Medical Law Review最新文献_第4页

Michael Holmes v Poeton Holdings Ltd [2023] EWCA Civ 1377: a necessary clarification for a non 'de minimis' discussion in causation. Michael Holmes 诉 Poeton 控股有限公司 [2023] EWCA Civ 1377：对因果关系中非 "微不足道 "讨论的必要澄清。

IF 1.8 4区医学

Medical Law Review Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI: 10.1093/medlaw/fwae024

Patricia de Moraes Paisani Matthey Claudet

引用次数: 0

Mediating disputes under the Mental Capacity Act 2005: relationships, participation, and best interests. 根据《2005 年心智能力法》调解纠纷：关系、参与和最佳利益。

IF 1.8 4区医学

Medical Law Review Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI: 10.1093/medlaw/fwae014

Jaime Lindsey, Chris Danbury

引用次数: 0

France's constitutional right to abortion: symbolism over substance. 法国宪法规定的堕胎权：象征意义大于实质意义。

IF 1.8 4区医学

Medical Law Review Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI: 10.1093/medlaw/fwae019

Zoe L Tongue

引用次数: 0

A health-conformant reading of the GDPR's right not to be subject to automated decision-making. 从健康角度解读 GDPR 规定的不受自动决策影响的权利。

IF 1.8 4区医学

Medical Law Review Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI: 10.1093/medlaw/fwae029

Hannah B van Kolfschooten

{"title":"A health-conformant reading of the GDPR's right not to be subject to automated decision-making.","authors":"Hannah B van Kolfschooten","doi":"10.1093/medlaw/fwae029","DOIUrl":"10.1093/medlaw/fwae029","url":null,"abstract":"As the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies in healthcare is expanding, patients in the European Union (EU) are increasingly subjected to automated medical decision-making. This development poses challenges to the protection of patients' rights. A specific patients' right not to be subject to automated medical decision-making is not considered part of the traditional portfolio of patients' rights. The EU AI Act also does not contain such a right. The General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) does, however, provide for the right 'not to be subject to a decision based solely on automated processing' in Article 22. At the same time, this provision has been severely critiqued in legal scholarship because of its lack of practical effectiveness. However, in December 2023, the Court of Justice of the EU first provided an interpretation of this right in C-634/21 (SCHUFA)-although in the context of credit scoring. Against this background, this article provides a critical analysis of the application of Article 22 GDPR to the medical context. The objective is to evaluate whether Article 22 GDPR may provide patients with the right to refuse automated medical decision-making. It proposes a health-conformant reading to strengthen patients' rights in the EU.","PeriodicalId":49146,"journal":{"name":"Medical Law Review","volume":" ","pages":"373-391"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11347939/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141972176","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

How should we decide how to treat the child: harm versus best interests in cases of disagreement. 我们应该如何决定如何对待孩子：在意见不一致的情况下，伤害与最佳利益的比较。

IF 1.7 4区医学

Medical Law Review Pub Date : 2024-05-28 DOI: 10.1093/medlaw/fwad040

David Archard, Emma Cave, Joe Brierley

引用次数: 0

Heritable human genome editing: correction, selection and treatment. 可遗传的人类基因组编辑：矫正、选择和治疗。

IF 1.7 4区医学

Medical Law Review Pub Date : 2024-05-28 DOI: 10.1093/medlaw/fwae003

Rosamund Scott

{"title":"Heritable human genome editing: correction, selection and treatment.","authors":"Rosamund Scott","doi":"10.1093/medlaw/fwae003","DOIUrl":"10.1093/medlaw/fwae003","url":null,"abstract":"Heritable human genome editing (HHGE) to correct a nuclear gene sequence that would result in a serious genetic condition in a future child is presented as 'treatment' in various ethics and policy materials, and as morally preferable to the 'selection' practice of preimplantation genetic testing (PGT), which is subject to the disability critique. However, whether HHGE is 'treatment' for a future child, or another form of 'selection', or whether HHGE instead 'treats' prospective parents, are now central questions in the debate regarding its possible legalisation. This article argues that the idea of 'treatment' for a future child is largely a proxy for 'seriousness of purpose', intended to distinguish HHGE to avoid serious genetic conditions from less obviously justifiable uses; that HHGE is best understood, and morally justified, as a form of 'treatment' for prospective parents who strongly desire an unaffected genetically related child and who have no, or poor, options to achieve this; that HHGE would be morally permissible if consistent with that child's welfare; that legalisation is supportable with reference to the right to respect for private and family life under Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights; and that HHGE is morally distinguishable from PGT.","PeriodicalId":49146,"journal":{"name":"Medical Law Review","volume":" ","pages":"178-204"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2024-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11132701/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140186067","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Case Comment-JJ v Spectrum Community Health: When Medical Paternalism Meets Prisoners' Dignity. 案例评论-JJ 诉 Spectrum Community Health：当医疗家长制遭遇囚犯尊严。

IF 1.7 4区医学

Medical Law Review Pub Date : 2024-05-28 DOI: 10.1093/medlaw/fwae005

Angelika R Reichstein

引用次数: 0

Accommodations of private and family life and non-traditional families: the limits of deference in cases of cross-border surrogacy before the European Court of Human Rights. 私人和家庭生活与非传统家庭的协调:在欧洲人权法院审理的跨国界代孕案件中尊重的限度。

IF 1.8 4区医学

Medical Law Review Pub Date : 2024-05-28 DOI: 10.1093/medlaw/fwad038

Lydia Bracken

{"title":"Accommodations of private and family life and non-traditional families: the limits of deference in cases of cross-border surrogacy before the European Court of Human Rights.","authors":"Lydia Bracken","doi":"10.1093/medlaw/fwad038","DOIUrl":"10.1093/medlaw/fwad038","url":null,"abstract":"The European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) case law on cross-border surrogacy establishes that a 'general and absolute impossibility' of obtaining recognition of the relationship, legally established in another country, between a surrogate-born child and their intended parents will violate the child's right to respect for private life. This approach requires States to accommodate familial bonds created through cross-border surrogacy and limits the margin of appreciation available to States to determine their national response. In recent case law, the ECtHR has adopted an interventionist approach in respect of national decision-making and has gone further than might be expected under the principle of subsidiarity. Examination of the emerging body of jurisprudence on cross-border surrogacy, however, reveals a preference for 'traditional' family formations, with the ECtHR tending to adopt a less interventionist and more deferential approach to national decision-making where the family at the centre of the case deviates from the structure of the family reflected in the seminal cross-border surrogacy case of Mennesson v France App no 65192/11 (ECtHR, 26 June 2014). This approach leads to inconsistency in the cross-border surrogacy case law as it creates something of a moving target for the vindication of children's rights in 'less traditional' family forms.","PeriodicalId":49146,"journal":{"name":"Medical Law Review","volume":" ","pages":"141-157"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2024-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11654689/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"89720117","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Indi Gregory: A Wider Perspective on Children's Best Interests at the End-of-life. 英迪-格雷戈里从更广阔的视角看待临终儿童的最大利益。

IF 1.8 4区医学

Medical Law Review Pub Date : 2024-05-28 DOI: 10.1093/medlaw/fwae006

Kevin De Sabbata, Abigail Pearson

引用次数: 0

McCulloch v Forth Valley Health Board [2023] UKSC 26: Hello Bolam, the court's old friend. McCulloch 诉 Forth Valley Health Board [2023] UKSC 26：你好，博勒姆，法院的老朋友。

IF 1.7 4区医学

Medical Law Review Pub Date : 2024-05-28 DOI: 10.1093/medlaw/fwae013

Louise Austin

引用次数: 0