Bone & Joint JournalPub Date : 2024-11-01DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.106B11.BJJ-2023-1187.R1
Evan M Dugdale, Mason E Uvodich, Mark W Pagnano, Daniel J Berry, Matthew P Abdel, Nicholas A Bedard
{"title":"Early adverse outcomes remain challenging to prevent in morbidly obese patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty.","authors":"Evan M Dugdale, Mason E Uvodich, Mark W Pagnano, Daniel J Berry, Matthew P Abdel, Nicholas A Bedard","doi":"10.1302/0301-620X.106B11.BJJ-2023-1187.R1","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.106B11.BJJ-2023-1187.R1","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>The prevalence of obesity is increasing substantially around the world. Elevated BMI increases the risk of complications following total hip arthroplasty (THA). We sought to evaluate trends in BMI and complication rates of obese patients undergoing primary THA over the last 30 years.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Through our institutional total joint registry, we identified 15,455 primary THAs performed for osteoarthritis from 1990 to 2019. Patients were categorized according to the World Health Organization (WHO) obesity classification and groups were trended over time. Cox proportional hazards regression analysis controlling for confounders was used to investigate the association between year of surgery and two-year risk of any reoperation, any revision, dislocation, periprosthetic joint infection (PJI), venous thromboembolism (VTE), and periprosthetic fracture. Regression was stratified by three separate groups: non-obese; WHO Class I and Class II (BMI 30 to 39 kg/m<sup>2</sup>); and WHO Class III patients (BMI ≥ 40 kg/m<sup>2</sup>).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was a significant increase in the proportion of all obesity classes from 1990 to 2019, and the BMI values within each WHO class significantly increased over time. Risk of any reoperation did not change over time among non-obese or WHO Class I/II patients, but increased for WHO Class III patients (hazard ratio (HR) 1.04; p = 0.044). Risk of dislocation decreased over time for non-obese (HR 0.96; p < 0.001) and WHO Class I/II (HR 0.96; p = 0.002) patients, but did not change over time for WHO Class III (HR 0.94; p = 0.073) patients. Risks of any revision and PJI did not change over time for any group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The proportion of patients undergoing THA who are obese has increased dramatically at our institution between 1990 and 2019. Despite BMI values increasing within all WHO classes over time, two-year complication risks have remained stable or decreased in WHO Class I/II patients. However, continued efforts will be required to mitigate risks in the heaviest WHO Class III patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":48944,"journal":{"name":"Bone & Joint Journal","volume":"106-B 11","pages":"1223-1230"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142559091","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Bone & Joint JournalPub Date : 2024-11-01DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.106B11.BJJ-2024-0264.R1
Reinier W A Spek, William J Smith, Marat Sverdlov, Sebastiaan Broos, Yang Zhao, Zhibin Liao, Johan W Verjans, Jasper Prijs, Minh-Son To, Henrik Åberg, Wael Chiri, Frank F A IJpma, Bhavin Jadav, John White, Gregory I Bain, Paul C Jutte, Michel P J van den Bekerom, Ruurd L Jaarsma, Job N Doornberg, Soheil Ashkani, Nick Assink, Joost W Colaris, Nynke V der Gaast, Prakash Jayakumar, Laura J Kim, Huub H de Klerk, Joost Kuipers, Wouter H Mallee, Anne M L Meesters, Stijn R J Mennes, Miriam G E Oldhof, Peter A J Pijpker, Ching Yiu Lau, Mathieu M E Wijffels, Arno D Wolf
{"title":"Detection, classification, and characterization of proximal humerus fractures on plain radiographs.","authors":"Reinier W A Spek, William J Smith, Marat Sverdlov, Sebastiaan Broos, Yang Zhao, Zhibin Liao, Johan W Verjans, Jasper Prijs, Minh-Son To, Henrik Åberg, Wael Chiri, Frank F A IJpma, Bhavin Jadav, John White, Gregory I Bain, Paul C Jutte, Michel P J van den Bekerom, Ruurd L Jaarsma, Job N Doornberg, Soheil Ashkani, Nick Assink, Joost W Colaris, Nynke V der Gaast, Prakash Jayakumar, Laura J Kim, Huub H de Klerk, Joost Kuipers, Wouter H Mallee, Anne M L Meesters, Stijn R J Mennes, Miriam G E Oldhof, Peter A J Pijpker, Ching Yiu Lau, Mathieu M E Wijffels, Arno D Wolf","doi":"10.1302/0301-620X.106B11.BJJ-2024-0264.R1","DOIUrl":"10.1302/0301-620X.106B11.BJJ-2024-0264.R1","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>The purpose of this study was to develop a convolutional neural network (CNN) for fracture detection, classification, and identification of greater tuberosity displacement ≥ 1 cm, neck-shaft angle (NSA) ≤ 100°, shaft translation, and articular fracture involvement, on plain radiographs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The CNN was trained and tested on radiographs sourced from 11 hospitals in Australia and externally validated on radiographs from the Netherlands. Each radiograph was paired with corresponding CT scans to serve as the reference standard based on dual independent evaluation by trained researchers and attending orthopaedic surgeons. Presence of a fracture, classification (non- to minimally displaced; two-part, multipart, and glenohumeral dislocation), and four characteristics were determined on 2D and 3D CT scans and subsequently allocated to each series of radiographs. Fracture characteristics included greater tuberosity displacement ≥ 1 cm, NSA ≤ 100°, shaft translation (0% to < 75%, 75% to 95%, > 95%), and the extent of articular involvement (0% to < 15%, 15% to 35%, or > 35%).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For detection and classification, the algorithm was trained on 1,709 radiographs (n = 803), tested on 567 radiographs (n = 244), and subsequently externally validated on 535 radiographs (n = 227). For characterization, healthy shoulders and glenohumeral dislocation were excluded. The overall accuracy for fracture detection was 94% (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) = 0.98) and for classification 78% (AUC 0.68 to 0.93). Accuracy to detect greater tuberosity fracture displacement ≥ 1 cm was 35.0% (AUC 0.57). The CNN did not recognize NSAs ≤ 100° (AUC 0.42), nor fractures with ≥ 75% shaft translation (AUC 0.51 to 0.53), or with ≥ 15% articular involvement (AUC 0.48 to 0.49). For all objectives, the model's performance on the external dataset showed similar accuracy levels.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CNNs proficiently rule out proximal humerus fractures on plain radiographs. Despite rigorous training methodology based on CT imaging with multi-rater consensus to serve as the reference standard, artificial intelligence-driven classification is insufficient for clinical implementation. The CNN exhibited poor diagnostic ability to detect greater tuberosity displacement ≥ 1 cm and failed to identify NSAs ≤ 100°, shaft translations, or articular fractures.</p>","PeriodicalId":48944,"journal":{"name":"Bone & Joint Journal","volume":"106-B 11","pages":"1348-1360"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142559090","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Bone & Joint JournalPub Date : 2024-10-01DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.106B10.BJJ-2024-0396.R1
Jawaad Saleem, Ben Rawi, Magnus Arnander, Eyiyemi Pearse, Duncan Tennent
{"title":"Outcomes of arthroscopic stabilization for recurrent instability are equal to stabilization after a primary event.","authors":"Jawaad Saleem, Ben Rawi, Magnus Arnander, Eyiyemi Pearse, Duncan Tennent","doi":"10.1302/0301-620X.106B10.BJJ-2024-0396.R1","DOIUrl":"10.1302/0301-620X.106B10.BJJ-2024-0396.R1","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Extensive literature exists relating to the management of shoulder instability, with a more recent focus on glenoid and humeral bone loss. However, the optimal timing for surgery following a dislocation remains unclear. There is concern that recurrent dislocations may worsen subsequent surgical outcomes, with some advocating stabilization after the first dislocation. The aim of this study was to determine if the recurrence of instability following arthroscopic stabilization in patients without significant glenoid bone loss was influenced by the number of dislocations prior to surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed using the PubMed, EMBASE, Orthosearch, and Cochrane databases with the following search terms: ((shoulder or glenohumeral) and (dislocation or subluxation) and arthroscopic and (Bankart or stabilisation or stabilization) and (redislocation or re-dislocation or recurrence or instability)). Methodology followed the PRISMA guidelines. Data and outcomes were synthesized by two independent reviewers, and papers were assessed for bias and quality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 35 studies including 7,995 shoulders were eligible for analysis, with a mean follow-up of 32.7 months (12 to 159.5). The rate of post-stabilization instability was 9.8% in first-time dislocators, 9.1% in recurrent dislocators, and 8.5% in a mixed cohort. A descriptive analysis investigated the influence of recurrent instability or age in the risk of instability post-stabilization, with an association seen with increasing age and a reduced risk of recurrence post-stabilization.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Using modern arthroscopic techniques, patients sustaining an anterior shoulder dislocation without glenoid bone loss can expect a low risk of recurrence postoperatively, and no significant difference was found between first-time and recurrent dislocators. Furthermore, high-risk cohorts can expect a low, albeit slightly higher, rate of redislocation. With the findings of this study, patients and clinicians can be more informed as to the likely outcomes of arthroscopic stabilization within this patient subset.</p>","PeriodicalId":48944,"journal":{"name":"Bone & Joint Journal","volume":"106-B 10","pages":"1141-1149"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142330562","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Bone & Joint JournalPub Date : 2024-10-01DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.106B10.BJJ-2023-0432.R1
Christopher J Lodge, Amirul Adlan, Rajpal S Nandra, Jasprit Kaur, Lee Jeys, Jonathan D Stevenson
{"title":"Staged revision of the infected knee arthroplasty and endoprosthesis.","authors":"Christopher J Lodge, Amirul Adlan, Rajpal S Nandra, Jasprit Kaur, Lee Jeys, Jonathan D Stevenson","doi":"10.1302/0301-620X.106B10.BJJ-2023-0432.R1","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.106B10.BJJ-2023-0432.R1","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a challenging complication of any arthroplasty procedure. We reviewed our use of static antibiotic-loaded cement spacers (ABLCSs) for staged management of PJI where segmental bone loss, ligamentous instability, or soft-tissue defects necessitate a static construct. We reviewed factors contributing to their failure and techniques to avoid these complications when using ABLCSs in this context.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted of 94 patients undergoing first-stage revision of an infected knee prosthesis between September 2007 and January 2020 at a single institution. Radiographs and clinical records were used to assess and classify the incidence and causes of static spacer failure. Of the 94 cases, there were 19 primary total knee arthroplasties (TKAs), ten revision TKAs (varus-valgus constraint), 20 hinged TKAs, one arthrodesis (nail), one failed spacer (performed elsewhere), 21 distal femoral endoprosthetic arthroplasties, and 22 proximal tibial arthroplasties.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 35/94 patients (37.2%) had spacer-related complications, of which 26/35 complications (74.3%) were because of mechanical failure of the spacer construct, while 9/35 (25.7%) were due to recurrence of infection. Risk factors for internal failure were a construct where the total intramedullary spacer length was less than twice the length of the central osseous defect (p = 0.009), where proximal or distal intraosseous spacer contact was < 10%, and after tibial tubercle osteotomy (p = 0.005). The incidence of spacer complications significantly increased the time to second stage: mean 157 days (42 to 458) in those without complications versus 227 days (11 to 528) with complications (p = 0.014).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The failure rate of static antibiotic-loaded cement spacers is much higher than anticipated. Complications of the spacer significantly increased the time to second-stage revision. The risk of mechanical failure is significantly increased if the spacer is less than double the size of the segmental defect, or if inadequate reinforcement is inserted into the residual bone. These findings serve as a guide for surgeons to avoid mechanical complications with static spacers.</p>","PeriodicalId":48944,"journal":{"name":"Bone & Joint Journal","volume":"106-B 10","pages":"1067-1073"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142330566","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Bone & Joint JournalPub Date : 2024-10-01DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.106B10.BJJ-2024-0262.R1
Gonzalo Luengo-Alonso, Maria Valencia, Natalia Martinez-Catalan, Cristina Delgado, Emilio Calvo
{"title":"Characterization of articular lesions associated with glenohumeral instability using arthroscopy.","authors":"Gonzalo Luengo-Alonso, Maria Valencia, Natalia Martinez-Catalan, Cristina Delgado, Emilio Calvo","doi":"10.1302/0301-620X.106B10.BJJ-2024-0262.R1","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.106B10.BJJ-2024-0262.R1","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>The prevalence of osteoarthritis (OA) associated with instability of the shoulder ranges between 4% and 60%. Articular cartilage is, however, routinely assessed in these patients using radiographs or scans (2D or 3D), with little opportunity to record early signs of cartilage damage. The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence and localization of chondral lesions and synovial damage in patients undergoing arthroscopic surgery for instablility of the shoulder, in order to classify them and to identify risk factors for the development of glenohumeral OA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 140 shoulders in 140 patients with a mean age of 28.5 years (15 to 55), who underwent arthroscopic treatment for recurrent glenohumeral instability, were included. The prevalence and distribution of chondral lesions and synovial damage were analyzed and graded into stages according to the division of the humeral head and glenoid into quadrants. The following factors that might affect the prevalence and severity of chondral damage were recorded: sex, dominance, age, age at the time of the first dislocation, number of dislocations, time between the first dislocation and surgery, preoperative sporting activity, Beighton score, type of instability, and joint laxity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 133 patients (95%) had synovial or chondral lesions. At the time of surgery, shoulders were graded as having mild, moderate, and severe OA in 55 (39.2%), 72 (51.4%), and six (4.2%) patients, respectively. A Hill-Sachs lesion and fibrillation affecting the anteroinferior glenoid cartilage were the most common findings. There was a significant positive correlation between the the severity of the development of glenohumeral OA and the patient's age, their age at the time of the first dislocation, and the number of dislocations (p = 0.004, p = 0.011, and p = 0.031, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Synovial inflammation and chondral damage associated with instability of the shoulder are more prevalent than previously reported. The classification using quadrants gives surgeons more information about the chondral damage, and could explain the pattern of development of glenohumeral OA after stabilization of the shoulder. As the number of dislocations showed a positive correlation with the development of OA, this might be an argument for early stabilization.</p>","PeriodicalId":48944,"journal":{"name":"Bone & Joint Journal","volume":"106-B 10","pages":"1125-1132"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142330554","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Bone & Joint JournalPub Date : 2024-10-01DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.106B10.BJJ-2024-0419.R1
Josephine Olsen Kipp, Emil T Petersen, Thomas Falstie-Jensen, Johanne Frost Teilmann, Anna Zejden, Rikke Jellesen Åberg, Sepp de Raedt, Theis M Thillemann, Maiken Stilling
{"title":"Glenohumeral joint kinematics during apprehension-relocation test in patients with anterior shoulder instability and glenoid bone loss.","authors":"Josephine Olsen Kipp, Emil T Petersen, Thomas Falstie-Jensen, Johanne Frost Teilmann, Anna Zejden, Rikke Jellesen Åberg, Sepp de Raedt, Theis M Thillemann, Maiken Stilling","doi":"10.1302/0301-620X.106B10.BJJ-2024-0419.R1","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.106B10.BJJ-2024-0419.R1","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>This study aimed to quantify the shoulder kinematics during an apprehension-relocation test in patients with anterior shoulder instability (ASI) and glenoid bone loss using the radiostereometric analysis (RSA) method. Kinematics were compared with the patient's contralateral healthy shoulder.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 20 patients with ASI and > 10% glenoid bone loss and a healthy contralateral shoulder were included. RSA imaging of the patient's shoulders was performed during a repeated apprehension-relocation test. Bone volume models were generated from CT scans, marked with anatomical coordinate systems, and aligned with the digitally reconstructed bone projections on the RSA images. The glenohumeral joint (GHJ) kinematics were evaluated in the anteroposterior and superoinferior direction of: the humeral head centre location relative to the glenoid centre; and the humeral head contact point location on the glenoid.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During the apprehension test, the centre of the humeral head was 1.0 mm (95% CI 0.0 to 2.0) more inferior on the glenoid for the ASI shoulder compared with the healthy shoulder. Furthermore, the contact point of the ASI shoulder was 1.4 mm (95% CI 0.3 to 2.5) more anterior and 2.0 mm (95% CI 0.8 to 3.1) more inferior on the glenoid compared with the healthy shoulder. The contact point of the ASI shoulder was 1.2 mm (95% CI 0.2 to 2.6) more anterior during the apprehension test compared to the relocation test.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The humeral head centre was located more inferior, and the GHJ contact point was located both more anterior and inferior during the apprehension test for the ASI shoulders than the healthy shoulders. Furthermore, the contact point displacement between the apprehension and relocation test revealed increased joint laxity for the ASI shoulder than the healthy shoulders. These results contribute to existing knowledge that ASI shoulders with glenoid bone loss may also suffer from inferior shoulder instability.</p>","PeriodicalId":48944,"journal":{"name":"Bone & Joint Journal","volume":"106-B 10","pages":"1133-1140"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142330559","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Bone & Joint JournalPub Date : 2024-10-01DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.106B10.BJJ-2024-0087.R1
Rasmus R Sørensen, Signe Timm, Lasse E Rasmussen, Claus L Brasen, Claus Varnum
{"title":"Metabolic syndrome and patient-reported outcome two years after hip and knee arthroplasty.","authors":"Rasmus R Sørensen, Signe Timm, Lasse E Rasmussen, Claus L Brasen, Claus Varnum","doi":"10.1302/0301-620X.106B10.BJJ-2024-0087.R1","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.106B10.BJJ-2024-0087.R1","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>The influence of metabolic syndrome (MetS) on the outcome after hip and knee arthroplasty is debated. We aimed to investigate the change in patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) scores after hip and knee arthroplasty, comparing patients with and without MetS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From 1 May 2017 to 30 November 2019, a prospective cohort of 2,586 patients undergoing elective unilateral hip and knee arthroplasty was established in Denmark. Data from national registries and a local database were used to determine the presence of MetS. Patients' scores on Oxford Hip Score (OHS) or Oxford Knee Score (OKS), EuroQol five-dimension five-level questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L), University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) Activity Scale, and Forgotten Joint Score (FJS) at baseline, three, 12, and 24 months after surgery were collected. Primary outcome was the difference between groups from baseline to 12 months in OHS and OKS. Secondary outcomes were scores of OHS and OKS at three and 24 months and EQ-5D-5L, UCLA Activity Scale, and FJS at three, 12, and 24 months after surgery. Generalized linear mixed model was applied, adjusting for age, sex, Charlson Comorbidity Index, and smoking to present marginal mean and associated 95% CIs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 62.3% (1,611/2,586) of the cohort met the criteria for MetS. Both groups showed similar increase in mean OHS (MetS group 22.5 (95% CI 21.8 to 23.1), non-MetS group 22.1 (21.3 to 22.8); p = 0.477) and mean OKS (MetS group 18.0 (17.4 to 18.6), non-MetS group 17.8 (17.0 to 18.7); p = 0.722) at 12 months' follow-up. Between groups, similar improvements were seen for OHS and OKS at three and 24 months postoperatively and for the mean EQ-5D-5L, EuroQol-visual analogue scale (EQ-VAS), UCLA Activity Scale, and FJS at every timepoint.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients meeting the criteria for MetS obtain the same improvement in PROM scores as individuals without MetS up to 24 months after hip and knee arthroplasty. This is important for the clinician to take into account when assessing and advising patients with MetS.</p>","PeriodicalId":48944,"journal":{"name":"Bone & Joint Journal","volume":"106-B 10","pages":"1074-1083"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142330561","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Bone & Joint JournalPub Date : 2024-10-01DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.106B10.BJJ-2024-0106.R1
Aaron S Hammat, Renjy Nelson, Joshua S Davis, Laurens Manning, David Campbell, Lucian B Solomon, Emmanuel S Gnanamanickam, Stuart A Callary
{"title":"Estimation of two-year hospital costs of hip and knee periprosthetic joint infection treatments using activity-based costing.","authors":"Aaron S Hammat, Renjy Nelson, Joshua S Davis, Laurens Manning, David Campbell, Lucian B Solomon, Emmanuel S Gnanamanickam, Stuart A Callary","doi":"10.1302/0301-620X.106B10.BJJ-2024-0106.R1","DOIUrl":"10.1302/0301-620X.106B10.BJJ-2024-0106.R1","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Our aim was to estimate the total costs of all hospitalizations for treating periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) by main management strategy within 24 months post-diagnosis using activity-based costing. Additionally, we investigated the influence of individual PJI treatment pathways on hospital costs within the first 24 months.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using admission and procedure data from a prospective observational cohort in Australia and New Zealand, Australian Refined Diagnosis Related Groups were assigned to each admitted patient episode of care for activity-based costing estimates of 273 hip PJI patients and 377 knee PJI patients. Costs were aggregated at 24 months post-diagnosis, and are presented in Australian dollars.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean cost per hip and knee PJI patient was $64,585 (SD $53,550). Single-stage revision mean costs were $67,029 (SD $47,116) and $80,063 (SD $42,438) for hip and knee, respectively. Two-stage revision costs were $113,226 (SD $66,724) and $122,425 (SD $60,874) for hip and knee, respectively. Debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention in hips and knees mean costs were $53,537 (SD$ 39,342) and $48,463 (SD $33,179), respectively. Suppressive antibiotic therapy without surgical management mean costs were $20,296 (SD $8,875) for hip patients and $16,481 (SD $6,712) for knee patients. Hip patients had 16 different treatment pathways and knee patients had 18 treatment pathways. Additional treatment, episodes of care, and length of stay contributed to substantially increased costs up to a maximum of $369,948.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Treating PJI incurs a substantial cost burden, which is substantially influenced by management strategy. With an annual PJI incidence of 3,900, the cost burden would be in excess of $250 million to the Australian healthcare system. Treatment pathways with additional surgery, more episodes of care, and a longer length of stay substantially increase the associated hospital costs. Prospectively monitoring individual patient treatment pathways beyond initial management is important when quantifying PJI treatment cost. Our study highlights the importance of optimizing initial surgical treatment, and informs treating hospitals of the resources required to provide care for PJI patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":48944,"journal":{"name":"Bone & Joint Journal","volume":"106-B 10","pages":"1084-1092"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142330556","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Bone & Joint JournalPub Date : 2024-10-01DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.106B10.BJJ-2024-0359.R1
Huub H de Klerk, Lukas P E Verweij, Job N Doornberg, Ruurd L Jaarsma, Tsuyoshi Murase, Neal C Chen, Michel P J van den Bekerom, Kekatpure Al, Bhashyam Ar, Watts Ac, van T A, Alder-Price Ac, Turow A, Boonrod A, Masri B, The B, Jadav B, Mudgal Cs, Lameijer Cm, Langhammer Cg, Tu Cg, Rosso C, Ring D, Ruch Ds, Eygendaal D, Alentorn-Geli E, Kholinne E, Ek Et, Bain Gi, Lawton Jn, White Ja, Phadnis J, Alexander J, Sato K, Shimada K, Boerboom Al, Cohen Ms, Maruyama M, Ramsey Ml, Sandow Mj, Anantavorasakul N, Wallwork N, Schep Nwl, Arrigoni P, Mansat P, Barco R, Tosti Rj, van R R, Garg R, Siebenlist S, Dodds Sd, Thaveepunsan S, Matsuura T, Choi Y
{"title":"Factors associated with the choice of treatment for coronoid fractures.","authors":"Huub H de Klerk, Lukas P E Verweij, Job N Doornberg, Ruurd L Jaarsma, Tsuyoshi Murase, Neal C Chen, Michel P J van den Bekerom, Kekatpure Al, Bhashyam Ar, Watts Ac, van T A, Alder-Price Ac, Turow A, Boonrod A, Masri B, The B, Jadav B, Mudgal Cs, Lameijer Cm, Langhammer Cg, Tu Cg, Rosso C, Ring D, Ruch Ds, Eygendaal D, Alentorn-Geli E, Kholinne E, Ek Et, Bain Gi, Lawton Jn, White Ja, Phadnis J, Alexander J, Sato K, Shimada K, Boerboom Al, Cohen Ms, Maruyama M, Ramsey Ml, Sandow Mj, Anantavorasakul N, Wallwork N, Schep Nwl, Arrigoni P, Mansat P, Barco R, Tosti Rj, van R R, Garg R, Siebenlist S, Dodds Sd, Thaveepunsan S, Matsuura T, Choi Y","doi":"10.1302/0301-620X.106B10.BJJ-2024-0359.R1","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.106B10.BJJ-2024-0359.R1","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>This study aimed to gather insights from elbow experts using the Delphi method to evaluate the influence of patient characteristics and fracture morphology on the choice between operative and nonoperative treatment for coronoid fractures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A three-round electronic (e-)modified Delphi survey study was performed between March and December 2023. A total of 55 elbow surgeons from Asia, Australia, Europe, and North America participated, with 48 completing all questionnaires (87%). The panellists evaluated the factors identified as important in literature for treatment decision-making, using a Likert scale ranging from \"strongly influences me to recommend nonoperative treatment\" (1) to \"strongly influences me to recommend operative treatment\" (5). Factors achieving Likert scores ≤ 2.0 or ≥ 4.0 were deemed influential for treatment recommendation. Stable consensus is defined as an agreement of ≥ 80% in the second and third rounds.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 68 factors considered important in the literature for treatment choice for coronoid fractures, 18 achieved a stable consensus to be influential. Influential factors with stable consensus that advocate for operative treatment were being a professional athlete, playing overhead sports, a history of subjective dislocation or subluxation during trauma, open fracture, crepitation with range of movement, > 2 mm opening during varus stress on radiological imaging, and having an anteromedial facet or basal coronoid fracture (O'Driscoll type 2 or 3). An anterolateral coronoid tip fracture ≤ 2 mm was the only influential factor with a stable consensus that advocates for nonoperative treatment. Most disagreement existed regarding the treatment for the terrible triad injury with an anterolateral coronoid tip fracture fragment ≤ 2 mm (O'Driscoll type 1 subtype 1).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study gives insights into areas of consensus among surveyed elbow surgeons in choosing between operative and nonoperative management of coronoid fractures. These findings should be used in conjunction with previous patient cohort studies when discussing treatment options with patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":48944,"journal":{"name":"Bone & Joint Journal","volume":"106-B 10","pages":"1150-1157"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142330557","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Bone & Joint JournalPub Date : 2024-10-01DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.106B10.BJJ-2024-0466.R1
Yael Gelfer, Anne E McNee, Jennifer D Harris, Jason Mavrotas, Laura Deriu, John Cashman, Jonathan Wright, Alpesh Kothari, Mia Dunkley, Christine Douglas, Derfel Williams, Sarah Dewhurst, Amanda Trees
{"title":"The management of idiopathic toe walking.","authors":"Yael Gelfer, Anne E McNee, Jennifer D Harris, Jason Mavrotas, Laura Deriu, John Cashman, Jonathan Wright, Alpesh Kothari, Mia Dunkley, Christine Douglas, Derfel Williams, Sarah Dewhurst, Amanda Trees","doi":"10.1302/0301-620X.106B10.BJJ-2024-0466.R1","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.106B10.BJJ-2024-0466.R1","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>The aim of this study was to gain a consensus for best practice of the assessment and management of children with idiopathic toe walking (ITW) in order to provide a benchmark for practitioners and guide the best consistent care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An established Delphi approach with predetermined steps and degree of agreement based on a standardized protocol was used to determine consensus. The steering group members and Delphi survey participants included members from the British Society of Children's Orthopaedic Surgery (BSCOS) and the Association of Paediatric Chartered Physiotherapists (APCP). The statements included definition, assessment, treatment indications, nonoperative and operative interventions, and outcomes. Descriptive statistics were used for analysis of the Delphi survey results. The AGREE checklist was followed for reporting the results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 227 participants (54% APCP and 46% BSCOS members) completed the first round, and 222 participants (98%) completed the second round. Out of 54 proposed statements included in the first round Delphi, 17 reached 'consensus in', no statements reached 'consensus out', and 37 reached 'no consensus'. These 37 statements were then discussed, reworded, amalgamated, or deleted before the second round Delphi of 29 statements. A total of 12 statements reached 'consensus in', four 'consensus out', and 13 'no consensus'. In the final consensus meeting, 13 statements were voted upon. Five were accepted, resulting in a total of 31 approved statements.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In the aspects of practice where sufficient evidence is not available, a consensus statement can provide a strong body of opinion that acts as a benchmark for excellence in clinical care. This statement can assist clinicians managing children with ITW to ensure consistent and reliable practice, and reduce geographical variability in practice and outcomes. It will enable those treating ITW to share the published consensus document with both carers and patient groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":48944,"journal":{"name":"Bone & Joint Journal","volume":"106-B 10","pages":"1190-1196"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142330570","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}