent long-term and the lack of an adequate 'vital interest' exception in the ePrivacy rules.","PeriodicalId":49146,"journal":{"name":"Medical Law Review","volume":"31 3","pages":"317-339"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2023-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10452051/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10078089","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 2

London Borough of Islington v EF [2022] EWHC 803 (FAM): falling through the great safety net of the inherent jurisdiction. 伦敦伊斯灵顿自治市诉EF【2022】EWHC 803（FAM）：落入固有管辖权的巨大安全网。

IF 1.7 4区医学

Medical Law Review Pub Date : 2023-08-25 DOI: 10.1093/medlaw/fwad016

Daniel Bedford, Philip Bremner

引用次数: 0

The publication of impaired doctors' identity by Australian and New Zealand tribunals: law, practice, and reform. 澳大利亚和新西兰法庭公布残疾医生身份:法律、实践和改革。

IF 1.7 4区医学

Medical Law Review Pub Date : 2023-08-25 DOI: 10.1093/medlaw/fwad007

Owen M Bradfield, Marie M Bismark, Matthew J Spittal, Paula O'Brien

{"title":"The publication of impaired doctors' identity by Australian and New Zealand tribunals: law, practice, and reform.","authors":"Owen M Bradfield, Marie M Bismark, Matthew J Spittal, Paula O'Brien","doi":"10.1093/medlaw/fwad007","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/medlaw/fwad007","url":null,"abstract":"For doctors with mental health or substance use disorders, publication of their name and sensitive medical history in disciplinary decisions may adversely impact their health and may reinforce barriers to accessing early support and treatment. This article challenges the view that naming impaired doctors or disclosing the intimate details of their medical condition in disciplinary decisions always serves the public interest in open justice. We analysed and compared the approach of Australian and New Zealand health tribunals to granting orders that suppress the name and/or medical history of impaired doctors. This revealed that Australian tribunals are less likely to grant non-publication orders compared to New Zealand, despite shared common law history and similar medical regulatory frameworks. We argue that Australian tribunals could be more circumspect when dealing with sensitive information in published decisions, especially where such information does not directly form a basis for the decision reached. This could occur without compromising public protection or the underlying goals of open justice. Finally, we argue that a greater distinction should be made between those aspects of decisions that deal with conduct allegations, where full details should be published, and those that deal with impairment allegations, where only limited information should be disclosed.","PeriodicalId":49146,"journal":{"name":"Medical Law Review","volume":"31 3","pages":"391-423"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2023-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/70/b9/fwad007.PMC10452052.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10080800","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Organization (2022): consequences one year on. 多布斯诉杰克逊妇女健康组织案（2022）：一年后的后果。

IF 1.7 4区医学

Medical Law Review Pub Date : 2023-08-25 DOI: 10.1093/medlaw/fwad021

Emily Ottley, Karolina Szopa, Jamie Fletcher

引用次数: 0

Mental capacity-why look for a paradigm shift? 心理能力——为什么要寻找范式转变?

IF 1.7 4区医学

Medical Law Review Pub Date : 2023-08-25 DOI: 10.1093/medlaw/fwac052

Alex Ruck Keene, Nuala B Kane, Scott Y H Kim, Gareth S Owen

引用次数: 1