Bone & Joint Journal最新文献

{"title":"Corrigendum.","authors":"Stephen Mc Donald, Andrel Yoong, Jonathan T Evans, Luke Farrow","doi":"10.1302/0301-620X.107B3.BJJ-2024-00054","DOIUrl":"10.1302/0301-620X.107B3.BJJ-2024-00054","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":48944,"journal":{"name":"Bone & Joint Journal","volume":"107-B 3","pages":"373"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143537944","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Surgery versus the non-surgical treatment of Perthes’ disease (Op NON-STOP) : the journey to a definitive randomized controlled trial in Perthes' disease.","authors":"Adam M Galloway, Nicolas Nicolaou, Daniel C Perry","doi":"10.1302/0301-620X.107B3.BJJ-2024-1377.R1","DOIUrl":"10.1302/0301-620X.107B3.BJJ-2024-1377.R1","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":48944,"journal":{"name":"Bone & Joint Journal","volume":"107-B 3","pages":"280-282"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143532098","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Advances in foot and ankle surgery : a review of recent innovations.","authors":"Ibrahem Al-Obaidi, Adrian Kendal, Arul Ramasamy","doi":"10.1302/0301-620X.107B3.BJJ-2024-0873.R2","DOIUrl":"10.1302/0301-620X.107B3.BJJ-2024-0873.R2","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The last five years have seen notable advancements in foot and ankle surgery as a result of technical innovations and more consistent reporting of results. Much progress has been made in improving patient-reported outcome measures, in the development of basic research in this area, and in the development of personalized approaches which optimize outcomes for specific groups of patients. This review focuses on five main areas of development within foot and ankle surgery: ankle arthroplasty, osteomyelitis and the diabetic foot, sports injuries, minimally invasive surgery, and orthobiologics. The aim of this annotation is to discuss the progress made in these fields during recent years and propose avenues for further development.</p>","PeriodicalId":48944,"journal":{"name":"Bone & Joint Journal","volume":"107-B 3","pages":"283-290"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143532018","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Long-term results of lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty with a mobile-bearing device.","authors":"Tilman Walker, Julius Freericks, Paul Mick, Raphael Trefzer, Andre Lunz, Kevin-Arno Koch, Tobias Renkawitz, Mustafa Hariri","doi":"10.1302/0301-620X.107B3.BJJ-2024-0859.R1","DOIUrl":"10.1302/0301-620X.107B3.BJJ-2024-0859.R1","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is one option in the treatment of isolated unicompartmental advanced osteoarthritis (OA). While long-term results exist for medial mobile-bearing (MB) UKA, evidence regarding lateral MB-UKA is still limited. The Oxford Domed Lateral (ODL) implant aims to reduce the bearing dislocation rate in lateral MB-UKA through enhanced bearing entrapment. However, the long-term performance of this implant remains unclear. This study evaluated the long-term survival and clinical outcomes of the ODL in a non-designer centre.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-centre retrospective analysis included 115 lateral MB-UKAs using the ODL performed between January 2006 and December 2014. The primary endpoint of the study was implant survival, defined as the time until a revision procedure was required for any reason. Secondary outcomes included Oxford Knee Score (OKS), Forgotten Joint Score (FJS), pain, satisfaction, and Tegner Activity Scale (TAS). Survival was assessed using Kaplan-Meier analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At ten years, the cumulative implant survival rate was 74.8% (95% CI 65.2 to 82.1; number at risk = 71), with bearing dislocation (8.5%) and OA progression (10.4%) as leading revision causes. In 55 non-revised knees with a mean follow-up of 13.4 years (SD 1.8), the mean postoperative OKS improved significantly to 37.8 (SD 9.1) (p < 0.001). Additionally, 85.5% of patients (n = 47) reported satisfaction, with a mean FJS of 65.9 (SD 32.2) and TAS of 2.8 (SD 1.1). However, only 76.4% (n = 42) attained the patient-acceptable symptom state for OKS and FJS.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This is the first long-term ODL study from a non-designer centre; our results demonstrated high failure rates due to bearing dislocation and OA progression, despite satisfactory clinical outcomes in non-revised patients. The disproportionately high risk of failure suggests that the MB design should be abandoned in favour of a fixed-bearing device for lateral UKA.</p>","PeriodicalId":48944,"journal":{"name":"Bone & Joint Journal","volume":"107-B 3","pages":"322-328"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143532091","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"What is the role of arthroscopy in hand and wrist trauma?","authors":"Paul H C Stirling, Andrew D Duckworth, Julie E Adams, Sanj Kakar","doi":"10.1302/0301-620X.107B3.BJJ-2024-1183.R1","DOIUrl":"10.1302/0301-620X.107B3.BJJ-2024-1183.R1","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The use of arthroscopy of the hand and wrist has recently increased sharply in the elective setting and this, not surprisingly, has been followed by an increasing use in the trauma setting. Advocates for the use of arthroscopy in these patients cite the improved assessment of the displacement and reduction of fractures and the early diagnosis of associated injuries, while others temper this with concerns about increased operating time and possible complications. The data relating to patient-reported benefits and costs are limited. The aim of this review was to discuss the current available literature for the use of arthroscopy in the management of injuries of the hand and wrist.</p>","PeriodicalId":48944,"journal":{"name":"Bone & Joint Journal","volume":"107-B 3","pages":"291-295"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143532114","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"The risk of complications after hip fracture.","authors":"En Lin Goh, May Ee Png, David Metcalfe, Juul Achten, Duncan Appelbe, Xavier L Griffin, Jonathan A Cook, Matthew L Costa, Michael Barrett, Peter Hull, David Melling, Jonathan Kosy, Charalambous P Charalambous, Oliver Keast-Butler, Paul Magill, Rathan Yarlagadda, Girish Vashista, Terence Savaridas, Seb Sturridge, Graham Smith, Kishore Dasari, Deepu Bhaskar, Stefan Bajada, Ewan Bigsby, Ansar Mahmood, Mark Dunbar, Andrea Jimenez, Ryan Wood, James Penny, William Eardley, Robert Handley, Suresh Srinivasan, Matt Gee, Ashwin Kulkarni, John Davison, Mohammad Maqsood, Amit Sharma, Chris Peach, Ahsan Sheeraz, Piers Page, Andrew Kelly, Iain McNamara, Lee Longstaff, Mike Reed, Iain Moppett, Ayman Sorial, Theophilus Joachim, Aaron Ng, Kieran Gallagher, Mark Farrar, Ad Ghande, Jonathan Bird, Shyam Rajagopalan, Andrew McAndrew, Andrew Sloan, Rory Middleton, Ian Dos Remedios, Damian McClelland, Benedict Rogers, James Berstock, Sharad Bhatnagar, Owen Diamond, Paul Fearon, Inder Gill, Doug Dunlop, Tim Chesser, Mehool Acharya, Deepak Sree, Johnathan Craik, David Hutchinson, David Johnson, Mosab Elgalli, Paul Dixon, Pregash Ellapparadja, Guy Slater, Jakub Kozdryk, Jonathan Young, Ben Ollivere, Khitish Mohanty, Mohammad Faisal, Callum Clark, Baljinder Dhinsa, Ibrahim Malek, Sam Heaton, Oliver Blocker, Kanthan Theivendran","doi":"10.1302/0301-620X.107B3.BJJ-2024-0858.R1","DOIUrl":"10.1302/0301-620X.107B3.BJJ-2024-0858.R1","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>The risk of mortality after a hip fracture has been extensively investigated, but there is little high-quality information available dealing with the overall risk of complications. The aim of this study was to report the risk of complications in the first 120 days after a hip fracture.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a multicentre, prospective cohort study of patients aged > 60 years with a hip fracture, involving 77 hospitals in England, Wales, and Northern Ireland, between January 2015 and 2022. The primary outcomes of interest were mortality and surgery-specific and general complications, at 120 days postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 24,523 patients with a hip fracture were enrolled. The 120-day risk of mortality was 12.4% (95% CI 12.0 to 12.8). The 120-day risks of surgery-specific complications were: for dislocation, 1.5% (95% CI 1.3 to 1.7); failure of fixation, 1.0% (95% CI 0.8 to 1.2); for peri-implant or periprosthetic fracture, 0.3% (95% CI 0.3 to 0.4); for reoperation for any indication, 2.7% (95% CI 2.5 to 2.9); and for surgical site infection, 3.4% (95% CI 3.2 to 3.6). The 120-day risks of general complications were: for acute kidney injury, 3.4% (95% CI 3.1 to 3.6); for the requirement of a blood transfusion, 7.0% (95% CI 6.7 to 7.3); for lower respiratory tract infection, 9.1% (95% CI 8.7 to 9.4); for urinary tract infection, 7.0% (95% CI 6.7 to 7.3); for cerebrovascular accident, 0.7% (95% CI 0.6 to 0.8); for myocardial infarction, 0.7% (95% CI 0.6 to 0.9); and for venous thromboembolism, 1.8% (95% CI 1.6 to 2.0).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although the risk of mortality has declined in recent years, older patients with a hip fracture remain at a high risk of surgery-specific and general complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":48944,"journal":{"name":"Bone & Joint Journal","volume":"107-B 3","pages":"362-367"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143532034","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"IntraMedullary nailing Versus EXternal ring fixation for the treatment of tibial shaft fractures (IMVEX): a multicentre randomized controlled clinical trial.","authors":"Rasmus Stokholm, Peter Larsen, Jan D Rölfing, Juozas Petruskevicius, Morten K Rasmussen, Steffen S Jensen, Rasmus Elsøe","doi":"10.1302/0301-620X.107B3.BJJ-2024-0812.R1","DOIUrl":"10.1302/0301-620X.107B3.BJJ-2024-0812.R1","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>One of the most common patient-reported complaints following intramedullary nailing (IMN) of tibial shaft fractures is anterior knee pain reported by 10% to 80% of patients. The present study aimed to compare the 12-month Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) sport and recreation activities subscale (sport/rec) scores after IMN with external ring fixation (RF) to adult patients with tibial shaft fractures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study was a pragmatic multicentre randomized, non-blinded trial, with two-group parallel design. Included were adult patients (aged ≥ 18 years) presenting with an acute tibial shaft fracture deemed operable with an intramedullary nail. The primary outcome was the KOOS sport/rec, ranging from 0 (worst score) to 100 (best score) at 12-month follow-up. Secondary outcomes included the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS), health-related quality of life assessed by EuroQol five-dimension five-level health questionnaire, and pain scores.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 67 patients were included in the study. In all, 33 patients were randomized to standard IMN and 34 patients to RF. The mean age of the patients was 47.7 years (SD 19.2; 18 to 84) and 34% were female (n = 23). The primary analysis revealed no statistically significant difference in KOOS sport/rec between the IMN and RF groups at the 12-month follow-up (adjusted mean difference -18.1 (95 % CI -43.4 to 7.2); favouring RF).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>No statistically significant differences in the KOOS sport/rec were observed between RF and IMN at 12-month follow-up. However, these results should be interpreted with caution, due to high risk of a type II error.</p>","PeriodicalId":48944,"journal":{"name":"Bone & Joint Journal","volume":"107-B 3","pages":"353-361"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143532086","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Travel distance to tertiary sarcoma centres does not influence oncological presentation or outcomes.","authors":"Aaron Gazendam, Liuzhe Zhang, David Clever, Anthony Griffin, Jay Wunder, Peter Ferguson, Kim M Tsoi","doi":"10.1302/0301-620X.107B3.BJJ-2024-0488.R1","DOIUrl":"10.1302/0301-620X.107B3.BJJ-2024-0488.R1","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Soft-tissue sarcomas (STSs) are rare cancers with centralized care advocated to consolidate resources and expertise. However, geographical challenges, particularly in countries like Canada, can increase travel distances for patients. The impact of travel distance on sarcoma presentation and outcomes remains unclear, particularly in single-payer healthcare systems with centralized care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort analysis was conducted on 1,570 patients with STS who underwent surgical resection at a Canadian tertiary referral centre between January 2010 and January 2021. Patients were divided into those living ≤ 50 km and > 50 km from the centre. Demographics, tumour characteristics, treatment methods, and survival outcomes were analyzed. A Cox regression model was constructed to evaluate predictors of overall survival.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients living > 50 km from the centre (n = 700) travelled a mean of 176 km (SD 250), while those ≤ 50 km (n = 870) travelled a mean of 24.8 km (SD 13.8). There were no significant differences in disease presentation, time to definitive treatment, use of systemic therapies, or functional outcomes between the two groups. The two-year and five-year overall survival rates were similar between the groups (83.1% (95% CI 80.1% to 86.1%) vs 83.8% (95% CI 81.8% to 85.8%) and 72.1% (95% CI 69.1% to 75.1%) vs 72.5% (95% CI 69.5% to 75.5%), respectively). The regression model demonstrated that age, higher tumour grade, depth, and lower income were predictive of worse overall survival, while distance travelled was not an independent predictor of survival.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Contrary to previous studies, our findings suggest that travel distance did not influence disease presentation or survival outcomes in STS patients treated at a centralized sarcoma centre. This challenges previous notions regarding the impact of travel distance on cancer outcomes, and supports the effectiveness of centralized care models, even in geographically vast regions.</p>","PeriodicalId":48944,"journal":{"name":"Bone & Joint Journal","volume":"107-B 3","pages":"368-372"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143532113","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Machine-learning models for the prediction of ideal surgical outcomes in patients with adult spinal deformity.","authors":"Dongfan Wang, Qijun Wang, Peng Cui, Shuaikang Wang, Di Han, Xiaolong Chen, Shibao Lu","doi":"10.1302/0301-620X.107B3.BJJ-2024-1220.R1","DOIUrl":"10.1302/0301-620X.107B3.BJJ-2024-1220.R1","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery can reduce pain and disability. However, the actual surgical efficacy of ASD in doing so is far from desirable, with frequent complications and limited improvement in quality of life. The accurate prediction of surgical outcome is crucial to the process of clinical decision-making. Consequently, the aim of this study was to develop and validate a model for predicting an ideal surgical outcome (ISO) two years after ASD surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective analysis of 458 consecutive patients who had undergone spinal fusion surgery for ASD between January 2016 and June 2022. The outcome of interest was achievement of the ISO, defined as an improvement in patient-reported outcomes exceeding the minimal clinically important difference, with no postoperative complications. Three machine-learning (ML) algorithms - LASSO, RFE, and Boruta - were used to identify key variables from the collected data. The dataset was randomly split into training (60%) and test (40%) sets. Five different ML models were trained, including logistic regression, random forest, XGBoost, LightGBM, and multilayer perceptron. The primary model evaluation metric was area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis included 208 patients (mean age 64.62 years (SD 8.21); 48 male (23.1%), 160 female (76.9%)). Overall, 42.8% of patients (89/208) achieved the ideal surgical outcome. Eight features were identified as key variables affecting prognosis: depression, osteoporosis, frailty, failure of pelvic compensation, relative functional cross-sectional area of the paraspinal muscles, postoperative sacral slope, pelvic tilt match, and sagittal age-adjusted score match. The best prediction model was LightGBM, achieving the following performance metrics: AUROC 0.888 (95% CI 0.810 to 0.966); accuracy 0.843; sensitivity 0.829; specificity 0.854; positive predictive value 0.806; and negative predictive value 0.872.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this prognostic study, we developed a machine-learning model that accurately predicted outcome after surgery for ASD. The model is built on routinely modifiable indicators, thereby facilitating its integration into clinical practice to promote optimized decision-making.</p>","PeriodicalId":48944,"journal":{"name":"Bone & Joint Journal","volume":"107-B 3","pages":"337-345"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143532094","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Facilitating clinical trials in hip fracture in the UK : the role and potential of the National Hip Fracture Database and routinely collected data.","authors":"James Webster, Raphael Goldacre, Jennifer C E Lane, Marion Mafham, Marion K Campbell, Antony Johansen, Xavier L Griffin","doi":"10.1302/0301-620X.107B2.BJJ-2024-0846.R1","DOIUrl":"10.1302/0301-620X.107B2.BJJ-2024-0846.R1","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>The aim of this study was to evaluate the suitability, against an accepted international standard, of a linked hip fracture registry and routinely collected administrative dataset in England to embed and deliver randomized controlled trials (RCTs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>First, a bespoke cohort of individuals sustaining hip fractures between 2011 and 2016 was generated from the National Hip Fracture Database (NHFD) and linked to individual Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) records and mortality data. Second, in order to explore the availability and distribution of outcomes available in linked HES-Office of National Statistics (ONS) data, a more contemporary cohort with incident hip fracture was identified within HES between January 2014 and December 2018. Distributions of the outcomes within the HES-ONS dataset were reported using standard statistical summaries; descriptive characteristics of the NHFD and linked HES-ONS dataset were reported in line with the Clinical Trials Transformation Initiative recommendations for registry-enabled trials.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Case ascertainment of the NHFD likely exceeds 94%. The assessment of the robustness, relevance, and reliability of the datasets was favourable. Outcomes from the HES-ONS dataset were concordant with other contemporaneous prospective cohort studies with bespoke data collection frameworks.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings support the feasibility of the NHFD and HES-ONS to support a registry-embedded, data-enabled RCT.</p>","PeriodicalId":48944,"journal":{"name":"Bone & Joint Journal","volume":"107-B 2","pages":"229-238"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143075510","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}