Open reduction and fixation does not improve short-term outcome of medium-sized posterior fragments in AO type B ankle fractures: one-year results of the POSTFIX randomized controlled trial.
Adriaan L Franx, Samuel M Verhage, Pieta Krijnen, Eric L L Twiss, Inger B Schipper, Jochem M Hoogendoorn
{"title":"Open reduction and fixation does not improve short-term outcome of medium-sized posterior fragments in AO type B ankle fractures: one-year results of the POSTFIX randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Adriaan L Franx, Samuel M Verhage, Pieta Krijnen, Eric L L Twiss, Inger B Schipper, Jochem M Hoogendoorn","doi":"10.1302/0301-620X.107B4.BJJ-2024-0521.R3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Guidelines for treatment of posterior malleolar fragments (PMFs) in trimalleolar fractures are scarce, mainly based on retrospective studies, and show varying advice. The need for fixation of smaller (< 25%) PMFs remains particularly controversial. This study aims to evaluate the superiority of fixation of medium-sized PMFs versus no fixation of the fragment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A multicentre randomized controlled trial was conducted between January 2014 and January 2022 in two Dutch level 1 trauma centres (protocol registration: NCT02596529). Patients presenting with an AO-44-B3 fracture with a medium-sized (5% to 25%) PMF were 1:1 randomized online between open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) (FIX) versus no fixation (NO-FIX) of the fragment. A total of 41 patients were allocated online to FIX via the posterolateral approach and 40 patients to NO-FIX. The primary outcome was functionality measured by the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) questionnaire one year postoperatively. Secondary outcomes were osteoarthritis (OA) measured on radiographs and the Olerud and Molander ankle score, visual analogue scale pain, and EuroQol five-dimension questionnaire during follow-up. Quality of reduction was assessed by step-off on postoperative CT scan and radiograph. Complications were recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After one-year follow-up, no difference (p = 0.141) in AAOS was found after FIX (median 90 (IQR 68 to 95)) and NO-FIX (median 93 (IQR 85 to 97)). OA (≥ grade 2) was present in four (17%) of the cases after FIX and five (20%) after NO-FIX (p = 0.763). After one year, median pain scores were 20 (IQR 5 to 40) versus 10 (IQR 5 to 25) (p = 0.032), and perceived general median health scores were 80 (IQR 60 to 89) versus 83 (IQR 71 to 90) (p = 0.596) after FIX and NO-FIX, respectively. Postoperative step-off > 1 mm on CT scan was present in 56% after FIX versus 71% after NO-FIX (p = 0.193). Complication rates were 18% versus 5% (p = 0.071) after FIX and NO-FIX, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ORIF of medium-sized posterior fragments in AO type B trimalleolar fractures does not prompt superior functional or radiological results after one-year follow-up. Longer follow-up is needed to evaluate intermediate or long-term effects.</p>","PeriodicalId":48944,"journal":{"name":"Bone & Joint Journal","volume":"107-B 4","pages":"461-469"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bone & Joint Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.107B4.BJJ-2024-0521.R3","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Aims: Guidelines for treatment of posterior malleolar fragments (PMFs) in trimalleolar fractures are scarce, mainly based on retrospective studies, and show varying advice. The need for fixation of smaller (< 25%) PMFs remains particularly controversial. This study aims to evaluate the superiority of fixation of medium-sized PMFs versus no fixation of the fragment.
Methods: A multicentre randomized controlled trial was conducted between January 2014 and January 2022 in two Dutch level 1 trauma centres (protocol registration: NCT02596529). Patients presenting with an AO-44-B3 fracture with a medium-sized (5% to 25%) PMF were 1:1 randomized online between open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) (FIX) versus no fixation (NO-FIX) of the fragment. A total of 41 patients were allocated online to FIX via the posterolateral approach and 40 patients to NO-FIX. The primary outcome was functionality measured by the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) questionnaire one year postoperatively. Secondary outcomes were osteoarthritis (OA) measured on radiographs and the Olerud and Molander ankle score, visual analogue scale pain, and EuroQol five-dimension questionnaire during follow-up. Quality of reduction was assessed by step-off on postoperative CT scan and radiograph. Complications were recorded.
Results: After one-year follow-up, no difference (p = 0.141) in AAOS was found after FIX (median 90 (IQR 68 to 95)) and NO-FIX (median 93 (IQR 85 to 97)). OA (≥ grade 2) was present in four (17%) of the cases after FIX and five (20%) after NO-FIX (p = 0.763). After one year, median pain scores were 20 (IQR 5 to 40) versus 10 (IQR 5 to 25) (p = 0.032), and perceived general median health scores were 80 (IQR 60 to 89) versus 83 (IQR 71 to 90) (p = 0.596) after FIX and NO-FIX, respectively. Postoperative step-off > 1 mm on CT scan was present in 56% after FIX versus 71% after NO-FIX (p = 0.193). Complication rates were 18% versus 5% (p = 0.071) after FIX and NO-FIX, respectively.
Conclusion: ORIF of medium-sized posterior fragments in AO type B trimalleolar fractures does not prompt superior functional or radiological results after one-year follow-up. Longer follow-up is needed to evaluate intermediate or long-term effects.
期刊介绍:
We welcome original articles from any part of the world. The papers are assessed by members of the Editorial Board and our international panel of expert reviewers, then either accepted for publication or rejected by the Editor. We receive over 2000 submissions each year and accept about 250 for publication, many after revisions recommended by the reviewers, editors or statistical advisers. A decision usually takes between six and eight weeks. Each paper is assessed by two reviewers with a special interest in the subject covered by the paper, and also by members of the editorial team. Controversial papers will be discussed at a full meeting of the Editorial Board. Publication is between four and six months after acceptance.